Commander-List Digest Archive

Mon 07/02/07


Total Messages Posted: 1



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:15 AM - Re: Twin vs Single engine (Robert S. Randazzo)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:15:24 AM PST US
    From: "Robert S. Randazzo" <rsrandazzo@precisionmanuals.com>
    Subject: Twin vs Single engine
    Nico- Ouch... That's tragic. And to think of all the people in the world NOT contributing to the greater good- we really could use keeping people like him around on this rock of ours. All of aviation is about risk management. I've had five engine failures while flying twin engine airplanes- and non flying a single engine airplane. To the uninitiated- that should tell you that twins are far less dependable. :-) When flying my wife and daughter around- I much prefer to fly them in a twin. I'm a competent multi pilot- so my risk factors are properly mitigated- and if one quits- I have lots more time to plan a safe resolution of the flight than I do in a single. The single engine advocates ask all kinds of questions about loss of control if an engine quits on rotation, or during a go around... But my answer sounds much like yours. Proficiency, training and GOOD JUDGMENT. A competent pilot puts quite a bit of effort into making sure that an engine failure within 500' AGL won't result in a twin that won't climb... You plan that out of the flight IN ADVANCE. In the T-6, if the engine quits anywhere in flight- I don't have the option of "planning it out of the flight." Robert S. Randazzo <fingers crossed that any further engine failures are also in the multi's!> -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of nico css Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 23:32 Subject: RE: Commander-List: Twin vs Single engine --> <nico@cybersuperstore.com> This is a report I picked up form avWebFlash news. My rant has nothing to do with the circumstances that killed Bruce Kennedy. Once again, I am astonished that folks would fly single engine planes over hazardous terrain, such as heavily populated areas, mountains or water. I usually get into an argument about multi vs single engine planes, and they never end with my counterparts seeing the light. Even though the chances of getting an in-flight engine failure are doubled in a twin, the chances of having to contend with an unscheduled landing aren't doubled. More often than not, an engine failure in a twin would get you to an airport where you can walk to the local FBO's offices for coffee. Shaken, perhaps, but nothing more than what a good dose of caffeine wouldn't fix. In the usual argument, at this point, I have to respond with "don't get yourself worked up about more training to stay proficient in a twin" because if the pilot is not proficient, don't fly. That goes for anything that leaves terra firma. Any number of hours in one's logbook won't save one when the choices have been reduced to a landing either on a rooftop or in a parking lot. My most sincere condolences with Bruce's family. Nico Quest Aircraft Chairman Killed In Crash Bruce Kennedy, 68, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Quest Aircraft, died in the crash of his Cessna 182 near the Cashmere (Wash.) Airport on Thursday. Kennedy had a long career with Alaska Airlines and retired as its CEO in 1991. He was on his way to Wenatchee to see his grandchildren when the plane went down in a high school parking lot while attempting to land. The airplane hit a truck and a tree before catching fire next to a house. No one on the ground was hurt. Weather was reported to be mostly clear with light winds at the time of the crash. Kennedy worked for Alaska Airlines and its predecessor for 32 years and is credited with the modern expansion that turned it into an international carrier. He took early retirement in 1991 to pursue humanitarian causes. According to a news release from his family, he was especially fond of his involvement with Quest Aircraft, which is on the cusp of certification for its turboprop Kodiak bush plane. The Kodiak will be sold in the general market and profits from those sales will be used to donate aircraft to humanitarian organizations flying into remote areas around the world. __________ NOD32 2368 (20070701) Information __________




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   commander-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Commander-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/commander-list
  • Browse Commander-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/commander-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --