Avionics-List Digest Archive

Mon 01/08/07


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 08:50 AM - GRT GPS TSO ()
     2. 09:49 AM - ABEA and TSO's ()
     3. 12:57 PM - Re: ICOM push to talk switch (Dale Walter)
     4. 03:44 PM - Re: Re: ICOM push to talk switch (Noel Loveys)
     5. 06:57 PM - Re: GRT GPS TSO (W J R HAMILTON)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:50:26 AM PST US
    From: <bakerocb@cox.net>
    Subject: GRT GPS TSO
    1/8/2006 Hello Bret, You quote GRT as writing: "The new RAIM-equipped version provides integrity monitoring and 5 updates per second to meet the requirements of IFR GPS TSO C129 and C146." This sounds like some subtle weasel wording to me. A piece of equipment either meets the full TSO requirements and is marked TSO compliant or it is not TSO'd. The manufacturer does not get to cherry pick certain standards within the TSO, or its references, just meet certain standards, and then mark the equipment as TSO'd. Most manufacturers who have gone to the expense and effort of obtaining TSO approval for a piece of equipment are very eager to make that approval and marking very evident to any prospective purchaser. OC -- The best investment we will ever make is in gathering knowledge. On 5 Jan 2007, at 22:05, Bret Smith wrote: > <smithhb@tds.net> > > See http://www.grtavionics.com/documents/Horizon%20System%20Flyer.pdf > > "The addition of the internal GPS receiver eliminates the need for an > external > GPS, or may be used as a backup to your primary GPS. Available in two > versions. The standard WAAS GPS module is perfect for VFR use, or > as backup > to an external GPS. The new RAIM-equipped version provides integrity > monitoring and 5 updates per second to meet the requirements of IFR > GPS > TSO C129 and C146." > > Standard WAAS GPS Receiver with antenna $450 > RAIM-Equipped WAAS GPS Receiver with antenna $750 > > > Bret Smith > RV-9A (91314) > Mineral Bluff, GA > www.FlightInnovations.com >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:49:11 AM PST US
    From: <bakerocb@cox.net>
    Subject: ABEA and TSO's
    1/8/2007 Hello Old Bob, You wrote: "I am definitely stepping out from my area of expertise here, but is a TSO required for operations of a home built aircraft?" I believe that a narrow legalistic response to your question is "No, because there are no published certification standards that ABEA's (Amateur Built Experimental Aircraft) are required to meet." But in a real world practical sense there are some operations that ABEA's participate in that require them to interface with other aircraft or facilities and those operations require compatibility with published standards established for those other entities. Compatibility could conceivably be achieved by individually creating equipment equivalent to a published standard, but the practicality of such creation is, in most cases, very remote.** In the postings copied below the operation at issue is GPS requirements for IFR operations. Here is just one extract (others may be found) from chapter 1-1-19 in the current edition of the AIM: "g. Equipment and Database Requirements 1. Authorization to fly approaches under IFR using GPS avionics systems requires that: (a) A pilot use GPS avionics with TSO- C129, or equivalent, authorization in class A1, B1, B3, C1, or C3; and" I understand that the AIM is not regulatory in nature, but I believe that an ABEA pilot having flown a GPS approach under IFR, and being called to account by the FAA or the NTSB for some sort of deviation or improper performance on his part would have a very difficult time convincing the authorities that his non TSO'd GPS equipment should be entirely acceptable to them. So the prudent ABEA builder / pilot does his homework and equips his aircraft so that it will perform in a manner that will not endanger him or others. If TSO'd equipment is the best way to accomplish that goal then his choice should be clear to him. OC -- The best investment we will ever make is in gathering knowledge. **PS: One notable exception is in the arena of external lighting where some innovative LED equipment may, in fact, be superior to the TSO requirements. But proving that superiority and getting an initial airworthiness inspector of an ABEA to accept the equipment (if he chooses to make it an issue) may be a problem. ----------------------- COPIED POSTINGS FOLLOW ----------------- Time: 06:53:45 AM PST US From: BobsV35B@aol.com Subject: AeroElectric-List: Re: 91.205 (WAAS) Good Morning Kevin, I am definitely stepping out from my area of expertise here, but is a TSO required for operations of a home built aircraft? It isn't even required for all operations of certificated aircraft. The determination of the equipment that is required for IFR flight appears to be left up to the operator. As long as the operator determines that the equipment meets the standards required for IFR flight, the stuff should be acceptable. What do you feel is required? Happy Skies, Old Bob AKA Bob Siegfried Ancient Aviator Stearman N3977A Brookeridge Air Park LL22 Downers Grove, IL 60516 630 985-8503 In a message dated 1/6/2007 6:26:49 A.M. Central Standard Time, khorton01@rogers.com writes: I'd ask to see a copy of the letters from the FAA that confirm the TSOs have been issued. Kevin Horton


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:57:06 PM PST US
    From: "Dale Walter" <dale1rv6@comcast.net>
    Subject: RE: ICOM push to talk switch
    Greetings, Can anyone tell me how to make a PTT switch for my handheld? I just bought an Icom A24. It came with a headset adapter. I tried to make a simple push to talk switch. That did not work, may have bungled it up. I thought all I needed was a 1/8 inch plug connected to a spring button switch to close 2 wires. It appeared to work. Seemed like the outlet for the PTT was defective because if I put a slight pressure on the plug it made a noise. So I did exploratory surgery, could not tell if outlet for PTT was bad, molded rubber design blocked view of details. But I did see 3 wires (red, blue, white) going in and only expected 2. I amputated what was left of PTT outlet. The female outlet for the mic is fine, and I have access to those wires as the outlet is 2 piece closed with simple nut & bolt. Inside are 3 wires; red, blue, white. Is it possible to wire up a PTT without too much complexity? Thanks, Dale Do not archive


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:44:59 PM PST US
    From: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: RE: ICOM push to talk switch
    All you need is the 1/8" jack that fits into the PTT ( push to talk input jack) and a N.O. (Normally Open) momentary switch. Parts could be relatively expensive.... maybe $4.00 at the local electronics shop so save up. ;-) There is no polarity to worry about. If you use a shielded wire you can use the shield to the ring side of the jack and the centre conductor to the tip of the jack. I have that system with the same radio in my plane... Works like a charm. Noel > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-avionics-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-avionics-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf > Of Dale Walter > Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 5:23 PM > To: avionics-list@matronics.com > Subject: Avionics-List: RE: ICOM push to talk switch > > > <dale1rv6@comcast.net> > > > Greetings, > Can anyone tell me how to make a PTT switch for my handheld? > > I just bought an Icom A24. It came with a headset adapter. I > tried to make a > simple push to talk switch. That did not work, may have > bungled it up. I > thought all I needed was a 1/8 inch plug connected to a > spring button switch > to close 2 wires. It appeared to work. Seemed like the outlet > for the PTT > was defective because if I put a slight pressure on the plug it made a > noise. So I did exploratory surgery, could not tell if outlet > for PTT was > bad, molded rubber design blocked view of details. But I did > see 3 wires > (red, blue, white) going in and only expected 2. I amputated > what was left > of PTT outlet. The female outlet for the mic is fine, and I > have access to > those wires as the outlet is 2 piece closed with simple nut & > bolt. Inside > are 3 wires; red, blue, white. Is it possible to wire up a > PTT without too > much complexity? > Thanks, > Dale > > Do not archive > > > > > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:57:43 PM PST US
    From: W J R HAMILTON <wjrhamilton@optusnet.com.au>
    Subject: Re: GRT GPS TSO
    Folks, There seems to be some confusion on standards here. RAIM is only applicable to C129 GPS engines, when used as "stand alone" units (ie: not as part of a full FMCS system as installed in larger aircraft, giving a navigation capability semi-independent of RAIM, such as IRS to cover short term signal outages). A major aim of the C145/146 RTCA docs. is to eliminate the shortcomings of the RAIM system, ie: when RAIM is lost the navigation function is lost, not something desirable with sole source navigation. There are serious shortcomings with the way the TSO is written, it is not outcome based, but very prescriptive of process, and allows little room for alternative means of compliance with the TSO, hence the limited choice and very high price of C145/146. As to TSO's, they are not necessarily a "one stop shop", but go in "steps and stages". WAAS is another matter altogether, used to improve the derived position accuracy. Cheers, Bill Hamilton At 03:47 AM 9/01/2007, you wrote: > >1/8/2006 > >Hello Bret, You quote GRT as writing: "The new RAIM-equipped version >provides integrity >monitoring and 5 updates per second to meet the requirements of IFR >GPS TSO C129 and C146." > >This sounds like some subtle weasel wording to me. A piece of >equipment either meets the full TSO requirements and is marked TSO >compliant or it is not TSO'd. > >The manufacturer does not get to cherry pick certain standards >within the TSO, or its references, just meet certain standards, and >then mark the equipment as TSO'd. > >Most manufacturers who have gone to the expense and effort of >obtaining TSO approval for a piece of equipment are very eager to >make that approval and marking very evident to any prospective purchaser. > >OC -- The best investment we will ever make is in gathering knowledge. > >On 5 Jan 2007, at 22:05, Bret Smith wrote: > >><smithhb@tds.net> >> >>See http://www.grtavionics.com/documents/Horizon%20System%20Flyer.pdf >> >>"The addition of the internal GPS receiver eliminates the need for an >>external >>GPS, or may be used as a backup to your primary GPS. Available in two >>versions. The standard WAAS GPS module is perfect for VFR use, or >>as backup >>to an external GPS. The new RAIM-equipped version provides integrity >>monitoring and 5 updates per second to meet the requirements of IFR >>GPS >>TSO C129 and C146." >> >>Standard WAAS GPS Receiver with antenna $450 >>RAIM-Equipped WAAS GPS Receiver with antenna $750 >> >> >>Bret Smith >>RV-9A (91314) >>Mineral Bluff, GA >>www.FlightInnovations.com > > CONFIDENTIALITY & PRIVILEGE NOTICE W.J.R.Hamilton,Glenalmond Group Companies,Fighter Flights Internet Services and Warbirds.Net.<wjrhamilton@optusnet.com.au> & <GlenalmondEngineering@Gmail.com> This message is intended for and should only be used by the addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information.If you are not the intended recipient any use distribution,disclosure or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this communication are not waived or lost by reason of the mistaken delivery to you. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately to: Australia 61 (0)408 876 526 Dolores capitis non fero. Eos do.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   avionics-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Avionics-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/avionics-list
  • Browse Avionics-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/avionics-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --