Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 09:16 PM - Re: Re: Considering a 500S.... (William J Hamilton)
2. 09:27 PM - Re: Re: Considering a 500S.... (cybersuperstore)
3. 09:35 PM - Re: Re: Considering a 500S.... (Tylor Hall)
4. 10:39 PM - Re: Re: Considering a 500S.... (Morris Kernick)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Considering a 500S.... |
Adam,
Minimum of 2500RPM, that sound very odd to me, can anybody else comment??
Cheers,
Bill Hamilton
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of stratobee
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 2:26 PM
Subject: Commander-List: Re: Considering a 500S....
Hi.
I can't lower the RPM any more as 2500rpm is as low as the green arc goes.
But I could run her at higher MP. Would would the benefits be?
--------
Adam
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=346739#346739
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Considering a 500S.... |
Now that you mention it. It's rather odd. Is it a proper RPM guage?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of William J
Hamilton
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 9:14 PM
Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Considering a 500S....
--> <wjrhamilton@optusnet.com.au>
Adam,
Minimum of 2500RPM, that sound very odd to me, can anybody else comment??
Cheers,
Bill Hamilton
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of stratobee
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 2:26 PM
Subject: Commander-List: Re: Considering a 500S....
Hi.
I can't lower the RPM any more as 2500rpm is as low as the green arc goes.
But I could run her at higher MP. Would would the benefits be?
--------
Adam
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=346739#346739
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Considering a 500S.... |
Adam is flying a 520. No supercharger and geared prop.
Does it read engine crank RPM or Prop RPM?
Tylor Hall
On Jul 18, 2011, at 10:19 PM, cybersuperstore wrote:
>
> Now that you mention it. It's rather odd. Is it a proper RPM guage?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of William J
> Hamilton
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 9:14 PM
> To: commander-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Considering a 500S....
>
> --> <wjrhamilton@optusnet.com.au>
>
> Adam,
> Minimum of 2500RPM, that sound very odd to me, can anybody else comment??
> Cheers,
> Bill Hamilton
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of stratobee
> Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 2:26 PM
> To: commander-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Commander-List: Re: Considering a 500S....
>
>
> Hi.
>
> I can't lower the RPM any more as 2500rpm is as low as the green arc goes.
> But I could run her at higher MP. Would would the benefits be?
>
> --------
> Adam
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=346739#346739
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Considering a 500S.... |
All geared Lycoming engines read engine rpm. the gear reduction is .64
on all geared Lycomings, which means when the tach reads 2,500 rpm the
prop is turning 1,600. GO435 & GO480 engines are not injected, but
have automatic mixture control pressure carburetors.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Tylor Hall <tylorhall@mac.com> wrote:
>
> Adam is flying a 520. No supercharger and geared prop.
> Does it read engine crank RPM or Prop RPM?
> Tylor Hall
>
> On Jul 18, 2011, at 10:19 PM, cybersuperstore wrote:
>
>>
>> Now that you mention it. It's rather odd. Is it a proper RPM guage?
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com
>> [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of William J
>> Hamilton
>> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 9:14 PM
>> To: commander-list@matronics.com
>> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Considering a 500S....
>>
>> --> <wjrhamilton@optusnet.com.au>
>>
>> Adam,
>> Minimum of 2500RPM, that sound very odd to me, can anybody else comment??
>> Cheers,
>> Bill Hamilton
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com
>> [mailto:owner-commander-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of stratobee
>> Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 2:26 PM
>> To: commander-list@matronics.com
>> Subject: Commander-List: Re: Considering a 500S....
>>
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I can't lower the RPM any more as 2500rpm is as low as the green arc goes.
>> But I could run her at higher MP. Would would the benefits be?
>>
>> --------
>> Adam
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Read this topic online here:
>>
>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=346739#346739
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|