Engines-List Digest Archive

Sat 11/19/05


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 11:10 AM - New Member (Richard & Martha Neilsen)
     2. 03:20 PM - Re: New Member (Tedd McHenry)
     3. 06:07 PM - Re: New Member (Richard & Martha Neilsen)
     4. 09:50 PM - Crossover exhaust (DEAN PSIROPOULOS)
     5. 10:21 PM - Re: Crossover exhaust (Red Hamilton)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:10:59 AM PST US
    From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM05@comcast.net>
    Subject: New Member
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM05@comcast.net> Hey all I'm a new member of the engines list. I have been a long term member of the Kolb list. I have a redrive VW powered Kolb MKIIIc. The engine is basically a 2180 cc dunebuggy engine with a Valley reduction drive and a three bladed 72" Power Fin Model F. When I originally flew my Kolb I had a 2180cc Great Plains direct drive engine on it. The original engine didn't have enough thrust for my plane to fly it with a passenger. Since switching to a redrive VW I have enjoyed a much better climb, faster cruise, lower engine temps, lower fuel consumption, and yes it is now a two passenger airplane. The only down side is a bit more vibration. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIc


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:20:00 PM PST US
    From: Tedd McHenry <tedd@vansairforce.org>
    Subject: Re: New Member
    --> Engines-List message posted by: Tedd McHenry <tedd@vansairforce.org> Rick: > Since switching to a redrive VW I have enjoyed a much better climb, faster > cruise, lower engine temps, lower fuel consumption, and yes it is now a two > passenger airplane. Interesting that you have lower temperatures. One criticism I've heard expressed about redrive VWs is that they can put out more heat than the cylinder heads can cool. Are you able to climb at a higher speed, and is that contributing to the lower temperatures? Tedd McHenry Surrey, BC


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:07:56 PM PST US
    From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM05@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: New Member
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM05@comcast.net> Ted I do climb at higher speeds but the real reason for my lower temps is that the engine is running at a lower power level at cruise yet I cruise at a speed 10 MPH faster. I have some good cooling scoops which keeps things cool. The CHTs are never above 300 degrees cruise at app 60% power, the direct drive engine was running 80% power 10MPH slower. These differences are all at the same 3200 RPMs for both redrive and direct. The engine is running in a pusher configuration so I do have to watch the temps on the ground. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered Kolb MKIIIc ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tedd McHenry" <tedd@vansairforce.org> Subject: Re: Engines-List: New Member > --> Engines-List message posted by: Tedd McHenry <tedd@vansairforce.org> > > Rick: > >> Since switching to a redrive VW I have enjoyed a much better climb, >> faster >> cruise, lower engine temps, lower fuel consumption, and yes it is now a >> two >> passenger airplane. > > Interesting that you have lower temperatures. One criticism I've heard > expressed about redrive VWs is that they can put out more heat than the > cylinder heads can cool. Are you able to climb at a higher speed, and is > that > contributing to the lower temperatures? > > Tedd McHenry > Surrey, BC > > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:50:53 PM PST US
    From: "DEAN PSIROPOULOS" <dean.psiropoulos@verizon.net>
    Subject: Crossover exhaust
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "DEAN PSIROPOULOS" <dean.psiropoulos@verizon.net> Question on exhaust: Parallel valve Lycoming 4 cylinder engine. Is there a reason the front two pipes have to cross over before they go out the cowling? Everyone says that Lycomings have to have an oil cooler because the oil runs hot. Gee I wonder why...two hot exhaust pipes run right past the front of the oil sump and dump gobs of heat into the oil (in addition to the rear cylinders heating up the sides of the sump)!!! So why not trash this exhaust pipe configuration (the crossover) and go to a simple 2 into 1 set up on each side of the engine? Just bring the two pipes together off the same side and dump it out the cowling without crossing over in front of the oil pan. A fellow Lancair 360 builder (who also used to work on race boats for a living) built his own exhaust like this from Aircraft Spruce parts. Airplane isn't flying yet but I certainly see his logic in doing it. Another fellow Q200 builder did the same thing with his 0-200 Continental engine and says there has been a noticeable difference in under-cowl temps. I can't believe this hasn't come up before, anybody know the answer? Is there a good reason the exhaust has to crossover? What wives-tail or urban legend says the exhaust has to crossover? Dean Psiropoulos RV-6A N197DM Installing exhaust


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:21:15 PM PST US
    From: "Red Hamilton" <redswing@mcn.org>
    Subject: Re: Crossover exhaust
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "Red Hamilton" <redswing@mcn.org> It doesn't have to cross over, the reason that it usually does is to make the firing impulses in each outlet (if two) 360* apart. If you run a tube on each bank, the impulses are 180/540etc in each outlet, again assuming two outlets. You can use metallic ceramic coatings and baffles to help contain heat, you could run a four outlet system or a 4into1 if you would sooner, Each has advantages and dis. Red ----- Original Message ----- From: DEAN PSIROPOULOS To: engines-list@matronics.com Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 9:49 PM Subject: Engines-List: Crossover exhaust --> Engines-List message posted by: "DEAN PSIROPOULOS" <dean.psiropoulos@verizon.net> Question on exhaust: Parallel valve Lycoming 4 cylinder engine. Is there a reason the front two pipes have to cross over before they go out the cowling? Everyone says that Lycomings have to have an oil cooler because the oil runs hot. Gee I wonder why...two hot exhaust pipes run right past the front of the oil sump and dump gobs of heat into the oil (in addition to the rear cylinders heating up the sides of the sump)!!! So why not trash this exhaust pipe configuration (the crossover) and go to a simple 2 into 1 set up on each side of the engine? Just bring the two pipes together off the same side and dump it out the cowling without crossing over in front of the oil pan. A fellow Lancair 360 builder (who also used to work on race boats for a living) built his own exhaust like this from Aircraft Spruce parts. Airplane isn't flying yet but I certainly see his logic in doing it. Another fellow Q200 builder did the same thing with his 0-200 Continental engine and says there has been a noticeable difference in under-cowl temps. I can't believe this hasn't come up before, anybody know the answer? Is there a good reason the exhaust has to crossover? What wives-tail or urban legend says the exhaust has to crossover? Dean Psiropoulos RV-6A N197DM Installing exhaust




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   engines-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Engines-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/engines-list
  • Browse Engines-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/engines-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --