Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 09:11 AM - test flying in the NW of England? (Richard)
     2. 01:04 PM - Re: test flying in the NW of England? (KarkelB@aol.com)
     3. 01:37 PM - Re: Aileron Pushrod Tube Dimensions (Rob Housman)
     4. 02:08 PM - Re: A bum wrap (Rob Housman)
     5. 05:25 PM - REdux: A bum wrap (irampil@notes.cc.sunysb.edu)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | test flying in the NW of England? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Richard" <riddon@btinternet.com>
      
      I am pleased to report that after finally finding my engine final inspection
      check list last night, the 912S in G-RIXS fired up for the first time today,
      no problem  What a milestone!
      
      I was hoping that Andy would be able to do the test flying from Wombleton
      during April but unfortunately he is away having some sun n fun etc. 
      
      I am now looking for someone to do the test flying and a venue to fly from.
      Ideally not too far from Preston. (Blackpool has now become very expensive
      at around 13 per landing).
      
      Any suggestions?
      
      My phone no. is 01772 600582 
      
      Richard Iddon.  
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: test flying in the NW of England? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: KarkelB@aol.com
      
      Hi Richard,
                       congratulations on the completion of your plane. Hope the 
      test session goes well too. Just wanted to know whether you still have the 
      snout thats comes with your engine kit.Its allow you to mould the hole in the 
      lower cowling for the cooling baffle.Please let me know if you haven't used 
      it.
      
        regards Karim.  
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Aileron Pushrod Tube Dimensions | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Rob Housman" <RobH@hyperion-ef.com>
      
      Your 5052 tube is apparently mis-identified on the BOM.  This alloy is not
      heat treated (nor can it be) so it would not have a -T designation following
      the alloy number.  5052 is available as annealed with the designation -O
      (the letter, not a zero) and work hardened in -H3 temper, typically in
      the -H34 and -H38 variations.  The mill that manufactured the tube should
      have applied marking along the entire length of the tube that not only
      identifies the size and alloy, but the manufacturer's code or name, and
      usually also the applicable specification.  Of course if you have painted or
      powder coated the tube you can not read the marking.
      
      My leftover 1 inch tube is 6061-T6, and the wall thickness is 0.028 inch.
      Since my wings are already closed I can not see what is installed but when I
      purchased additional tube (you can guess why) I probably did not change from
      what the factory supplied.  6061-T6 is much higher strength than 5052-O, and
      both have the same Young's Modulus  so it would be a good substitute,
      something I would have considered if I had made the substitution.
      
      You will find that tube in  6061 alloy is more readily available than 5052
      (in the US it is available in home improvement stores) but the price should
      be about the same for either alloy.  Although your antipodean aviation
      authority might not allow it,  from an engineering perspective substitution
      of 6061 for 5052 is appropriate for this application.
      
      
      Best regards,
      
      Rob Housman
      A070
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Tony Renshaw
      Subject: Europa-List: Aileron Pushrod Tube Dimensions
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw@ozemail.com.au>
      
      Gidday,
      Well it was a day of 3 steps forward and 2 back. I bonded in the port
      aileron torque tube in the cockpit module, successfully, and then with my
      daughters assistance I measured and cut the port wing's aileron pushrod.
      Failure!!!! I cut the bloody thing at the base of the rod end insert, not
      its head. Oh, I kicked myself around the workshop with my daugter somewhat
      surprised to see me castigate myself as much as I do her from time to time.
      Well now the problem is that I have to source another 12' length of this
      stuff, but I am unsure of the spec. My   bill of materials describes a tube
      that I think might be it, but I'm not sure. TU25RM and it also says
      5052-TO- .25" X .035. Well the tube is 1" OD with a wall thickness of .035,
      so I figure it must be 5052 tubing, but the .25" has got the better of me?
      Any clues as to this, or my ultimate question of "what type of aluminium
      tubing is the aileron pushrods"????
      P.S. I'd really appreciate a score of people telling me how easy it is to
      do what I did, as the bill alone will be a sting, and I have a bruised
      behind already from my own kicking.
      Reg
      Tony Renshaw
      Sydney Australia.
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Rob Housman" <RobH@hyperion-ef.com>
      
      In re: inertia (or inertial, but not interial) reels
      
      The term derives from Newton's concept of inertia, and here refers to the
      means by which the mechanism "locks" when subjected to rapid deceleration.
      Many aircraft and all late model automotive three point seatbelts employ
      this technique to allow freedom of movement unless and until the vehicle
      decelerates suddenly.
      
      For a brief description of the product, and how not to install the things go
      FAA's guidance on the subject go to
      http://www2.faa.gov/avr/afs/news/harness/seatbelt.htm
      
      
      Best regards,
      
      Rob Housman
      A070
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Fergus Kyle
      Subject: Europa-List: A bum wrap
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Fergus Kyle" <VE3LVO@rac.ca>
      
      
      Ira,
      
      "He is no fan of interial reels either."
                  Can I ask what 'interial' is? Is that the site of its
      base(inside) or a reference to the reel function?
      
      "Also, he thought 3 inches of tempurfoam is not adequate for safely passing
      the 19g vertical acceleration test."
                  I haven't been around to the back to check contours, but I
      suspect my posterior would be content with the quality of 1 to 1-1/2 inches
      of that expensive  cushioning - on top of stiffer underlayers of course. I
      wonder what the good perfesser would think of Graham Singleton's
      consideration that a fair depth of foam 'worms' a la beanbag principle had
      saved his 'bacon' on pranging?
      Nervously,
      Ferg A064
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | REdux: A bum wrap | 
       03/17/2003 08:24:10 PM
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: irampil@notes.cc.sunysb.edu
      
      
      Greetings All,
      
      Since I've had a few personal queries on the subject, I thought I'd provide
      the
      direct link to the Advisory Circular on shoulder harness installation:
      
         http://www2.faa.gov/avr/afs/news/harness/AC%2021-34.pdf
      
      
      There are some points of discussion about the old qualifications which used
      static tests at 9 gs with blocks of wood for people in the seat. The
      current tests
      and standards use anthropometric dummies and higher, dynamic loads, i.e.,
      19 Gz for GA type aircraft.
      
      There are some recent restraint videos (sounds kinky!) produced by the
      Civilian Aeromedical Institute (FAA) at:
      
         http://www.cami.jccbi.gov/National-Resource/CAMI21st.html
      
      Enjoy,
      
      Ira
      
      
      
      
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |