Commander-List Digest Archive

Thu 01/20/11


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 08:30 AM - Re: NICE FLIGHT (Cate Chagnot)
     2. 08:51 AM - Re: Re: NICE FLIGHT (Tylor Hall)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:30:54 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: NICE FLIGHT
    From: "Cate Chagnot" <cchagnot@ultimateair.com>
    Nico, >From an engineering standpoint, the fewer the blades the more efficient the prop. Theoretically a single blade counterbalanced prop is the most efficient. I know a couple of folks that have changed from two bladed props on their 180 Skywagons to three bladed and have been disappointed with the performance. -------- Cate N4278S 680E Skywagon N180PK Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=327676#327676


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:51:43 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: NICE FLIGHT
    From: Tylor Hall <tylorhall@mac.com>
    MT Propeller did a 5 bladed conversion for the 690 and did not get any performance improvement. I think there is a STC for the 690 from Dowty Propeller that is a wide cord 3 bladed prop that did get a performance increase. The Mr RPM conversion seems to have a low thrust issue with the prop that is approved. MT has a new STC for the Comanche 400 with the IO-720 engine. http://www.mt-propeller.com/en/entw/stcs/pa24_1.htm In the photo on their web site, you can see the new design is wider. Tylor Hall tylorhall@mac.com First Fueling Systems, Inc. 100 Iron St SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 505-247-3001 505-247-3005 FAX 505-400-8373 Cell www.firstfueling.com On Jan 20, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Cate Chagnot wrote: > > Nico, > >> From an engineering standpoint, the fewer the blades the more efficient the prop. Theoretically a single blade counterbalanced prop is the most efficient. I know a couple of folks that have changed from two bladed props on their 180 Skywagons to three bladed and have been disappointed with the performance. > > -------- > Cate > > N4278S 680E > Skywagon N180PK > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=327676#327676 > > > > > > > > > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   commander-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Commander-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/commander-list
  • Browse Commander-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/commander-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --