AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Wed 01/31/24


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 10:57 AM - Re: Z-12N based architecture review request (N1921R)
     2. 07:33 PM - Re: One for the battery gurus: recovery from deep discharge (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:57:52 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Z-12N based architecture review request
    From: "N1921R" <RV.6A.N1921R@gmail.com>
    esco wrote: > ... Bill Judge is very clear about the need to connect to the switched side of battery contactor... It is not necessary to connect the Monkworkz regulator current output to the switched side of the master contactor/main bus, only that it be disconnected from the battery somehow while parked to prevent its parasitic load from depleting the battery. I show it connected to the engine/essential bus which is on the forward side of the firewall. This way the engine will run with the main bus offline, for instance in the smoke in the cockpit scenario. Snip attached. More complete PDF schematic in folder 1) / A) here The OP has seen this but maybe others have thoughts. -------- John Bright, RV-6A N1921R, working on FWF. Single battery, alternator on main bus, Monkworkz generator on engine/essential bus. My links <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YOtPiA3AdUsQEYR4nodBESNAo21rxdnx4pFs7VxXfuI/edit?pli=1">here</a> Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=513177#513177 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/n1921r_electrical_power_schematic_snip_141.jpg


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:33:30 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: One for the battery gurus: recovery from deep
    discharge At 04:09 PM 1/30/2024, you wrote: > >I have an SBS-J16 battery in an aircraft in >which the battery master was left on for two weeks (I know). > > When found, the open circuit terminal voltage > had dropped to 2.2 volts. A Dewalt > sophisticated battery charger didn=99t want to have anything to do with it, Yeah . . . many smart chargers do a pre-assessment of the target battery and will not take on the task unless the terminal voltage is above some minimum level . . . I have a couple chargers that do this. A temporary parallel connection of the smart-charger and some other voltage source, like another battery will often convince the charger that it's time to go to work. Now, recall the days long before RG/GlasMat batteries. The 'wet' stuff inside was (and still is) a dilute mixture of water and sulfuric acid. Pure water is a very poor conductor of electrons . . . but adding some combination of free ions like salt, sodium bicarbonate, or sulfuric acid to the water and it becomes a ready conductor of current. Recall that we could test the relative state of charge for a lead-acid battery by measuring the electrolyte's DENSITY with a hydrometer. The legacy float/in/glass hydrometer is generally calibrated in density vs. state of charge where electrolyte 12% greater than 1.000 (pure water) is zero-percent; 26% is full charge. Note in attached figure (shamelessly stollen off BatteryUniversity.com), 0% state of charge on a 12 volt produces an open circuit reading on the order of 11.9 volts. You cited an open circuit voltage of 2.2 volts . . . Hmmmm . . . less than 0% state of charge? Actually, yes. Active material in the plates had sucked still more acid from the electrolyte than what would produce any useful energy from the chemistry. The closer to pure water . . . the more depressed conductivity. Hence, first attempts to push energy back into the battery will be met with lots of resistance . . . no pun intended. I recall reading a qualification test on a Concorde battery document where a fully discharged battery is dead-shorted for a period of time after which a recharge protocol calls for applying a higher than normal voltage until significant recharge current is observed. The test proceeds with a normal constant voltage/constant current charge. After top-off, the battery is cap-checked and must demonstrate some minimum. I dug around in the library but could not come up with that document so I cannot quote exact times and values. But note that this is a quality test for a new battery. While a certain level of degradation is expected, the battery is EXPECTED to recover by some minimum amount required for return to service. > so I=99ve now put it on charge with my bench > power supply at 14.4V limited to 4 amps. >Initially the battery resistance was very high, >and increasing - the voltage was limited at >14.4V and the current dropped from 1.3 amps, to >about 1.1 amps, within a couple of minutes, and >then started to ramp up, about 1mA per second. >After being on charge for an hour or so, the >current it is accepting has risen so the current >limiting has kicked in, presently at 4 amps and >the terminal voltage has dropped to 14.3 V. Yup, this is expected and you may well recover this battery to some level for continued service. After a 24-hour float at 14.4, let it see idle for 24-hours then do a cap check followed by recharge and a load test. >I=9Dm curious why the resistance was so high to >start with, why it has now dropped (to what >seems =99normal=99 charging behaviour to me) and >also to know if this battery has a chance of >resurrection,. It=99s only a couple of years >old, so if it will soldier on after its >mistreatment, I would be happy. What are my chances, do you think? As Lord Kelvin oft admonished, if you don't know the numbers, what you DO know is of limited value. Bob . . . //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o======= = < Go ahead, make my day . . . > < show me where I'm wrong. > ======================== ======== In the interest of creative evolution of the-best-we-know-how-to-do based on physics and good practice.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --