Engines-List Digest Archive

Fri 03/10/06


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:12 PM - C-90 or 0-200 cam. (john koning)
     2. 09:30 PM - Re: C-90 or 0-200 cam. (jrc)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:12:01 PM PST US
    From: john koning <fltrbg@yahoo.com>
    Subject: C-90 or 0-200 cam.
    --> Engines-List message posted by: john koning <fltrbg@yahoo.com> Hello all, I'm about to begin re-assembly of a C-90 and I have both the C-90 and 0-200 cams available.I'd like some advice as to which one to use. Is it preferable to use the C-90 cam with a slightly higher pitch prop,or the 0-200 cam with less pitch prop to allow higher RPM.The plane that it will power has about 100 mph cruise and I'm trying to maximize short field performance. Thanks in advance for any advice, John Koning C-FGCC Stits Flut-r-bug. ---------------------------------


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:30:56 PM PST US
    From: "jrc" <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: C-90 or 0-200 cam.
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "jrc" <jrccea@bellsouth.net> The 90 with a relatively flat pitch will give you better takeoff and climb (you won't be able to reach maximum rater rpm with either engine or prop). The 90 does better at lower rpm. ----- Original Message ----- From: "john koning" <fltrbg@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 9:07 PM Subject: Engines-List: C-90 or 0-200 cam. > --> Engines-List message posted by: john koning <fltrbg@yahoo.com> > > Hello all, > I'm about to begin re-assembly of a C-90 and I have both the C-90 and > 0-200 cams available.I'd like some advice as to which one to use. > Is it preferable to use the C-90 cam with a slightly higher pitch > prop,or the 0-200 cam with less pitch prop to allow higher RPM.The plane > that it will power has about 100 mph cruise and I'm trying to maximize > short field performance. > Thanks in advance for any advice, > John Koning > C-FGCC > Stits Flut-r-bug. > > > --------------------------------- > > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   engines-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Engines-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/engines-list
  • Browse Engines-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/engines-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --