Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 06:22 AM - Re: Commanders as Automobiles (Bill Bow)
2. 06:22 AM - hose job (Bill Bow)
3. 06:38 AM - Re: Commanders as Automobiles (Jim Addington)
Message 1
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Commanders as Automobiles |
--> Commander-List message posted by: "Bill Bow" <bowing74@earthlink.net>
If it was a RR it might have wound up with a Lucas(The Prince of Darkness)
electrical system. That would have been scary.
bilbo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Addington" <jtaddington@charter.net>
Subject: RE: Commander-List: Commanders as Automobiles
> --> Commander-List message posted by: "Jim Addington"
<jtaddington@charter.net>
>
> I guess that tells how some people think of their plane. I thought it was
> more like a Rolls Royce.
>
> Jim Addington
> N444BD
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of
> CloudCraft@aol.com
> To: commander-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Commander-List: Commanders as Automobiles
>
>
> --> Commander-List message posted by: CloudCraft@aol.com
>
> In a message dated 06/15/03 17:19:51 Pacific Daylight Time,
cgalley@qcbc.org
> writes:
>
>
> > No, Commanders were Studebakers!
>
> That's true, isn't it, Cy?
>
> About a year or more ago a thread ran on the first generation TCFG email
net
> about the Studebaker Commander logo and whether it was -- or at least
> influenced -- the Aero Commander logo.
>
> I wrote to the Studebaker museum but never got a response.
>
> Wing Commander Gordon
>
>
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Commander-List message posted by: "Bill Bow" <bowing74@earthlink.net>
During the process of overhauling my offending engine. The subject of hoses
surfaced. Some are like new and others are not. There is one large hose,
that goes from the firewall sump(oops I said that "s" word) to the engine.
It was covered with that orange fire protective coating. I removed the hose
because it seemed to be a little stiff. I was able to break off, the end of
the hose by the engine, by hand. I suspect it was original equipment.
I guess my point is, the orange fire protective sleeve does not degrade like
the hose. The orange stuff looked good while the hose underneath was "lying
in wait" for me.
Just food for thought.
bilbo
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Commanders as Automobiles |
--> Commander-List message posted by: "Jim Addington" <jtaddington@charter.net>
That would be bad.
Jim A
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Bill Bow
Subject: Re: Commander-List: Commanders as Automobiles
--> Commander-List message posted by: "Bill Bow" <bowing74@earthlink.net>
If it was a RR it might have wound up with a Lucas(The Prince of Darkness)
electrical system. That would have been scary.
bilbo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Addington" <jtaddington@charter.net>
Subject: RE: Commander-List: Commanders as Automobiles
> --> Commander-List message posted by: "Jim Addington"
<jtaddington@charter.net>
>
> I guess that tells how some people think of their plane. I thought it was
> more like a Rolls Royce.
>
> Jim Addington
> N444BD
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of
> CloudCraft@aol.com
> To: commander-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Commander-List: Commanders as Automobiles
>
>
> --> Commander-List message posted by: CloudCraft@aol.com
>
> In a message dated 06/15/03 17:19:51 Pacific Daylight Time,
cgalley@qcbc.org
> writes:
>
>
> > No, Commanders were Studebakers!
>
> That's true, isn't it, Cy?
>
> About a year or more ago a thread ran on the first generation TCFG email
net
> about the Studebaker Commander logo and whether it was -- or at least
> influenced -- the Aero Commander logo.
>
> I wrote to the Studebaker museum but never got a response.
>
> Wing Commander Gordon
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|