Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 11:24 PM - Re: 3 bladed conversion (W J R HAMILTON)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 3 bladed conversion |
--> Commander-List message posted by: W J R HAMILTON <wjrhamilton@optusnet.com.au>
Folks,
I note the comment about cruise speeds 2 v. 3 blades.
Several friend recently upgraded their C-310A. Manufacturers STC etc. The
outcome was a disaster, turned out no testing on this model had been done,
the vibration on takeoff was frightening. After much investigation,
balancing etc., nothing changed. All of a sudden, the manufacturer decided
a full refund would be a real good idea, it was an inherent couple that was
causing the highly dangerous situation.
Also, with a later model C-310, the only discernable performance change was
a loss of about 4kt IAS in cruise, which worked out at about AU$7500 per
knot, ripper deal.
Cheers,
Bill Hamilton.
At 01:57 4/01/2005, you wrote:
>--> Commander-List message posted by: "Dan Brady" <westwind@hdiss.net>
>
>For what it's worth, many years ago I flew just about every old "bath
>tub" commander made(although at the time they weren't very old). 1
>comparison I recall was between 2 520s, 1 with 2 blades & 1 with 3 blades.
>At the time most of our flying involved gravel strips & unimproved landing
>sites so the main benefits to us were less prop damage due to more ground
>clearance, less cabin noise, slightly shorter TO distance & climb
>performance plus the fact that it was a factory improvement as opposed to
>an after-market mod. Since the 3 blade upgrade also included an increase
>of 15hp per engine, the increased TO & climb performance wasn't due just
>to the 3 blades......plus the 2 bladder even with less hp got slightly
>better cruise speeds. Fast forward to 16 years ago when we got our present
>"straight" commander with 0540 lycs we looked into upgrading to 3 blade
>Black-Mac conversions & were assured that we could get approval for this
>conversion but after getting the cost estimate we !
>decided not to pursue it further so I do not know the FAA's position. I
>did have a customer who had it done to his 250 Comanche and was pleased as
>punch with it due mainly to the increased ground clearance. I hope this is
>of some help to you.......Dan Brady the desert duck.
>
CONFIDENTIALITY & PRIVILEGE NOTICE
W.J.R.Hamilton,Glenalmond Group Companies,Fighter Flights Internet Services
and Warbirds.Net. & <wjrhamilton@optusnet.com.au>.
This message is intended for and should only be used by the addressee. It
is confidential and may contain legally privileged information.If you are
not the intended recipient any use distribution,disclosure or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited.Confidentiality and legal privilege
attached to this communication are not waived or lost by reason of the
mistaken delivery to you.If you have received this message in error, please
notify us immediately to Australia 61 (0)408 876 526
Dolores capitis non fero. Eos do.
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|