Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 06:37 AM - Re: Engines-List Digest: 2 Msgs - 09/13/06 (Gary Casey)
2. 07:06 AM - Re: Re: Engines-List Digest: 2 Msgs - 09/13/06 (Olen Goodwin)
3. 07:29 AM - T-3A engines (Michael)
4. 01:37 PM - Re: T-3A engines (Hopperdhh@aol.com)
5. 02:17 PM - T-3A Firefly Aircraft Destroyed (Rhonda Bewley)
6. 06:48 PM - CHT question....... (Jim Baker)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engines-List Digest: 2 Msgs - 09/13/06 |
On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:56 PM, Engines-List Digest Server wrote:
> Engines-List: FYI
>
> The US Air Force has announced that it will scrap all 110
> remaining T-3A
> Firefly training aircraft in the fleet. The planes were grounded
> in 1997 after
>
> numerous incidents and three crashes. While the Air Force
> attributed two of
> the fatal mishaps to pilot error, all three accidents involved
> problems with the
>
> engine, a six cylinder Textron Lycoming AEIO-540-D4A5 generating
> 260 hp
> driving a three-bladed prop.
Any idea about what sort of engine problem?
Gary Casey
flying behind an IO-540-D4A5, as are a lot of Comanche owners
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engines-List Digest: 2 Msgs - 09/13/06 |
I think from what I've read over the years that there were problems with
the installation rather than the engine. Been a while, but when the AF
first admitted the problem, it sounded like the problems were peculiar
to that airframe.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gary Casey
To: engines-list@matronics.com
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 7:36 AM
Subject: Engines-List: Re: Engines-List Digest: 2 Msgs - 09/13/06
On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:56 PM, Engines-List Digest Server wrote:
Engines-List: FYI
The US Air Force has announced that it will scrap all 110 remaining
T-3A
Firefly training aircraft in the fleet. The planes were grounded in
1997 after
numerous incidents and three crashes. While the Air Force
attributed two of
the fatal mishaps to pilot error, all three accidents involved
problems with the
engine, a six cylinder Textron Lycoming AEIO-540-D4A5 generating 260
hp
driving a three-bladed prop.
Any idea about what sort of engine problem?
Gary Casey
flying behind an IO-540-D4A5, as are a lot of Comanche owners
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Any idea about what sort of engine problem?
As I recall, and memory being what it is, there was a fuel starvation
problem which most likely had to do with the fuel delivery system (lines
including routing, etc) rather than the engines themselves.
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: T-3A engines |
Where do I go to buy one of these engines?
Dan Hopper
RV-7A (future RV-10?)
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | T-3A Firefly Aircraft Destroyed |
Sorry for the cross postings, but I felt this issue was worthwhile. See
below an email sent to several news agencies. In addition, a letter is
in the draft stages to Sen. Jim Inhofe, who is a member of the Senate
Arms Committee and a GA advocate. I encourage you to do the same.
"Please review the attached stories regarding the Air Force's disposal
of 110 T-3A Firefly airplanes that cost the American taxpayers
$33,000,000. These airplanes were grounded after three fatal accidents.
It was determined that the airplanes had fuel delivery problems.
http://www.txaa.org/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabid=1554
http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123026857
Generally when aircraft are destroyed, they are disassembled and the
good components are then sold through auction or salvage. The Air
Force, however, has completely destroyed all components, including new
engines and propellers still in the crates from the factory.
My company is an engine overhaul facility which supports the general
aviation market. The engines associated with these aircraft are used in
a multitude of certified and experimental aircraft with very reliable
results and are highly sought after. In fact, we had already begun
inquiries with the GSA on how to bid on these components when these
stories came across our desk.
What a waste of the taxpayer's money!! I feel confident that even those
individuals who don't have a passion for flight would find this type of
activity deplorable. I hope you will give this story your
consideration."
Rhonda Barrett-Bewley
Barrett Precision Engines, Inc.
2870-B N. Sheridan Rd.
Tulsa, OK 74115
(918) 835-1089
www.barrettprecisionengines.com
<http://www.barrettprecisionengines.com/>
________________________________
From: owner-engines-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-engines-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
Speedy11@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: Engines-List: FYI
The US Air Force has announced that it will scrap all 110 remaining
T-3A Firefly training aircraft in the fleet. The planes were grounded
in 1997 after numerous incidents and three crashes. While the Air Force
attributed two of the fatal mishaps to pilot error, all three accidents
involved problems with the engine, a six cylinder Textron Lycoming
AEIO-540-D4A5 generating 260 hp driving a three-bladed prop.
According to GlobalSecurity.org, the T-3A's engine had failed 66 times
during takeoffs or landings. The Air Force grounded 57 of the planes on
ten separate occasions due to problems with either engines, fuel
systems, or brakes.
Do not archive
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | CHT question....... |
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41)
--> Engines-List message posted by: "Jim Baker" <jlbaker@msbit.net>
FARs......
A CHT is required for acft with cowl flaps.... FAR Part 23, Sec.
23.1305 b(3)i
If the aircraft doesn't have cowl flaps but the CHT was installed
anyway by the factory, could one consider this a mandatory item
to be left in place should a JPI, or like engine monitor, be
installed? That is, what regulation prevents me from replacing
the factory bayonnet with a JPI bayonnet instead of leaving the
factory sensor in place and doing a plug gasket as most have
done?
I already know about the dual bayonnet adaptor...the question
still remains....why not disable the factory installed unit.
Thanks.
Jim Baker
580.788.2779
Elmore City, OK
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|