Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 08:53 PM - Re: Re: Considering a 500S.... (William J Hamilton)
2. 09:06 PM - Re: Re: Considering a 500S.... (cybersuperstore)
3. 09:27 PM - Re: Considering a 500S.... (stratobee)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Considering a 500S.... |
Adam,
Have a good look into your performance figures and engine/prop. numbers and
try low RPM and "high boost", it will make quite an improvement. Better
still, fit GAMIjectors and a decent CHT/EGT system and run lean of peak,
really save some fuel for the same TAS.
Cheers,
Bill Hamilton
From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Moe Mills
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 10:48 AM
Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Considering a 500S....
Hi Adam,
Very interesting. Just goes to show that you have to more or less square
the power (and fuel burn) to increase the speed of basically the same
airframe. Last week end I flew to Mena, AR from Farmington, NM. It appears
that you get about 4.8 NM per gallon, whereas, I get only about 3.3 NM per
gallon, crusing at about 180 Kts. About 40% difference in fuel burn to get
there. The best price I could find was in Borger, TX, $ 5.22 per gallon,
literally next to the Phillips Refinery. Hope you make it to Michigan with
your bird.
Best regards,
Moe
> Subject: Commander-List: Re: Considering a 500S....
> From: adam@adamfrisch.com
> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:49:30 -0700
> To: commander-list@matronics.com
>
>
> Moe, I've just finished a 17hr tour of the north west - my first real
flying on my own - so have some fresh numbers. My fuel burn was around 29gph
when I stayed low, but can be forced down to 23-25gph up high. It's a little
tricky to gage as the tanks transfer fuel and most FBO guys don't have the
time to spend 15 minutes refuelling them. It's easier when you can do it
yourself, but even I sometimes had to give up on those last gallons.
>
> The above numbers are at 20-22" and 2500-2600 rpm, so pretty throttled
back. She showed around 135-140kts here, so not bad considering. I know
Bonanzas that burn that much! The posh FBO's always charge an arm and a leg,
but I found Avgas for around $5.20/gal on this trip and according to my
little Foreflight software, there were out-of-the-way strips with prices as
low as $4.70. I'll try to hit those next time.
>
> Also, as a friend once put it - any airplane will be cheaper than a coke
habit! :D
>
> --------
> Adam
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344618#344618
>
>
>
>
>======================
&g===================
>
>
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Considering a 500S.... |
Low RPM and high boost makes good (common) sense, too. An internal
combustion engine is nothing more than an air pump. The higher the RPM the
more air it pumps. The air is loaded with a certain percentage of fuel and
the more air one pumps the more fuel goes with it. Lower the RPM and the
amount of fuel carried through the engine is also reduced. Increase the
manifold pressure and the resident fuel is burned more effectively yielding
energy comparable to the higher RPM settings.
Perhaps too simple.
_____
From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of William J
Hamilton
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 8:51 PM
Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Considering a 500S....
Adam,
Have a good look into your performance figures and engine/prop. numbers and
try low RPM and "high boost", it will make quite an improvement. Better
still, fit GAMIjectors and a decent CHT/EGT system and run lean of peak,
really save some fuel for the same TAS.
Cheers,
Bill Hamilton
From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Moe Mills
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 10:48 AM
Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Considering a 500S....
Hi Adam,
Very interesting. Just goes to show that you have to more or less square
the power (and fuel burn) to increase the speed of basically the same
airframe. Last week end I flew to Mena, AR from Farmington, NM. It appears
that you get about 4.8 NM per gallon, whereas, I get only about 3.3 NM per
gallon, crusing at about 180 Kts. About 40% difference in fuel burn to get
there. The best price I could find was in Borger, TX, $ 5.22 per gallon,
literally next to the Phillips Refinery. Hope you make it to Michigan with
your bird.
Best regards,
Moe
> Subject: Commander-List: Re: Considering a 500S....
> From: adam@adamfrisch.com
> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:49:30 -0700
> To: commander-list@matronics.com
>
>
> Moe, I've just finished a 17hr tour of the north west - my first real
flying on my own - so have some fresh numbers. My fuel burn was around 29gph
when I stayed low, but can be forced down to 23-25gph up high. It's a little
tricky to gage as the tanks transfer fuel and most FBO guys don't have the
time to spend 15 minutes refuelling them. It's easier when you can do it
yourself, but even I sometimes had to give up on those last gallons.
>
> The above numbers are at 20-22" and 2500-2600 rpm, so pretty throttled
back. She showed around 135-140kts here, so not bad considering. I know
Bonanzas that burn that much! The posh FBO's always charge an arm and a leg,
but I found Avgas for around $5.20/gal on this trip and according to my
little Foreflight software, there were out-of-the-way strips with prices as
low as $4.70. I'll try to hit those next time.
>
> Also, as a friend once put it - any airplane will be cheaper than a coke
habit! :D
>
> --------
> Adam
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344618#344618
>
>
>
>
>======================
&g===================
>
>
>
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List
http://forums.matronics.com
http://www.matronics.com/contribution
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Considering a 500S.... |
Hi.
I can't lower the RPM any more as 2500rpm is as low as the green arc goes. But
I could run her at higher MP. Would would the benefits be?
--------
Adam
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=346739#346739
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|