Engines-List Digest Archive

Sat 01/17/04


Total Messages Posted: 4



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 09:21 AM - Fw: Choke versa Parallel Info (TeamGrumman@aol.com)
     2. 05:01 PM - Re: Fw: Choke versa Parallel Info (Archie)
     3. 05:57 PM - Atkins rotary (Scott Trask)
     4. 08:18 PM - Re: Atkins rotary (Archie)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:21:45 AM PST US
    From: TeamGrumman@aol.com
    Subject: Fwd: Choke versa Parallel Info
    --> Engines-List message posted by: TeamGrumman@aol.com Sorry to not remember who the race engine Guru is on the Engines List. This is especially for him and other engine builders. There is a discussion going on in the Grumman-American (Tiger, Cheetah, etc. ) group on what the effect is on having the cylinders in Lycoming have so much choke. The discussion also talks about the best ring gap. Here are a couple of posts. Sorry they are so long. **** Please give me/us your oppinion, **** The response needn't be lengthy, I'd just like to know the real skinny (boy, what does that say about my age?) on this. Thanks. Gary Post #1 =A0 Gangster Fast Eddie now owns SR22 with a IO 520N Continental, and asked=20if he could cross post my cylinder wear reply to the SR 22 list.=A0 I think this may help Grumman owners further understand the relationship between cylinder barrel life, and cylinder barrel choke.=A0 Eddie stated that many SR22 engines need top end work at 400 to 700 hours on their new engines which is the same think I have noticed since Continentals latest cylinder and piston revisions. Read below. Eddie, thanks for the consideration on asking permission to cross post. Feel free to do so. And since you were so nice to ask, here is the story on your Continental engine as I see it. =A0=A0 Continental's are now different then the Lycoming's in regards to cylinder barrel choke.=A0 The Continental cylinders use to have choke just like the Lycoming cylinders until they introduced a new piston that has a steel ring cast into the aluminum piston to form the groove that the top piston ring fits into. Continental did this because on some high time engines the piston ring groove in the soft aluminum piston would wear, and get much wider.=A0 The wide piston ring groove would not give enough support to the piston ring, and the ring would some times break.=A0 Soon after the insert pistons were installed some broke their entire heads off. Continental decided that the piston heads must have been running into the choked area at the top end of the cylinder before the cylinder heated up, and expand the choked area to provide a straight cylinder barrel. As a result of this thinking they reduced their choke to .001"to .0035" maximum if I remember exactly.=A0 Now when the cylinder is heated up the rings end up running on a tapered cylinder wall that is larger in diameter up at the top end where all the heat is then down at the bottom where it is much cooler. Now just like a worn out choked Lycoming cylinder the rings must expand out of the ring groove to stay in contact with the larger diameter cylinder at the top end of the cylinder.=A0 With the rings expanded out of their groove they do not get the needed support from being in the piston groove fully, and they roll on the cylinder wall at top, and bottom dead center where the piston changes direction of travel. All of this ring rolling around causes a tremendous amount of cylinder barrel, ring, and piston wear.=A0 We have repaired many low time Continental cylinders because of this.=A0 Many of these cylinder wear themselves=A0 .005" to .007" oversize in just a few hundred hours.=A0 We repair these cylinders by over sizing them to P .015", and re introducing as much choke as possible back into them which is usually around .006" to .008".=A0 We have had great success with these repaired cylinders, and they run to TBO with out sucking down oil, or breaking pistons. =A0=A0 I will also add that aluminum pistons with steel inserts are from the diesel engine world.=A0 While diesel engines have a lot of compression, and they subject pistons to high loads they operated about 150 degrees cooler then a piston in a air cooled engine. I believe it is the different thermal expansion rates of the aluminum piston, and the steel insert that caused the top of these pistons to break off.=A0 These pistons were all tested ultrasonically while being turned to test the joint between the piston and the insert. An inspector was expected to check each one while viewing a analog gage for deflection which would indicated a defects. I think they really need to hook an alarm to it. A Continental engineer stated to me that it was their new center vented oil control ring that was working to efficiently causing cylinder wear by not allowing enough oil past it to lubricated the compression rings. I think that's a bunch of bunk, and told this engineer that in a heated phone conversation many years ago.=A0 I also told him that the guy that designed it should be fired, and it turned out to be him.=A0 A bunch of choice words flowed back, and forth at that point that were very color full to say the least. =A0 Based on the above, running a Continental engine a little on the cool side is the way I would go if you want the cylinder barrels, pistons, and rings to last. Time to get back to work, good luck with your new bird. Bill & Carol Scott Precision Engine L.L.C. =A0=A0 In regards to Cliffs posting I would say that a Porsche race car engine, and how it is operated has little bearing on how an aircraft engine is operated, and the amount of time it is expected to operate. There are many mechanical difference between a Porsche engine, and a aircraft engine. A Porsche engines cylinders are oil cooled, and may have 5 or more oil coolers on the engine.=A0 A Porsche engine does not run over square pistons like a Lycoming or Continental, that is pistons that are larger in diameter then their length, this allows the piston that is not cocking around in the barrel to support the piston rings much better, and keep the rings from rolling on the cylinder wall.=A0 The Porsches piston runs with much less operating clearances with the cylinder barrel then a aircraft engines piston.=A0 The Porches cylinder barrels have far less thermal expansion as a result of being oil cooled which allows for the tighter operating clearances between the piston, and cylinder wall to be acceptable.=A0 Most aircraft engines run at a steady state cruise power 98 % of their life unlike a Porsche. There are many more differences between these engines but I do not have time to write a book. =A0 Another point I would make is that the top of the cylinder barrel on an aircraft cylinder is screwed into the aluminum cylinder head, and is subjected to high temperatures that does cause cylinder barrel expansion. A cylinder running in a test cell with worn out cylinders with no choke will produce more power briefly but has no service life.=A0 It is the amount of time that the top of the cylinder barrel, and the lower part of the cylinder barrel is exposed to combustion heat that determines the thermal expansion of the barrel at different stations.=A0 The piston shields the lower part of the cylinder barrel from the heat of combustion almost all the time compared to how it shields the top of the cylinder barrel from heat very briefly.=A0=20A firm understanding of how long the piston shields various stations of the cylinder wall from heat, and its effect on thermal expansion at each station is that's important.=A0 The=A0 cylinder barrels choke profile must be designed with the cylinder barrels temperature hence thermal expansion in mind at various barrel stations if you want to have straight cylinder barrels for your piston, and rings to run on at operating temperatures. Ya, one of those WASG's. Thanks to all that told me what this means, I laughed so hard I had tears in my eyes, and my chubs hurt=A0=A0 :-) Bill & Carol Scott Precision Engine L.L.C. Post #2 data, other than articles by John Deakin, such as http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182155-1.html He states, in part: During the past 15 years or so, quite a number of people (including me) have come to the following conclusions: 1) Engines built by TCM prior to about 1991 usually ran to (and beyond) full TBO without much work on the cylinders. 2) Engines (and cylinders) built during or after the 1991 strike at TCM have consistently suffered from seriously excessive premature cylinder problems, with very few making more than about 500 hours. There was a VERY interesting account of three Bonanzas which all required cylinder work at low total time. It's not coming up on a Google search - it did before, so maybe it got pulled. In any case, I have the article as a text file if anyone is interested. Post #3 Ok Gang,=A0 Bill Scott is on the right track about cylinder heat expansion.=A0 He will also tell you that we did not agree on this subject in the past and it's never too late to learn and there is still much to be learned on this subject. =A0=A0 He has mentioned to me that the curve is much too radical at the top=20and this I full agree with him on.=A0 This may be the real problem, I don't like it at all.=A0 In my opinion it shoul be a more gradual curve at the top so it does not jam the piston and rings so quickly.=A0 For me trhe way I look at the problem or I should say all engines do not need or should need the same choke profile.=A0 As Scott says the piston wobble is where the trouble lies. Now how do you keep that piston from doing that.=A0 One thing Ill gurantee and that is never to reuse an old piston on rebuild.=A0 Oh! I beed blast and they are OK, Bull ain't so, ring groove wear will definately let the rings roll and flop. There goes your TBO. My old chrome cylinders have have ring flop grooves at the top very bad and some at the bottom where that piston reverses.=A0 We don't want any=20at all and there is a reason for it and untill we get rid of this problem we'll have early black oil and heavy carbon before the 25 hours is up.=A0 Why do we have these flop grooves? WHY !!! I don't see this problem as bad in Continental as bad as I do in Lycoming.=A0 Continental did use a 4 ring piston same as the=20Lyc C2C.=A0 I.ve lost track on Continental because I don't work on them any more because I'm a Pratt man not a Wright.=A0 All the C2 engines used the 4 ring piston or did but but a lot are changing over to the L2C 3 ring design.=A0 The 4 ring piston in my opinion in the C group give better give better ring support both at the top and bottom of the stroke.=A0 C design engines are not hi-performance but longivity engines.=A0 The C-152 change cylinder like popping pop corn.=A0 I gave up telling the training out fit its time to change a jug when I see that prop jerk to stop on shut down=A0 Many times was ask how I knew that engine=20was going to fail in flight.=A0 Just psychic, can just feel it in my bones. =A0=A0 I'de like to have the Nye Squirts in my block but can't that.=A0 Oil=20does cool and the more you have in the right place up to a point the cooler that engine will run.=A0 Every now and then some one will call me and said some IDIOT put the bottom ring in up side down but i fixed it and put it it correct.=A0 Wrong son!=A0 it was designed that way but if you call Lycoming like I did they say it doesn't matter.=A0 Wrong again like I told them tey were installing slotted=20key siuntered iron in the oil pumps in 71 and up engines. =A0=A0 Take note guys & gals in the past engineers ran engines loose and ring gap of about .020 to .030 was the standard in those days but the California pollution people design laws have changed all of that.=A0 Briggs Stratten, Honda, Kohler and ECI all say .007 is now it and live with it.=A0 Briggs Warrany records skyrocketed and this made me a lot of money for Auto Fuel for my little Ratty airplane. But not any more due to health problems that will not let me work like this any more.=A0 Members have chewed me out and told to quit cheating=20the people and to write again.=A0 Fellow typing expert I'm using a dictionary,=A0 hope I'm improving.=A0 So the big question is what=A0 are we going to do about the radical curve and the tight ring gap now?=A0 Well Bill Scott is trying and he's young and can carry on=A0 Bill did you wver get that ignition on your speed wagon=20I flew for you at Butter-Fly Ville.=A0 Your wife said you had better. =A0=A0 I look for Lycomining to go for the Nye Jet spray and Roller Rockers=20would help also.=A0 I'm not a Mechanical Engineer but Electronic Engineer.=A0 Still I wiil not run .007 ring gap on my engines=A0 .010 does fine for my break in's=A0 Make sure you use Meneral for the full 25 hour first in.=A0 And a lot of you know I'm a Marvey Mystery nut also love Av-Blend.=A0 Don't dare put any of this stuff in that engine makes break in.=A0 I like my rings to seat in the first 10 hours, one did at 5 on a new cylinder and one went 20 on a chrome.=A0 Change that oil at twenty five hours or any time the oil lite comes on to get that fine metal out, take my word you can't see it but it's there. =A0=A0 Guess I've used enought space =A0 Fly safe, see & avoid.=A0 Love Yaa, E-Gap From: FlyinFever@aol.com Subject: Fwd: Choke versa Parallel Info From: RandallWH@aol.com Subject: Choke versa Parallel Info List-Archive: <http://www.grumman.net/archive/> List-Subscribe: <mailto:grumman-gang-request@lists.xmission.com?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:grumman-gang-request@lists.xmission.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Help: <mailto:grumman-gang-request@lists.xmission.com?subject=help> Ok Gang, Bill Scott is on the right track about cylinder heat expansion. He will also tell you that we did not agree on this subject in the past and it's never too late to learn and there is still much to be learned on this subject. He has mentioned to me that the curve is much too radical at the top and this I full agree with him on. This may be the real problem, I don't like it at all. In my opinion it shoul be a more gradual curve at the top so it does not jam the piston and rings so quickly. For me trhe way I look at the problem or I should say all engines do not need or should need the same choke profile. As Scott says the piston wobble is where the trouble lies. Now how do you keep that piston from doing that. One thing Ill gurantee and that is never to reuse an old piston on rebuild. Oh! I beed blast and they are OK, Bull ain't so, ring groove wear will definately let the rings roll and flop. There goes your TBO. My old chrome cylinders have have ring flop grooves at the top very bad and some at the bottom where that piston reverses. We don't want any at all and there is a reason for it and untill we get rid of this problem we'll have early black oil and heavy carbon before the 25 hours is up. Why do we have these flop grooves? WHY !!! I don't see this problem as bad in Continental as bad as I do in Lycoming. Continental did use a 4 ring piston same as the Lyc C2C. I.ve lost track on Continental because I don't work on them any more because I'm a Pratt man not a Wright. All the C2 engines used the 4 ring piston or did but but a lot are changing over to the L2C 3 ring design. The 4 ring piston in my opinion in the C group give better give better ring support both at the top and bottom of the stroke. C design engines are not hi-performance but longivity engines. The C-152 change cylinder like popping pop corn. I gave up telling the training out fit its time to change a jug when I see that prop jerk to stop on shut down Many times was ask how I knew that engine was going to fail in flight. Just psychic, can just feel it in my bones. I'de like to have the Nye Squirts in my block but can't that. Oil does cool and the more you have in the right place up to a point the cooler that engine will run. Every now and then some one will call me and said some IDIOT put the bottom ring in up side down but i fixed it and put it it correct. Wrong son! it was designed that way but if you call Lycoming like I did they say it doesn't matter. Wrong again like I told them tey were installing slotted key siuntered iron in the oil pumps in 71 and up engines. Take note guys & gals in the past engineers ran engines loose and ring gap of about .020 to .030 was the standard in those days but the California pollution people design laws have changed all of that. Briggs Stratten, Honda, Kohler and ECI all say .007 is now it and live with it. Briggs Warrany records skyrocketed and this made me a lot of money for Auto Fuel for my little Ratty airplane. But not any more due to health problems that will not let me work like this any more. Members have chewed me out and told to quit cheating the people and to write again. Fellow typing expert I'm using a dictionary, hope I'm improving. So the big question is what are we going to do about the radical curve and the tight ring gap now? Well Bill Scott is trying and he's young and can carry on Bill did you wver get that ignition on your speed wagon I flew for you at Butter-Fly Ville. Your wife said you had better. I look for Lycomining to go for the Nye Jet spray and Roller Rockers would help also. I'm not a Mechanical Engineer but Electronic Engineer. Still I wiil not run .007 ring gap on my engines .010 does fine for my break in's Make sure you use Meneral for the full 25 hour first in. And a lot of you know I'm a Marvey Mystery nut also love Av-Blend. Don't dare put any of this stuff in that engine makes break in. I like my rings to seat in the first 10 hours, one did at 5 on a new cylinder and one went 20 on a chrome. Change that oil at twenty five hours or any time the oil lite comes on to get that fine metal out, take my word you can't see it but it's there. Guess I've used enought space Fly safe, see & avoid. Love Yaa, E-Gap


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:01:18 PM PST US
    From: "Archie" <archie97@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Fwd: Choke versa Parallel Info
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Archie" <archie97@earthlink.net> As I have read a portion of the messages, I see a number of opinions, many quite valid. Obviously, we are dealing with procrastinating manufacturers, and feds afraid to lose their retirement over making a common sense decision, I will add info from our realistic racing technology scenario. As far as I am concerned, choke, and the amount of it, is moot. We tried that years ago in racing, caused more problems than it solved, and was not worth the effort. Theoretically it should have helped, but it did not. As far as ring gaps are concerned, the optimum gaps are obtained through blood, sweat, and tears. Each engine takes on it's own individual personality, even if it is a clone. This inclusive, gaps are determined on the dyno, (for the most part), and are initially set at less than the manufacturer's recommended minimum, run through numerous pulls under varying conditions, then removed for inspection. The minimum gap is determined when the ring ends indicate signs of "butting wear". The trend is now heading toward modified steel rings, as opposed to cast iron. Archie


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:57:58 PM PST US
    Subject: Atkins rotary
    From: Scott Trask <sctrask@diisd.org>
    (not processed: message from valid local sender) --> Engines-List message posted by: Scott Trask <sctrask@diisd.org> Hi I'm looking at Atkins rotary engine with Powersport's gear box on it. Looks like it would be a nice engine. What you think? Scott RV 7A


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:18:02 PM PST US
    From: "Archie" <archie97@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Atkins rotary
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Archie" <archie97@earthlink.net> > --> Engines-List message posted by: Scott Trask <sctrask@diisd.org> > > Hi > I'm looking at Atkins rotary engine with Powersport's gear box on it. Looks > like it would be a nice engine. What you think? > Scott RV 7A Atkins has a nice setup. The powersport redrive is nice, but a bit pricey.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   engines-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Engines-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/engines-list
  • Browse Engines-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/engines-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --