Engines-List Digest Archive

Sun 01/04/04


Total Messages Posted: 7



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:52 AM - Re: RV8A turbine engine/turbine's place (Nielsenbe@aol.com)
     2. 08:45 AM - Re: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320 (Vic Jacko)
     3. 11:29 AM - Re: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320 (Al Latham)
     4. 12:10 PM - Re: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320 (James R. Cunningham)
     5. 12:30 PM - Re: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320 (Vic Jacko)
     6. 12:30 PM - Re: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320 (Vic Jacko)
     7. 01:01 PM - Re: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320 (James R. Cunningham)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:52:42 AM PST US
    From: Nielsenbe@aol.com
    Subject: Re: RV8A turbine engine/turbine's place
    --> Engines-List message posted by: Nielsenbe@aol.com So what sort of fuel burn are the allisons that are in the 300HP range? I am sure turbine power is the way to go above 400hp since those planes are usually distance driven with the fuel capacity tailored as such. That is also when piston power loses reliability(except LARGE radials) I think we are getting some experimentals that are getting big enough to play there. I would love to get something beside a 540 or M-14 for my plane but the LS1 chevy V8 is the leader for me as far as alternitive power. Turbine dreams but chevy check book and fuel storage. Brad


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:45:34 AM PST US
    From: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net> Hi, new to the list and wondering if anyone is using auto fuel in the 160 HP Lycoming 0-320 engines with 8.5 to 1 comp ratios when installed in the low wing aircraft? Vic, Roswell, NM ----- Original Message ----- From: <Nielsenbe@aol.com> Subject: Re: Engines-List: RV8A turbine engine/turbine's place > --> Engines-List message posted by: Nielsenbe@aol.com > > So what sort of fuel burn are the allisons that are in the 300HP range? I am > sure turbine power is the way to go above 400hp since those planes are usually > distance driven with the fuel capacity tailored as such. That is also when > piston power loses reliability(except LARGE radials) I think we are getting some > experimentals that are getting big enough to play there. I would love to get > something beside a 540 or M-14 for my plane but the LS1 chevy V8 is the leader > for me as far as alternitive power. Turbine dreams but chevy check book and > fuel storage. > > Brad > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:29:55 AM PST US
    From: "Al Latham" <geebeed@grm.net>
    Subject: Re: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Al Latham" <geebeed@grm.net> Vic, This is coming strictly from what is approved by a STC for certified aircraft. The Lycoming high compression engines i.e.. 160 and 200 HP engines are not approved for auto fuel while the 150 and 180 LC engines are. I am sure there are people out in the field using it. I didn't mention the 540 engine group because it covers a wide range of HP and I'm not sure which ones are considered high compression and which are not. Right now I'm paying $2.25 for 100 octane and it isn't worth the hassle as 91 oct. is $1.65. Also every carb that I've torn down that was using auto fuel has had some degree of corroision in the bowl. Al Latham ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Engines-List: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320 > --> Engines-List message posted by: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net> > > Hi, new to the list and wondering if anyone is using auto fuel in the 160 > HP Lycoming 0-320 engines with 8.5 to 1 comp ratios when installed in the > low wing aircraft? > > Vic, > > Roswell, NM > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <Nielsenbe@aol.com> > To: <engines-list@matronics.com> > Subject: Re: Engines-List: RV8A turbine engine/turbine's place > > > > --> Engines-List message posted by: Nielsenbe@aol.com > > > > So what sort of fuel burn are the allisons that are in the 300HP range? I > am > > sure turbine power is the way to go above 400hp since those planes are > usually > > distance driven with the fuel capacity tailored as such. That is also when > > piston power loses reliability(except LARGE radials) I think we are > getting some > > experimentals that are getting big enough to play there. I would love to > get > > something beside a 540 or M-14 for my plane but the LS1 chevy V8 is the > leader > > for me as far as alternitive power. Turbine dreams but chevy check book > and > > fuel storage. > > > > Brad


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:10:57 PM PST US
    From: "James R. Cunningham" <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "James R. Cunningham" <jrccea@bellsouth.net> There is an STC to do so. I don't remember who owns it. In automobile engines, 92 octane mogas can be used at compressions up to 11.2:1 if the ratio is kept rich enough and the ignition is somewhat retarded. JimC Vic Jacko wrote: > > --> Engines-List message posted by: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net> > > Hi, new to the list and wondering if anyone is using auto fuel in the 160 > HP Lycoming 0-320 engines with 8.5 to 1 comp ratios when installed in the > low wing aircraft? > > Vic, > > Roswell, NM > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <Nielsenbe@aol.com> > To: <engines-list@matronics.com> > Subject: Re: Engines-List: RV8A turbine engine/turbine's place > > > --> Engines-List message posted by: Nielsenbe@aol.com > > > > So what sort of fuel burn are the allisons that are in the 300HP range? I > am > > sure turbine power is the way to go above 400hp since those planes are > usually > > distance driven with the fuel capacity tailored as such. That is also when > > piston power loses reliability(except LARGE radials) I think we are > getting some > > experimentals that are getting big enough to play there. I would love to > get > > something beside a 540 or M-14 for my plane but the LS1 chevy V8 is the > leader > > for me as far as alternitive power. Turbine dreams but chevy check book > and > > fuel storage. > > > > Brad > > > > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:30:23 PM PST US
    From: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net> Thanks for the info. Vic do not archive ----- Original Message ----- From: "James R. Cunningham" <jrccea@bellsouth.net> Subject: Re: Engines-List: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320 > --> Engines-List message posted by: "James R. Cunningham" <jrccea@bellsouth.net> > > There is an STC to do so. I don't remember who owns it. In automobile > engines, 92 octane mogas can be used at compressions up to 11.2:1 if the > ratio is kept rich enough and the ignition is somewhat retarded. > JimC > > Vic Jacko wrote: > > > > --> Engines-List message posted by: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net> > > > > Hi, new to the list and wondering if anyone is using auto fuel in the 160 > > HP Lycoming 0-320 engines with 8.5 to 1 comp ratios when installed in the > > low wing aircraft? > > > > Vic, > > > > Roswell, NM > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <Nielsenbe@aol.com> > > To: <engines-list@matronics.com> > > Subject: Re: Engines-List: RV8A turbine engine/turbine's place > > > > > --> Engines-List message posted by: Nielsenbe@aol.com > > > > > > So what sort of fuel burn are the allisons that are in the 300HP range? I > > am > > > sure turbine power is the way to go above 400hp since those planes are > > usually > > > distance driven with the fuel capacity tailored as such. That is also when > > > piston power loses reliability(except LARGE radials) I think we are > > getting some > > > experimentals that are getting big enough to play there. I would love to > > get > > > something beside a 540 or M-14 for my plane but the LS1 chevy V8 is the > > leader > > > for me as far as alternitive power. Turbine dreams but chevy check book > > and > > > fuel storage. > > > > > > Brad > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:30:23 PM PST US
    From: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net> Thanks for the info Al. Vic ----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Latham" <geebeed@grm.net> Subject: Re: Engines-List: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320 > --> Engines-List message posted by: "Al Latham" <geebeed@grm.net> > > Vic, > > This is coming strictly from what is approved by a STC for certified > aircraft. The Lycoming > high compression engines i.e.. 160 and 200 HP engines are not approved for > auto fuel while the > 150 and 180 LC engines are. > I am sure there are people out in the field using it. I didn't mention the > 540 engine group because > it covers a wide range of HP and I'm not sure which ones are considered high > compression and > which are not. > Right now I'm paying $2.25 for 100 octane and it isn't worth the hassle as > 91 oct. is $1.65. Also > every carb that I've torn down that was using auto fuel has had some degree > of corroision in the bowl. > > Al Latham > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net> > To: <engines-list@matronics.com> > Subject: Re: Engines-List: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming > 0-320 > > > > --> Engines-List message posted by: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net> > > > > Hi, new to the list and wondering if anyone is using auto fuel in the > 160 > > HP Lycoming 0-320 engines with 8.5 to 1 comp ratios when installed in > the > > low wing aircraft? > > > > Vic, > > > > Roswell, NM > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <Nielsenbe@aol.com> > > To: <engines-list@matronics.com> > > Subject: Re: Engines-List: RV8A turbine engine/turbine's place > > > > > > > --> Engines-List message posted by: Nielsenbe@aol.com > > > > > > So what sort of fuel burn are the allisons that are in the 300HP range? > I > > am > > > sure turbine power is the way to go above 400hp since those planes are > > usually > > > distance driven with the fuel capacity tailored as such. That is also > when > > > piston power loses reliability(except LARGE radials) I think we are > > getting some > > > experimentals that are getting big enough to play there. I would love to > > get > > > something beside a 540 or M-14 for my plane but the LS1 chevy V8 is the > > leader > > > for me as far as alternitive power. Turbine dreams but chevy check book > > and > > > fuel storage. > > > > > > Brad > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:01:44 PM PST US
    From: "James R. Cunningham" <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming 0-320
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "James R. Cunningham" <jrccea@bellsouth.net> All that aside, I have a Lycoming that has 9.0:1 compression. I wouldn't dream of running mogas in it. JimC Vic Jacko wrote: > Subject: Re: Engines-List: Use of 91-92 octane Auto Fuel in 160 HP Lycoming > 0-320 > > > --> Engines-List message posted by: "James R. Cunningham" > <jrccea@bellsouth.net> > > > > There is an STC to do so. I don't remember who owns it. In automobile > > engines, 92 octane mogas can be used at compressions up to 11.2:1 if the > > ratio is kept rich enough and the ignition is somewhat retarded.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   engines-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Engines-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/engines-list
  • Browse Engines-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/engines-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --