Engines-List Digest Archive

Thu 06/03/04


Total Messages Posted: 3



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:14 AM - Re: Lycoming OI-360/540 (Scott Derrick)
     2. 07:23 AM - Re: Running a TSIO520 without the turbo. (Scott Derrick)
     3. 06:20 PM - Re: Lycoming OI-360/540 (Charlie England)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:14:16 AM PST US
    From: Scott Derrick <scott@tnstaafl.net>
    Subject: Re: Lycoming OI-360/540
    --> Engines-List message posted by: Scott Derrick <scott@tnstaafl.net> The IO360 does not have a return line, I believe the 540 does. You could put in a Bonanza style return. Have one return line to the largest left or right tank, always start on that tank when full, burn it down to 10-25% and then run through the rest of the tanks. By then the return tank is now full as your last tank.... Sounds weird but i drove Banana for years and it got to be a natural process.. Scott At 06:03 AM 6/2/2004, you wrote: >--> Engines-List message posted by: "caldwell" <caldwell@mswin.net> > >I'm putting the tanks in the wings of a CH-801. I'm contemplating getting >the injected OI-360 or OI-540 Lycoming engine. I got the extended range >option, so I have four tanks. My question is, do I need a return to all >four tanks from the engine or do I need one at all? > >Thanks, Jay > > "Those who sacrifice freedom to get security, deserve neither." - Benjamin Franklin


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:23:38 AM PST US
    From: Scott Derrick <scott@tnstaafl.net>
    Subject: Re: Running a TSIO520 without the turbo.
    --> Engines-List message posted by: Scott Derrick <scott@tnstaafl.net> James, Thanks for the reply. I thought it was strange to think it would burn more gas at the same HP output as an engine with higher compression pistons. made no sense at all. The TSIO520-CE has an automatic wastegate. I'm pretty sure the compression ratio is 7.5 to 1 and max boost is around 38 inches. My plan at this time is to install the engine with the turbo, but its going to take a large amount of modifications to get it all to fit so I wondered how it would run without it.... Just thinking about going from a 200 HP normally aspirated engine to a turbo'd 325 HP engine is exciting... Especially when your home field is at 6500 ft and summer temps are in the 90's. Scott At 04:47 PM 6/2/2004, you wrote: >--> Engines-List message posted by: jamesbaldwin@attglobal.net > >Scott - >This engine will run just fine without a turbo and will not use more >gas. Fuel consumption, all other variables being equal, is dependent >upon horsepower output as a ratio to BSFC (brake specific fuel >consumption). Although higher compression ratios have a minimal effect >on BSFC, your fuel consumption will vary with how much horsepower is >being delivered to the prop. If the manifold pressure is less, >horsepower to the prop will be less and so will your fuel consumption. >Also, the engine will get 30 inches at standard sea level conditions >just like any other normally aspirated engine regardless of compression >ratio. The big catch is it won't develop as much horsepower as it would >with the effective boost in compression ratio that a turbo supplies. >Look at the data plate to see what the compression ratio is. This will >determine how much power loss you will suffer. Engines that are rated >at large boost levels --i.e. over 38 inches or so -- have compression >ratios correspondingly low. Those which are only boosted slightly or >are "normalized" have ratios the same as or close to their unboosted >counterparts. This is why some turbocharged engines are not boosted >for sea level takeoffs. The wastegate, usually manual, is left wide >open, bypassing the turbo output. Turbos are installed on normally >aspirated engines to maintain sea level pressure conditions at altitude. > >James Baldwin > >Dan Rogers wrote: > > >--> Engines-List message posted by: Dan Rogers <drogers@maf.org> > > > >All turbo 520s that I know have lower compression than their non turbo > >counterparts, so therefore make less power and use more gas. I don't > >think you will ever get 30" in a running non turbo engine so would not > >get 285 hp. All you sure it doesn't need 32 inches for 285? > > > >All the compression difference is in the pistons so if you got the non > >turbo pistons you would be set to make full power without turbo. I > >think you would still need to get the right fuel pump and injectors and > >you would also have to make something for the intake airfilter system. > > > >Dan Rogers > > > >Scott Derrick wrote: > > > > > > > >>--> Engines-List message posted by: Scott Derrick <scott@tnstaafl.net> > >> > >>I am rebuilding the bottom end of a TSIO520 for installation into a Std. > >>Velocity. > >> > >>Can I run this engine without the turbo? It is rated at 285 HP at 30 > >>inches, so I would assume it would operate just like a IO520? > >> > >>Scott > >> > >>"Those who sacrifice freedom to get security, deserve neither." > >>- Benjamin Franklin > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > "Those who sacrifice freedom to get security, deserve neither." - Benjamin Franklin


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:20:29 PM PST US
    From: Charlie England <ceengland@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Lycoming OI-360/540
    --> Engines-List message posted by: Charlie England <ceengland@bellsouth.net> caldwell wrote: >--> Engines-List message posted by: "caldwell" <caldwell@mswin.net> > >I'm putting the tanks in the wings of a CH-801. I'm contemplating getting the injected OI-360 or OI-540 Lycoming engine. I got the extended range option, so I have four tanks. My question is, do I need a return to all four tanks from the engine or do I need one at all? > >Thanks, Jay > Continentals typically use a return line; Bendix injection on Lycs (at least on the IO-320/360 series engines I've flown) don't use a return line. Charlie




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   engines-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Engines-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/engines-list
  • Browse Engines-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/engines-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --