Engines-List Digest Archive

Mon 07/03/06


Total Messages Posted: 8



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:55 AM - Re: Max. Oil Consumption (jrc)
     2. 06:00 AM - Re: Max. Oil Consumption (jrc)
     3. 06:13 AM - Re: Max. Oil Consumption (Gary Casey)
     4. 06:58 AM - Re: Max. Oil Consumption (Archie)
     5. 07:08 AM - Re: Max. Oil Consumption (Rhonda Bewley)
     6. 07:19 AM - Re: Max. Oil Consumption (Joe Trampota)
     7. 08:38 AM - Lycoming Engines Max Oil Consumption (J. Mcculley)
     8. 04:30 PM - Re: Max. Oil Consumption (steve korney)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:55:23 AM PST US
    From: "jrc" <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Max. Oil Consumption
    One would expect the number of cylinders to factor into the oil consumption. I'd be surprised if it doesn't. JimC ----- Original Message ----- From: Archie To: engines-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 7:05 PM Subject: Re: Engines-List: Max. Oil Consumption Did not take the time to analyze the formula. Just as given by Lycoming. To the best of my knowledge, this applies to all their piston engines, therefore the 4 would not fit.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:00:42 AM PST US
    From: "jrc" <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Max. Oil Consumption
    The equation is given in Lycoming Service Instruction 1427B. Here's a URL. http://www.lycoming.textron.com/main.jsp?bodyPage=/support/publications /keyReprints/maintenance/reciprocatingEngine.html ----- Original Message ----- From: Archie To: engines-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 7:05 PM Subject: Re: Engines-List: Max. Oil Consumption Did not take the time to analyze the formula. Just as given by Lycoming. To the best of my knowledge, this applies to all their piston engines, therefore the 4 would not fit. As far as I am concerned, one quart between oil changes is enough, but have been there before, and have told people how it is done. (albeit against manufacturer and FAA edicts) Nuff said. Archie ----- Original Message ----- From: Hopperdhh@aol.com To: engines-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 7:27 PM Subject: Re: Engines-List: Max. Oil Consumption Archie, Just curious -- why wouldn't it just be simplified to: .00324xBHP=consumption in qt. per hr. Is 4 the number of cylinders? What do the terms stand for? ?? Dan Hopper RV-7A In a message dated 7/1/2006 10:43:46 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, archie97@earthlink.net writes: Just found a copy here in my office. .006 X BHP X 4 / 7.4 = qt. per hr. ----- Original Message ----- From: Konrad L. Werner To: engines-list@matronics.com Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 8:12 PM Subject: Engines-List: Max. Oil Consumption Fellow Lister, Does anyone know how excessive an engines oil consumption can become, before one should take it apart for an overhaul? What does Lycoming recommend in regard to max allowed oil consumption? Thanks, Konrad Do Not Archive


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:13:41 AM PST US
    From: Gary Casey <glcasey@adelphia.net>
    Subject: Re: Max. Oil Consumption
    I once saw in similar equation published by Continental. Yes, indeed, they could have made it much simpler, but I'm pretty sure all the extra numbers just convert pounds to quarts. 4 quarts per gallon and the density is about 7.4 pounds per gallon. And everyone (including me) must have stopped at OSH and asked them the same question about oil level. I was told that the top quart or two were there mostly for long ferry flights where any increased oil consumption during the flight would give maximum capability of arriving. Don't know, but in a flight behind my IO-360 I burned 2 qts. in an hour's flight. If the flight were much longer I would have needed all 8. The reason it seems to blow out the first quart or two is (supposedly) that during initial climbout the oil level is higher at the back and gets into the gearcase, where it is slung up to the top of the engine. And as some have mentioned, a sudden change in consumption is almost more important than the consumption rate itself since in aviation it seems that any unexpected change is a bad change. I'm trying to figure out my newly-overhauled high-compression IO-540, which started off not burning too much oil (good sign I thought). But now with about 15 hours on the engine I'm getting what seems to be ever increasing blowby. Now the oil drops on the gear leg are real drops, not just oil dark spots. Broken ring? > > Just curious -- why wouldn't it just be simplified to: > > .00324xBHP=consumption in qt. per hr.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:58:00 AM PST US
    From: "Archie" <archie97@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Max. Oil Consumption
    Not likely, Gary, but possible. Usually a blowby problem. With antiquated iron ring designs, and very liberal end gaps, this is to be expected. Keep in mind, that as the rings wear in, the gaps also increase, accentuating the blowby. The "perfect" engine has none. We have no break in on race engines as such. No time for that when racing so we use the latest technologies in piston rings. A leakdown of more than 2-3% indicates hp loss and mandates investigation. ----- Original Message ----- From: Gary Casey To: engines-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 9:11 AM Subject: Re: Engines-List: Max. Oil Consumption I once saw in similar equation published by Continental. Yes, indeed, they could have made it much simpler, but I'm pretty sure all the extra numbers just convert pounds to quarts. 4 quarts per gallon and the density is about 7.4 pounds per gallon. And everyone (including me) must have stopped at OSH and asked them the same question about oil level. I was told that the top quart or two were there mostly for long ferry flights where any increased oil consumption during the flight would give maximum capability of arriving. Don't know, but in a flight behind my IO-360 I burned 2 qts. in an hour's flight. If the flight were much longer I would have needed all 8. The reason it seems to blow out the first quart or two is (supposedly) that during initial climbout the oil level is higher at the back and gets into the gearcase, where it is slung up to the top of the engine. And as some have mentioned, a sudden change in consumption is almost more important than the consumption rate itself since in aviation it seems that any unexpected change is a bad change. I'm trying to figure out my newly-overhauled high-compression IO-540, which started off not burning too much oil (good sign I thought). But now with about 15 hours on the engine I'm getting what seems to be ever increasing blowby. Now the oil drops on the gear leg are real drops, not just oil dark spots. Broken ring? Just curious -- why wouldn't it just be simplified to: .00324xBHP=consumption in qt. per hr.


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:08:02 AM PST US
    From: "Rhonda Bewley" <Rhonda@bpaengines.com>
    Subject: Max. Oil Consumption
    Gary: Blowby as described by Archie below, typically occurs when the cylinders become glazed. This is often caused by allowing the engine to get too hot (usually a long run up on the ground.) If this is the case, you should be able to have the cylinders cleaned up by your engine shop or a good cylinder o'h shop. Rhonda ________________________________ [mailto:owner-engines-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Archie Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 8:54 AM Not likely, Gary, but possible. Usually a blowby problem. With antiquated iron ring designs, and very liberal end gaps, this is to be expected. Keep in mind, that as the rings wear in, the gaps also increase, accentuating the blowby. The "perfect" engine has none. We have no break in on race engines as such. No time for that when racing so we use the latest technologies in piston rings. A leakdown of more than 2-3% indicates hp loss and mandates investigation. ----- Original Message ----- From: Gary Casey <mailto:glcasey@adelphia.net> To: engines-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 9:11 AM Subject: Re: Engines-List: Max. Oil Consumption I once saw in similar equation published by Continental. Yes, indeed, they could have made it much simpler, but I'm pretty sure all the extra numbers just convert pounds to quarts. 4 quarts per gallon and the density is about 7.4 pounds per gallon. And everyone (including me) must have stopped at OSH and asked them the same question about oil level. I was told that the top quart or two were there mostly for long ferry flights where any increased oil consumption during the flight would give maximum capability of arriving. Don't know, but in a flight behind my IO-360 I burned 2 qts. in an hour's flight. If the flight were much longer I would have needed all 8. The reason it seems to blow out the first quart or two is (supposedly) that during initial climbout the oil level is higher at the back and gets into the gearcase, where it is slung up to the top of the engine. And as some have mentioned, a sudden change in consumption is almost more important than the consumption rate itself since in aviation it seems that any unexpected change is a bad change. I'm trying to figure out my newly-overhauled high-compression IO-540, which started off not burning too much oil (good sign I thought). But now with about 15 hours on the engine I'm getting what seems to be ever increasing blowby. Now the oil drops on the gear leg are real drops, not just oil dark spots. Broken ring? Just curious -- why wouldn't it just be simplified to: .00324xBHP=consumption in qt. per hr.


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:19:17 AM PST US
    From: "Joe Trampota" <jtrampota@eci2fly.com>
    Subject: Max. Oil Consumption
    One of the visual signs that you have blowby is the rapid darkening of the oil color after you have changed the oil... Blowby/glazing simply lets the combustion past the rings/cylinder born directly into the case ,,, hence black/discolored oil.. JT ________________________________ [mailto:owner-engines-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rhonda Bewley Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 9:06 AM Gary: Blowby as described by Archie below, typically occurs when the cylinders become glazed. This is often caused by allowing the engine to get too hot (usually a long run up on the ground.) If this is the case, you should be able to have the cylinders cleaned up by your engine shop or a good cylinder o'h shop. Rhonda ________________________________ [mailto:owner-engines-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Archie Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 8:54 AM Not likely, Gary, but possible. Usually a blowby problem. With antiquated iron ring designs, and very liberal end gaps, this is to be expected. Keep in mind, that as the rings wear in, the gaps also increase, accentuating the blowby. The "perfect" engine has none. We have no break in on race engines as such. No time for that when racing so we use the latest technologies in piston rings. A leakdown of more than 2-3% indicates hp loss and mandates investigation. ----- Original Message ----- From: Gary Casey <mailto:glcasey@adelphia.net> To: engines-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 9:11 AM Subject: Re: Engines-List: Max. Oil Consumption I once saw in similar equation published by Continental. Yes, indeed, they could have made it much simpler, but I'm pretty sure all the extra numbers just convert pounds to quarts. 4 quarts per gallon and the density is about 7.4 pounds per gallon. And everyone (including me) must have stopped at OSH and asked them the same question about oil level. I was told that the top quart or two were there mostly for long ferry flights where any increased oil consumption during the flight would give maximum capability of arriving. Don't know, but in a flight behind my IO-360 I burned 2 qts. in an hour's flight. If the flight were much longer I would have needed all 8. The reason it seems to blow out the first quart or two is (supposedly) that during initial climbout the oil level is higher at the back and gets into the gearcase, where it is slung up to the top of the engine. And as some have mentioned, a sudden change in consumption is almost more important than the consumption rate itself since in aviation it seems that any unexpected change is a bad change. I'm trying to figure out my newly-overhauled high-compression IO-540, which started off not burning too much oil (good sign I thought). But now with about 15 hours on the engine I'm getting what seems to be ever increasing blowby. Now the oil drops on the gear leg are real drops, not just oil dark spots. Broken ring? Just curious -- why wouldn't it just be simplified to: .00324xBHP=consumption in qt. per hr.


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:38:45 AM PST US
    From: "J. Mcculley" <mcculleyja@starpower.net>
    Subject: Lycoming Engines Max Oil Consumption
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "J. Mcculley" <mcculleyja@starpower.net> The following data is taken from the Approved Lycoming Overhaul Manual available from Lycoming. Note that the maximum consumption allowed varies according to the model and is based on consumption at full rated horsepower and maximum rated rpm. All data is at maximum oil inlet temperature of 245 degrees Fahrenheit: ENGINE MODEL Maximum/HOUR Pounds Quarts RPM O-235-C1,-C1B 0.9 .50 2600 O-290-D,-D2 Series 1.0 .56 2600 O-320-A,-B,-D,-E,IO-320-A,-B Series 1.2 .67 2700 O-340-A Series 1.3 .72 2700 O-360-A,-B,-C,-D 1.4 .78 2700 IO-360-A,-C 1.5 .83 2700 IO-360-B1A,-B1B 1.4 .78 2700 HO-360-B 1.4 .78 2900 HIO-360-A,-B,VO-360-A,-B,IVO-360-A1A 1.5 .83 2900 O-540-A,-B Series 1.8 1.00 2575 O-540-E 1.8 1.00 2700 O-540-F 1.8 1.00 2800 IO-540-A,-B,-E,-G 2.0 1.11 2575 IO-540-C Series 1.8 1.00 2575 IO-540-D 1.8 1.00 2700 IO-720-A1A,-B1A 3.0 1.67 2650 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Fellow Lister, Does anyone know how excessive an engines oil consumption can become, before one should take it apart for an overhaul? What does Lycoming recommend in regard to max allowed oil consumption? Thanks, Konrad -----------------------------------------------------------------------


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:30:47 PM PST US
    From: "steve korney" <s_korney@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Max. Oil Consumption
    --> Engines-List message posted by: "steve korney" <s_korney@hotmail.com> How many hours after an oil change would you say the oil would start to turn dark on a good engine... Best... Steve ----Original Message Follows---- One of the visual signs that you have blowby is the rapid darkening of the oil color after you have changed the oil... Blowby/glazing simply lets the combustion past the rings/cylinder born directly into the case ,,, hence black/discolored oil.. JT ________________________________ [mailto:owner-engines-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rhonda Bewley Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 9:06 AM Gary: Blowby as described by Archie below, typically occurs when the cylinders become glazed. This is often caused by allowing the engine to get too hot (usually a long run up on the ground.) If this is the case, you should be able to have the cylinders cleaned up by your engine shop or a good cylinder o'h shop. Rhonda ________________________________ [mailto:owner-engines-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Archie Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 8:54 AM Not likely, Gary, but possible. Usually a blowby problem. With antiquated iron ring designs, and very liberal end gaps, this is to be expected. Keep in mind, that as the rings wear in, the gaps also increase, accentuating the blowby. The "perfect" engine has none. We have no break in on race engines as such. No time for that when racing so we use the latest technologies in piston rings. A leakdown of more than 2-3% indicates hp loss and mandates investigation. ----- Original Message ----- From: Gary Casey <mailto:glcasey@adelphia.net> To: engines-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 9:11 AM Subject: Re: Engines-List: Max. Oil Consumption I once saw in similar equation published by Continental. Yes, indeed, they could have made it much simpler, but I'm pretty sure all the extra numbers just convert pounds to quarts. 4 quarts per gallon and the density is about 7.4 pounds per gallon. And everyone (including me) must have stopped at OSH and asked them the same question about oil level. I was told that the top quart or two were there mostly for long ferry flights where any increased oil consumption during the flight would give maximum capability of arriving. Don't know, but in a flight behind my IO-360 I burned 2 qts. in an hour's flight. If the flight were much longer I would have needed all 8. The reason it seems to blow out the first quart or two is (supposedly) that during initial climbout the oil level is higher at the back and gets into the gearcase, where it is slung up to the top of the engine. And as some have mentioned, a sudden change in consumption is almost more important than the consumption rate itself since in aviation it seems that any unexpected change is a bad change. I'm trying to figure out my newly-overhauled high-compression IO-540, which started off not burning too much oil (good sign I thought). But now with about 15 hours on the engine I'm getting what seems to be ever increasing blowby. Now the oil drops on the gear leg are real drops, not just oil dark spots. Broken ring? Just curious -- why wouldn't it just be simplified to: .00324xBHP=consumption in qt. per hr.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   engines-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Engines-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/engines-list
  • Browse Engines-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/engines-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --