AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Tue 04/30/24


Total Messages Posted: 1



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:07 PM - Re: Re: Switch Schemes for Reliability (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:07:34 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com>
    Subject: Re: Switch Schemes for Reliability
    At 06:16 PM 4/20/2024, you wrote: > >Recently I spotted a document from a well known >brand of EFII recommending an =9CEssential >Buss=9D backed up with a Aux Battery and simple >switch to connect it. While this is supposed to >make powering the engine possible even if the Main Battery Bus goes cold, Under what circumstances would your main battery ever 'go cold'? When maintained with century old practices for system reliability, a battery can be the most reliable source of energy in the system. So finding yourself lacking in battery supplied energy means you've lost all engine driven sources, your battery is inadequate to the task of meeting your battery only endurance goals; -OR- your system architecture/craftsmanship fails to eliminate all single points of failure in energy conduction pathways to accessories necessary for comfortable completion of a flight. Adding any sort of 'back up' battery to a system only adds to the number of devices that beg for $time$ to maintain airworthiness for yet another commodity . . . a thing that begins to degrade, be consumed the day you installed it. Tires, drive belts, engine oil, propeller blades, FUEL, etc are all things we fuss over every flight as a matter of course . . . walk-around during pre-flight is drilled into us from day-one. But my flight instructor never said a peep about batteries. For as long as I can recall reading the dark-n-stormy-night narratives in the aviation rags, pilots who survived the dark-panel-syndrome never once suggested that the battery in their airplane was not properly evaluated, maintained or utilized for comfortable completion of flight under the circumstances they experienced. It's easy to debate 'reliability' at length and with great enthusiasm. It's tempting to pile on 'back-ups' at the risk of increasing weight, cost of ownership and complexity of operation . . . complexity that only work against 'aviate, navigate, communicate' when things are not going well in the cockpit. I'll suggest a FOURTH feature in the famous axiom for emergency management: 'First aviate, then navigate, then communicate, but last and certainly least, FIDDLE WITH STUFF ON THE PANEL'. Having a battery 'go cold' is the final chapter in a litany of failures that PRECEDE loss of the the battery. Things over which we have absolute control. I've not forgotten about you guys. The new crowbar OVM project is sitting on the bench waiting for a window of opportunity amongst other matters. Additionally, we need to spool up the discussion on Figure Z-101. I'm increasingly of the opinion that Z-101 should be the ONLY z-figure in any 'upgrade' to the connection. It has the opportunity of being the legos/ tinkertoy/modular plug-n-play system with options that adress EVERY electrical system configuration requirement from ultra-light to LA-IVP with all the 'goodies'. But we need a cogent, convincing narrative to accompany Z-101 . . . a option/by/option account of when, why and how any particular feature should be considered. >Recently I spotted a document from a well known brand of EFII >recommending an Essential Bus=9D backed up with a Aux Battery >and simple switch to connect it. Yeah, Klaus was of similar opinion when I met him back in '86 . . . and in all years since. So to have MOST producers of really slick electro-whizzies in years since. It's really easy to suggest that "adding back up to keep MY miracle product powered and happy" is a good thing to do . . . but I'll wager that few if any have brought the forces of experience and thoughtful Failure Mode Effects Analysis to bear on their recommendations. The goal: craft and maintain a system with an extremely high probability of bringing you home without breaking a sweat. Every failure is a maintenance even, not an emergency. Bob . . . //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o======= = < Go ahead, make my day . . . > < show me where I'm wrong. > ======================== ======== In the interest of creative evolution for the-best-we-know-how-to-do based on physics and repeatable experiment.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --