---------------------------------------------------------- Avionics-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Mon 12/06/10: 1 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 05:28 AM - Encoder Certification () ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 05:28:44 AM PST US From: Subject: Avionics-List: Encoder Certification 12/6/2010 Hello vipin, On Jan 24, 2010 Angier Ames wrote: "And unless the operation is conducted under part 121 or 135, as per FARS, 14CFR Section215(a), they do NOT need to be certified/ TSO'd." On Jan 25, 2010 I wrote: "{Response} Not true because 14 CFR Section 215 (a) says exactly the opposite......" On Dec 05, 2010 8:05 pm you wrote: "I agree, providing the word "under" is changed to the word "in"....." {Response 1} Wow! I am both astounded and curious. Why are you responding to a Jan 25, 2010 posting to this thread almost a year later on Dec 5, 2010? {Response 2} It is not clear whether you are agreeing with what Angier wrote or what I wrote in response. {Response 3} I am reluctant to post again to this thread because some readers became a bit bored / disgusted with it, but your preference for the word "in" instead of the word "under" when it comes to which part of the regulations apply to a particular kind of operation does not change what the FARs actually say. Here is the quote that applies, directly extracted from 14 CFR 91.215 (a): "All airspace: U.S.-registered civil aircraft. For operations not conducted under part 121 or 135 of this chapter, ATC transponder equipment installed must meet ............." {Response 4} Perhaps you are thinking of operating "in" a particular kind of airspace instead of operating "under" a particular part of the regulations that apply to that operation. 'OC' Baker Says: "The best investment we can make is the time and effort to gather and understand knowledge." ========================================================== Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:05 pm Post subject: Re: Encoder Certification Time: 08:10:10 PM PST US Subject: Avionics-List: Re: Encoder Certification From: "vipin" I agree, providing the word "under" is changed to the word "in" as "in" is a more inclusive word -------- Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=322416#322416 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Matronics Email List Services ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post A New Message avionics-list@matronics.com UN/SUBSCRIBE http://www.matronics.com/subscription List FAQ http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Avionics-List.htm Web Forum Interface To Lists http://forums.matronics.com Matronics List Wiki http://wiki.matronics.com Full Archive Search Engine http://www.matronics.com/search 7-Day List Browse http://www.matronics.com/browse/avionics-list Browse Digests http://www.matronics.com/digest/avionics-list Browse Other Lists http://www.matronics.com/browse Live Online Chat! http://www.matronics.com/chat Archive Downloading http://www.matronics.com/archives Photo Share http://www.matronics.com/photoshare Other Email Lists http://www.matronics.com/emaillists Contributions http://www.matronics.com/contribution ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.