Engines-List Digest Archive

Fri 08/20/04


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:11 AM - Re: Pumping Losses vs Carb Heat! (Gary Casey)
     2. 06:27 AM - Re: Re: Pumping Losses vs Carb Heat! (Vic Jacko)
     3. 10:26 AM - Re: Re: Pumping Losses vs Carb Heat! (steve korney)
     4. 11:20 AM - Re: Re: Pumping Losses vs Carb Heat! (Vic Jacko)
     5. 09:39 PM - Re: Re: Pumping Losses vs Carb Heat! (steve korney)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:11:33 AM PST US
    From: "Gary Casey" <glcasey@adelphia.net>
    Subject: Re: Pumping Losses vs Carb Heat!
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Gary Casey" <glcasey@adelphia.net> <<Climbed to 6,500 feet , leveled off and kept the throttle open all the way, added full carb heat, leaned until the engine started to lose power and then enriched until it ran smooth. The engine would only pull 2500 RPM in this configuration. Thesis: The engine thinks it is flying at a higher altitude than 6,500 feet due to the hot intake air...Because the carb throttle plate is fully open there are less pumping losses than a partially closed throttle.>> You are precisely right, Vic. The effects of doing this will be: 1. The inlet air temperature will be higher, increasing the octane requirement (likelihood of detonation). But the octane requirement of that engine is very low so I'm sure this would not be a consideration. You are right in being more cautious on a warm summer day, although at altitude the manifold pressure is low enough that I wouldn't give this a second thought. 2. The density of the inlet air goes down. This means that you need to run a higher manifold pressure for a given power output. You've already compensated for this effect by using rpm as the measure. 3. Higher inlet air temperature will improve vaporization from the carburetor and hence reduces cylinder-to-cylinder and cycle-to-cycle air/fuel variation. A very good thing. 4. There will indeed be less pumping loss because there is no pressure drop across the throttle. This means that the engine will produce slightly more power at a given manifold pressure and the BSFC will go down (burn less fuel at a given power setting). 5. The engine will breath unfiltered air, not usually a concern at altitude. The only problem I see is that you really don't know how much the temperature is increased by the carb heat control, although I would guess it is in the range of 100 degrees. All in all, there is no reason not to do this under the right conditions (power settings of 75% or less, no dust, ambient temperatures of maybe 70 degrees or less). Gary Casey


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:27:08 AM PST US
    From: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Pumping Losses vs Carb Heat!
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net> Gary, thanks for your response, you have confirmed my thesis. Now if someone with a fuel flow device can confirm this we all stand to gain a little and burn a little less fuel. BTW, many experimnetals use filtered air right at the carb or throttle body so this may not be an issue. Perhaps those who are checking this out will "experiment" with different amounts of carb heat to achieve a balance of the systems. Vic ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Casey" <glcasey@adelphia.net> Subject: Engines-List: Re: Pumping Losses vs Carb Heat! > --> Engines-List message posted by: "Gary Casey" <glcasey@adelphia.net> > > <<Climbed to 6,500 feet , leveled off and kept the throttle open all the > way, added > full carb heat, leaned until the engine started to lose power and then > enriched > until it ran smooth. The engine would only pull 2500 RPM in this > configuration. > > Thesis: The engine thinks it is flying at a higher altitude than 6,500 feet > due to the hot intake air...Because the carb throttle plate is fully open > there are less pumping > losses than a partially closed throttle.>> > > You are precisely right, Vic. > > The effects of doing this will be: > 1. The inlet air temperature will be higher, increasing the octane > requirement (likelihood of detonation). But the octane requirement of that > engine is very low so I'm sure this would not be a consideration. You are > right in being more cautious on a warm summer day, although at altitude the > manifold pressure is low enough that I wouldn't give this a second thought. > 2. The density of the inlet air goes down. This means that you need to run > a higher manifold pressure for a given power output. You've already > compensated for this effect by using rpm as the measure. > 3. Higher inlet air temperature will improve vaporization from the > carburetor and hence reduces cylinder-to-cylinder and cycle-to-cycle > air/fuel variation. A very good thing. > 4. There will indeed be less pumping loss because there is no pressure drop > across the throttle. This means that the engine will produce slightly more > power at a given manifold pressure and the BSFC will go down (burn less fuel > at a given power setting). > 5. The engine will breath unfiltered air, not usually a concern at > altitude. > > The only problem I see is that you really don't know how much the > temperature is increased by the carb heat control, although I would guess it > is in the range of 100 degrees. > > All in all, there is no reason not to do this under the right conditions > (power settings of 75% or less, no dust, ambient temperatures of maybe 70 > degrees or less). > > Gary Casey > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:26:08 AM PST US
    From: "steve korney" <s_korney@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Pumping Losses vs Carb Heat!
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "steve korney" <s_korney@hotmail.com> Vic... Would you explain to me what exactly happens when you go to full carb heat...What happens to the air flow to heat it up...? Doesn't that relate to pumping losses...? Best... Steve Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:20:39 AM PST US
    From: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Pumping Losses vs Carb Heat!
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Vic Jacko" <vicwj@earthlink.net> Steve, I am not an expert on this matter so you are getting my opinion only: The hot air coming through the carb heat outlet has a higher density altitude than outside air because it is hotter! The engine thinks it is at a higher altitude and produces less HP. We must then open the throttle more to regain the power lost which in effect reduces the pumping losses and improves efficiency. At the same time we have to lean the mixture to compensate for the higher density altitude as perceived by the engine. The energy to produce the hot air by the carb heat muff is a waste product of combustion and therefore is free! When you go to full carb heat the intake air passes over the exhaust system within the carb heat muff and increases the temperature. This heated air is directed to the intake side of the throttle body or carb. That is my story and I am going to stick with it. (no waffling with me) Vic ----- Original Message ----- From: "steve korney" <s_korney@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Engines-List: Re: Pumping Losses vs Carb Heat! > --> Engines-List message posted by: "steve korney" <s_korney@hotmail.com> > > Vic... > > Would you explain to me what exactly happens when you go to full carb > heat...What happens to the air flow to heat it up...? Doesn't that relate > to pumping losses...? > > > Best... Steve > > Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:39:19 PM PST US
    From: "steve korney" <s_korney@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Pumping Losses vs Carb Heat!
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "steve korney" <s_korney@hotmail.com> Vic... Does the heat muff make the air turn or twist or slow down in any way as it picks up the heat......I think its the same as closing the throttle body a small amount as far as pumping effeciency goes... Best... Steve Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   engines-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Engines-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/engines-list
  • Browse Engines-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/engines-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --