Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 11:34 AM - ATP Turboprop (Don.Alexander@AstenJohnson.com)
2. 12:02 PM - Re: ATP Turboprop (Scott Bilinski)
3. 01:28 PM - Re: ATP Turboprop (Scott Derrick)
4. 03:24 PM - Re: ATP Turboprop (Nielsenbe@aol.com)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
04/14/2004 02:27:43 PM
--> Engines-List message posted by: Don.Alexander@AstenJohnson.com
How can it be???
An article on AvWeb states that ATP's turbine cranks out roughly 200 hp at
slightly over 13 gph. This would mean that they have achieved an
efficiency on par with a piston engine. Any thoughts as to how this
unbelievable accomplishment was pulled off?
Do not archive
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: ATP Turboprop |
--> Engines-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
This has been brought up many times. A normal turbine engine would melt
down at this fuel to power ratio. They claim it all has to do with their
injection system they designed. They also calculate the HP by thrust last I
heard. I would really like them to succeed but they have been awfully quiet
lately.
At 02:33 PM 4/14/04 -0400, you wrote:
>--> Engines-List message posted by: Don.Alexander@AstenJohnson.com
>
>
>How can it be???
>An article on AvWeb states that ATP's turbine cranks out roughly 200 hp at
>slightly over 13 gph. This would mean that they have achieved an
>efficiency on par with a piston engine. Any thoughts as to how this
>unbelievable accomplishment was pulled off?
>Do not archive
>
>
Scott Bilinski
Eng dept 305
Phone (858) 657-2536
Pager (858) 502-5190
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: ATP Turboprop |
--> Engines-List message posted by: Scott Derrick <scott@tnstaafl.net>
Almost a dead silence.....
At 01:02 PM 4/14/2004, you wrote:
>--> Engines-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski
><bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
>
>This has been brought up many times. A normal turbine engine would melt
>down at this fuel to power ratio. They claim it all has to do with their
>injection system they designed. They also calculate the HP by thrust last I
>heard. I would really like them to succeed but they have been awfully quiet
>lately.
>
>
>At 02:33 PM 4/14/04 -0400, you wrote:
> >--> Engines-List message posted by: Don.Alexander@AstenJohnson.com
> >
> >
> >How can it be???
> >An article on AvWeb states that ATP's turbine cranks out roughly 200 hp at
> >slightly over 13 gph. This would mean that they have achieved an
> >efficiency on par with a piston engine. Any thoughts as to how this
> >unbelievable accomplishment was pulled off?
> >Do not archive
> >
> >
>
>
>Scott Bilinski
>Eng dept 305
>Phone (858) 657-2536
>Pager (858) 502-5190
>
>
"Those who sacrifice freedom to get security, deserve neither."
- Benjamin Franklin
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: ATP Turboprop |
--> Engines-List message posted by: Nielsenbe@aol.com
if it sounds too good to be true????? I think someone will have a handheld
hydogen fuel cell or pocket size nuclear reactor before these guys get anything
in production.
Brad
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|