Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 01:36 AM - Door Support (Kingsley Hurst)
     2. 02:18 AM - Re: Door Support (R.C.Harrison)
     3. 02:33 AM -  (owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com)
     4. 03:31 AM -  (owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com)
     5. 05:19 AM - Re: Door Support (Kingsley Hurst)
     6. 09:41 AM - Re: Door Support (R.C.Harrison)
     7. 09:42 AM - Re: PFA roadshow 6-7 Gloucester Staverton (R.C.Harrison)
     8. 11:34 AM - Re: PFA roadshow 6-7 Gloucester Staverton (Michael Parkin)
     9. 11:49 AM - Re: Door Support (Ami McFadyean)
    10. 12:37 PM - Re: Andrew Sarangan's Archive (John Cliff)
    11. 12:57 PM - Re: Europa XS 'conventional' landing gear (Ami McFadyean)
    12. 02:29 PM - Re: Door Support (JR \(Bob\) Gowing)
    13. 03:07 PM - Re: Door Support (Peter Zutrauen)
    14. 03:44 PM - Re: Door Support (Kingsley Hurst)
    15. 11:21 PM - Antw: Door Support (Alfred Buess)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Kingsley Hurst" <hurstkr@growzone.com.au>
      
      Hello All,
      
      This posting is rather belated but nevertheless I think it is worth doing.
      Some time ago, there was considerable discussion regarding the problem of
      deformation of the doors and the method of attachment of the gas struts.
      
      I now wish to announce to the world that I have adopted the principle and
      now sing the praises of Ted Gladstone's brilliant idea which completely
      eliminates all strain on the door as a result of the forces applied by the
      gas strut.
      
      Before carrying out this mod, I must admit to having first tried the
      "alternative" method which I think most builders are now adopting.  When I
      did so however, I still found that the door deformed slightly where the
      strut attached at its new location and also that the gap at the top of the
      door opened up an extra 1.5mm.  Further,  on closing the door, there was a
      large amount of distortion requiring it to be positively held in alignment
      before it could be fully closed.  Admittedly, there was no perspex in the
      door to provide extra bracing but it was my desire that the perspex should
      not have to contribute in this manner.  I therefore went to the trouble of
      laying up one ply of carbon fibre on the inner surface from the rear hinge
      to 2/3 of the way down the back of the door.  This strengthened the door
      considerably but I was still not happy about the poor rear hinge having to
      withstand the consistent 25 to 27 kg load.  If you don't feel sorry for the
      hinge, see how long you can hold the gas strut fully closed.  I hadn't got
      to replacing the new attachment point when I learned of Ted's idea and I
      immediately recognised it as being what I consider the only true answer to
      the problem found to date.
      
      Because I am not constrained by limitations imposed by the PFA like Ted is,
      I was able to make mine slightly different from Ted's in as much as I cut
      the bottom out of the gas strut channel in order that I could make it a
      little deeper which in turn allowed a little longer strut and slightly
      differing geometry which I am pleased to be able to say has been most
      rewarding.  Anybody who is interested in this approach and who hasn't yet
      installed the roll over bracing at the back between the doors would be well
      advised to do the modified layup of the channels and the reinforcement
      section all in one go because it provides a good opportunity to include a
      couple of layers of uni from just below the lower end of the channel right
      across to the same point on the opposite side.
      
      The end result of all this is that I now have doors (still without perspex)
      that close without the slightest sign of misalignment, that have absolutely
      no residual strain on them when fully closed and have a much improved hold
      open force which supports 4 x 1 kg bags of sand placed on the larger area of
      the door when fully open.  The only disappointment was that the carbon fibre
      layups have been made completely redundant but I am certainly not going to
      remove them now.
      
      CAVEAT
      
      This mod does require a reasonable amount of work and indeed patience and I
      would suggest it is not for the feint hearted.  If you like a bit of a
      challenge then the reward is there for the taking.
      
      For me, it is one of those things that when completed, makes me feel good
      every time I operate it as opposed to being something that "I wish I had
      done"
      
      If there is sufficient interest, I would be prepared to draw up the
      dimensions I finally arrived at.  I have photos and a video of the operation
      but unfortunately I don't know how to make the video condensed enough to
      publish it on the web.  If I am requested to supply details I wish to point
      out that I have to do so with full acknowledgement to Ted Gladstone for the
      advice and assistance provided by him to me several months ago for which I
      am extremely grateful.  Thanks Ted.  Hope you haven't taken out a patent!!
      
      Regards
      Kingsley Hurst
      Mono Classic 281 in Oz
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "R.C.Harrison" <ptag.dev@ukonline.co.uk>
      
      Hi! Kingsley.
      I'll confirm that all you say about Ted's mod. is true. Having seen it at
      the East Fortune Fly In a couple of weeks ago I can say that it is a most
      simplistic way of addressing the problem.
      From my point of view I'm wondering if it were to be fitted retrospectively
      would the doors eventually return to their original undeformed shape ? Any
      input on this question would convince me to action it this next winter.
      Did Ted send you details or is he leaving it to you to circulate because
      although I spoke to him I was rushing to leave and am now wishing I had
      asked him to forward me a copy.
      Incidentally he has also developed an excellent Mono Wheel and Flap
      operating system which is very inovative....I believe he is awaiting PFA
      approval.
      Regards
      Bob Harrison G-PTAG
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Kingsley
      Hurst
      Subject: Europa-List: Door Support
      
      
      -
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: 
      
      =0D=0ADe:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com=0D=0A=0D=0APara:europa-list@matronics.com=0D=0A=0D=0AC=F3pia:=0D=0A=0D=0AData:Thu,
      04 Sep 2003 12:38:05 +0100=0D=0A=0D=0AAssunto:Europa-List:
      Re: Glide Angles=0D=0A=0D=0A  =0D=0A=0D=0A> -->
      Europa-List message posted by: "david joyce" =0D=0A> =0D=0A> Alex, Increased
      weight does not alter best glide angle nor glide range, it=0D=0A> just lets
      you achieve your optimum glide angle at higher speeds, or hit the=0D=0A> ground
      sooner if you like to look at it that way! David Joyce=0D=0A> =0D=0A=0D=0AYes,
      thanks Dave- i have eaten humble pie and washed it down with miff juice!=0D=0AMiffed
      because I was taught the wrong way around on a CPL course and I wonder
      how many more have gotten it the wrong way- I remember it being a point of
      much discussion and now that I looked up the question on the net, several places
      actually says the wrong thing!! The majority of places gives the right information
      with very good explanations.=0D=0A=0D=0AAlex
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: 
      
      
      De:Alex Kaarsberg
      Para:europa-list@matronics.com
      Cpia:
      
      Data:Sun, 07 Sep 2003 06:33:00 -0300
      
      Assunto:Forum archive
      
        
      
      Can anybody tell me why it is not possible to search for old messages on asarangans'
      site? 
      Is it not running any more?
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Door Support | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Kingsley Hurst" <hurstkr@growzone.com.au>
      
      > I'll confirm that all you say about Ted's mod. is true. Having seen it at
      > the East Fortune Fly In a couple of weeks ago I can say that it is a most
      > simplistic way of addressing the problem.
      > From my point of view I'm wondering if it were to be fitted
      retrospectively
      > would the doors eventually return to their original undeformed shape ?
      
      Bob,
      
      I am far from being an authority in this field but I can see no reason why
      you could not get the doors back to their original shape.
      
      I would try placing heavy shot bags (something that absorbs heat) on the
      doors while the aircraft is parked in the sun and maybe cover the top corner
      of the doors with some black pvc sheeting too.  It may take some time but I
      think it would gradually work provided the mod was done first so that there
      would be nothing trying to still push the corners up.  If you don't have
      enough sun over there, bring it over here because I can assure you we have
      plenty.  Last week I did a trip in a C172 with one of my boys who is doing
      his commercial training....... we covered just under 1400 nm and didn't see
      one cloud from horizon to horizon all the way.
      
      Back to the subject, I think I remember reading on the Forum that the
      "alternative" method has the effect of returning things to normal too so it
      might be worthwhile checking that out too.
      
      Hope you get on top of the problem Bob, the deformity sure does detract from
      the appeal of what is otherwise a lovely aircraft.
      
      BTW, I am familiar also with Ted and Justin's undercarriage geometry but
      unfortunately, I found out about it too late and the equipment to do such is
      not available where I live anyway so I have to pass on that one.
      
      Regards
      Kingsley
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "R.C.Harrison" <ptag.dev@ukonline.co.uk>
      
      Hi! Kingsley.
      Yes, I was concerned about the doors returning to their original shape since
      that would leave about 1/18" filler sitting proud on the top of the
      fuselage. Nevertheless the mod. is a worthy consideration.
      On your weather item..... our summer this time round has left your
      boastfullness a little pale!
      But as to recent years you've answered where our Summers had gone!
      
      Regards
      Bob Harrison G-PTAG
      PS Don't archive.
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Kingsley
      Hurst
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: Door Support
      
      
      -
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | PFA roadshow 6-7 Gloucester Staverton | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "R.C.Harrison" <ptag.dev@ukonline.co.uk>
      
      Hi! Rowland/David B.
      Thanks for the info. on Gloucester/Staverton. It's nice to have it indicated
      that I'm really a "youngster" after all !!!! Alas I fear it is more likely
      because Gloucester isn't a place I've often frequented other than when my
      Son was involved on the Second Severn Crossing.  Because I was aware of the
      "Ha'penny Green" item!
      I guess now I stayed at home you will tell me that the weather was perfect
      in spite of the crap forcast I collected at 0600 hours this morning?
      regards
      Bob H G-PTAG
      
      Don't archive.
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: PFA roadshow 6-7 Gloucester Staverton | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Michael Parkin" <Mikenjulie.Parkin@btopenworld.com>
      
      Bob,
      
      You were right, the weather was perfect!!!    Where were you - noticeable by
      your absence.
      
      regards,
      
      Mike
      
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "R.C.Harrison" <ptag.dev@ukonline.co.uk>
      Subject: RE: Europa-List: PFA roadshow 6-7 Gloucester Staverton
      
      
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: "R.C.Harrison"
      <ptag.dev@ukonline.co.uk>
      >
      > Hi! Rowland/David B.
      > Thanks for the info. on Gloucester/Staverton. It's nice to have it
      indicated
      > that I'm really a "youngster" after all !!!! Alas I fear it is more likely
      > because Gloucester isn't a place I've often frequented other than when my
      > Son was involved on the Second Severn Crossing.  Because I was aware of
      the
      > "Ha'penny Green" item!
      > I guess now I stayed at home you will tell me that the weather was perfect
      > in spite of the crap forcast I collected at 0600 hours this morning?
      > regards
      > Bob H G-PTAG
      >
      > Don't archive.
      >
      >
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Door Support | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Ami McFadyean" <ami@mcfadyean.freeserve.co.uk>
      
      I've found that the doors generally do have a memory for their original
      shape, once the distorting load is permently removed. It takes a while
      (weeks) and is helped by hot weather.
      
      Duncan McF.
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "R.C.Harrison" <ptag.dev@ukonline.co.uk>
      
      
      > From my point of view I'm wondering if
      ......................................the doors eventually return to their
      original undeformed shape ?
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Andrew Sarangan's Archive | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "John Cliff" <mx@crixbinfield.freeserve.co.uk>
      
      
      > Can anybody tell me why it is not possible to search for old messages on
      asarangans' site?
      > Is it not running any more?
      
      The website is running but the search engine, as you say, won't find anything.
      Andrew, are you reading ?
      
      John Cliff
      #0259
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Europa XS 'conventional' landing gear | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Ami McFadyean" <ami@mcfadyean.freeserve.co.uk>
      
      The photos shown on the CCE web page are of Stephan Rouvenet's Europa that
      had his own iteration of the TD gear. The tailwhel spring was taken from a
      KIS, which is deeper than the standard Europa
      
      As to your comments, the Swiss TD conversion will place the nose in a higher
      position (unless hte leg is cut-down during installation) so that with the
      sandard tailwheel there is LESS need of a wheeler landing. The axle position
      of hte gear is at the same fuselage station as the Monowheel, which is
      already at a position well forward of hte norm.
      
      There are a number of these conversions flying in hte UK.
      
      Duncan McF.
      
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: <n3eu@comcast.net>
      >
      > Skipping commentary on their home page(!), the above web story seems to
      end
      > about 1/2000, before flight testing.  Though someone more qualified re
      > taildraggers than I should comment, seems to me not much nose-up attitude,
      > making wheel landings the norm.  How this then affects behavior on rough
      > surfaces would be one question. Another consideration thus may be engine
      > choice, where the heavier the installation the more tendency to nose over,
      as
      > the gear location seems as minimally fwd as desirable, esp with the effect
      > full flaps on the Europa.
      >
      > In general though, the tunnel not required for the monowheel is available
      for
      > installation of systems, making them far more accessible for inspection
      and
      > maintenance.
      >
      > Regards,
      > Fred F.
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Door Support | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "JR \(Bob\) Gowing" <gowingjr@acr.net.au>
      
      Kingsley
      
      Put me on the list of interested persons please.
      J R
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Kingsley Hurst" <hurstkr@growzone.com.au>
      Subject: Europa-List: Door Support
      
      
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: "Kingsley Hurst"
      <hurstkr@growzone.com.au>
      >
      > Hello All,
      >
      > This posting is rather belated but nevertheless I think it is worth doing.
      > Some time ago, there was considerable discussion regarding the problem of
      > deformation of the doors and the method of attachment of the gas struts.
      >
      > I now wish to announce to the world that I have adopted the principle and
      > now sing the praises of Ted Gladstone's brilliant idea which completely
      > eliminates all strain on the door as a result of the forces applied by the
      > gas strut.
      >
      > Before carrying out this mod, I must admit to having first tried the
      > "alternative" method which I think most builders are now adopting.  When I
      > did so however, I still found that the door deformed slightly where the
      > strut attached at its new location and also that the gap at the top of the
      > door opened up an extra 1.5mm.  Further,  on closing the door, there was a
      > large amount of distortion requiring it to be positively held in alignment
      > before it could be fully closed.  Admittedly, there was no perspex in the
      > door to provide extra bracing but it was my desire that the perspex should
      > not have to contribute in this manner.  I therefore went to the trouble of
      > laying up one ply of carbon fibre on the inner surface from the rear hinge
      > to 2/3 of the way down the back of the door.  This strengthened the door
      > considerably but I was still not happy about the poor rear hinge having to
      > withstand the consistent 25 to 27 kg load.  If you don't feel sorry for
      the
      > hinge, see how long you can hold the gas strut fully closed.  I hadn't got
      > to replacing the new attachment point when I learned of Ted's idea and I
      > immediately recognised it as being what I consider the only true answer to
      > the problem found to date.
      >
      > Because I am not constrained by limitations imposed by the PFA like Ted
      is,
      > I was able to make mine slightly different from Ted's in as much as I cut
      > the bottom out of the gas strut channel in order that I could make it a
      > little deeper which in turn allowed a little longer strut and slightly
      > differing geometry which I am pleased to be able to say has been most
      > rewarding.  Anybody who is interested in this approach and who hasn't yet
      > installed the roll over bracing at the back between the doors would be
      well
      > advised to do the modified layup of the channels and the reinforcement
      > section all in one go because it provides a good opportunity to include a
      > couple of layers of uni from just below the lower end of the channel right
      > across to the same point on the opposite side.
      >
      > The end result of all this is that I now have doors (still without
      perspex)
      > that close without the slightest sign of misalignment, that have
      absolutely
      > no residual strain on them when fully closed and have a much improved hold
      > open force which supports 4 x 1 kg bags of sand placed on the larger area
      of
      > the door when fully open.  The only disappointment was that the carbon
      fibre
      > layups have been made completely redundant but I am certainly not going to
      > remove them now.
      >
      > CAVEAT
      >
      > This mod does require a reasonable amount of work and indeed patience and
      I
      > would suggest it is not for the feint hearted.  If you like a bit of a
      > challenge then the reward is there for the taking.
      >
      > For me, it is one of those things that when completed, makes me feel good
      > every time I operate it as opposed to being something that "I wish I had
      > done"
      >
      > If there is sufficient interest, I would be prepared to draw up the
      > dimensions I finally arrived at.  I have photos and a video of the
      operation
      > but unfortunately I don't know how to make the video condensed enough to
      > publish it on the web.  If I am requested to supply details I wish to
      point
      > out that I have to do so with full acknowledgement to Ted Gladstone for
      the
      > advice and assistance provided by him to me several months ago for which I
      > am extremely grateful.  Thanks Ted.  Hope you haven't taken out a patent!!
      >
      > Regards
      > Kingsley Hurst
      > Mono Classic 281 in Oz
      >
      >
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Peter Zutrauen" <peterz@zutrasoft.com>
      
      Hi Kingsley,
      
      Yip, yet another thanks from me.... I would be very interested in
      any/all info you could provide about your mod. I really liked Ted's
      solution, except for the limited open pressure when fully opened. You
      seem to have conquered that geometry issue.
      
      
      Cheers & Thanks,
      Peter Zutrauen
      Europa Builder A239 dual-wing
      Ph:   613-831-0348
      Cell:  613-851-1640
      Fax:  613-831-9955
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Kingsley Hurst [mailto:hurstkr@growzone.com.au] 
      Subject: Europa-List: Door Support
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Kingsley Hurst"
      <hurstkr@growzone.com.au>
      
      Hello All,
      
      This posting is rather belated but nevertheless I think it is worth
      doing.
      Some time ago, there was considerable discussion regarding the problem
      of
      deformation of the doors and the method of attachment of the gas struts.
      
      I now wish to announce to the world that I have adopted the principle
      and
      now sing the praises of Ted Gladstone's brilliant idea which completely
      eliminates all strain on the door as a result of the forces applied by
      the
      gas strut.
      
      Before carrying out this mod, I must admit to having first tried the
      "alternative" method which I think most builders are now adopting.  When
      I
      did so however, I still found that the door deformed slightly where the
      strut attached at its new location and also that the gap at the top of
      the
      door opened up an extra 1.5mm.  Further,  on closing the door, there was
      a
      large amount of distortion requiring it to be positively held in
      alignment
      before it could be fully closed.  Admittedly, there was no perspex in
      the
      door to provide extra bracing but it was my desire that the perspex
      should
      not have to contribute in this manner.  I therefore went to the trouble
      of
      laying up one ply of carbon fibre on the inner surface from the rear
      hinge
      to 2/3 of the way down the back of the door.  This strengthened the door
      considerably but I was still not happy about the poor rear hinge having
      to
      withstand the consistent 25 to 27 kg load.  If you don't feel sorry for
      the
      hinge, see how long you can hold the gas strut fully closed.  I hadn't
      got
      to replacing the new attachment point when I learned of Ted's idea and I
      immediately recognised it as being what I consider the only true answer
      to
      the problem found to date.
      
      Because I am not constrained by limitations imposed by the PFA like Ted
      is,
      I was able to make mine slightly different from Ted's in as much as I
      cut
      the bottom out of the gas strut channel in order that I could make it a
      little deeper which in turn allowed a little longer strut and slightly
      differing geometry which I am pleased to be able to say has been most
      rewarding.  Anybody who is interested in this approach and who hasn't
      yet
      installed the roll over bracing at the back between the doors would be
      well
      advised to do the modified layup of the channels and the reinforcement
      section all in one go because it provides a good opportunity to include
      a
      couple of layers of uni from just below the lower end of the channel
      right
      across to the same point on the opposite side.
      
      The end result of all this is that I now have doors (still without
      perspex)
      that close without the slightest sign of misalignment, that have
      absolutely
      no residual strain on them when fully closed and have a much improved
      hold
      open force which supports 4 x 1 kg bags of sand placed on the larger
      area of
      the door when fully open.  The only disappointment was that the carbon
      fibre
      layups have been made completely redundant but I am certainly not going
      to
      remove them now.
      
      CAVEAT
      
      This mod does require a reasonable amount of work and indeed patience
      and I
      would suggest it is not for the feint hearted.  If you like a bit of a
      challenge then the reward is there for the taking.
      
      For me, it is one of those things that when completed, makes me feel
      good
      every time I operate it as opposed to being something that "I wish I had
      done"
      
      If there is sufficient interest, I would be prepared to draw up the
      dimensions I finally arrived at.  I have photos and a video of the
      operation
      but unfortunately I don't know how to make the video condensed enough to
      publish it on the web.  If I am requested to supply details I wish to
      point
      out that I have to do so with full acknowledgement to Ted Gladstone for
      the
      advice and assistance provided by him to me several months ago for which
      I
      am extremely grateful.  Thanks Ted.  Hope you haven't taken out a
      patent!!
      
      Regards
      Kingsley Hurst
      Mono Classic 281 in Oz
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Door Support | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Kingsley Hurst" <hurstkr@growzone.com.au>
      
      Do not archive
      
      > Yes, I was concerned about the doors returning to their original shape
      since
      > that would leave about 1/18" filler sitting proud on the top of the
      > fuselage.
      
      What sort of measuring system are you using here Bob ??  Space age imperial
      ??  1/18" sounds like about 1/2 of 2/3 of 5/8 of F%$# ALL to me.  Just
      joking mate.
      
      Sorry, I misunderstood you, I thought you WANTED the deformation to
      disappear!
      
      BTW, I wasn't "boasting" about the sun, we would much prefer some rain
      believe me.
      
      Regards
      Kingsley
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Alfred Buess" <Alfred.Buess@shl.bfh.ch>
      
      Hi Kingsley
      
      As I am not happy at all with the standard door support system, I am very interested
      in Ted's and your solution. Any pictures, sketches and measures are welcome!
      
      Thank you,
      Alfred Buess, Switzerland
      # 097 Monowheel Classic wings XS fuselage
      
      
      >>> hurstkr@growzone.com.au 09/07 10:35   >>>
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Kingsley Hurst" <hurstkr@growzone.com.au>
      
      Hello All,
      
      This posting is rather belated but nevertheless I think it is worth doing.
      Some time ago, there was considerable discussion regarding the problem of
      deformation of the doors and the method of attachment of the gas struts.
      
      I now wish to announce to the world that I have adopted the principle and
      now sing the praises of Ted Gladstone's brilliant idea which completely
      eliminates all strain on the door as a result of the forces applied by the
      gas strut.
      
      Before carrying out this mod, I must admit to having first tried the
      "alternative" method which I think most builders are now adopting.  When I
      did so however, I still found that the door deformed slightly where the
      strut attached at its new location and also that the gap at the top of the
      door opened up an extra 1.5mm.  Further,  on closing the door, there was a
      large amount of distortion requiring it to be positively held in alignment
      before it could be fully closed.  Admittedly, there was no perspex in the
      door to provide extra bracing but it was my desire that the perspex should
      not have to contribute in this manner.  I therefore went to the trouble of
      laying up one ply of carbon fibre on the inner surface from the rear hinge
      to 2/3 of the way down the back of the door.  This strengthened the door
      considerably but I was still not happy about the poor rear hinge having to
      withstand the consistent 25 to 27 kg load.  If you don't feel sorry for the
      hinge, see how long you can hold the gas strut fully closed.  I hadn't got
      to replacing the new attachment point when I learned of Ted's idea and I
      immediately recognised it as being what I consider the only true answer to
      the problem found to date.
      
      Because I am not constrained by limitations imposed by the PFA like Ted is,
      I was able to make mine slightly different from Ted's in as much as I cut
      the bottom out of the gas strut channel in order that I could make it a
      little deeper which in turn allowed a little longer strut and slightly
      differing geometry which I am pleased to be able to say has been most
      rewarding.  Anybody who is interested in this approach and who hasn't yet
      installed the roll over bracing at the back between the doors would be well
      advised to do the modified layup of the channels and the reinforcement
      section all in one go because it provides a good opportunity to include a
      couple of layers of uni from just below the lower end of the channel right
      across to the same point on the opposite side.
      
      The end result of all this is that I now have doors (still without perspex)
      that close without the slightest sign of misalignment, that have absolutely
      no residual strain on them when fully closed and have a much improved hold
      open force which supports 4 x 1 kg bags of sand placed on the larger area of
      the door when fully open.  The only disappointment was that the carbon fibre
      layups have been made completely redundant but I am certainly not going to
      remove them now.
      
      CAVEAT
      
      This mod does require a reasonable amount of work and indeed patience and I
      would suggest it is not for the feint hearted.  If you like a bit of a
      challenge then the reward is there for the taking.
      
      For me, it is one of those things that when completed, makes me feel good
      every time I operate it as opposed to being something that "I wish I had
      done"
      
      If there is sufficient interest, I would be prepared to draw up the
      dimensions I finally arrived at.  I have photos and a video of the operation
      but unfortunately I don't know how to make the video condensed enough to
      publish it on the web.  If I am requested to supply details I wish to point
      out that I have to do so with full acknowledgement to Ted Gladstone for the
      advice and assistance provided by him to me several months ago for which I
      am extremely grateful.  Thanks Ted.  Hope you haven't taken out a patent!!
      
      Regards
      Kingsley Hurst
      Mono Classic 281 in Oz
      
      
      
      
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |