Avionics-List Digest Archive

Sat 06/09/12


Total Messages Posted: 1



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:13 AM - Bi-ennial transponder/encoder/static certifications (bakerocb)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:13:25 AM PST US
    From: "bakerocb" <bakerocb@cox.net>
    Subject: Bi-ennial transponder/encoder/static certifications
    6/9/2012 Hello Ralph Capen, Kelly McMullen has given you some good words on this subject, but I would like to clarify one point. Kelly wrote: "You can leak test your static system if you ever need to open it between the required certifications, and that is legal, ......" This is true only if you meet one of the qualification requirements listed in paragraph 91.411 (b). See a copy of that paragraph below: "91.411 Altimeter system and altitude reporting equipment tests and inspections. (a) No person may operate an airplane, or helicopter, in controlled airspace under IFR unless- (1) Within the preceding 24 calendar months, each static pressure system, each altimeter instrument, and each automatic pressure altitude reporting system has been tested and inspected and found to comply with appendices E and F of part 43 of this chapter; (2) Except for the use of system drain and alternate static pressure valves, following any opening and closing of the static pressure system, that system has been tested and inspected and found to comply with paragraph (a), appendix E, of part 43 of this chapter; and (3) Following installation or maintenance on the automatic pressure altitude reporting system of the ATC transponder where data correspondence error could be introduced, the integrated system has been tested, inspected, and found to comply with paragraph (c), appendix E, of part 43 of this chapter. (b) The tests required by paragraph (a) of this section must be conducted by- (1) The manufacturer of the airplane, or helicopter, on which the tests and inspections are to be performed; (2) A certificated repair station properly equipped to perform those functions and holding- (i) An instrument rating, Class I; (ii) A limited instrument rating appropriate to the make and model of appliance to be tested; (iii) A limited rating appropriate to the test to be performed; (iv) An airframe rating appropriate to the airplane, or helicopter, to be tested; or (3) A certificated mechanic with an airframe rating (static pressure system tests and inspections only)." Note that holding only a Repairman's Certificate for a specific experimental amateur built aircraft is not listed as one of the persons qualified to perform static pressure system tests and inspections (in order to detect a leak) on the aircraft that he is rated for. Please let me know if you have any questions on this subject. 'OC' Baker Says: "The best investment we can make is the time and effort to gather and understand knowledge." PS: It is possible that some FAA employee has given the OK for some Repairman to perform a static pressure system leak test on his experimental amateur built aircraft, but that does not constitute a universal change the regulation. Besides what equipment and test performance criteria would the Repairman use to determine whether or not he had an acceptable leak? Hint: The answer to this question can be found in the Matronics aeroelectric list archives. (Search for "static check" dated Sep 11) ========================================================== >From: Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com> >Sent: Jun 8, 2012 10:22 AM >To: avionics-list@matronics.com >Subject: Re: Avionics-List: Bi-ennial transponder/encoder/static >certifications > > >A common misconception. Yes you built your aircraft. That does not make >you a "manufacturer" in the terms of these regulations. >You need the transponder certified by someone with a repair station >license. There is no certification of the pitot system, only the static >system. The only reason the pitot is connected to the test is to protect >your airspeed indicator from an excessive pressure difference with the >static port. >You can leak test your static system if you ever need to open it between >the required certifications, and that is legal, but the certification >must be done by an appropriately rated repair station. >Kelly McMullen >A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor =========================================== > >On 6/8/2012 6:46 AM, Ralph E. Capen wrote: >> <recapen@earthlink.net> >> >> In reading 91.411 and 91.413, it says the manufacturer of the airplane >> can perform the tests. >> >> Since I built my 6A, I'm thinking that I cando the tests myself and make >> the logbook entry. >> >> Testing the transponder codes might be the difficult part - but I have >> already built the test equipment and tested the Pitot-static system and verified the altitude goung to the transponder is correct. >> >> Thoughts please, >> Ralph




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   avionics-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Avionics-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/avionics-list
  • Browse Avionics-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/avionics-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --