Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 05:28 AM - Encoder Certification ()
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Encoder Certification |
12/6/2010
Hello vipin,
On Jan 24, 2010 Angier Ames wrote: "And unless the operation is conducted
under part 121 or 135, as per FARS, 14CFR Section215(a), they do NOT need
to be certified/ TSO'd."
On Jan 25, 2010 I wrote: "{Response} Not true because 14 CFR Section 215 (a)
says exactly the opposite......"
On Dec 05, 2010 8:05 pm you wrote: "I agree, providing the word "under" is
changed to the word "in"....."
{Response 1} Wow! I am both astounded and curious. Why are you responding to
a Jan 25, 2010 posting to this thread almost a year later on Dec 5, 2010?
{Response 2} It is not clear whether you are agreeing with what Angier wrote
or what I wrote in response.
{Response 3} I am reluctant to post again to this thread because some
readers became a bit bored / disgusted with it, but your preference for the
word "in" instead of the word "under" when it comes to which part of the
regulations apply to a particular kind of operation does not change what the
FARs actually say. Here is the quote that applies, directly extracted from
14 CFR 91.215 (a):
"All airspace: U.S.-registered civil aircraft. For operations not conducted
under part 121 or 135 of this chapter, ATC transponder equipment installed
must meet ............."
{Response 4} Perhaps you are thinking of operating "in" a particular kind of
airspace instead of operating "under" a particular part of the regulations
that apply to that operation.
'OC' Baker Says: "The best investment we can make is the time and effort to
gather and understand knowledge."
==========================================================
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:05 pm Post subject: Re: Encoder Certification
Time: 08:10:10 PM PST US
Subject: Avionics-List: Re: Encoder Certification
From: "vipin" <vvipin84@hotmail.com>
I agree, providing the word "under" is changed to the word "in" as "in" is a
more inclusive word
--------
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=322416#322416
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|