Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:03 AM - Lead Alternative for Valves (lehmansmtl@netzero.com)
     2. 04:51 PM - Fuel Pump or Vapor Lock ? (Mike Pierzina)
     3. 11:01 PM - Valves and UL GAs (Dean Psiropoulos)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Lead Alternative for Valves | 
      
      --> Engines-List message posted by: lehmansmtl@netzero.com
      
      
      Gentlemen,
      
      Until a few years ago, I endeavored to run either 20% 100LL with mogas (or the
      occasional 100LL fill-up when necessary on trips)to protect against the valve
      seat to valve face micro-welding (described in a recent posting).
      
      For the last few years, I've used a lower cost alternative called AVP (aviation
      valve protectant) obtained from Canadian Aero Petroleum Products.  The same company
      in the USA is Niagara Airparts.  Perhaps Gary can tell us what chemical
      additive was used decades ago as a lead scavenger in leaded autogas (in North
      America) because I believe that's what AVP actually is.  AVP is described as
      a vapor phase lubricant, non-toxic and is a added to the aircraft fuel tank in
      the ratio 1 ml to 10 liters autogas (1:10,000).  I've used AVP with both Continental
      and Lycoming engines but don't have enough experience to prove or disprove
      its effectiveness (except that to report no valve durability problems, yet).
      
      BTW, my HIO-360-D1A had severe valve stem corrosion and considerable valve seat
      recession after about 500 hours of helicopter service (considered severe).  Lead
      compound deposits are tough on valve stems and guides and, it seems, that
      lead is only a partial solution even with hardened seats.
      
      Mike
      
      
      The best thing to hit the internet in years - NetZero HiSpeed!
      Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
      Only $14.95/ month -visit www.netzero.com to sign up today!
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Fuel Pump or Vapor Lock ? | 
      
      --> Engines-List message posted by: "Mike Pierzina" <planecrazzzy@lycos.com>
      
      
      Hey Guys,
               I fired up my 582 the other day and "top end" was rough....I figured it
      was old fuel....I didn't have a decent hose to sipfon the fuel , so I pulled
      the fuel line apart and drained most the fuel. I added the new fuel and with
      a few primes it was running. I warmed it up to 140 degrees and then started to
      raise the RPM's higher until I could test "top end".
        It ran great , top end was smooth again.
       Next day I loaded it on the trailer , packed all the gear, and  while I was doing
      my warm-up I couldn't get it to rev up , I noticed the fuel line going to
      the rear carb wasn't pushing the fuel. and after the engine would die , I noticed
      the fuel in the line would return to the fuel pump....
        I'm getting a new rebuild kit for the Mikuni fuel pump.
       Do any of you guys think it has anything to do with "Vapor Lock" .....I wouldn't
      think so because of the run time the day before 10 - 15 min ......
         and wouldn't you know it parts place is closed today...
        Well, back to work on my Kolb. I'm still fabracating a 2cycle oil tank....which
      was delayed because of the heat & humidity...
                     Gotta Fly...
                                  Mike in MN   FSII 503 w/injection
      "B" w/ 3 blade-66" IVO ,EIS,GPL, 90% done 90% to go...
      
      ---
      Sometimes you just have to take the leap 
      and build your wings on the way down...
                  Gotta Fly...
      
      
      Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Valves and UL GAs | 
      
      --> Engines-List message posted by: "Dean Psiropoulos" <deanpsir@easystreet.com>
      
      A couple other things that have helped auto engines survive Unleaded gas
      are:
      
      
      Automatic valve rotators and liquid cooling.  Automatic valve rotators are
      something GM began installing on their engines in the late 70s.  From what I
      understand they are a fairly simple mechanism that is installed at the top
      of the valve stem under the rocker arm.  Every time the valve is actuated by
      the rocker arm the mechanism turns the valve a set number of degrees before
      it closes.  This in effect results in a continuous lapping action of the
      valve and valve seat.  That way when a microscopic piece of the seat welds
      itself to the valve face, it doesn't continually contact the same spot on
      the seat and exacerbate the problem.  This works really well in my
      experience, my little 2.8 V6 in my Cheverolet S-10 PU has been run hard for
      17 years and 230 thousand miles.  After a compression check last year it
      showed only 1 cylinder down in compression and that was only 10 PSI less
      than the rest.  I attribute part of this longevity to religiously changing
      my oil and filter EVERY 3000 miles as well.  As has been said before, oil
      changes are cheap insurance.  And while oil does not wear out, the additives
      in it do and when they do they quit holding combustion byproducts in
      suspension. Then it starts depositing them inside the engine where they turn
      into a tarry goo that plugs oil galleries and other important engine parts.
      
      
      Also a big difference between airplane and car engines is obviously the
      cooling systems, car engines run cooler and that's another reason the valves
      don't erode like VW beatles or airplane engines.  The less differential
      between the melting point of metal and the valve temperature, the faster the
      metal is going to wear away.  Air cooled aircraft engines run almost twice
      as hot as most car engines and that is a factor in valve problems, that's
      why the rotax can run UL gasoline and last longer, the heads are liquid
      cooled (and they use modern engine design techniques, something Lycoming
      hasn't bothered to do for 50 years). 
      
      
      Dean Psiropoulos
      
      Tinkerer and RV-6 builder.
      
      
      Don not archive
      
      
      
      
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |