Commander-List Digest Archive

Mon 02/07/05


Total Messages Posted: 6



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 08:37 AM - Sir Barry photos of 680E (Barry Hancock)
     2. 10:46 AM - Re: Re: Avionics (James Rodriguez Colom)
     3. 11:03 AM - Re: Re: Avionics (CloudCraft@aol.com)
     4. 11:14 AM - Re: Re: Avionics (John Vormbaum)
     5. 01:35 PM - Re: Sir Barry photos of 680E (Barry Collman)
     6. 04:13 PM - Re: Moe Mills I need to talk with you. (Moe)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:37:58 AM PST US
    From: Barry Hancock <radialpower@cox.net>
    Subject: Sir Barry photos of 680E
    --> Commander-List message posted by: Barry Hancock <radialpower@cox.net> Sir Barry, At the fly-in at HIO a few years ago, you took some air to air photos of my ship. Do you have any of those that you could email me off list? Thanks! Barry N680E


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:46:45 AM PST US
    From: "James Rodriguez Colom" <jamesrodriguez@bppr.com>
    Subject: RE: Avionics
    --> Commander-List message posted by: "James Rodriguez Colom" <jamesrodriguez@bppr.com> Hi Larry, Can you tell us more about the Merlyn 320 conversion? In the Mirage installation, those engines were blamed for excessive vibration, oil consumption and temperatures. How does it behave in the 500B? Sounds like a great panel. I'm thinking about the MX20 and GNS430 myself. What convinced you to go the 480 route? Jimmy -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry Wokral Subject: Commander-List: RE: Avionics --> Commander-List message posted by: "Larry Wokral" <l.wokral@ix.netcom.com> >Wow Larry, All I know is that when your airplane is done, it's going to be one of the finest examples of a piston commander. What did you put in your panel? I need to do avionics next, I was thinking Garmin GNS480 (CNX80) plus the MX20 MFD...> Yup John, that's what I would suggest. I put in a new CNX80; MX20 with Chart View and terrain options; Garmin GTX330 S mode transponder with TIS to the MX20; Shadin Digidata fuel flow/air data computer that cross feeds air data info to the CNX80 (approved as primary replacement for the stock fuel flow gauge during the Merlyn 320 conversion); PS Engineering 7000B audio panel w/seven place stereo intercom (with cell phone connect, dual stereo audio inputs that can be switched or shared from front seats and back; PS Engineering PXE7300 CD/MP3/AM&FM player; a four receptacle 28 to 12V converter mounted at the rear table and one receptacle at the copilot's lower panel (I have a small 12V to 115V inverter that can plug into any of these for laptops, coolers, etc.); Electronics International volt/amp, MP, RPM, and dual CHT gauges as primary replacements; and two JPI EDM800 engine scanners with all available scanning options (all CHTs, all EGTs, TIT, IAT, OAT, fuel flow, volt/amps). I already had and reused a King HSI, a 1000E Stormscope, and a KX155 as the secondary radio. We built a new center panel section. The MX20, CNX80, and GTX330 are mounted in a stack on the left half. This was considered to be within the normal IFR scan, so no separate "within scan" enunciators were required. The PS Eng 7000B, PXE7300, and KX155 are mounted immediately to the right of those in another stack. The Shadin, Stormscope, and JPIs are lined up vertically to the right of those with the two 3-in-one gauges and the E.I. dual CHT gauge horizontally below them. The MP, RPM, and volt/amp gauges are in a horizontal row of six in a small, extended sub panel running across the top just under the glare shield. While we were at it, I put in an Electro luminescent light strip under the glare shield that is wired to the main bus and has a battery backup. I also put Electro Luminescent light rings around all instruments and gauges that weren't already internally lighted. As a backup, I left in the existing post lights too. For now, I left the copilot's panel alone. It has a new A.I., older T&B, older VSI, and older DG. Some of these still have the older brow lights as does the flap and trim indicators. We installed Bose's buss powered jack for my headset. We also prewired the main harness for the XM/WX audio entertainment & weather links where the weather will be displayed on the MX20. It's pretty hard to imagine all of this without a photo. I need to take some. There were a lot of complications encountered during the installation. A lot of old wiring behind the panel was removed and replaced with a new harness designed for this particular installation. Many of these components are long, leaving little clearance in the back - another reason for a formed custom harness. Instead of in-line fuses for the additional gauges etc. as is suggested by the manufacturers, we made a small new sub panel and attached it just below the existing avionics bus so that an additional row of pullable circuit breakers could be installed. Where ever possible, we wired through existing cannon plugs for easier future maintenance. Because the amperage load is now substantially higher (easily handled by the two 70 amp alternators included with the Merlyn 320 conversion), we had to run a larger feed wire from the new Zefftronics Alternator Controller/Voltage Regulator too. I've spent lots of bucks over the last couple of years for the Merlyn 320 conversion, the new built in altitude compensating oxygen system (dual 115 cf Kevlar bottles mounted aft of the extended baggage area on the starboard side opposite the battery), and the avionics installation. Now I'm broke, eating chicken pot pies for dinner, and can't afford avgas. The plane still needs paint - I'll just have to keep it waxed up for now. The interior is in OK shape, but it is in an older style and not up to what the plane deserves. I still need to refinish and re-label the overhead panel and the quadrant. When I bought the plane, it already had the dual pane cabin windows, flap gap seals, the Shrike nose, stinger tail cone, the square rudder cap, eyebrow windows, and the frameless vent windows. During the Merlyn conversion, we certified the extended baggage area (I previously had no paperwork showing its installation) as an additional 150 lb. "light weight" area. The other things I'd still like to do include installing winglets with tip strobes, new paint, leather interior refurbishment (with window and crew/cabin separation curtains), make a new small drawered "entertainment center" cabinet that could be placed between the copilot seat and the aft facing one behind it, exchange the rear bench seat for one that has the droppable center armrest, and install deicing boots (or maybe even a TKS system - don't need known ice, but good deicing or anti-icing would be good). The new "compact" propellers already have the hot prop kit. I'm also considering Merlyn's fuel increase system that allows an extra 70 gallons with their additional gross weight increase to 7,400 lbs. (fuel weight only to be added to the present allowed gross weight of 7200 lbs.). This increase would put the plane back into the 1,000 mile IFR range. It would also be nice to replace the present Century III autopilot with a new digital roll steering type like the S-TEC. Keep dreaming I guess! Sure, I've spent more money on this plane than I could ever expect to get back from a sale (and there's more to spend). I guess a way to rationalize this is by contemplating what other plane could do what this one can: with the short field performance and safety designed in by Mr. Smith, with the added performance of the Merlyn conversion, with the great sleek look of an Aerocommander, and at what purchase price. A pressurized turboprop would be nice, but the cost to operate one is out of my budget. This one will now cruise at 200 KTAS (75% power @ about 34 gph); has good climb ability (I just did a high performance takeoff with just me and 70 gallons of fuel (cool air has the capability of flying to 25,000'; and has a single engine service ceiling of 16,000'. I'm jazzed! Sorry I got so involved. Several people wanted to know what was installed, so I though I would try to be complete and answer all at the same time. Larry Wokral CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This communication and any attachments hereto contain information that may be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee or agent entrusted with the responsibility of delivering the message to the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please delete or destroy all copies and notify the sender immediately. In addition, although precautions have been taken to ensure that the data included herein is free from viruses or other malicious content, we cannot assure that such is indeed the case and disclaim any responsibility attributable thereto. AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este documento, y cualquier anejo incluido, contienen informacin que podra considerarse privilegiada, confidencial y exenta de divulgacin bajo las leyes aplicables. La informacin es para el uso exclusivo del individuo o entidad a quien est dirigida. Si usted no es el destinatario, el empleado o el agente a quien se le confi la responsabilidad de hacer llegar el mensaje al destinatario, debe percatarse que la divulgacin, copia o distribucin de esta transmisin est estrictamente prohibida. Si ha recibido esta comunicacin por error, favor de borrarla o destruir todas las copias y notificar al remitente inmediatamente. Adems, aunque se hayan tomado precauciones para asegurar que los datos que aqu se incluyen estn libre de virus u otro contenido malintencionado, no podemos asegurar que as sea y, por lo tanto, no nos hacemos responsables de cualquier dao atribuible al caso.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:03:15 AM PST US
    From: CloudCraft@aol.com
    Subject: Re: RE: Avionics
    --> Commander-List message posted by: CloudCraft@aol.com In a message dated 06-Feb-05 20:03:09 Pacific Standard Time, alh1@juno.com writes: > > NOW MY MECHANIC TELLS ME THE REST OF THE RADIO WILL NEED TO BE ADDED TO KEEP > FROM HAVING A BIG HOLE IN THE PANEL. Very clever of him. Not that a sheet of flat gray sheet metal would ever be placed where avionics were missing .... no, better put more avionics there. Are you pole dancing or lap dancing? You'll earn more lap dancing ... that's where the money is, here in Las Vegas. With all this talk of panel-mount nuggets of gold, is it time to review Commander weight and balance vs. the original design with aft radio racks? Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:14:21 AM PST US
    From: "John Vormbaum" <john@vormbaum.com>
    Subject: Re: RE: Avionics
    --> Commander-List message posted by: "John Vormbaum" <john@vormbaum.com> What are you saying, Keith? If I put me & 5 new radios in the front, will the airplane adopt a permanent nose-down attitude? ----- Original Message ----- From: <CloudCraft@aol.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: RE: Avionics > --> Commander-List message posted by: CloudCraft@aol.com > > In a message dated 06-Feb-05 20:03:09 Pacific Standard Time, alh1@juno.com > writes: > > > > > NOW MY MECHANIC TELLS ME THE REST OF THE RADIO WILL NEED TO BE ADDED TO KEEP > > FROM HAVING A BIG HOLE IN THE PANEL. > > Very clever of him. > > Not that a sheet of flat gray sheet metal would ever be placed where avionics > were missing .... no, better put more avionics there. > > Are you pole dancing or lap dancing? You'll earn more lap dancing ... that's > where the money is, here in Las Vegas. > > With all this talk of panel-mount nuggets of gold, is it time to review > Commander weight and balance vs. the original design with aft radio racks? > > Wing Commander Gordon > > Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. > > > __________ NOD32 1.992 (20050205) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.992 (20050205) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:35:03 PM PST US
    From: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
    Subject: Re: Sir Barry photos of 680E
    --> Commander-List message posted by: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk> Hi Barry, The ones I took were taken on 'ordinary' film. I did scan a couple of the best ones some while ago, but the quality was not too good. I'll have another go shortly and get some better-quality shots off to you. Kindest Regards, Barry C. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barry Hancock" <radialpower@cox.net> Subject: Commander-List: Sir Barry photos of 680E | --> Commander-List message posted by: Barry Hancock <radialpower@cox.net> | | Sir Barry, | | At the fly-in at HIO a few years ago, you took some air to air photos | of my ship. Do you have any of those that you could email me off list? | | Thanks! | | Barry | N680E | | | | | | |


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:13:30 PM PST US
    From: "Moe" <moe@rosspistons.com>
    Subject: Re: Moe Mills I need to talk with you.
    --> Commander-List message posted by: "Moe" <moe@rosspistons.com> Kevin, Great talking to you. As per our phone con. anytime between about the 10th of July and the 15th of August will work for me. I am about 99% sure on this deal. Please advise as soon as practical. Regards, Moe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Coons" <kevincoons@cavucompanies.net> Subject: Commander-List: Moe Mills I need to talk with you. > --> Commander-List message posted by: "Kevin Coons" <kevincoons@cavucompanies.net> > > Moe, > > I misplaced your cell phone number and I want to give you an update on the > crossing. Private email me if you'd like at kevincoons@cavucompanies.net or > call me at 859-992-6920 to discuss. > > Kevin Coons > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Barry > Collman > To: commander-list@matronics.com > Subject: Commander-List: N6291B & N401E > > --> Commander-List message posted by: "Barry Collman" > <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk> > > Hi Steve, > > As promised, I've now extracted the history of your Model 500 N6291B and the > Model 720 N401E from my database and have attached them as .XLS files. Both > are > ready to be printed out on 'Letter' format paper. > > With regard to the date suffix letters: > "S" - indicates the Bill of Sale date > "A" - indicates the Application for Registration date, where the Bill of > Sale is > undated, or the owner moves to a new location. > > Unusually, both these Commanders retained their original ex-factory 'N' > numbers! > > With regard to N6291B: > (1) - Does anything in the paperwork or log books throw any light on the > propellers quoted in August 1983? What props were actually on the aircraft > at > that time and when were they actually installed? > > (2) - When were the winglets signed-off as being installed? > > Kindest Regards, > Barry Collman > Aero Commander historian (UK) > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   commander-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Commander-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/commander-list
  • Browse Commander-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/commander-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --