Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:45 AM - Re: Sticky pre-skinned surfaces (Cripps, David)
     2. 02:12 AM - Re: Sticky pre-skinned surfaces (Tony S. Krzyzewski)
     3. 05:41 AM - Re: Static Charges and how to avoid them (J R \(Bob\) Gowing)
     4. 05:41 AM - Re: Mods needed for glider wings? (J R \(Bob\) Gowing)
     5. 06:34 AM - Re: Door latch (Fergus Kyle)
     6. 07:55 AM - Re: Door latch (Nigel Charles)
     7. 08:59 AM - Re: Static Charges and how to avoid them (Fred Fillinger)
     8. 09:22 AM - Re: Static Charges and how to avoid them (Peter Zutrauen)
     9. 10:08 AM - Re: Mods needed for glider wings? (Tony S. Krzyzewski)
    10. 10:56 AM - Terra radio (Frank Mycroft)
    11. 11:12 AM - Re: Static Charges and how to avoid them (Gerry Holland)
    12. 11:47 AM - Water Temperature (Gerry Holland)
    13. 01:07 PM - Re: Door latch (Ami McFadyean)
    14. 02:09 PM - Re: Static Charges and how to avoid them (KARL HEINDL)
    15. 02:11 PM - Re: Water Temperature (KARL HEINDL)
    16. 03:08 PM - Re: Water Temperature (Gerry Holland)
    17. 05:09 PM - Re: Water Temperature (James Nelson)
    18. 05:32 PM - Re: Static Charges and how to avoid them (J R \(Bob\) Gowing)
    19. 05:32 PM - Re: Mods needed for glider wings? (J R \(Bob\) Gowing)
    20. 06:11 PM - Re: Static Charges and how to avoid them (Fred Fillinger)
    21. 08:14 PM - Re: Mods needed for glider wings? (Paul McAllister)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Sticky pre-skinned surfaces | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Cripps, David" <david.cripps@spsystems.com>
      
      Here at SP Systems we use only disposable nitrile gloves when handling epoxies
      - both in bulk during manufacture and when doing trial layups or laminate sanding
      operations. Latex does provide epoxy protection but, as you know, some people
      are sensitive to latex itself. The nitrile gloves are not quite as stretchy
      as the latex, but are pretty durable and not much more expensive (about 12GBP
      per box for a single box of 50+). You just need to be disciplined to replace
      them if they get torn. Other possibilities are heavier duty versions of the same.
      
      If you're looking for a source of the disposable nitrile gloves in the UK try Marineware in Southampton, UK (02380 330208) or try one of the safety supply mail order places such as Arco for the heavy duty ones.( www.arco.co.uk) 
      
      David
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Jeremy Davey [mailto:jeremycrdavey@btinternet.com]
      Subject: RE: Europa-List: Sticky pre-skinned surfaces
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Jeremy Davey" <jeremycrdavey@btinternet.com>
      
      I believe they are not 100% resistant to the epoxy systems - which is why
      rubber gloves are recommended for layups. That said, I don't wear latex
      gloves for extended periods (they are so easily torn anyway) so slow
      permeability to the surface contaminants is not really an issue as they
      simply would not have time to diffuse through.
      
      Is anyone out there an expert on latex or chemical protection who can
      comment?
      
      Regards,
      Jeremy
      
      Jeremy Davey
      
      Europa XS Monowheel 537M G-EZZA
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Paul Sweeting
      Subject: RE: Europa-List: Sticky pre-skinned surfaces
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: Paul Sweeting <Paul.Sweeting@ntl.com>
      
      Wasnt it mentioned latex gloves are permeable to the irritant or is this
      just the case for pvc based disposible gloves??
      
      Cheers
      
      Paul.
      
      Paul Sweeting
      Europa XS Monowheel 558
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Jeremy Davey [mailto:jeremycrdavey@btinternet.com]
      Subject: RE: Europa-List: Sticky pre-skinned surfaces
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Jeremy Davey"
      <jeremycrdavey@btinternet.com>
      
      John,
      
      All my Stage 1 components have this to one extent or other. Indeed, at the
      time we went into it in great depth with the factory and SP Systems (who
      make the resin). Apparently it is a result of contaminants emerging from the
      resin and reacting with water out of the atmosphere (which is exacerbated by
      slow hardener being used and tallies with your weather report) and will need
      to be cleaned up prior to finishing. It is not of structural significance.
      
      Having said it is not structurally significant, it is worth taking
      precautions for the sake of your health when handling these (and all)
      layups. I generally wear latex gloves when handling cured layups, or wash my
      hands promptly afterwards. I do not want to acquire an allergy for the sake
      of a few hundred disposable gloves and a little care.
      
      Regards,
      Jeremy
      
      Jeremy Davey
      
      Europa XS Monowheel 537M G-EZZA
      
      
      The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal
      attention
      of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential.  If you are not the
      intended
      addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments
      is
      unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message.
      Any
      representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to
      contract. 
      
      ntl Group Limited
      
      
      Visit SP at stand D103 at the European Wind Energy Conference, Madrid, Spain, 16th
      - 19th June 2003
      
      **********************************************************************************************
      All sales of goods are subject to the terms and conditions of sale (the Conditions)
      of SP Systems (the Company) which are available on request from the Company 
      or may be viewed on our Website (http://www.spsystems.com).
      
      Any advice given by the Company in connection with the sale of goods is given 
      in good faith but the company only warrants that advice in writing is given with
      
      reasonable skill and care.  All advice is otherwise given subject to the Conditions.
      
      The contents of this message and any attachments are confidential and
      are intended solely for the attention and use of the addressee only.
      Information contained in this message may be subject to legal, 
      professional or other privilege or may otherwise be protected by other
      legal rules. This message should not be copied or forwarded to any other
      person without the express permission of the sender. If you are not the
      intended recipient you are not authorised to disclose, copy, distribute
      or retain this message or any part of it.
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Sticky pre-skinned surfaces | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Tony S. Krzyzewski" <tonyk@kaon.co.nz>
      
      
      >> Here at SP Systems we use only disposable nitrile gloves when
      handling epoxies
      
      ... and just what does SP Systems know about handling resins huh?
      
      Sorry, just couldn't resist that one.
      
      David, thanks. It's great to have a definitive answer on latex gloves
      and to know that the 500+ latex gloves I've used so far do provide
      protection from Ampreg. I started off using rubber gloves but decided
      that life was too short to  spend time cleaning them and switched to
      latex gloves which just get thrown out at the end.
      
      For really big layups I always wore two pairs as I inevitably ended up
      tearing through a layer at an inopportune moment and it's nice having a
      backup.
      
      Tony
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Static Charges and how to avoid them | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "J R \(Bob\) Gowing" <gowingjr@acr.net.au>
      
      Dale
      
      I have an aluminium surround that fits into an XS plastic filler tube but
      have not put in the extended bay and filler etc just yet. I have done no
      checking, too busy getting the UC and engine mount into the fuse and then
      the rudder pedals.
      J R (Bob) Gowing, Kit 324
      
      do not archive
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Dale Hetrick" <gdale2@juno.com>
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: Static Charges and how to avoid them
      
      
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: Dale Hetrick <gdale2@juno.com>
      >
      > Bob,
      > You must have gotten one of  aluminum filler caps and neck.  Mine is
      > plastic but looks like aluminum.  Did you check for continuity across
      > portions of the neck?
      > Dale
      > Dale
      > On Mon, 26 May 2003 22:18:43 +0100 "R.C.Harrison"
      > <ptag.dev@ukonline.co.uk> writes:
      > > --> Europa-List message posted by: "R.C.Harrison"
      > > <ptag.dev@ukonline.co.uk>
      > >
      > > Hi! Dale,
      > > I've presumed they mean the aliminium neck to the filler. My system
      > > has
      > > always to have the fuel supply pump grounded at the exhaust , I make
      > > sure I
      > > touch the neck with a damp finger whilst removing the cap and I
      > > touch the
      > > fuel nozzle on to the neck whilst filling.
      > > No problems yet but can't say I've ever found really dry conditions
      > > in
      > > Europe yet.
      > > Regards
      > > Bob Harrison G-PTAG
      > >
      > > -----Original Message-----
      > > From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      > > [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Dale
      > > Hetrick
      > > To: europa-list@matronics.com
      > > Subject: Re: Europa-List: Static Charges and how to avoid them
      > >
      > >
      > > --> Europa-List message posted by: Dale Hetrick <gdale2@juno.com>
      > >
      > > All,
      > > There seems to be a lot of reliance on grounding the "filler cap"
      > > plus
      > > other components to create a grounding path.  If other "filler caps"
      > > are
      > > like mine, it's not possible because its plastic, not aluminum as
      > > it
      > > appears to be.
      > > Dale
      > > A#140
      > > On Sun, 25 May 2003 21:32:40 -0400 Fred Fillinger
      > > <fillinger@ameritech.net> writes:
      > > > --> Europa-List message posted by: Fred Fillinger
      > > > <fillinger@ameritech.net>
      > > >
      > > > DuaneFamly@aol.com wrote:
      > > >  > So am I to conclude that there should be two separate
      > > electrical
      > > > bonds
      > > >  > in the plane? One for all the regular things that need
      > > electrons
      > > > to
      > > >  > operate (lights, engine, instruments, etc.) and a separate one
      > > > that
      > > >  > bonds the various nonoperating parts of the fueling systems to
      > > a
      > > >  > single point that one can attach a ramp ground wire to and the
      > > >  > container that the fuel is presently in when refueling.
      > > >
      > > > There is no need for the A/C's electrical system ground be
      > > involved,
      > > > but
      > > > a practical consideration is that airport fueling personnel will
      > > > attach
      > > > the bonding wire to the exhaust pipe. One need minimally only bond
      > > > the
      > > > metal filler opening, so I suppose one could placard the filler
      > > to
      > > > that
      > > > effect and provide a means of attaching the clip.
      > > >
      > > > If by "bonding the various nonoperating parts of the fueling
      > > system"
      > > >
      > > > means other than the filler cap, then I believe that's more
      > > > hazardous.
      > > > What will happen is that any static accumulating in the vicinity
      > > of
      > > >
      > > > those metal parts will be sent to the filler cap, unnecessarily
      > > > raising
      > > > its voltage potential.  If the filler cap is also earthed in some
      > > > way,
      > > > then there's no hazard.  Even one's body can drain off the charge
      > > if
      > > > the
      > > > conditions are right.  However, it's best to leave any static
      > > deep
      > > > inside the system, and this is the reason that filling an
      > > ungrounded
      > > >
      > > > metal can is more hazardous than a plastic container, where
      > > static
      > > > charges tend to remain where they accumulate.
      > > >
      > > > Regards,
      > > > Fred F.
      > > >
      > > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      >
      >
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Mods needed for glider wings? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "J R \(Bob\) Gowing" <gowingjr@acr.net.au>
      
      I have thought that it would be abit of ajob to get the lift pins in exactly
      the same position on the second pair of wings. Anyone done this easily yet?
      
      J R (Bob) Gowing, Classic Kit 327 in Oz
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: <irampil@notes.cc.sunysb.edu>
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: Mods needed for glider wings?
      
      
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: irampil@notes.cc.sunysb.edu
      >
      >
      > Hi Ron,
      >
      > The main thing I know of is to do the dive brake control install while the
      > cockpit module out of the fuse.  If you wait til you are done, you will be
      > squeezed for space and have to rip up uphostery.
      >
      > Ira
      snipped
      do not archive
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Fergus Kyle" <VE3LVO@rac.ca>
      
      
      Drill a hole into the fuselage at the center, half way between the shoot
      bolts that hold the door closed and centered on the fuselage lip. The width
      of the hole is determined by how far you want the egg to drop into the hole.
      I used ~ 1"circumference so the hole squeezes the egg about a third of the
      way up it.
      
      Hello
                  My impression of previous emails and articles in the Club
      magazine says "it better be a tiny hole" because some considerable
      structural integrity is dependent upon a secure doorsill. The PFA warns
      against decreasing the sill strength in all but a small way - and even then
      suggests careful scrutiny ever after.
                  Previous emails and articles refer.
      Ferg
      Europa A064
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Nigel Charles" <nigelcharles@tiscali.co.uk>
      
      >Drill a hole into the fuselage at the center, half way between the shoot
      bolts that hold the door closed and centered on the fuselage lip. The width
      of the hole is determined by how far you want the egg to drop into the hole.
      I used ~ 1"circumference so the hole squeezes the egg about a third of the
      way up it.<
      
      If I understand this correctly the hole is drilled in the horizontal part of
      the door frame. If this is the case I would strongly advise against this
      mod. The PFA have warned us that this frame rebate is a strength critical
      area of the airframe particularly in the event of an accident. As the amount
      of material removed across the width of the rebate greatly exceeds the
      remaining material it would be very difficult to regain the strength lost by
      reinforcing around the hole.
      
      Nigel Charles
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Static Charges and how to avoid them | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: Fred Fillinger <fillinger@ameritech.net>
      
       > Fred,
       >
       > I agree with you that bonding other metal parts in the fuel
       > system to the filler cap is probably less safe rather than
       > more so.  However if fuel drains are fitted, I think it's a
       > good idea to ground them independently. Although it's a fairly
       > remote possibility the last thing you need is a spark when you
       > are lying on the ground draining fuel!
       >
       > Best regards,
       > Nick
      
      If a remote possibility, it's because static inside the tank dissipates 
      by itself shortly after refueling, and pre-flight fuel samples aren't 
      static producers.  Nevertheless, note that merely tying it to A/C ground 
      does not remove any charge.  The A/C ground has to be earthed also to be 
      effective.
      
      Regarding anything metal exposed to the fuel tank innards which is tied 
      via a run of wire to A/C ground, there may be no good statistical answer 
      comparing the lightning hazard vs. that of static charges.  I have only 
      one such item, the fuel sender, and it has a 2-pin connector accessible 
      inside the headrest.  Theory is if caught near a storm, pull the thing 
      to at least feel better.
      
      Recently a Lancair IV "exploded" in cruise, deviating around 
      thunderstorms, in apparent VMC on top.  The preliminary report suggests 
      either G-load induced separation of both wings simultaneously - a rare 
      event...or a lightning strike.  At least worrisome until NTSB says what 
      happened:
      
      www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?ev_id=20030520X00696&key=1
      
      Regards,
      Fred F.
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Static Charges and how to avoid them | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Peter Zutrauen" <peterz@zutrasoft.com>
      
      Not to be argumentative, and altho I agree with Fred that internal
      grounding of the tank may be a bad idea in the case of a
      lightning-strike, plastic planes (without any embedded
      charge-distributing protective mesh) can and do indeed 'explode' when
      hit by lightning anyway - the UK glider as an example.  Hmmmm.... I
      wonder how they would have faired if it were a Motorglider with fuel on
      board ;-)
      
      
      If the lancair accident was indeed a lightning strike, they should
      easily identify all those melted/burned pieces. I wonder if the new
      Lancairs have mesh.
      
      Cheers,
      Pete
      A239
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Fred Fillinger [mailto:fillinger@ameritech.net] 
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: Static Charges and how to avoid them
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: Fred Fillinger
      <fillinger@ameritech.net>
      
       > Fred,
       >
       > I agree with you that bonding other metal parts in the fuel
       > system to the filler cap is probably less safe rather than
       > more so.  However if fuel drains are fitted, I think it's a
       > good idea to ground them independently. Although it's a fairly
       > remote possibility the last thing you need is a spark when you
       > are lying on the ground draining fuel!
       >
       > Best regards,
       > Nick
      
      If a remote possibility, it's because static inside the tank dissipates 
      by itself shortly after refueling, and pre-flight fuel samples aren't 
      static producers.  Nevertheless, note that merely tying it to A/C ground
      
      does not remove any charge.  The A/C ground has to be earthed also to be
      
      effective.
      
      Regarding anything metal exposed to the fuel tank innards which is tied 
      via a run of wire to A/C ground, there may be no good statistical answer
      
      comparing the lightning hazard vs. that of static charges.  I have only 
      one such item, the fuel sender, and it has a 2-pin connector accessible 
      inside the headrest.  Theory is if caught near a storm, pull the thing 
      to at least feel better.
      
      Recently a Lancair IV "exploded" in cruise, deviating around 
      thunderstorms, in apparent VMC on top.  The preliminary report suggests 
      either G-load induced separation of both wings simultaneously - a rare 
      event...or a lightning strike.  At least worrisome until NTSB says what 
      happened:
      
      www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?ev_id=20030520X00696&key=1
      
      Regards,
      Fred F.
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Mods needed for glider wings? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Tony S. Krzyzewski" <tonyk@kaon.co.nz>
      
      
      >>> I have thought that it would be abit of ajob to get the lift pins in
      exactly
      the same position on the second pair of wings. Anyone done this easily
      yet?
      
      I think that was one of the drivers behind the factory predrilling and
      tapping the lift pin holes in the XS short wings and glider wings.
      
      Tony
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Frank Mycroft" <frankm@clara.net>
      
      For the last two years I have been having intermittent trouble with my Terra transceiver.
      Two local radio shops have found no fault and Free Flight Systems
      in USA had it for repair but although it worked when first returned it soon went
      on the blink again.  I have now stumbled on a chap in the UK who seems to have
      found the root cause of the problem, which in my case was unreadable transmission,
      but not all the time.  He was able to experience the condition where
      the radio worked perfectly and then for no apparent reason didn't, and then found
      a solution.  Certainly my radio has worked perfectly since I got it back from
      him, although I have to say that I have not done a lot of flying since.  If
      you are in the UK and having similar problems you might like to contact him.
      He is Graham Laucht at grahamlaucht@blueyonder.co.uk  His charges, for an intractable
      problem, were reasonable.
      
      Frank Mycroft     G-BWYD
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Static Charges and how to avoid them | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: Gerry Holland <gnholland@onetel.com>
      
      Hi! to all.
      
      After much deliberation about Engines I have fitted a Rotax 912 with Arplast
      PV50 Prop. and CS Controller. Tri-gear now stands on it's three legs!
      
      I had not taken account or thought about Water Temperature or maybe a Water
      Pressure Gauge too but it would seem sensible to monitor. I would like some
      advice or experiences on fitting 'steam Gauge' type indicators and where the
      sensor should or could be positioned. Should a mechanical Water Temperature
      Gauge considered.
      
      Regards
      
      Gerry
      
      Gerry Holland
      Europa 384
      G-FIZY
      +44 7808 402404
      gnholland@onetel.com
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Water Temperature | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: Gerry Holland <gnholland@onetel.com>
      
      Sorry about Subject field being wrong on earlier e-mail. I need information
      on Water Temperature Monitoring.
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Ami McFadyean" <ami@mcfadyean.freeserve.co.uk>
      
      "....The shape of the egg draws the door to an exact fit with the fuselage
      and holds it there securely....."
      
      Or the matching big hole in the door sill allows the (now weakened) fuselage
      to conform to the shape of the door!!
      
      To avoid the Big Hole, why couldn't this mod. be turned on its head?
       i.e. use a much smaller egg (or eggs) attached to the door sill with the
      corresponding holes drilled (and reinforced) in the door frame? The buckling
      or bending strength of the door frame would not be affected ( now that it is
      additionally braced by the egg/s attached to the structurally much-stronger
      and unmolested sill).
      
      Duncan McF.
      
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Rob Neils" <RobNeils@aimcomm.com>
      Subject: Europa-List: Door latch
      
      
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: RobNeils@aimcomm.com (Rob Neils)
      >
      > Europa "egg" door latch.
      >
      > I've installed a wooden egg to prevent the cabin doors from bulging in
      flight. A wooden egg is trimmed and affixed to each door so that as the door
      closes the pointy end of the egg inserts into a circular hole in the
      fuselage. The shape of the egg draws the door to an exact fit with the
      fuselage and holds it there securely.
      >
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Static Charges and how to avoid them | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "KARL HEINDL" <kheindl@msn.com>
      
      
      Hi Gerry,
      
      Take a look at Skydrive kit for water temperature. It is very cheap, passive 
      VDO probe (same as
      is used by Rotax for CH), goes directly into one of the water hoses on top 
      of the engine and
      is easy to install. I use an EIS, but other instruments should be fine also.
      
      Regards,  Karl
      
      
      >From: Gerry Holland <gnholland@onetel.com>
      >Reply-To: europa-list@matronics.com
      >To: <europa-list@matronics.com>
      >Subject: Re: Europa-List: Static Charges and how to avoid them
      >Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 19:13:36 +0100
      >
      >--> Europa-List message posted by: Gerry Holland <gnholland@onetel.com>
      >
      >Hi! to all.
      >
      >After much deliberation about Engines I have fitted a Rotax 912 with 
      >Arplast
      >PV50 Prop. and CS Controller. Tri-gear now stands on it's three legs!
      >
      >I had not taken account or thought about Water Temperature or maybe a Water
      >Pressure Gauge too but it would seem sensible to monitor. I would like some
      >advice or experiences on fitting 'steam Gauge' type indicators and where 
      >the
      >sensor should or could be positioned. Should a mechanical Water Temperature
      >Gauge considered.
      >
      >Regards
      >
      >Gerry
      >
      >Gerry Holland
      >Europa 384
      >G-FIZY
      >+44 7808 402404
      >gnholland@onetel.com
      >
      >
      
      http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Water Temperature | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "KARL HEINDL" <kheindl@msn.com>
      
      do not archive
      
      Gerry, I also used your wrong heading for return answer on water 
      temperature.
      
      Karl
      
      
      >From: Gerry Holland <gnholland@onetel.com>
      >Reply-To: europa-list@matronics.com
      >To: <europa-list@matronics.com>
      >Subject: Europa-List: Water Temperature
      >Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 19:48:38 +0100
      >
      >--> Europa-List message posted by: Gerry Holland <gnholland@onetel.com>
      >
      >Sorry about Subject field being wrong on earlier e-mail. I need information
      >on Water Temperature Monitoring.
      >
      >
      
      http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Water Temperature | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: Gerry Holland <gnholland@onetel.com>
      
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: "KARL HEINDL" <kheindl@msn.com>
      > 
      > do not archive
      > 
      > Gerry, I also used your wrong heading for return answer on water
      > temperature.
      > 
      
      I started that with a senior moment earlier!
      
      Regards
      
      Gerry
      
      
      Gerry Holland
      Europa 384
      G-FIZY
      +44 7808 402404
      gnholland@onetel.com
      
      do not archive
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Water Temperature | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: James Nelson <europajim@juno.com>
      
      Gerry,
              If you are using the EIS system, they have provisions for water
      temp. monitoring.  I have it on mine. The sender is in an aluminum tube
      inserted in the return line going back to the radiator.  Just be sure to
      include a ground wire for the sensor.  It just gives you one more sensor
      to detect a failure.  You have the CHT, EGT and water temp. to sense a
      coolant failure.  What more could you want?   :-))    I like my EIS..
      
      
      Jim Nelson
      N15JN
      
      
      On Tue, 27 May 2003 19:48:38 +0100 Gerry Holland <gnholland@onetel.com>
      writes:
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: Gerry Holland 
      > <gnholland@onetel.com>
      > 
      > Sorry about Subject field being wrong on earlier e-mail. I need 
      > information
      > on Water Temperature Monitoring.
      > 
      > 
      >
      >
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Static Charges and how to avoid them | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "J R \(Bob\) Gowing" <gowingjr@acr.net.au>
      
      It was my understanding that the exploding glider in the UK had water in the
      wings and the lightning used it as a right-of-way converting the water to a
      sort of steam explosive-like charge which disintegrated the ship.
      
      J R (Bob) Gowing, Kit 327 in Oz
      do not archive
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Peter Zutrauen" <peterz@zutrasoft.com>
      Subject: RE: Europa-List: Static Charges and how to avoid them
      
      
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: "Peter Zutrauen" <peterz@zutrasoft.com>
      >
      > Not to be argumentative, and altho I agree with Fred that internal
      > grounding of the tank may be a bad idea in the case of a
      > lightning-strike, plastic planes (without any embedded
      > charge-distributing protective mesh) can and do indeed 'explode' when
      > hit by lightning anyway - the UK glider as an example.  Hmmmm.... I
      > wonder how they would have faired if it were a Motorglider with fuel on
      > board ;-)
      >
      >
      > If the lancair accident was indeed a lightning strike, they should
      > easily identify all those melted/burned pieces. I wonder if the new
      > Lancairs have mesh.
      >
      > Cheers,
      > Pete
      > A239
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: Fred Fillinger [mailto:fillinger@ameritech.net]
      > To: europa-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: Re: Europa-List: Static Charges and how to avoid them
      >
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: Fred Fillinger
      > <fillinger@ameritech.net>
      >
      >  > Fred,
      >  >
      >  > I agree with you that bonding other metal parts in the fuel
      >  > system to the filler cap is probably less safe rather than
      >  > more so.  However if fuel drains are fitted, I think it's a
      >  > good idea to ground them independently. Although it's a fairly
      >  > remote possibility the last thing you need is a spark when you
      >  > are lying on the ground draining fuel!
      >  >
      >  > Best regards,
      >  > Nick
      >
      > If a remote possibility, it's because static inside the tank dissipates
      > by itself shortly after refueling, and pre-flight fuel samples aren't
      > static producers.  Nevertheless, note that merely tying it to A/C ground
      >
      > does not remove any charge.  The A/C ground has to be earthed also to be
      >
      > effective.
      >
      > Regarding anything metal exposed to the fuel tank innards which is tied
      > via a run of wire to A/C ground, there may be no good statistical answer
      >
      > comparing the lightning hazard vs. that of static charges.  I have only
      > one such item, the fuel sender, and it has a 2-pin connector accessible
      > inside the headrest.  Theory is if caught near a storm, pull the thing
      > to at least feel better.
      >
      > Recently a Lancair IV "exploded" in cruise, deviating around
      > thunderstorms, in apparent VMC on top.  The preliminary report suggests
      > either G-load induced separation of both wings simultaneously - a rare
      > event...or a lightning strike.  At least worrisome until NTSB says what
      > happened:
      >
      > www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?ev_id=20030520X00696&key=1
      >
      > Regards,
      > Fred F.
      >
      >
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Mods needed for glider wings? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "J R \(Bob\) Gowing" <gowingjr@acr.net.au>
      
      Thank you Tony,
      It has had me intrigued but have not seen any explanation published in
      Europa Aricraft News where one would expect to see such informantion; or
      anywhere else.
      
      Now I can permanently forget glider wings!
      
      J R (Bob) Gowing, Kit 327 in Oz
      do not archive
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Tony S. Krzyzewski" <tonyk@kaon.co.nz>
      Subject: RE: Europa-List: Mods needed for glider wings?
      
      
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: "Tony S. Krzyzewski" <tonyk@kaon.co.nz>
      >
      >
      > >>> I have thought that it would be abit of ajob to get the lift pins in
      > exactly
      > the same position on the second pair of wings. Anyone done this easily
      > yet?
      >
      > I think that was one of the drivers behind the factory predrilling and
      > tapping the lift pin holes in the XS short wings and glider wings.
      >
      > Tony
      >
      >
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Static Charges and how to avoid them | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: Fred Fillinger <fillinger@ameritech.net>
      
      Peter Zutrauen wrote:
      > Not to be argumentative, and altho I agree with Fred that internal
      > grounding of the tank may be a bad idea in the case of a
      > lightning-strike, plastic planes (without any embedded
      > charge-distributing protective mesh) can and do indeed 'explode' when
      > hit by lightning anyway - the UK glider as an example.
      
      With one very important difference though.  Even beyond the fact the UK 
      incident involved a monster lightning bolt that is rare:
      
      I takes 2/10 of one thousandth of a Joule to ignite gasoline.  The 
      average lightning bolt has 5 billion Joules!  This is why FAA cautions 
      lightning discharges of a variety we don't consider lightning bolts can 
      blow up a plastic fuel tank, if it has a way of getting inside.
      
      In the UK incident, the lightning didn't damage the fiberglass 
      structure, but it was the indirect effects of attachment to control 
      systems - EMP blast and 50,000F degrees worth of atmospheric 
      overpressure.  In strikes of average strength to composite A/C, the 
      instances I can find suggests lightning commonly attaches to electrical 
      systems.
      
      Regards,
      Fred F.
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Mods needed for glider wings? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Paul McAllister" <paul.mcallister@qia.net>
      
      Bob,
      
      I did ask Neville at the factory the same question and they have a method
      for doing this for the earlier Europa's that did not have pre drilled holes.
      I can't recollect the exact details but the approach was pretty cunning. If
      its something you want to pursue send him an email.
      
      Cheers,  Paul
      
      
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "J R (Bob) Gowing" <gowingjr@acr.net.au>
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: Mods needed for glider wings?
      
      
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: "J R \(Bob\) Gowing"
      <gowingjr@acr.net.au>
      >
      > Thank you Tony,
      > It has had me intrigued but have not seen any explanation published in
      > Europa Aricraft News where one would expect to see such informantion; or
      > anywhere else.
      >
      > Now I can permanently forget glider wings!
      >
      > J R (Bob) Gowing, Kit 327 in Oz
      > do not archive
      >
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: "Tony S. Krzyzewski" <tonyk@kaon.co.nz>
      > To: <europa-list@matronics.com>
      > Subject: RE: Europa-List: Mods needed for glider wings?
      >
      >
      > > --> Europa-List message posted by: "Tony S. Krzyzewski"
      <tonyk@kaon.co.nz>
      > >
      > >
      > > >>> I have thought that it would be abit of ajob to get the lift pins in
      > > exactly
      > > the same position on the second pair of wings. Anyone done this easily
      > > yet?
      > >
      > > I think that was one of the drivers behind the factory predrilling and
      > > tapping the lift pin holes in the XS short wings and glider wings.
      > >
      > > Tony
      > >
      > >
      >
      >
      
      
      
      
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |