Engines-List Digest Archive

Mon 01/12/04


Total Messages Posted: 1



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 08:09 PM - Re: Alternate engines (Gary Casey)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:09:16 PM PST US
    From: "Gary Casey" <glcasey@adelphia.net>
    Subject: RE: Alternate engines
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Gary Casey" <glcasey@adelphia.net> <<Why inverted? If I go the auto engine route the 350 will be big enough. It's rated at 350HP with standard exhaust. The plane was designed for 360HP with alot of people using 400HP. I can make that easy with the LS1 and have more room under the cowl. I believe most PSRU's are set for a small block setting upright. Do you know of someone building one for a Big block inverted setup? I didn't know chevy offered a 500ci aluminum engine either. I will have to check into that.>> As someone else mentioned, with a good aftermarket aluminum block you can go for displacements over 600 cu. in. if you like. I would stick to about 500 as the components get rapidly more expense going much beyond that. The key word in my choice was "direct drive" and that pretty much forces the engine to be mounted inverted, although a few have been mounted "right-side" up. In my version the lightweight prop would be mounted directly to the crank. I think the crank is strong enough as the main bearing diameters are larger than in the Lycoming IO-720. I would not take the risk of hanging an aluminum prop on it, though. With the prop mounted on the crank the cowling will be forced to have a good-sized chin, but not as bad as any Bonanza. Why direct drive? Light weight, low cost, better durability and reliability. A direct-drive big block turbocharged and running at 2700 can produce more power than any small block and will do it with little strain. The manifold pressure will have to be about 50 inches, but that's not much for these engines. The complexity of the turbo system is easier to handle than that of a PSRU. The direct-drive big block will weigh about the same as a small block with a PSRU. And the cost will be much lower. Gary Casey




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   engines-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Engines-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/engines-list
  • Browse Engines-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/engines-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --