Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 11:10 AM - New Member (Richard & Martha Neilsen)
     2. 03:20 PM - Re: New Member (Tedd McHenry)
     3. 06:07 PM - Re: New Member (Richard & Martha Neilsen)
     4. 09:50 PM - Crossover exhaust (DEAN PSIROPOULOS)
     5. 10:21 PM - Re: Crossover exhaust (Red Hamilton)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Engines-List message posted by: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM05@comcast.net>
      
      Hey all
      
      I'm a new member of the engines list. I have been a long term member of the Kolb
      list. I have a redrive VW powered Kolb MKIIIc. The engine is basically a 2180
      cc dunebuggy engine with a Valley reduction drive and a three bladed 72" Power
      Fin Model F. When I originally flew my Kolb I had a 2180cc Great Plains direct
      drive engine on it. The original engine didn't have enough thrust for my plane
      to fly it with a passenger. Since switching to a redrive VW I have enjoyed
      a much better climb, faster cruise, lower engine temps, lower fuel consumption,
      and yes it is now a two passenger airplane. The only down side is a bit more
      vibration.
      
      Rick Neilsen
      Redrive VW powered MKIIIc
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Engines-List message posted by: Tedd McHenry <tedd@vansairforce.org>
      
      Rick:
      
      > Since switching to a redrive VW I have enjoyed a much better climb, faster
      > cruise, lower engine temps, lower fuel consumption, and yes it is now a two
      > passenger airplane.
      
      Interesting that you have lower temperatures.  One criticism I've heard
      expressed about redrive VWs is that they can put out more heat than the
      cylinder heads can cool.  Are you able to climb at a higher speed, and is that
      contributing to the lower temperatures?
      
      Tedd McHenry
      Surrey, BC
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Engines-List message posted by: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM05@comcast.net>
      
      Ted
      
      I do climb at higher speeds but the real reason for my lower temps is that 
      the engine is running at a lower power level at cruise yet I cruise at a 
      speed 10 MPH faster. I have some good cooling scoops which keeps things 
      cool. The CHTs are never above 300 degrees cruise at app 60% power, the 
      direct drive engine was running 80% power 10MPH slower. These differences 
      are all at the same 3200 RPMs for both redrive and direct. The engine is 
      running in a pusher configuration so I do have to watch the temps on the 
      ground.
      
      Rick Neilsen
      Redrive VW powered Kolb MKIIIc
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Tedd McHenry" <tedd@vansairforce.org>
      Subject: Re: Engines-List: New Member
      
      
      > --> Engines-List message posted by: Tedd McHenry <tedd@vansairforce.org>
      >
      > Rick:
      >
      >> Since switching to a redrive VW I have enjoyed a much better climb, 
      >> faster
      >> cruise, lower engine temps, lower fuel consumption, and yes it is now a 
      >> two
      >> passenger airplane.
      >
      > Interesting that you have lower temperatures.  One criticism I've heard
      > expressed about redrive VWs is that they can put out more heat than the
      > cylinder heads can cool.  Are you able to climb at a higher speed, and is 
      > that
      > contributing to the lower temperatures?
      >
      > Tedd McHenry
      > Surrey, BC
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Crossover exhaust | 
      
      --> Engines-List message posted by: "DEAN PSIROPOULOS" <dean.psiropoulos@verizon.net>
      
      Question on exhaust:
      
      Parallel valve Lycoming 4 cylinder engine.  Is there a reason the front two
      pipes have to cross over before they go out the cowling?  Everyone says that
      Lycomings have to have an oil cooler because the oil runs hot.  Gee I wonder
      why...two hot exhaust pipes run right past the front of the oil sump and
      dump gobs of heat into the oil (in addition to the rear cylinders heating up
      the sides of the sump)!!! So why not trash this exhaust pipe configuration
      (the crossover) and go to a simple 2 into 1 set up on each side of the
      engine?  Just bring the two pipes together off the same side and dump it out
      the cowling without crossing over in front of the oil pan.   A fellow
      Lancair 360 builder (who also used to work on race boats for a living) built
      his own exhaust like this from Aircraft Spruce parts. Airplane isn't flying
      yet but I certainly see his logic in doing it.  Another fellow Q200 builder
      did the same thing with his 0-200 Continental engine and says there has been
      a noticeable difference in under-cowl temps. I can't believe this hasn't
      come up before, anybody know the answer?  Is there a good reason the exhaust
      has to crossover?  What wives-tail or urban legend says the exhaust has to
      crossover?  
      
      Dean Psiropoulos
      RV-6A N197DM
      Installing exhaust
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Crossover exhaust | 
      
      --> Engines-List message posted by: "Red Hamilton" <redswing@mcn.org>
      
      It doesn't have to cross over, the reason that it usually does is to make the firing
      impulses in each outlet (if two) 360* apart. If you run a tube on each bank,
      the impulses are 180/540etc in each outlet, again assuming two outlets.
      You can use metallic ceramic coatings and baffles to help contain heat, you could
      run a four outlet system or a 4into1 if you would sooner, Each has advantages
      and dis.
      Red
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: DEAN PSIROPOULOS
        To: engines-list@matronics.com
        Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 9:49 PM
        Subject: Engines-List: Crossover exhaust
      
      
        --> Engines-List message posted by: "DEAN PSIROPOULOS" <dean.psiropoulos@verizon.net>
      
        Question on exhaust:
      
        Parallel valve Lycoming 4 cylinder engine.  Is there a reason the front two
        pipes have to cross over before they go out the cowling?  Everyone says that
        Lycomings have to have an oil cooler because the oil runs hot.  Gee I wonder
        why...two hot exhaust pipes run right past the front of the oil sump and
        dump gobs of heat into the oil (in addition to the rear cylinders heating up
        the sides of the sump)!!! So why not trash this exhaust pipe configuration
        (the crossover) and go to a simple 2 into 1 set up on each side of the
        engine?  Just bring the two pipes together off the same side and dump it out
        the cowling without crossing over in front of the oil pan.   A fellow
        Lancair 360 builder (who also used to work on race boats for a living) built
        his own exhaust like this from Aircraft Spruce parts. Airplane isn't flying
        yet but I certainly see his logic in doing it.  Another fellow Q200 builder
        did the same thing with his 0-200 Continental engine and says there has been
        a noticeable difference in under-cowl temps. I can't believe this hasn't
        come up before, anybody know the answer?  Is there a good reason the exhaust
        has to crossover?  What wives-tail or urban legend says the exhaust has to
        crossover? 
      
        Dean Psiropoulos
        RV-6A N197DM
        Installing exhaust
      
      
      
      
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |