Avionics-List Digest Archive

Fri 01/22/10


Total Messages Posted: 4



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:33 AM - Aircraft Manufacturer ()
     2. 06:37 AM - Charting Uncontrolled Airspace ()
     3. 08:55 AM - Re: Encoder CertificationAeroElectric-List: Encoder Certification (Bill Morelli)
     4. 09:51 AM - Give it a rest ()
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:33:32 AM PST US
    From: <bakerocb@cox.net>
    Subject: Aircraft Manufacturer
    1/22/2010 Hello Jim Ayers, You wrote: 1) "What did you put on the 8050-1 form you sent to FAA Oklahoma City to register your air craft?" {Response} I put my name. 2) "There is no BUILDER block on the aircraft registration form." {Response} That is correct. Similarly only the term MANUFACTURER rather than BUILDER appears in many other generic FAA forms that are used in the process of getting our experimental amateur built aircraft through the FAA administrative wickets of purchasing, registration, and certification. To wit: Form 8050-2, AIRCRAFT BILL OF SALE Form 8050-3, CERTIFICATE OF AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION Form 8050-88, IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ASSIGNMENT AND REGISTRATION OF AMATEUR-BUILT AIRCRAFT. (This form refers to the "bill of sale from manufacturer of the kit" -- they mean the company that created the kit from which the aircraft is built.)** Form 8050-110, CONFIRMATION OF RESERVATION OF UNITED STATES REGISTRATION NUMBER. The use of these generic FAA forms in the process and the use of the term MANUFACTURER in those generic forms and on the FAA web site does not make the builder of an amateur built experimental aircraft into an approved aircraft manufacturer in the eyes of the FAA. This fact is made abundantly clear in the FAA Form 8130-7 SPECIAL AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATE for each individual experimental amateur built aircraft when the MANUFACTURER block is filled with N/A (Not Applicable) and the BUILDER block is filled with the builder's name by the FAA Representative who fills out and signs the form. 'OC' Says: "The best investment we can make is the effort to gather and understand knowledge." **PS: Note that this same form number 8050-88 is use for a different FAA form AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP FOR AMATEUR-BUILT AIRCRAFT which does use the term "Builder's Name". I guess the FAA was running short of money and could not afford different numbers for these two different forms. ================================================== Time: 09:23:27 AM PST US Subject: Re: Avionics-List: Encoder Certification From: lessdragprod@aol.com Hi All, I just checked the FAA records: William E. Boyd, Jr is the "manufacturer" of a RV-6A. There is no BUILDER block on the aircraft registration form. What did you put on the 8050-1 form you sent to FAA Oklahoma City to register your air craft? I think this is the first form the FAA sees for a new homebuilt. Jim Ayers


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:37:48 AM PST US
    From: <bakerocb@cox.net>
    Subject: Charting Uncontrolled Airspace
    1/22/2010 Hello Jon, You wrote: 1) "Oh brother.." {Response} Hang in there for one more go around. This time we will restrict the discussion to just charting of uncontrolled airspace and leave transponders out of it since that subject seems to make some peoples' head hurt. 2) ".............. one has to actually look at a sectional (NOT IFRchart) to see where true "uncontrolled airspace" exists." and "RE: #2. Look at the Class E section of this page: http://www.flytandem.com/airspace.htm" {Response} Just looking at a Sectional chart alone and the web site diagram does not permit one to see where all true uncontrolled airspace exists. Here is why: A) The AIRPORT TRAFFIC AND AIRSPACE Legend portion of current Sectional charts has this wording in it: "Only the controlled and reserved airspace effective below 18,000 ft. MSL are shown on this chart." This means that the location of lateral areas of uncontrolled Class G airspace that go from the surface up to 14,500 feet can not be determined by looking at a Sectional chart. B) The AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES AND AIRSPACE INFORMATION on a current IFR ENROUTE LOW ALTITUDE chart has these wordings in it under AIRSPACE INFORMATION: "Open area (white) indicates controlled airspace (Class E); unless otherwise indicated." "All airspace 14,500' and above is controlled (Class E)" "Shaded area (brown) indicates uncontrolled airspace below 14,500' (Class G)" So one needs both Sectional and IFR ENROUTE LOW ALTITUDE charts to completely determine where all uncontrolled Class G airspace is located. The Sectional chart will tell one where the controlled Class E airspace exists both laterally by an outline and vertically by either magenta or blue shading, but won't tell one where the the lateral dimensions of uncontrolled Class G airspace are. The IFR ENROUTE LOW ALTITUDE chart, by brown shading, will show one where uncontrolled Class G airspace exists laterally from the surface up to 14,500. Why don't you get an IFR ENROUTE LOW ALTITUDE chart for some areas out west where there is some brown shading, check it out, and let us know what you find. Our IFR ENROUTE LOW ALTITUDE charts back east are all white between the navigation information. Thanks. 'OC' Says: "The best investment we can make is the effort to gather and understand knowledge." ================================================= From: "Jon Finley" <jon(at)finleyweb.net> Subject: RE: Encoder Certification Oh brother.. Apparently this discussion has went around and around enough times that what is being said no longer makes sense to anyone. Next subject please! Jon ======================================= Jon Finley wrote: RE: #2. Look at the Class E section of this page: http://www.flytandem.com/airspace.htm Jon


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:55:08 AM PST US
    From: "Bill Morelli" <billvt@together.net>
    Subject: Encoder CertificationAeroElectric-List: Encoder Certification
    1/22/201 It does not mention "Controlled Airspace" anywhere in 91.215 (b) but: 91.215 (c) states: Transponder-on operation. While in the airspace as specified in paragraph (b) of this section or in all controlled airspace, each person operating an aircraft equipped with an operatble ATC transponder maintained in accordance with 91.413 of this part shall operate the transponder, including Mode C equipment f installed and shall reply on the appropriated code or as assigned by ATC. *********************************************************************************************************************** So this means to me that if you have a transponder installed that has been tested per 91.413, you MUST turn it on when in ANY CONTROLLED AIRSPACE. (A,B,C,D,E) If your transponder has NOT been tested per 91.413, you MUST NOT turn it on> 1/21/2010 Hello Again Jon Finley, Thank you for responding to my request (copied below) to review the charting of controlled and uncontrolled airspace in your area. Before I respond to the specific points that you made in that charting regard I would like to again remind all of the readers regarding the non relevance of generic controlled airspace when it comes to determining whether or not an aircraft must be equipped with an operable coded transponder. I repeat: "Anyway the real issue here when it comes to requiring a transponder or not is not the existence or not of generic controlled airspace, but rather the specific airspaces identified in 91.215 (b). The term "controlled airspace" is not used once in the entire 91.215 (b) parargraph and this is the 14 CFR paragaph that regulates whether an aircraft must be equipped with a transponder or not." Bill Morelli billvt@together.net EarthLink Revolves Around You.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:51:01 AM PST US
    From: <bakerocb@cox.net>
    Subject: Give it a rest
    1/22/2010 Hello Greg Young, You wrote: "Give it a rest." I agree -- I'm gone too. Some people have controlled airspace and transponder requirement and uncontrolled airspace and transponder non requirement so hard wired into their brain that no facts can change their mind. 'OC' Says: "The best investment we can make is the effort to gather and understand knowledge." ======================================================== "Greg Young" <gyoung@cs-sol.com> Subject: Encoder Certification Date: Jan 21, 2010 Dude... Give it a rest. I've exercised the delete key way too often. I'm gone.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   avionics-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Avionics-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/avionics-list
  • Browse Avionics-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/avionics-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --