Avionics-List Digest Archive

Tue 07/15/14


Total Messages Posted: 1



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:49 PM - Re: King KX155 weak VOR reception (David Josephson)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:49:27 PM PST US
    From: David Josephson <dlj04@josephson.com>
    Subject: Re: King KX155 weak VOR reception
    On 7/14/14 11:59 PM, Avionics-List Digest Server wrote: > > Re my interest in an antenna analyzer: I've been looking at some of > the newer units online (such as the Rigexpert AA-600) and it appears > they have the capability of testing the coax for faults (distance to > fault) while connected to the antenna. I wasn't thinking of > replacing the RG58 with RG400 simply because of the RG400 is a lower > loss cable, rather I wanted to use the analyzer to check the RG58 > for faults. I would replace the RG58 with RG400 ONLY IF the RG58 > is questionable (open, shorted, etc). This BTW may be a real > possibility because the existing cable makes some pretty tight bends > under the panel. Also using a tester such as the AA-600 would > allow me to check the SWR of the antenna. > > Thoughts? My thoughts are that you really want to buy a new antenna analyzer. Great, but only if you're willing to invest in the time needed to understand what's going on. These things are not magic and can easily produce numbers and graphs that can fool you if you don't know what you're looking at. You do have the ability to make an S-parameter measurement over a range of frequencies, and remote it to the end of a characterized transmission line by the use of time gating so you can actually measure the antenna separately from the coax -- this is a powerful tool. Just prepare for a steep learning curve. I don't know about the AA-600 specifically, I have always done this with traditional lab equipment. I would suggest looking at the VNWA 3E (sdr-kits.net) as an alternative to the AA-600. It's about the same price, uses a PC for display, works up through DME/ATCRBS frequencies, and is supported by lots of hams worldwide who use it for antenna development. Finally, no amount of electrical sleuthing will tell you whether the antenna was an effective receive device as built. It may have a good 50 ohm match which is nearly irrelevant to its performance as a VOR/LOC/GS antenna.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   avionics-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Avionics-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/avionics-list
  • Browse Avionics-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/avionics-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --