Commander-List Digest Archive

Mon 09/07/09


Total Messages Posted: 8



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:39 AM - Re: low suction mystery (Scottmain2003@aol.com)
     2. 07:51 AM - Re: Want to purchase a 680FLP (Mr.RPM) (MASON CHEVAILLIER)
     3. 09:52 AM - Re: Hydraulic Failures (Donnie Rose)
     4. 10:26 AM - Re: Hydraulic Failures (yourtcfg@aol.com)
     5. 11:22 AM - Re: Hydraulic Failures (Donnie Rose)
     6. 02:37 PM - Re: Hydraulic Failures (lloyd silverman)
     7. 02:54 PM - Re: Hydraulic Failures (Tom Fisher)
     8. 07:25 PM - Re: Hydraulic Failures (yourtcfg@aol.com)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:39:50 AM PST US
    From: Scottmain2003@aol.com
    Subject: Re: low suction mystery
    I had similar experience with my L-26. I isolated each segment of the plumbing and tested one by one and eventually found the culprit. the hard line from the inside upper left of the right engine nacelle that goes through the bulkhead and connects to another hard line just to the right of the oil cover had chaffed through and had a fairly large hole allowing ambient air to enter there. I had to take the inspection covers off that area on the wing upper panel to repair the hole and then all worked fine. a vacuum cleaner connected to the hose at the pump made enough of a suction noise at the hole to find the problem. Probably been that way for years as the pressure controller was cranked all the way in in an attempt to compensate for the bleed problem. hope that helps scott In a message dated 9/1/2009 11:09:10 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, moe-rosspistons@hotmail.com writes: Gary, Have you tested the pump alone by connecting a hose directly to the pump with the remainder of the system not in the loop? Moe N680RR 680Fp From: _Gary Moshluk_ (mailto:gmosh@charter.net) Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 6:26 PM Subject: Commander-List: low suction mystery To all Commander aficionados, Having an issue with low suction specifically when running the left engine alone. The right engine system is operating normally without the left engine running producing about 4.2 Hg of suction. The left engine alone will only produce 2.2 to 2.3 Hg max even at higher RPM settings. I have a straight 560 fitted with dual wet suction pumps. The engine driven vac pumps are piped to bulkhead fittings on each firewall into the nacelle. The bulkhead fitting is connected to the regulator (via hose and clamps). The regulator is "T"'d for attaching the low vacuum switch and check valve, thence to the hardline forward to the instrument panel. Ostensibly the dual check valves protect the operating vacuum source from an open leak on the opposite side When I rebuilt the instrument panel I relocated the engine gages, centering them over/above the throttle pedestal to allow for a panel mounted radio stack AND I added an artificial horizon, DG (airspeed and altimeter) to the co-pilot side. Harry Merrit sent me a used vacuum pump and regulator; both of which I installed today. Best I can get off the left side vacuum pump is 2.2 HG of suction. The regulator adjustments so far have had a negligible effect on the suction pressure. I had thought up until today the problem resided with the (engine driven) pump and/or regulator ahead of the check valve in the left nacelle but the pump and regulator still won't get me the required suction off the left side. Anyone out there with a theory as to what I should be looking for? Gary (c.s "Blaster") href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List) (http://www.matronics.com/contribution)


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:51:42 AM PST US
    From: MASON CHEVAILLIER <kamala@MSN.COM>
    Subject: Want to purchase a 680FLP (Mr.RPM)
    tf=2C sorry. gmc lost mine in july. From: tfisher@commandergroup.bc.ca Subject: Commander-List: Want to purchase a 680FLP (Mr.RPM) There is a change all right. C-GISS (680FLP (Mr.RPM)) is no more=2C total hydraulic failure in the starb oard brake line=2C landed by the numbers without flaps=2C brakes or steerin g=2C ended up careening across a ditch which bent the main spar and tore of f the right main landing gear and skidded to a stop on the right side of th e belly. My insurance company will be offering it up for sale "where is=2C as is". Does anyone know of a 680FLP (Mr.RPM) available for sale? Tom Fisher formally C-GISS ----- Original Message ----- From: yourtcfg@aol.com Sent: Friday=2C September 04=2C 2009 9:47 AM Subject: Commander-List: TCFG Directory Hi TCFG members=2C We're working on this year's Membership and Vendor Directory and would appr eciate it if you would let us know of any changes to your personal informat ion or additions/changes to the Vendor listing. Looking forward to the Fly-In. What a special treat to have Hoover attend our awards Banquet. See ya in a couple of weeks. ~jb href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List">http://www.matro nics.com/Navigator?Commander-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:52:33 AM PST US
    From: Donnie Rose <aquadiver99@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Hydraulic Failures
    Hi John, pulling that breaker is not in my POH but it makes sense.=0AIs the idea to push it in and leave after TO for the duration or-in-just prio r to landing?=0A=0A-=0ADonnie Rose =0A205/492-8444=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A_____ ___________________________=0AFrom: John Vormbaum <john@vormbaum.com>=0ATo: commander-list@matronics.com=0ASent: Sunday, September 6, 2009 7:09:40 PM =0ASubject: RE: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures=0A=0A=0AHi all,=0A-=0A I also had a complete hyd. failure in my 500B a few years back. I cracked a hard line in the wing root, and had forgotten to pull the aux pump breaker on takeoff (lesson learned) so it pumped everything overboard...I had no h ydraulic pressure at all. To compound the error, after putting the gear han dle down & getting the mains locked, I got a few PSI back in the system and thought I-could use it to cycle the gear & lock the nosegear. No luck... .ended up blowing my chance to get all three wheels locked down, and had to land knowing the nose wasn't locked down.=0A-=0ASince I had no hydraulic s for steering, flaps or brakes, I chose Stockton's long (10,000 foot?) run way. I landed on the mains, pulled the power back, and coasted awhile down the runway with the nosegear held off, under minimal power. That big Comman der tail/rudder was more than sufficient for directional control. I finally lost full elevator authority at about 20 knots, and gently settled the nos e onto the pavement. I rolled about 8 feet before the nosegear gently colla psed at about-10 knots. The only damage was a pair of nosegear doors, a b ell crank, and some rivets.=0A-=0AI guess it's true what they say, "fly t he airplane all the way until it stops".=0A-=0AIncidentally, I probably c ould have done the same landing in less than half the length. I actually ha d to roll some throttle in to keep the nose up & give me enough speed to ro ll through the last half of the runway...so I ended up doing a 9000-foot wh eelie. The airplane really is balanced beautifully.=0A-=0A/John=0A-=0AP S: Nico, I have to ask, what's with the "feather the props on short final" thing? In a Commander, you'd be hard pressed to have a prop strike under an y circumstances, even a straight belly landing. If you had one main gear un locked, dumping it on a prop & needing a new engine still seems less expens ive & life-threatening than sawing the airplane off the runway sideways at 75 knots...=0A-=0A-=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: ow ner-commander-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server @matronics.com] On Behalf Of yourtcfg@aol.com=0ASent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 2:29 PM=0ATo: commander-list@matronics.com=0ASubject: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures=0A=0A=0AHI KIDS=0A=0AI thought I might share with you s ome real world experience regarding hyd failures.- Over my 30 years and w ell over-2000 hours of Commander experience,- I have suffered three com plete-hydraulicfailures.- All in FAT nacelled Commanders.- It would b e good to spend a moment to discuss the difference in the systems of FLAT a nd FAT nacelled airplanes.- The FAT nacelles do not have an electric-hy d aux pump.- They share the same basic system including the reservoir, bu t instead of an electric-aux pump, they use a valve that isolates the sta nd pipe in the reservoir and a hand pump.- The FLAT nacelled airplanes ha ve an electric pump.- There is a standpipe in the reservoir that is inten ded to isolate a small amount of fluid to be used in an emergency.- The e ngine driven pumps only have access to the fluid from the standpipe.- The re is a fitting in-the resiviour below the standpipe that feeds only-th e aux pump.- The trouble with that system is the aux pump is operated by a pressure switch.- So, if a leak occurs, the en gine pump(s) will eventually pump all the fluid overboard.- When the last of the fluid is gone, the pressure will drop, turning on the aux pump dump ing the last of the fluid that was intended to be used to stop and steer- the airplane.- The FAT nacelled airplanes have the same standpipe for th e engine driven pumps, but the emergency system requires that a valve in th e floor of the cabin be selected to "Brakes only" and a hand pump is used t o build pressure.--Unlike the electric system, there is no way the emer gency-fluid can be pumped overboard without he pilot knowing it.=0AMy fir st failure at least 25 years ago in a 560A, N2649B.- I had completed a no rmal landing at Caldwell Idaho (EUL) and as I started to brake, the pedals simply went- to the floor.- I was slow to react but did finally break t he code and switched the floor-valve and as the end of the runway approac hed, I feverishly pumped the handle.- The airplane stopped with only the nose wheel off the end!!- I learned an important lesson that day.- ALWA YS check the hyd gauge-AND press on the brakes on short final (more later ).- A hard line in the belly of the airplane had failed, pumping all the fluid overboard.=0AFailure number two was about ten years ago in my current Commander 680E,-N222JS.- I had entered the pattern at Grove field (1W1 ) when I noticed the gear was not extending as usual.- A quick glance at the pressure gauge confirmed a complete hyd failure.- I elected to fly ac ross he river to Troutdale Or (TLD).- Grove field is only 2200 feet long -for landing.- The gear extended and locked.- The flaps were of cours e up.- I told the tower of my predicament but declined their offer to dec lare an emergency.- I-switched the valve in the floor and waited-to t ouch down.--The landing was normal, if a little fast, and-as the nose wheel touched I depressed the rudder pedals and pumped the handle to regul ated the braking pressure.- I have found it nearly impossible, in the rea l world, to build sufficient pressure in advance to operate the brakes/stee ring.- Better to depress the brakes and build the ne eded pressure.- It worked very well and I was able to taxi to parking with no trouble.- A flex line from the back side of the firewall had-failed.=0AThe-last failure was only a couple-mon ths ago in a 680-Commander destined for a A&P school.- Morris Kernick a nd I had spent considerable time preparing N87YA for its last-gear down f erry.- The airplane had only been flown-once in the last 25 years.- T he hyd system would only indicate about 700psi, but since it was on a ferry permit and the gear would remain down and very locked, I was not overly co ncerned.- The 2.5 hour flight was completely uneventfully.- Those old e ngines ran great!- When I entered the patter to land, I placed the flap h andle fully down.- With the gear extended. the airplane never flew out of -the flap speed.- As I turned final, I did my-gauge and break check a nd to my surprise, there was NO pressure.- The flaps I had called for nev er extended and the brakes were flat.- I was committed to the landing and tried the hand pump.- It worked, but since the flaps had been selected, they-started down first, changing the airplanes trim.-With touchdown only seconds away, I-decided the best s alvation was to abandon the flaps and I selected "brakes only" and again wa ited-for the mains to touch.- I had already pulled both throttles to fu ll idle and as I flared the airplane began to swerve sharply to the left. - As the-nose touched-I-squeezed the brakes and pumped the hanle. - The airplane used most of the runway width, but stayed on the blacktop and rolled to a stop on the centerline with plenty of room to spare.- It was only then I noticed that the RH engine had quite and feathered itself. - Hence the swerving on landing.- With the-drag from the windmilling -LH propeller and the RH feathered, there was significant adverse yaw.- I was able to restart the RH engine and again, taxied to-parking using t he hand pump.- Thought this might be of value to some of yo! u other Comm ander drivers.- See ya at the fly-in (I hope!!)- ;=0A=0A=0Ahref="http ://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List">http://www.matronics.com/Nav igator?Commander-Listhref="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.mat ronics.com=0Ahref="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matr =========================0A =0A=0A=0A


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:26:47 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Hydraulic Failures
    From: yourtcfg@aol.com
    As soon as the first engine is started, pull the breaker and do no push in until the next start.? It is not in the POH but should be.? We have been advocating this for years and I have had two members call me to thank me.? They were able to manage a complete hyd failure.? jb -----Original Message----- From: Donnie Rose <aquadiver99@yahoo.com> Sent: Mon, Sep 7, 2009 9:52 am Subject: Re: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures Hi John, pulling that breaker is not in my POH but it makes sense. Is the idea to push it in and leave after TO for the duration or?in?just prior to landing? ? Donnie Rose 205/492-8444 ? From: John Vormbaum <john@vormbaum.com> Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2009 7:09:40 PM Subject: RE: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures Hi all, ? I also had a complete hyd. failure in my 500B a few years back. I cracked a hard line in the wing root, and had forgotten to pull the aux pump breaker on takeoff (lesson learned) so it pumped everything overboard...I had no hydraulic pressure at all. To compound the error, after putting the gear handle down & getting the mains locked, I got a few PSI back in the system and thought I?could use it to cycle the gear & lock the nosegear. No luck....ended up blowing my chance to get all three wheels locked down, and had to land knowing the nose wasn't locked down. ? Since I had no hydraulics for steering, flaps or brakes, I chose Stockton's long (10,000 foot?) runway. I landed on the mains, pulled the power back, and coasted awhile down the runway with the nosegear held off, under minimal power. That big Commander tail/rudder was more than sufficient for directional control. I finally lost full elevator authority at about 20 knots, and gently settled the nose onto the pavement. I rolled about 8 feet before the nosegear gently collapsed at about?10 knots. The only damage was a pair of nosegear doors, a bell crank, and some rivets. ? I guess it's true what they say, "fly the airplane all the way until it stops". ? Incidentally, I probably could have done the same landing in less than half the length. I actually had to roll some throttle in to keep the nose up & give me enough speed to roll through the last half of the runway...so I ended up doing a 9000-foot wheelie. The airplane really is balanced beautifully. ? /John ? PS: Nico, I have to ask, what's with the "feather the props on short final" thing? In a Commander, you'd be hard pressed to have a prop strike under any circumstances, even a straight belly landing. If you had one main gear unlocked, dumping it on a prop & needing a new engine still seems less expensive & life-threatening than sawing the airplane off the runway sideways at 75 knots... ? ? From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of yourtcfg@aol.com Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 2:29 PM Subject: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures HI KIDS ? I thought I might share with you some real world experience regarding hyd failures.? Over my 30 years and well over?2000 hours of Commander experience,? I have suffered three complete?hydraulic failures.? All in FAT nacelled Commanders.? It would be good to spend a moment to discuss the difference in the systems of FLAT and FAT nacelled airplanes.? The FAT nacelles do not have an electric?hyd aux pump.? They share the same basic system including the reservoir, but instead of an electric?aux pump, they use a valve that isolates the stand pipe in the reservoir and a hand pump.? The FLAT nacelled airplanes have an electric pump.? There is a standpipe in the reservoir that is intended to isolate a small amount of fluid to be used in an emergency.? The engine driven pumps only have access to the fluid from the standpipe.? There is a fitting in?the resiviour below the standpipe that feeds only?the aux pump.? The trouble with that system is the aux pump is operated by a pressure swi tch.? So, if a leak occurs, the engine pump(s) will eventually pump all the fluid overboard.? When the last of the fluid is gone, the pressure will drop, turning on the aux pump dumping the last of the fluid that was intended to be used to stop and steer? the airplane.? The FAT nacelled airplanes have the same standpipe for the engine driven pumps, but the emergency system requires that a valve in the floor of the cabin be selected to "Brakes only" and a hand pump is used to build pressure.??Unlike the electric system, there is no way the emergency?fluid can be pumped overboard without he pilot knowing it. My first failure at least 25 years ago in a 560A, N2649B.? I had completed a normal landing at Caldwell Idaho (EUL) and as I started to brake, the pedals simply went? to the floor.? I was slow to react but did finally break the code and switched the floor?valve and as the end of the runway approached, I feverishly pumped the handle.? The airplane stopped with only the nose wheel off the end!!? I learned an important lesson that day.? ALWAYS check the hyd gauge?AND press on the brakes on short final (more later).? A hard line in the belly of the airplane had failed, pumping all the fluid overboard. Failure number two was about ten years ago in my current Commander 680E,?N222JS.? I had entered the pattern at Grove field (1W1) when I noticed the gear was not extending as usual.? A quick glance at the pressure gauge confirmed a complete hyd failure.? I elected to fly across he river to Troutdale Or (TLD).? Grove field is only 2200 feet long?for landing.? The gear extended and locked.? The flaps were of course up.? I told the tower of my predicament but declined their offer to declare an emergency.? I?switched the valve in the floor and waited?to touch down.??The landing was normal, if a little fast, and?as the nose wheel touched I depressed the rudder pedals and pumped the handle to regulated the braking pressure.? I have found it nearly impossible, in the real world, to build sufficient pressure in advance to operate the brakes/steering.? Better to depress the brakes and build the ne eded pressure.? It worked very well and I was able to taxi to parking with no trouble.? A flex line from the back side of the firewall had?failed. The?last failure was only a couple?months ago in a 680?Commander destined for a A&P school.? Morris Kernick and I had spent considerable time preparing N87YA for its last?gear down ferry.? The airplane had only been flown?once in the last 25 years.? The hyd system would only indicate about 700psi, but since it was on a ferry permit and the gear would remain down and very locked, I was not overly concerned.? The 2.5 hour flight was completely uneventfully.? Those old engines ran great!? When I entered the patter to land, I placed the flap handle fully down.? With the gear extended. the airplane never flew out of?the flap speed.? As I turned final, I did my?gauge and break check and to my surprise, there was NO pressure.? The flaps I had called for never extended and the brakes were flat.? I was committed to the landing and tried the hand pump.? It worked, but since the flaps had been selected, they?started down first, changing the airplanes trim.?With touchdown only seconds aw ay, I?decided the best salvation was to abandon the flaps and I selected "brakes only" and again waited?for the mains to touch.? I had already pulled both throttles to full idle and as I flared the airplane began to swerve sharply to the left.? As the?nose touched?I?squeezed the brakes and pumped the hanle.? The airplane used most of the runway width, but stayed on the blacktop and rolled to a stop on the centerline with plenty of room to spare.? It was only then I noticed that the RH engine had quite and feathered itself.? Hence the swerving on landing.? With the?drag from the windmilling?LH propeller and the RH feathered, there was significant adverse yaw.? I was able to restart the RH engine and again, taxied to?parking using the hand pump.? Thought this might be of value to some of yo! u other Commander drivers.? See ya at the fly-in (I hope!!)? ; href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-Listhref="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:22:42 AM PST US
    From: Donnie Rose <aquadiver99@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Hydraulic Failures
    By "next start" do you mean the second engine? And if so, does'nt that only provide-protection from full hyd fluid loss for those few seconds? It se ams the leak would occur-in a more stressfull scenario such as take off. =0A=0A-=0ADonnie Rose =0A205/492-8444=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A__________________ ______________=0AFrom: "yourtcfg@aol.com" <yourtcfg@aol.com>=0ATo: commande r-list@matronics.com=0ASent: Monday, September 7, 2009 12:25:08 PM=0ASubjec t: Re: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures=0A=0AAs soon as the first engine is started, pull the breaker and do no push in until the next start.- It is not in the POH but should be.- We have been advocating this for years and I have had two members call me to thank me.- They were able to manage a complete hyd failure.- jb=0A=0A=0A-----Original Message-----=0AFrom: D onnie Rose <aquadiver99@yahoo.com>=0ATo: commander-list@matronics.com=0ASen t: Mon, Sep 7, 2009 9:52 am=0ASubject: Re: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failur es=0A=0A=0AHi John, pulling that breaker is not in my POH but it makes sens e.=0AIs the idea to push it in and leave after TO for the duration or-in -just prior to landing?=0A=0A-=0ADonnie Rose =0A205/492-8444=0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: John Vormbaum <john@vormb aum.com>=0ATo: commander-list@matronics.com=0ASent: Sunday, September 6, 20 09 7:09:40 PM=0ASubject: RE: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures=0A=0A=0AHi all,=0A-=0AI also had a complete hyd. failure in my 500B a few years back . I cracked a hard line in the wing root, and had forgotten to pull the aux pump breaker on takeoff (lesson learned) so it pumped everything overboard ...I had no hydraulic pressure at all. To compound the error, after putting the gear handle down & getting the mains locked, I got a few PSI back in t he system and thought I-could use it to cycle the gear & lock the nosegea r. No luck....ended up blowing my chance to get all three wheels locked dow n, and had to land knowing the nose wasn't locked down.=0A-=0ASince I had no hydraulics for steering, flaps or brakes, I chose Stockton's long (10,0 00 foot?) runway. I landed on the mains, pulled the power back, and coasted awhile down the runway with the nosegear held off, under minimal power. Th at big Commander tail/rudder was more than sufficient for directional contr ol. I finally lost full elevator authority at about 20 knots, and gently se ttled the nose onto the pavement. I rolled about 8 feet before the nosegear gently collapsed at about-10 knots. The only damage was a pair of nosege ar doors, a bell crank, and some rivets.=0A-=0AI guess it's true what the y say, "fly the airplane all the way until it stops".=0A-=0AIncidentally, I probably could have done the same landing in less than half the length. I actually had to roll some throttle in to keep the nose up & give me enoug h speed to roll through the last half of the runway...so I ended up doing a 9000-foot wheelie. The airplane really is balanced beautifully.=0A-=0A/J ohn=0A-=0APS: Nico, I have to ask, what's with the "feather the props on short final" thing? In a Commander, you'd be hard pressed to have a prop st rike under any circumstances, even a straight belly landing. If you had one main gear unlocked, dumping it on a prop & needing a new engine still seem s less expensive & life-threatening than sawing the airplane off the runway sideways at 75 knots...=0A-=0A-=0A=0A=0A______________________________ __=0AFrom: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-commande r-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of yourtcfg@aol.com=0ASent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 2:29 PM=0ATo: commander-list@matronics.com=0ASubject: Co mmander-List: Hydraulic Failures=0A=0A=0AHI KIDS=0A=0AI thought I might sha re with you some real world experience regarding hyd failures.- Over my 3 0 years and well over-2000 hours of Commander experience,- I have suffe red three complete-hydraulicfailures.- All in FAT nacelled Commanders. - It would be good to spend a moment to discuss the difference in the sys tems of FLAT and FAT nacelled airplanes.- The FAT nacelles do not have an electric-hyd aux pump.- They share the same basic system including the reservoir, but instead of an electric-aux pump, they use a valve that is olates the stand pipe in the reservoir and a hand pump.- The FLAT nacelle d airplanes have an electric pump.- There is a standpipe in the reservoir that is intended to isolate a small amount of fluid to be used in an emerg ency.- The engine driven pumps only have access to the fluid from the sta ndpipe.- There is a fitting in-the resiviour below the standpipe that f eeds only-the aux pump.- The trouble with that system is the aux pump is operated by a pressure switch.- So, if a leak occurs, the en gine pump(s) will eventually pump all the fluid overboard.- When the last of the fluid is gone, the pressure will drop, turning on the aux pump dump ing the last of the fluid that was intended to be used to stop and steer- the airplane.- The FAT nacelled airplanes have the same standpipe for th e engine driven pumps, but the emergency system requires that a valve in th e floor of the cabin be selected to "Brakes only" and a hand pump is used t o build pressure.--Unlike the electric system, there is no way the emer gency-fluid can be pumped overboard without he pilot knowing it.=0AMy fir st failure at least 25 years ago in a 560A, N2649B.- I had completed a no rmal landing at Caldwell Idaho (EUL) and as I started to brake, the pedals simply went- to the floor.- I was slow to react but did finally break t he code and switched the floor-valve and as the end of the runway approac hed, I feverishly pumped the handle.- The airplane stopped with only the nose wheel off the end!!- I learned an important lesson that day.- ALWA YS check the hyd gauge-AND press on the brakes on short final (more later ).- A hard line in the belly of the airplane had failed, pumping all the fluid overboard.=0AFailure number two was about ten years ago in my current Commander 680E,-N222JS.- I had entered the pattern at Grove field (1W1 ) when I noticed the gear was not extending as usual.- A quick glance at the pressure gauge confirmed a complete hyd failure.- I elected to fly ac ross he river to Troutdale Or (TLD).- Grove field is only 2200 feet long -for landing.- The gear extended and locked.- The flaps were of cours e up.- I told the tower of my predicament but declined their offer to dec lare an emergency.- I-switched the valve in the floor and waited-to t ouch down.--The landing was normal, if a little fast, and-as the nose wheel touched I depressed the rudder pedals and pumped the handle to regul ated the braking pressure.- I have found it nearly impossible, in the rea l world, to build sufficient pressure in advance to operate the brakes/stee ring.- Better to depress the brakes and build the ne eded pressure.- It worked very well and I was able to taxi to parking with no trouble.- A flex line from the back side of the firewall had-failed.=0AThe-last failure was only a couple-mon ths ago in a 680-Commander destined for a A&P school.- Morris Kernick a nd I had spent considerable time preparing N87YA for its last-gear down f erry.- The airplane had only been flown-once in the last 25 years.- T he hyd system would only indicate about 700psi, but since it was on a ferry permit and the gear would remain down and very locked, I was not overly co ncerned.- The 2.5 hour flight was completely uneventfully.- Those old e ngines ran great!- When I entered the patter to land, I placed the flap h andle fully down.- With the gear extended. the airplane never flew out of -the flap speed.- As I turned final, I did my-gauge and break check a nd to my surprise, there was NO pressure.- The flaps I had called for nev er extended and the brakes were flat.- I was committed to the landing and tried the hand pump.- It worked, but since the flaps had been selected, they-started down first, changing the airplanes trim.-With touchdown only seconds away, I-decided the best s alvation was to abandon the flaps and I selected "brakes only" and again wa ited-for the mains to touch.- I had already pulled both throttles to fu ll idle and as I flared the airplane began to swerve sharply to the left. - As the-nose touched-I-squeezed the brakes and pumped the hanle. - The airplane used most of the runway width, but stayed on the blacktop and rolled to a stop on the centerline with plenty of room to spare.- It was only then I noticed that the RH engine had quite and feathered itself. - Hence the swerving on landing.- With the-drag from the windmilling -LH propeller and the RH feathered, there was significant adverse yaw.- I was able to restart the RH engine and again, taxied to-parking using t he hand pump.- Thought this might be of value to some of yo! ! u other Co mmander drivers.- See ya at the fly-in (I hope!!)&nb sp; ;=0A=0A=0Ahref ="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List">http://www.matronics .com/Navigator?Commander-Listhref="http://forums.matronics.com/">http://f orums.matronics.com=0Ahref="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http:/ ====0A=0A=0A


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:37:39 PM PST US
    From: "lloyd silverman" <LLOYDSSS11@MSN.COM>
    Subject: Re: Hydraulic Failures
    RE: THE NOSE GEAR SPRING INSPECTIONDOOR, IS THIS OUTSIDE THE AIRCRAFT OR INSIDE ABOVE THE RUDDER PEDALS. MINE HAS NEVER BEEN LUBED OR INSPECTED AS FAR AS I KNOW. THANKS,LLOYD ----- Original Message ----- From: yourtcfg@aol.com<mailto:yourtcfg@aol.com> To: commander-list@matronics.com<mailto:commander-list@matronics.com> Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 10:16 PM Subject: Re: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures Great story John.. That brings up another great point. The landing gear should extend without hyd pressure. The main gear uses bungee chords to assist them. These are easy to check visually and should be replaced every couple years if the airplane is hangared, every year if it sits outside. The nose gear is another story. The nose gear is extended by spring located in the RH inspection door, just ahead of where the rudder pedals live. These need inspected and lubricated every year, more often if the airplane is parked out. To inspect them, one must get on your knees. get a strong light and look forward and up through the aforementioned inspection panel. I have seen one that had corroded, stuck and was completely broken in half!! These are often overlooked by mechanics. Also, your mechanic should do an emergency extension each annual. This is done on jacks, with the gear up and locked. Then,&nbs p;by bleeding the hyd pressure to zero by running the flaps up and down. It takes awhile! Next, place the gear handle down. All the gear should go down and lock with some gusto. If any are "sleepy", investigate. There are several grease fittings so make certain they are all properly greased. jb -----Original Message----- From: John Vormbaum <john@vormbaum.com> To: commander-list@matronics.com Sent: Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:30 pm Subject: RE: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures Oh I misread that then....I thought you had good reason and I somehow missed it :-). /J ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com<mailto:owner-commander-list-ser ver@matronics.com> [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com<mailto:owner-commander- list-server@matronics.com?>] On Behalf Of nico css Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 6:18 PM To: commander-list@matronics.com<mailto:commander-list@matronics.com> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures what's with the "feather the props on short final" thing John, Yup, I agree. As I said, it wasn't that smart. Nico ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com<mailto:owner-commander-list-ser ver@matronics.com> [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com<mailto:owner-commander- list-server@matronics.com?>] On Behalf Of John Vormbaum Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 5:10 PM To: commander-list@matronics.com<mailto:commander-list@matronics.com> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures Hi all, I also had a complete hyd. failure in my 500B a few years back. I cracked a hard line in the wing root, and had forgotten to pull the aux pump breaker on takeoff (lesson learned) so it pumped everything overboard...I had no hydraulic pressure at all. To compound the error, after putting the gear handle down & getting the mains locked, I got a few PSI back in the system and thought I could use it to cycle the gear & lock the nosegear. No luck....ended up blowing my chance to get all three wheels locked down, and had to land knowing the nose wasn't locked down. Since I had no hydraulics for steering, flaps or brakes, I chose Stockton's long (10,000 foot?) runway. I landed on the mains, pulled the power back, and coasted awhile down the runway with the nosegear held off, under minimal power. That big Commander tail/rudder was more than sufficient for directional control. I finally lost full elevator authority at about 20 knots, and gently settled the nose onto the pavement. I rolled about 8 feet before the nosegear gently collapsed at about 10 knots. The only damage was a pair of nosegear doors, a bell crank, and some rivets. I guess it's true what they say, "fly the airplane all the way until it stops". Incidentally, I probably could have done the same landing in less than half the length. I actually had to roll some throttle in to keep the nose up & give me enough speed to roll through the last half of the runway...so I ended up doing a 9000-foot wheelie. The airplane really is balanced beautifully. /John PS: Nico, I have to ask, what's with the "feather the props on short final" thing? In a Commander, you'd be hard pressed to have a prop strike under any circumstances, even a straight belly landing. If you had one main gear unlocked, dumping it on a prop & needing a new engine still seems less expensive & life-threatening than sawing the airplane off the runway sideways at 75 knots... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com<mailto:owner-commander-list-ser ver@matronics.com> [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com<mailto:owner-commander- list-server@matronics.com?>] On Behalf Of yourtcfg@aol.com<mailto:yourtcfg@aol.com> Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 2:29 PM To: commander-list@matronics.com<mailto:commander-list@matronics.com> Subject: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures HI KIDS I thought I might share with you some real world experience regarding hyd failures. Over my 30 years and well over 2000 hours of Commander experience, I have suffered three complete hydraulic failures. All in FAT nacelled Commanders. It would be good to spend a moment to discuss the difference in the systems of FLAT and FAT nacelled airplanes. The FAT nacelles do not have an electric hyd aux pump. They share the same basic system including the reservoir, but instead of an electric aux pump, they use a valve that isolates the stand pipe in the reservoir and a hand pump. The FLAT nacelled airplanes have an electric pump. There is a standpipe in the reservoir that is intended to isolate a small amount of fluid to be used in an emergency. The engine driven pumps only have access to the fluid from the standpipe. There is a fitting in the resiviour below the standpipe that feeds only the aux pump. The trouble with that system is the aux pump is operated by a pressure switch. So, if a leak occurs, the engine pump(s) will eventually pump all the fluid overboard. When the last of the fluid is gone, the pressure will drop, turning on the aux pump dumping the last of the fluid that was intended to be used to stop and steer the airplane. The FAT nacelled airplanes have the same standpipe for the engine driven pumps, but the emergency system requires that a valve in the floor of the cabin be selected to "Brakes only" and a hand pump is used to build pressure. Unlike the electric system, there is no way the emergency fluid can be pumped overboard without he pilot knowing it. My first failure at least 25 years ago in a 560A, N2649B. I had completed a normal landing at Caldwell Idaho (EUL) and as I started to brake, the pedals simply went to the floor. I was slow to react but did finally break the code and switched the floor valve and as the end of the runway approached, I feverishly pumped the handle. The airplane stopped with only the nose wheel off the end!! I learned an important lesson that day. ALWAYS check the hyd gauge AND press on the brakes on short final (more later). A hard line in the belly of the airplane had failed, pumping all the fluid overboard. Failure number two was about ten years ago in my current Commander 680E, N222JS. I had entered the pattern at Grove field (1W1) when I noticed the gear was not extending as usual. A quick glance at the pressure gauge confirmed a complete hyd failure. I elected to fly across he river to Troutdale Or (TLD). Grove field is only 2200 feet long for landing. The gear extended and locked. The flaps were of course up. I told the tower of my predicament but declined their offer to declare an emergency. I switched the valve in the floor and waited to touch down. The landing was normal, if a little fast, and as the nose wheel touched I depressed the rudder pedals and pumped the handle to regulated the braking pressure. I have found it nearly impossible, in the real world, to build sufficient pressure in advance to operate the brakes/steering. Better to depress the brakes and build the ne eded pressure. It worked very well and I was able to taxi to parking with no trouble. A flex line from the back side of the firewall had failed. The last failure was only a couple months ago in a 680 Commander destined for a A&P school. Morris Kernick and I had spent considerable time preparing N87YA for its last gear down ferry. The airplane had only been flown once in the last 25 years. The hyd system would only indicate about 700psi, but since it was on a ferry permit and the gear would remain down and very locked, I was not overly concerned. The 2.5 hour flight was completely uneventfully. Those old engines ran great! When I entered the patter to land, I placed the flap handle fully down. With the gear extended. the airplane never flew out of the flap speed. As I turned final, I did my gauge and break check and to my surprise, there was NO pressure. The flaps I had called for never extended and the brakes were flat. I was committed to the landing and tried the hand pump. It worked, but since the flaps had been selected, they started down first, changing the airplanes trim. With touchdown only seconds away, I decided the best salvation was to abandon the flaps and I selected "brakes only" and again waited for the mains to touch. I had already pulled both throttles to full idle and as I flared the airplane began to swerve sharply to the left. As the nose touched I squeezed the brakes and pumped the hanle. The airplane used most of the runway width, but stayed on the blacktop and rolled to a stop on the centerline with plenty of room to spare. It was only then I noticed that the RH engine had quite and feathered itself. Hence the swerving on landing. With the drag from the windmilling LH propeller and the RH feathered, there was significant adverse yaw. I was able to restart the RH engine and again, taxied to parking using the hand pump. Thought this might be of value to some of yo! ! u other Commander drivers. See ya at the fly-in (I hope!!)&nb sp; ; href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List<http://www.matr onics.com/Navigator?Commander-List>">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?C ommander-List<http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List> href="http://forums.matronics.com<http://forums.matronics.com/>">http:/ /forums.matronics.com<http://forums.matronics.com/> href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution<http://www.matronics.com/co ntribution>">http://www.matronics.com/c<http://www.matronics.com/c> href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List<http://www.matr onics.com/Navigator?Commander-List>">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?C ommander-List<http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List> href="http://forums.matronics.com<http://forums.matronics.com/>">http:/ /forums.matronics.com<http://forums.matronics.com/> href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution<http://www.matronics.com/co ntribution>">http://www.matronics.com/c<http://www.matronics.com/c> href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List<http://www.matr onics.com/Navigator?Commander-List>">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?C ommander-List<http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List> href="http://forums.matronics.com<http://forums.matronics.com/>">http:/ /forums.matronics.com<http://forums.matronics.com/> href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution<http://www.matronics.com/co ntribution>">http://www.matronics.com/c<http://www.matronics.com/c> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List<http://www.matronics.co m/Navigator?Commander-List> http://www.matronics.com/contribution<http://www.matronics.com/contributi on>


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:54:04 PM PST US
    From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher@commandergroup.bc.ca>
    Subject: Re: Hydraulic Failures
    What pushes the gear down is mainly (pun intended) the Nitrogen cylinder on the outboard side of each gear. I was advised that the bungees are a six month item. Tom formally C-GISS ----- Original Message ----- From: lloyd silverman To: commander-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 2:29 PM Subject: Re: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures RE: THE NOSE GEAR SPRING INSPECTIONDOOR, IS THIS OUTSIDE THE AIRCRAFT OR INSIDE ABOVE THE RUDDER PEDALS. MINE HAS NEVER BEEN LUBED OR INSPECTED AS FAR AS I KNOW. THANKS,LLOYD ----- Original Message ----- From: yourtcfg@aol.com To: commander-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 10:16 PM Subject: Re: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures Great story John.. That brings up another great point. The landing gear should extend without hyd pressure. The main gear uses bungee chords to assist them. These are easy to check visually and should be replaced every couple years if the airplane is hangared, every year if it sits outside. The nose gear is another story. The nose gear is extended by spring located in the RH inspection door, just ahead of where the rudder pedals live. These need inspected and lubricated every year, more often if the airplane is parked out. To inspect them, one must get on your knees. get a strong light and look forward and up through the aforementioned inspection panel. I have seen one that had corroded, stuck and was completely broken in half!! These are often overlooked by mechanics. Also, your mechanic should do an emergency extension each annual. This is done on jacks, with the gear up and locked. Then,&nbs p;by bleeding the hyd pressure to zero by running the flaps up and down. It takes awhile! Next, place the gear handle down. All the gear should go down and lock with some gusto. If any are "sleepy", investigate. There are several grease fittings so make certain they are all properly greased. jb -----Original Message----- From: John Vormbaum <john@vormbaum.com> To: commander-list@matronics.com Sent: Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:30 pm Subject: RE: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures Oh I misread that then....I thought you had good reason and I somehow missed it :-). /J ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of nico css Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 6:18 PM To: commander-list@matronics.com Subject: RE: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures what's with the "feather the props on short final" thing John, Yup, I agree. As I said, it wasn't that smart. Nico ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Vormbaum Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 5:10 PM To: commander-list@matronics.com Subject: RE: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures Hi all, I also had a complete hyd. failure in my 500B a few years back. I cracked a hard line in the wing root, and had forgotten to pull the aux pump breaker on takeoff (lesson learned) so it pumped everything overboard...I had no hydraulic pressure at all. To compound the error, after putting the gear handle down & getting the mains locked, I got a few PSI back in the system and thought I could use it to cycle the gear & lock the nosegear. No luck....ended up blowing my chance to get all three wheels locked down, and had to land knowing the nose wasn't locked down. Since I had no hydraulics for steering, flaps or brakes, I chose Stockton's long (10,000 foot?) runway. I landed on the mains, pulled the power back, and coasted awhile down the runway with the nosegear held off, under minimal power. That big Commander tail/rudder was more than sufficient for directional control. I finally lost full elevator authority at about 20 knots, and gently settled the nose onto the pavement. I rolled about 8 feet before the nosegear gently collapsed at about 10 knots. The only damage was a pair of nosegear doors, a bell crank, and some rivets. I guess it's true what they say, "fly the airplane all the way until it stops". Incidentally, I probably could have done the same landing in less than half the length. I actually had to roll some throttle in to keep the nose up & give me enough speed to roll through the last half of the runway...so I ended up doing a 9000-foot wheelie. The airplane really is balanced beautifully. /John PS: Nico, I have to ask, what's with the "feather the props on short final" thing? In a Commander, you'd be hard pressed to have a prop strike under any circumstances, even a straight belly landing. If you had one main gear unlocked, dumping it on a prop & needing a new engine still seems less expensive & life-threatening than sawing the airplane off the runway sideways at 75 knots... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of yourtcfg@aol.com Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 2:29 PM To: commander-list@matronics.com Subject: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures HI KIDS I thought I might share with you some real world experience regarding hyd failures. Over my 30 years and well over 2000 hours of Commander experience, I have suffered three complete hydraulic failures. All in FAT nacelled Commanders. It would be good to spend a moment to discuss the difference in the systems of FLAT and FAT nacelled airplanes. The FAT nacelles do not have an electric hyd aux pump. They share the same basic system including the reservoir, but instead of an electric aux pump, they use a valve that isolates the stand pipe in the reservoir and a hand pump. The FLAT nacelled airplanes have an electric pump. There is a standpipe in the reservoir that is intended to isolate a small amount of fluid to be used in an emergency. The engine driven pumps only have access to the fluid from the standpipe. There is a fitting in the resiviour below the standpipe that feeds only the aux pump. The trouble with that system is the aux pump is operated by a pressure switch. So, if a leak occurs, the engine pump(s) will eventually pump all the fluid overboard. When the last of the fluid is gone, the pressure will drop, turning on the aux pump dumping the last of the fluid that was intended to be used to stop and steer the airplane. The FAT nacelled airplanes have the same standpipe for the engine driven pumps, but the emergency system requires that a valve in the floor of the cabin be selected to "Brakes only" and a hand pump is used to build pressure. Unlike the electric system, there is no way the emergency fluid can be pumped overboard without he pilot knowing it. My first failure at least 25 years ago in a 560A, N2649B. I had completed a normal landing at Caldwell Idaho (EUL) and as I started to brake, the pedals simply went to the floor. I was slow to react but did finally break the code and switched the floor valve and as the end of the runway approached, I feverishly pumped the handle. The airplane stopped with only the nose wheel off the end!! I learned an important lesson that day. ALWAYS check the hyd gauge AND press on the brakes on short final (more later). A hard line in the belly of the airplane had failed, pumping all the fluid overboard. Failure number two was about ten years ago in my current Commander 680E, N222JS. I had entered the pattern at Grove field (1W1) when I noticed the gear was not extending as usual. A quick glance at the pressure gauge confirmed a complete hyd failure. I elected to fly across he river to Troutdale Or (TLD). Grove field is only 2200 feet long for landing. The gear extended and locked. The flaps were of course up. I told the tower of my predicament but declined their offer to declare an emergency. I switched the valve in the floor and waited to touch down. The landing was normal, if a little fast, and as the nose wheel touched I depressed the rudder pedals and pumped the handle to regulated the braking pressure. I have found it nearly impossible, in the real world, to build sufficient pressure in advance to operate the brakes/steering. Better to depress the brakes and build the ne eded pressure. It worked very well and I was able to taxi to parking with no trouble. A flex line from the back side of the firewall had failed. The last failure was only a couple months ago in a 680 Commander destined for a A&P school. Morris Kernick and I had spent considerable time preparing N87YA for its last gear down ferry. The airplane had only been flown once in the last 25 years. The hyd system would only indicate about 700psi, but since it was on a ferry permit and the gear would remain down and very locked, I was not overly concerned. The 2.5 hour flight was completely uneventfully. Those old engines ran great! When I entered the patter to land, I placed the flap handle fully down. With the gear extended. the airplane never flew out of the flap speed. As I turned final, I did my gauge and break check and to my surprise, there was NO pressure. The flaps I had called for never extended and the brakes were flat. I was committed to the landing and tried the hand pump. It worked, but since the flaps had been selected, they started down first, changing the airplanes trim. With touchdown only seconds away, I decided the best salvation was to abandon the flaps and I selected "brakes only" and again waited for the mains to touch. I had already pulled both throttles to full idle and as I flared the airplane began to swerve sharply to the left. As the nose touched I squeezed the brakes and pumped the hanle. The airplane used most of the runway width, but stayed on the blacktop and rolled to a stop on the centerline with plenty of room to spare. It was only then I noticed that the RH engine had quite and feathered itself. Hence the swerving on landing. With the drag from the windmilling LH propeller and the RH feathered, there was significant adverse yaw. I was able to restart the RH engine and again, taxied to parking using the hand pump. Thought this might be of value to some of yo! ! u other Commander drivers. See ya at the fly-in (I hope!!)&nb sp; ; href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c title=http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:25:04 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Hydraulic Failures
    From: yourtcfg@aol.com
    HI TOM The nitrogen does assist the main gear extension on the twisty gear Commanders, not so on the fat nacelle airplanes.? The nose gear is on its own on all models.? The bungees and the spring finsh what gravity and nitrogen started and ensure the the gear remains locked after?touchdown and at anytime there in no hyd pressure present.? There is no official?TBO on the bungee's.? They should be replaced on condition but, for sure Tom, sooner is better than later!! ? The access panel to inspect the nose spring is located on the?fuselage skin RH (Co-pilot) side?low? It is just ahead of the forward bulkhead that separates the nose section from the cabin, just ahead of the rudder pedals.? ? The circuit breaker should be pushed in only long enough to bring up the hyd pressure so you have brakes to start the engines, then be?pulled and should remain pulled until the next engine start.? I kinda answerd the last three posts at once, hope nobody minds.? jb? -----Original Message----- From: Tom Fisher <tfisher@commandergroup.bc.ca> Sent: Mon, Sep 7, 2009 2:48 pm Subject: Re: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures What pushes the gear down is mainly (pun intended) the Nitrogen cylinder on the outboard side of each gear. I was advised that the bungees are a six month item. Tom formally C-GISS ----- Original Message ----- From: lloyd silverman Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 2:29 PM Subject: Re: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures RE: THE NOSE GEAR SPRING INSPECTIONDOOR, IS THIS OUTSIDE THE AIRCRAFT OR INSIDE ABOVE THE RUDDER PEDALS. MINE HAS NEVER BEEN LUBED OR INSPECTED AS FAR AS I KNOW. THANKS,LLOYD ----- Original Message ----- From: yourtcfg@aol.com Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 10:16 PM Subject: Re: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures Great story John.. That brings up another great point.? The landing gear should extend without hyd pressure.? The main gear uses bungee chords to assist them.? These are easy to check visually and should be replaced every couple years if the airplane is hangared, every year if it sits outside.??The nose gear is another story.? The nose gear is extended by spring located in the RH inspection door, just ahead of where the rudder pedals live.? These need?inspected and lubricated every year,?more often?if the airplane is parked out.? To inspect them, one must get on your knees. get a strong light and look forward and up through the aforementioned inspection panel.? I have seen one that had corroded, stuck and was completely broken in half!!? These are often overlooked by mechanics.? Also, your mechanic should do an emergency extension each annual.? This is done?on jacks, with the gear up and locked.? Then,&nbs p;by?bleeding the hyd pressure to zero by running the flaps?up and down.? It takes awhile !? Next, place the gear handle down.? All the gear should go down and lock with some gusto.? If any are "sleepy", investigate.? There are several grease fittings so make certain they are all properly greased.? jb????? -----Original Message----- From: John Vormbaum <john@vormbaum.com> Sent: Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:30 pm Subject: RE: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures Oh I misread that then....I thought you had good reason and I somehow missed it :-). ? /J From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of nico css Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 6:18 PM Subject: RE: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures what's with the "feather the props on short final" thing ? John, Yup, I agree. As I said, it wasn't that smart. Nico ? From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Vormbaum Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 5:10 PM Subject: RE: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures Hi all, ? I also had a complete hyd. failure in my 500B a few years back. I cracked a hard line in the wing root, and had forgotten to pull the aux pump breaker on takeoff (lesson learned) so it pumped everything overboard...I had no hydraulic pressure at all. To compound the error, after putting the gear handle down & getting the mains locked, I got a few PSI back in the system and thought I?could use it to cycle the gear & lock the nosegear. No luck....ended up blowing my chance to get all three wheels locked down, and had to land knowing the nose wasn't locked down. ? Since I had no hydraulics for steering, flaps or brakes, I chose Stockton's long (10,000 foot?) runway. I landed on the mains, pulled the power back, and coasted awhile down the runway with the nosegear held off, under minimal power. That big Commander tail/rudder was more than sufficient for directional control. I finally lost full elevator authority at about 20 knots, and gently settled the nose onto the pavement. I rolled about 8 feet before the nosegear gently collapsed at about?10 knots. The only damage was a pair of nosegear doors, a bell crank, and some rivets. ? I guess it's true what they say, "fly the airplane all the way until it stops". ? Incidentally, I probably could have done the same landing in less than half the length. I actually had to roll some throttle in to keep the nose up & give me enough speed to roll through the last half of the runway...so I ended up doing a 9000-foot wheelie. The airplane really is balanced beautifully. ? /John ? PS: Nico, I have to ask, what's with the "feather the props on short final" thing? In a Commander, you'd be hard pressed to have a prop strike under any circumstances, even a straight belly landing. If you had one main gear unlocked, dumping it on a prop & needing a new engine still seems less expensive & life-threatening than sawing the airplane off the runway sideways at 75 knots... ? ? From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of yourtcfg@aol.com Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 2:29 PM Subject: Commander-List: Hydraulic Failures HI KIDS ? I thought I might share with you some real world experience regarding hyd failures.? Over my 30 years and well over?2000 hours of Commander experience,? I have suffered three complete?hydraulic failures.? All in FAT nacelled Commanders.? It would be good to spend a moment to discuss the difference in the systems of FLAT and FAT nacelled airplanes.? The FAT nacelles do not have an electric?hyd aux pump.? They share the same basic system including the reservoir, but instead of an electric?aux pump, they use a valve that isolates the stand pipe in the reservoir and a hand pump.? The FLAT nacelled airplanes have an electric pump.? There is a standpipe in the reservoir that is intended to isolate a small amount of fluid to be used in an emergency.? The engine driven pumps only have access to the fluid from the standpipe.? There is a fitting in?the resiviour below the standpipe that feeds only?the aux pump.? The trouble with that system is the aux pump is operated by a pressure swi tch.? So, if a leak occurs, the engine pump(s) will eventually pump all the fluid overboard.? When the last of the fluid is gone, the pressure will drop, turning on the aux pump dumping the last of the fluid that was intended to be used to stop and steer? the airplane.? The FAT nacelled airplanes have the same standpipe for the engine driven pumps, but the emergency system requires that a valve in the floor of the cabin be selected to "Brakes only" and a hand pump is used to build pressure.??Unlike the electric system, there is no way the emergency?fluid can be pumped overboard without he pilot knowing it. My first failure at least 25 years ago in a 560A, N2649B.? I had completed a normal landing at Caldwell Idaho (EUL) and as I started to brake, the pedals simply went? to the floor.? I was slow to react but did finally break the code and switched the floor?valve and as the end of the runway approached, I feverishly pumped the handle.? The airplane stopped with only the nose wheel off the end!!? I learned an important lesson that day.? ALWAYS check the hyd gauge?AND press on the brakes on short final (more later).? A hard line in the belly of the airplane had failed, pumping all the fluid overboard. Failure number two was about ten years ago in my current Commander 680E,?N222JS.? I had entered the pattern at Grove field (1W1) when I noticed the gear was not extending as usual.? A quick glance at the pressure gauge confirmed a complete hyd failure.? I elected to fly across he river to Troutdale Or (TLD).? Grove field is only 2200 feet long?for landing.? The gear extended and locked.? The flaps were of course up.? I told the tower of my predicament but declined their offer to declare an emergency.? I?switched the valve in the floor and waited?to touch down.??The landing was normal, if a little fast, and?as the nose wheel touched I depressed the rudder pedals and pumped the handle to regulated the braking pressure.? I have found it nearly impossible, in the real world, to build sufficient pressure in advance to operate the brakes/steering.? Better to depress the brakes and build the ne eded pressure.? It worked very well and I was able to taxi to parking with no trouble.? A flex line from the back side of the firewall had?failed. The?last failure was only a couple?months ago in a 680?Commander destined for a A&P school.? Morris Kernick and I had spent considerable time preparing N87YA for its last?gear down ferry.? The airplane had only been flown?once in the last 25 years.? The hyd system would only indicate about 700psi, but since it was on a ferry permit and the gear would remain down and very locked, I was not overly concerned.? The 2.5 hour flight was completely uneventfully.? Those old engines ran great!? When I entered the patter to land, I placed the flap handle fully down.? With the gear extended. the airplane never flew out of?the flap speed.? As I turned final, I did my?gauge and break check and to my surprise, there was NO pressure.? The flaps I had called for never extended and the brakes were flat.? I was committed to the landing and tried the hand pump.? It worked, but since the flaps had been selected, they?started down first, changing the airplanes trim.?With touchdown only seconds aw ay, I?decided the best salvation was to abandon the flaps and I selected "brakes only" and again waited?for the mains to touch.? I had already pulled both throttles to full idle and as I flared the airplane began to swerve sharply to the left.? As the?nose touched?I?squeezed the brakes and pumped the hanle.? The airplane used most of the runway width, but stayed on the blacktop and rolled to a stop on the centerline with plenty of room to spare.? It was only then I noticed that the RH engine had quite and feathered itself.? Hence the swerving on landing.? With the?drag from the windmilling?LH propeller and the RH feathered, there was significant adverse yaw.? I was able to restart the RH engine and again, taxied to?parking using the hand pump.? Thought this might be of value to some of yo! ! u other Commander drivers.? See ya at the fly-in (I hope!!)&nb sp; ; href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c title=http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   commander-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Commander-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/commander-list
  • Browse Commander-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/commander-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --