Engines-List Digest Archive

Sun 10/05/03


Total Messages Posted: 3



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 11:32 AM - Re: Eggenfellner 6 cyl (Tracy Crook)
     2. 11:39 AM - Re: Eggenfellner 6 cyl (Tracy Crook)
     3. 11:45 AM - Re: Eggenfellner 6 cyl (Tracy Crook)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:32:45 AM PST US
    From: "Tracy Crook" <lors01@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: Eggenfellner 6 cyl
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Tracy Crook" <lors01@msn.com> > --> Engines-List message posted by: "CHUCK KELLY" <heavy707@comcast.net> > > How many cubic inches are in the 13B Rotary Mazda Engine? > Thanks > Chuck > A subject of much debate. Mazda rates it as 1308 cc. This is 80 CI. BUT, the rotary pumps ALL of its displacement in one rev instead of two like a 4 stroke piston engine. To compare it to a piston engine, think of it as a 2.6L engine (160 ci) that safely revs to 6500 rpm. I limit it to 6400 for prop tip speed reasons. Tracy Crook


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:39:50 AM PST US
    From: "Tracy Crook" <lors01@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: Eggenfellner 6 cyl
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Tracy Crook" <lors01@msn.com> > --> Engines-List message posted by: "Healy, Joseph" <WJH@BRPLUSA.COM> > > I notice that your calculation does not consider compression ratio. And > I assume these are sea level numbers. Is there a correction factor for > compression ratio? > > Joe Healy, In the range of 8 - 10 : to 1, the difference is not great. Combustion chamber design has as much or more effect than CR, not to mention Volumetric efficiency. Still, we are only talking about a range of 5-10%. Intermittent combustion gasoline engines have very close to the same BSFC, in a range of .43 - .47 when run at economy mixturte settings. There is no magic engine technology out there. Tracy Crook > > --> Engines-List message posted by: Don.Alexander@AstenJohnson.com > > > > > > Listers, > > Do any of you have any idea what the anticipated output of the 6 cyl > > normally aspirated Subaru conversion is supposed to be? Looking at > > this engine as an option for the RV-8. Do Not Archive > > Don Alexander > > Here's my favorite method of "sanity checking" HP claims and estimating > HP > on prospective engines. Calculate the theoretical CFM of the engine at > max > HP rpm. It takes about 1.59 cfm of fuel air mixture to make 1 HP. > > For instance, an O - 360 at 2750 rpm calculates out to 286 cfm. > (remember to divide piston engine CI by 2 because it takes two revs to > pump all of its > cubes) Divide this by 1.59 and you get 180 HP. If the answer comes out > much different than what the maker says their engine makes, be very > suspicious. > > This method applies only to normally aspirated engines of course. > > Tracy Crook


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:45:57 AM PST US
    From: "Tracy Crook" <lors01@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: Eggenfellner 6 cyl
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Tracy Crook" <lors01@msn.com> > --> Engines-List message posted by: kempthornes <kempthornes@earthlink.net> > > > >Tracy wrote: > > > >Calculate the theoretical CFM of the engine at max > >HP rpm. It takes about 1.59 cfm of fuel air mixture to make 1 HP. > > I suppose this assumes stochiometric fuel air ratio. Another quick > estimator I've heard of involves fuel burn, like 0.4 pounds per HP per > hour. So a 180 HP engine would burn 72 pounds per hour. I think this > would also apply to boosted engines. > > > K. H. (Hal) Kempthorne > RV6-a N7HK - Three trips to OSH now. > PRB (El Paso de Robles, CA) Very true, although .4 is optomistic. Real World numbers are closer to .45 - .47. In other words, if someone says their 165 HP engine burns 6 GPH at 75% power, they are "streaching the truth to the breaking point". Tracy Crook >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   engines-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Engines-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/engines-list
  • Browse Engines-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/engines-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --