Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:22 AM - List Fund Raiser - What Listers Are Saying... (Matt Dralle)
     2. 03:03 AM - Re: Insurance for aeroplane parts (Raimo Toivio)
     3. 05:22 AM - Re: Insurance for aeroplane parts (Gerry Holland)
     4. 06:01 AM - Re: Insurance for aeroplane parts (Jim Puglise)
     5. 09:46 AM - Re: Where to get a 914 Intercooler? (Shaun Simpkins)
     6. 09:46 AM - Re: What engine for my Europa? (Shaun Simpkins)
     7. 09:53 AM - Re: What engine for my Europa? (Terry Seaver)
     8. 10:28 AM - Re:Brake Oil Seals (Alan Burrows)
     9. 10:36 AM - Re: Re: What engine for my Europa? (Gilles Thesee)
    10. 10:43 AM - Re: What engine for my Europa? (Richard Sementilli)
    11. 11:14 AM - New Spar Pip-pn (Raimo Toivio)
    12. 12:08 PM - Re: New Spar Pip-pn (Duncan McFadyean)
    13. 12:08 PM - Re: What engine for my Europa? (Duncan McFadyean)
    14. 01:41 PM - 912S - cylinder cowl??? (Sidsel & Svein Johnsen)
    15. 01:57 PM - Help - I need a ferry pilot in the UK (Peter Rees)
    16. 02:23 PM - Re: 912S - cylinder cowl??? (Gilles Thesee)
    17. 02:26 PM - Long wings and ratings (Dave Anderson)
    18. 03:52 PM - Re: 912S - cylinder cowl??? (JEFF ROBERTS)
    19. 05:46 PM - Re: Long wings and ratings (Kevin Klinefelter)
    20. 06:27 PM - Re: What engine for my Europa? (KARL HEINDL)
    21. 10:42 PM - my first flight (Paul Boulet)
    22. 10:43 PM - SV: 912S - cylinder cowl??? (Sidsel & Svein Johnsen)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | List Fund Raiser - What Listers Are Saying... | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com>
      
      Dear Listers,
      
      First, I'd like say *thank you* to everyone that has already made a 
      Contribution to this year's List Fund Raiser!  Thank you!  If you haven't 
      made your Contribution, won't you show your support for these valuable 
      services today?  Since there's no advertising or other forms of direct 
      commercialism on the forums to support the Lists, its solely YOUR 
      GENEROSITY that keeps them running!!
      
      Members have been including some very nice comments along with their 
      Contributions this year.  Please take a minute to read over some of the 
      thoughts your fellow Listers have expressed regarding the Lists and what 
      they mean to them.  What do the Lists mean to you...?
      
               http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      Thank you!
      
      Matt Dralle
      Matronics Email List Admin
      
      
      The amount of information and simple entertainment I derive from the lists 
      you administer is enormous.
      
                                                     -Chris R.
      
      The [List] digest is the one message in my inbox that I look forward to 
      reading every day.
      
                                                     -Brian U.
      
      [The Lists] are a major asset for the homebuilder.
      
                                                     -Gary K.
      
      I use, and enjoy the List all the time. It is a fantastic tool.
      
                                                     -Patrick M.
      
      [The List] has already paid for itself by answering two questions that I 
      had concerning construction of my [Homebuilt].
      
                                                     -Mike L.
      
      [The List] has provided me with very useful information and helpful 
      building tips.
      
                                                     -Michael E.
      
      Thanks for keeping this text-only and commercial free for all us dial-up 
      users!  Your Lists are the best...
      
                                                     -Mark P.
      
      Great service, I have learned many valuable lessons from others on the 
      [List]...
      
                                                     -Malcolm T.
      
      ...great List service [for] the many and varied within the aviation community.
      
                                                     -David P.
      
      ...great service.
      
                                                     -Terry B.
      
      ...enjoy monitoring the lists.
      
                                                     -Ed A.
      
      ...I do enjoy the Matrix (List).
      
                                                     -Galen H.
      
      Thanks for a great listserve!
      
                                                     -Gary S.
      
      ...GREAT lists...!
      
                                                     -Ray M.
      
      It is a great service.
      
                                                     -Robert K.
      
      Invaluable!
      
                                                     -Larry M.
      
      [The Lists are] the backbone (along with a UK list for Europa) of my 
      building program.
      
                                                     -Fergus K.
      
      Thanks for supporting aviation in this way.
      
                                                     -Reade G.
      
      ...wonderful source of info!
      
                                                     -Lynn M.
      
      
      [The] List has certainly helped me along the way.
      
                                                     -Kevin S.
      
      ...excellent list.
      
                                                     -Ed A.
      
      I enjoy the [the] List, and find it useful.
      
                                                     -John G.
      
      An indispensable part of my day every day!
      
                                                     -Owen B.
      
      A great source of help, encouragement and "partners in crime"!
      
                                                     -Richard T.
      
      Great List.
      
                                                     -Ed K.
      
      Couldn't have [finished my project] without your site and the help of the 
      guys on the List.
      
                                                     -Larry M.
      
      ...great service!
      
                                                     -Walt S.
      
      I enjoy the [the] List everyday.
      
                                                     -John B.
      
      Thank you for keeping everyone in line :)  Its a great list to stay 
      subscribed to.
      
                                                     -Janet D.
      
      ...the most important resource I have to support my hobby.
      
                                                     -Jeff D.
      
      Thank you for all the great features.
      
                                                     -Brian U.
      
      Very valuable resource.
      
                                                     -Thomas S.
      
      ...great service.
      
                                                     -William C.
      
      
      Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551
      925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle@matronics.com Email
      http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft
      do not archive
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Insurance for aeroplane parts | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Raimo Toivio" <raimo.toivio@rwm.fi>
      
      Yes of course!
      
      I have an insurance to cover fire,
      theft and all kind of accidents.
      The insurance covers only parts 
      + work shop + tools and it 
      does not cover manhours
      (too valuable to cover!).
      The worth of my insurance
      is so far about 100 000 euros
      = 120 000 USA dollars 
      = 70 000 english pounds.
      I pay about 0,5 % a year.
      If the worst happens,
      a good insurance is some 
      kind of skinny consolation.
      
      Buy an insurance and you never 
      need it, they say. I hope it works.
      
      Regards,
      Raimo M W Toivio
      
      OH-XRT #417
      OH-CVK
      OH-BLL
      
      37500  Lempaala
      Finland
      tel + 358 3 3753 777
      fax + 358 3 3753 100
      gsm + 358 40 590 1450
      
      raimo.toivio@rwm.fi
      www.rwm.fi
      
      do not archive
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Ronald J. Parigoris" <rparigor@suffolk.lib.ny.us>
      Subject: Europa-List: Insurance for aeroplane parts
      
      
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: "Ronald J. Parigoris" <rparigor@suffolk.lib.ny.us>
      > 
      > Any recommendations for insurance on Europa aeroplane parts sitting in a
      > hangar well
      > before ready to fly?
      > 
      > Thx.
      > Sincerely
      > Ron Parigoris
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Insurance for aeroplane parts | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: Gerry Holland <gnholland@onetel.com>
      
      I have Insurance whilst building.
      
      40,000 Cover whilst in Workshop and it also covers Hull and damage in
      transit on a Trailer.
      
      Price: 260.00 per annum
      
      Regards
      
      Gerry
      Europa 384 G-FIZY
      Trigear with Rotax 912 and Arplast CS Prop.
      Dynon EFIS, KMD 150, Icom A-200 and SL70 Transponder.
      PSS AoA Fitted.
      
      http://www.g-fizy.com
      Mobile: +44 7808 402404
      WebFax: +44 870 7059985
      gnholland@onetel.com
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Insurance for aeroplane parts | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Jim Puglise" <jimpuglise@comcast.net>
      
      Ron-
      
      I am using the regular EAA insurance through Falcon.  You can bind it on a
      phone call, cost is 1% of the insured value.  I was concerned because of the
      number of hurricanes in FL this year.  I've never had a claim under it so
      can't address exactly how good it is.
      
      Jim, A283
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ronald J.
      Parigoris
      Subject: Europa-List: Insurance for aeroplane parts
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Ronald J. Parigoris"
      <rparigor@suffolk.lib.ny.us>
      
      Any recommendations for insurance on Europa aeroplane parts sitting in a
      hangar well
      before ready to fly?
      
      Thx.
      Sincerely
      Ron Parigoris
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | RE: Where to get a 914 Intercooler? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Shaun Simpkins" <shauns@hevanet.com>
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Simpkins, Shaun [mailto:Shaun_Simpkins@or.mxim.com]
      Subject: FW: Message *Not* Posted to Europa-List...
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matronics Email Bounce Service [mailto:bounces@matronics.com]
      Subject: Message *Not* Posted to Europa-List...
      
      
      --
      --     "Poster:   "Simpkins, Shaun" <Shaun_Simpkins@or.mxim.com>"
      --     "Subject:  RE: Where to get a 914 Intercooler?"
      --
      --  The message below was not posted to the Europa-List because the
      --  poster is not a member of any Email List on the Matronics Email System.
      --
      --  Note that this check can be triggered in some cases where your
      --  your message's From: address isn't an *exact* match to the email
      --  address that is subscribed.  An example of this might be where
      --  you are subscribed to a List as:
      --
      --       "joe@internet.com"
      --
      --  but your email message's From: line shows your address as:
      --
      --       "joe@email.internet.com"
      --
      --  While these may be functionally the same email address, there is
      --  no way for the receiving email system to determine that they are
      --  in fact actually the same address.
      --
      --  If this has occured to you while posting a message to a List here at
      --  Matronics, please either change your email application's configuration
      --  so that your From: line matches the email address you have subscribed
      --  as, or go to the Subscription Web Site and unsubscribe your old email
      --  address an subscribe your actual email address.  The Matronics Email
      --  List Subscription Web Page can be found at:
      --
      --       http://www.matronics.com/subscribe
      --
      --  Thank you for your interest in these Email Lists,
      --
      --  Matt Dralle
      --  Matronics Email List Administrator
      --  dralle@matronics.com
      --
      --
      
      
      >-------------------
      >
      >
      > From Shaun_Simpkins@or.mxim.com  Mon Nov  8 07:27:54 2004
      > Received: from barracuda.matronics.com (barracuda.matronics.com
      [66.92.24.21])
      >         by matronics.com (8.11.6/8.11.0/Rbl-Orbs-Dul) with ESMTP id
      iA8FRsw09064
      > X-Barracuda-URL: http://66.92.24.21:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi
      > Received: from mfnex1.maximhq.com (or.mxim.com [204.17.142.6])
      >         by barracuda.matronics.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id
      
      There isn't one that the factory offers.
      
      Denis Vories had one custom-made for his Europa by one of the many
      automobile aftermarket shops in the L.A. area.  Vories' vague description of
      it and
      pictures of the installation were posted on the now-defunct
      www.europa-usa.com website.
      As of 2002 Vories was trying to scare up enough interest in it to get a
      small
      production run started.
      However, he would not release the engineering drawings or specifications
      because he wanted to recoup the engineering costs.
      The design of the intercooler is a bit tricky.  It requires a very low
      pressure drop across the heat exchanger, which is not common in most
      automotive
      intercoolers.
      
      SS
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: What engine for my Europa? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Shaun Simpkins" <shauns@hevanet.com>
      
      If you are interested in low "observer" noise, one thing to consider is
      that the 914's turbo removes a lot of energy, and therefore noise, from
      the engine exhaust.  Noise isn't much of a concern in the US - yet - but
      it's a big deal in Europe and has spawned some interesting designs.
      I'm thinking of the HB207 Alfa, the prototype of which used a 5-blade CS
      prop of scimitar shape turning at 1800RPM to reduce observer noise to
      57dBA, about the level of normal conversation.  The engine was a 110HP 
      2:1 geared Porsche, which, as you might expect, enjoyed such wide
      acceptance that it was replaced by a Rotax 912/914.
      
      Andy's comments about the Jabiru 3300 installation are very interesting
      and informative.  John Lawton's comments about the quietness of the Jabiru
      installation are provocative, given the 3000RPM takeoff RPM.  Andy, would
      you happen to have any ideas as to why this is so, and what Jabiru does
      to address the observer noise issue?
      
      SS
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: What engine for my Europa? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: Terry Seaver <terrys@cisco.com>
      
      Hi Richard,
      
      You didn't say where you do your flying.  If you intend flying at 
      altitude like we do around the Sierra Nevadas, you might consider the 
      914 the best bet.
      We have a mono-wheel XS with 912S and Airmaster prop.  I would seriously 
      consider installing the 914 or Jabiru over the 912S, given our 
      experiences (we have over 400 hours on the plane/engine).
      Issues I have with the 912S are:
      
      1) It shakes the whole plane when starting and stopping, causing great 
      stress on any number of componants.  Our exhaust system is in constant 
      need of repair because of this.  An ignition wire probably broke because 
      of this.  Standing outside the uncowled engine and watching the extreme 
      travel of the shaken componants can be a real eye opener.  It is not 
      unusual to see +2G/0G on the panel mounted accelerometer following a 
      start or stop.   I would guess the 912S is worse than the 914 because of 
      its higher compression.  I would expect the Jabiru to be much smoother.
      
      2) The 912S is a little anemic at high density altitudes.  At 7,000+ 
      feet the plane has difficulty accelerating past 55 knots on take off 
      until the gear/flaps are lifted a little.  Climb rate at these altitudes 
      can also be lower than I would like.
      
      3) The mixture becomes rich at altitude, negating the fuel economy 
      advantages of flying at altitude.  The 914 is altitude compensating, and 
      I assume the Jabiru has a mixture control (?).
      
      4) Although the Rotax is claimed to have a TBO of 1000 hours or greater 
      it is recommended that the gearbox be removed and sent in for check out 
      every 300-400 hours.  There have also been suggestions that idling the 
      912S down to 1400 rpm can cause damage to the gearbox due to rough 
      idling.  We idle our engine at about 1700-1800 rpm, which make the 
      landings a little hotter with the additional idle thrust.
      
      just my two cents worth,
      regards,
      Terry Seaver
      A135 / N135TD
      
      Richard Sementilli wrote:
      
      >--> Europa-List message posted by: Richard Sementilli <rsementi@gmail.com>
      >
      >I am down to 3 choices for an engine for my Europa. 
      >1. Rotax 912S
      >2. Rotax 914
      >3. Jabiru 3300
      >
      >I would like to get objective opinions and actual experiences from
      >anyone about the pro's and cons of each engine.
      >My first choice is the 914 because of the all around performance but
      >more than the huge price, I am worried about the complexity of the
      >engine as it relates to maintenance and overall reliability. I have
      >spoken to a few mechanics for Rotax but none of them have any
      >experience with the 914 turbo. They all say to keep it simple and go
      >with the 912 or the 3300. I agree but I'm willing to stretch that goal
      >if  feel that I could handle the burden of its complexity.
      >My most probable choice would be the 912S because it seems I can get
      >great performance (the same or better than the Jabiru 3300) with
      >relative ease of operation and mainenance, lighter weight, and
      >comparable price to the Jabiru. I've even found a mechanic that is
      >near (2 hours away) to my location. However, to the best of my
      >research, it is still a more complicated engine and drive unit than
      >the simple low reving Jabiru. It needs pump gas almost always, which
      >may not be easy to come by during cross country flights.
      >The Jabiru is the least expensive, most simple design, seems easier to
      >maintain, and is direct drive. However, it's less proven, heavier and
      >I can't find any repair facilities in the NY tristate area.
      >Am I missing any other engine possibilities that could be even a better choice?
      >
      >
      >  
      >
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | RE:Brake Oil Seals | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Alan Burrows" <alan@kestrel-insurance.com>
      
      
      Can anyone help me with finding replacement seals for the parking brake
      unit on my tri-gear. I was doing an overhaul this weekend and found some
      of the seals were badly degraded, so as I had the unit in pieces it
      seemed sensible to replace them all. Also is there a "best way" to
      refill the system with fluid?
      I thought the best way was to force brake fluid up through one of the
      callipers under pressure, thereby pushing the air to the top of the
      system. This theory falls down however when you notice that there is a
      hole between the cylinders in the nice shiny piston unit that I thought
      kept the two brakes on separate systems. So if you fill from one
      calliper then you will simply force the air down the other as well as up
      into the master cylinder in the engine bay and it will not be possible
      to completely purge all the air or am I thinking about this wrongly? 
      Many Thanks
      
      Alan
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: What engine for my Europa? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Gilles Thesee" <Gilles.Thesee@ac-grenoble.fr>
      
      
      > Andy's comments about the Jabiru 3300 installation are very interesting
      > and informative.  John Lawton's comments about the quietness of the Jabiru
      > installation are provocative, given the 3000RPM takeoff RPM.  Andy, would
      > you happen to have any ideas as to why this is so, and what Jabiru does
      > to address the observer noise issue?
      >
      
      Here are a few data on the Jabiru 2200 direct from DynAero, the French
      manufacturer and designer of the MCRs :
      
      - They never had any problems with the Jabiru (except one which was covered
      by warranty)
      - It is lighter than the 912, which is it's main advantage
      - It can't really use it's 80 hp due to the high prop RPM (3300 RPM as
      compared to 2300 for the Rotax)
      - For the same reasons the observer noise is higher because of the higher
      tip mach number.
      - It necessitates a real break in period of 50 h, with mineral oil,
      adjustments every 5 hours, and much heating.
      - They have 250 Rotax flying, and only two Jabiru so they don't have much
      flight experience to date.
      - They would recommend the Rotax for a private owner and the Jabiru for the
      flying clubs, who have a Lycoming culture and would keep their familiar
      landmarks with this "mini Lycoming".
      Further, flying clubs use the Jabiru powered MCR circa 220 km/h, with a
      fixed pitch propeller with medium pitch. This setup gives a performance very
      similar to the familiar Robin DR 400.
      - DynAero's intentions are to have few Jabiru powered aircraft for the time
      being, but with high annual flight time (500 h per year) in order to rapidly
      build experience with the engine.
      - They have a great faith in this engine.
      
      Regards,
      
      Gilles Thesee
      Grenoble, France
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
              s=beta; d=gmail.com;
              b=kSyYPx/NvtwnonWRC4/ZRBLTVQshBR4bB/YnGaUhVc/+prqkPH5yUpGRzpMIWhw0jsIDkVrU7nYaaphfvUC12cA/+cf+hEUBc/ypFF+HJP3+9jYXfZGYYrH6nID5G0GpRDZwIvMb3gmYJP8pbdVMleKzr+WZrk+9PwFVfJ2Zxg0Received:
      by 10.38.15.25 with SMTP id 25mr758431rno;
              Mon, 08 Nov 2004 10:42:53 -0800 (PST)
| Subject:  | Re: What engine for my Europa? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: Richard Sementilli <rsementi@gmail.com>
      
      Thank you for your email. 
      1. Yes, I've heard about the bumpy starts and stops with the 912S
      motor. I also heard that the new ones are equipped with a stronger
      starter motor that powers through the high compression starts, have
      you heard this? I aslo read another email here on the Europa list that
      claims wonderful performance even at altitude with the 912S...I'm so
      confused!!!
      2. I intend to fly it mostly on the east coast but I do intend to take
      it to Lake Tahoe too so I was hoping to get through the mountains with
      the 912S. I would buy the 914 turbo but I am afraid of the reliability
      and complexity of the engine.
      3. I have never heard about the mixture issue, is that common?
      4. Never heard about the gear box wear due to the bumby idle either.
      Is their any solution to this while still using the 912S?
      
      
      On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 09:53:15 -0800, Terry Seaver <terrys@cisco.com> wrote:
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: Terry Seaver <terrys@cisco.com>
      > 
      > Hi Richard,
      > 
      > You didn't say where you do your flying.  If you intend flying at
      > altitude like we do around the Sierra Nevadas, you might consider the
      > 914 the best bet.
      > We have a mono-wheel XS with 912S and Airmaster prop.  I would seriously
      > consider installing the 914 or Jabiru over the 912S, given our
      > experiences (we have over 400 hours on the plane/engine).
      > Issues I have with the 912S are:
      > 
      > 1) It shakes the whole plane when starting and stopping, causing great
      > stress on any number of componants.  Our exhaust system is in constant
      > need of repair because of this.  An ignition wire probably broke because
      > of this.  Standing outside the uncowled engine and watching the extreme
      > travel of the shaken componants can be a real eye opener.  It is not
      > unusual to see +2G/0G on the panel mounted accelerometer following a
      > start or stop.   I would guess the 912S is worse than the 914 because of
      > its higher compression.  I would expect the Jabiru to be much smoother.
      > 
      > 2) The 912S is a little anemic at high density altitudes.  At 7,000+
      > feet the plane has difficulty accelerating past 55 knots on take off
      > until the gear/flaps are lifted a little.  Climb rate at these altitudes
      > can also be lower than I would like.
      > 
      > 3) The mixture becomes rich at altitude, negating the fuel economy
      > advantages of flying at altitude.  The 914 is altitude compensating, and
      > I assume the Jabiru has a mixture control (?).
      > 
      > 4) Although the Rotax is claimed to have a TBO of 1000 hours or greater
      > it is recommended that the gearbox be removed and sent in for check out
      > every 300-400 hours.  There have also been suggestions that idling the
      > 912S down to 1400 rpm can cause damage to the gearbox due to rough
      > idling.  We idle our engine at about 1700-1800 rpm, which make the
      > landings a little hotter with the additional idle thrust.
      > 
      > just my two cents worth,
      > regards,
      > Terry Seaver
      > A135 / N135TD
      > 
      > Richard Sementilli wrote:
      > 
      > >--> Europa-List message posted by: Richard Sementilli <rsementi@gmail.com>
      > >
      > >I am down to 3 choices for an engine for my Europa.
      > >1. Rotax 912S
      > >2. Rotax 914
      > >3. Jabiru 3300
      > >
      > >I would like to get objective opinions and actual experiences from
      > >anyone about the pro's and cons of each engine.
      > >My first choice is the 914 because of the all around performance but
      > >more than the huge price, I am worried about the complexity of the
      > >engine as it relates to maintenance and overall reliability. I have
      > >spoken to a few mechanics for Rotax but none of them have any
      > >experience with the 914 turbo. They all say to keep it simple and go
      > >with the 912 or the 3300. I agree but I'm willing to stretch that goal
      > >if  feel that I could handle the burden of its complexity.
      > >My most probable choice would be the 912S because it seems I can get
      > >great performance (the same or better than the Jabiru 3300) with
      > >relative ease of operation and mainenance, lighter weight, and
      > >comparable price to the Jabiru. I've even found a mechanic that is
      > >near (2 hours away) to my location. However, to the best of my
      > >research, it is still a more complicated engine and drive unit than
      > >the simple low reving Jabiru. It needs pump gas almost always, which
      > >may not be easy to come by during cross country flights.
      > >The Jabiru is the least expensive, most simple design, seems easier to
      > >maintain, and is direct drive. However, it's less proven, heavier and
      > >I can't find any repair facilities in the NY tristate area.
      > >Am I missing any other engine possibilities that could be even a better choice?
      > 
      > 
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > 
      > 
      >
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Raimo Toivio" <raimo.toivio@rwm.fi>
      
      For your information:
      
      As you remember my earlier pip-pin disaster,
      I ordered last Thursday a new pip-pin from
      www.mcmaster.com
      and got it today. So it was only four days
      shipment from the other side of the ball.
      McMaster-Carr service is exellent.
      
      I decided to try part # 93750A720 which is
      T-Handle Push-Button Quick-Release Pin
      W/ Lanyard, 1/2" Diameter,  3 1/2" Usable
      Lenght.
      
      Unit Price is 32,32 USA dollars.
      
      What I got:
      
      It looks exactly like original exept
      T-handle and lanyard. I think manufacturer
      is same. The head of the pin is slightly less
      tapered. All the materials, dimensions and
      even colours seems to be same. It works
      just like original do. So far I am happy.
      
      Raimo M W Toivio
      
      OH-XRT #417
      OH-CVK
      OH-BLL
      
      37500  Lempaala
      Finland
      tel + 358 3 3753 777
      fax + 358 3 3753 100
      gsm + 358 40 590 1450
      
      raimo.toivio@rwm.fi
      www.rwm.fi
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: New Spar Pip-pn | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Duncan McFadyean" <ami@mcfadyean.freeserve.co.uk>
      
      One pip or two pips?
      
      Duncan Mcf.
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Raimo Toivio" <raimo.toivio@rwm.fi>
      Subject: Europa-List: New Spar Pip-pn
      
      
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: "Raimo Toivio" <raimo.toivio@rwm.fi>
      > 
      > For your information:
      > 
      > As you remember my earlier pip-pin disaster,
      > I ordered last Thursday a new pip-pin from
      > www.mcmaster.com
      > and got it today. So it was only four days
      > shipment from the other side of the ball.
      > McMaster-Carr service is exellent.
      > 
      > I decided to try part # 93750A720 which is
      > T-Handle Push-Button Quick-Release Pin
      > W/ Lanyard, 1/2" Diameter,  3 1/2" Usable
      > Lenght.
      > 
      > Unit Price is 32,32 USA dollars.
      > 
      > What I got:
      > 
      > It looks exactly like original exept
      > T-handle and lanyard. I think manufacturer
      > is same. The head of the pin is slightly less
      > tapered. All the materials, dimensions and
      > even colours seems to be same. It works
      > just like original do. So far I am happy.
      > 
      > Raimo M W Toivio
      > 
      > OH-XRT #417
      > OH-CVK
      > OH-BLL
      > 
      > 37500  Lempaala
      > Finland
      > tel + 358 3 3753 777
      > fax + 358 3 3753 100
      > gsm + 358 40 590 1450
      > 
      > raimo.toivio@rwm.fi
      > www.rwm.fi
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: What engine for my Europa? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Duncan McFadyean" <ami@mcfadyean.freeserve.co.uk>
      
      The gearbox service interval is the same for both 912 and 912S. So it's not
      necessarily a function of the high-compression of the "S". In any case, the
      "S" box is stronger.
      
      
      Duncan McF.
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Richard Sementilli" <rsementi@gmail.com>
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: What engine for my Europa?
      
      
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: Richard Sementilli <rsementi@gmail.com>
      >
      > Thank you for your email.
      > 1. Yes, I've heard about the bumpy starts and stops with the 912S
      > motor. I also heard that the new ones are equipped with a stronger
      > starter motor that powers through the high compression starts, have
      > you heard this? I aslo read another email here on the Europa list that
      > claims wonderful performance even at altitude with the 912S...I'm so
      > confused!!!
      > 2. I intend to fly it mostly on the east coast but I do intend to take
      > it to Lake Tahoe too so I was hoping to get through the mountains with
      > the 912S. I would buy the 914 turbo but I am afraid of the reliability
      > and complexity of the engine.
      > 3. I have never heard about the mixture issue, is that common?
      > 4. Never heard about the gear box wear due to the bumby idle either.
      > Is their any solution to this while still using the 912S?
      >
      >
      > On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 09:53:15 -0800, Terry Seaver <terrys@cisco.com> wrote:
      > > --> Europa-List message posted by: Terry Seaver <terrys@cisco.com>
      > >
      > > Hi Richard,
      > >
      > > You didn't say where you do your flying.  If you intend flying at
      > > altitude like we do around the Sierra Nevadas, you might consider the
      > > 914 the best bet.
      > > We have a mono-wheel XS with 912S and Airmaster prop.  I would seriously
      > > consider installing the 914 or Jabiru over the 912S, given our
      > > experiences (we have over 400 hours on the plane/engine).
      > > Issues I have with the 912S are:
      > >
      > > 1) It shakes the whole plane when starting and stopping, causing great
      > > stress on any number of componants.  Our exhaust system is in constant
      > > need of repair because of this.  An ignition wire probably broke because
      > > of this.  Standing outside the uncowled engine and watching the extreme
      > > travel of the shaken componants can be a real eye opener.  It is not
      > > unusual to see +2G/0G on the panel mounted accelerometer following a
      > > start or stop.   I would guess the 912S is worse than the 914 because of
      > > its higher compression.  I would expect the Jabiru to be much smoother.
      > >
      > > 2) The 912S is a little anemic at high density altitudes.  At 7,000+
      > > feet the plane has difficulty accelerating past 55 knots on take off
      > > until the gear/flaps are lifted a little.  Climb rate at these altitudes
      > > can also be lower than I would like.
      > >
      > > 3) The mixture becomes rich at altitude, negating the fuel economy
      > > advantages of flying at altitude.  The 914 is altitude compensating, and
      > > I assume the Jabiru has a mixture control (?).
      > >
      > > 4) Although the Rotax is claimed to have a TBO of 1000 hours or greater
      > > it is recommended that the gearbox be removed and sent in for check out
      > > every 300-400 hours.  There have also been suggestions that idling the
      > > 912S down to 1400 rpm can cause damage to the gearbox due to rough
      > > idling.  We idle our engine at about 1700-1800 rpm, which make the
      > > landings a little hotter with the additional idle thrust.
      > >
      > > just my two cents worth,
      > > regards,
      > > Terry Seaver
      > > A135 / N135TD
      > >
      > > Richard Sementilli wrote:
      > >
      > > >--> Europa-List message posted by: Richard Sementilli
      <rsementi@gmail.com>
      > > >
      > > >I am down to 3 choices for an engine for my Europa.
      > > >1. Rotax 912S
      > > >2. Rotax 914
      > > >3. Jabiru 3300
      > > >
      > > >I would like to get objective opinions and actual experiences from
      > > >anyone about the pro's and cons of each engine.
      > > >My first choice is the 914 because of the all around performance but
      > > >more than the huge price, I am worried about the complexity of the
      > > >engine as it relates to maintenance and overall reliability. I have
      > > >spoken to a few mechanics for Rotax but none of them have any
      > > >experience with the 914 turbo. They all say to keep it simple and go
      > > >with the 912 or the 3300. I agree but I'm willing to stretch that goal
      > > >if  feel that I could handle the burden of its complexity.
      > > >My most probable choice would be the 912S because it seems I can get
      > > >great performance (the same or better than the Jabiru 3300) with
      > > >relative ease of operation and mainenance, lighter weight, and
      > > >comparable price to the Jabiru. I've even found a mechanic that is
      > > >near (2 hours away) to my location. However, to the best of my
      > > >research, it is still a more complicated engine and drive unit than
      > > >the simple low reving Jabiru. It needs pump gas almost always, which
      > > >may not be easy to come by during cross country flights.
      > > >The Jabiru is the least expensive, most simple design, seems easier to
      > > >maintain, and is direct drive. However, it's less proven, heavier and
      > > >I can't find any repair facilities in the NY tristate area.
      > > >Am I missing any other engine possibilities that could be even a better
      choice?
      > >
      > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      >
      >
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | 912S - cylinder cowl??? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Sidsel & Svein Johnsen" <sidsel.svein@oslo.online.no>
      
      I downloaded Issue 2 of the 912/912S installation manual from the Club's
      members' section today, to see if it contains any improvements over Issue 1
      which came with my Firewall Forward kit in 2001.  It does, but it also
      leaves me quite confused and concerned:
      
      On p. 7-3 it says:  "The Rotax 912S engine is provided with a glass fibre
      cowl around the cylinders to ensure that sufficient cooling air reaches
      them", and then goes on to describe how to make the additional air inlet for
      this cowl by using a "splash" moulding.  My 912S (delivered by Europa in
      Lakeland in 2001) does NOT have this glass fibre cowl, but the FF kit HAS
      the splash moulding!
      
      The 912S installation instructions from Rotax (came with the engine) does
      not mention anything regarding the cylinder cowl, and does not show it on
      any of the engine drawings, either.
      
      Can anyone explain this?  Do I have an older version of 912S than what Issue
      2 of the factory's manual refers to (serial no. 4426924)?  Is the cylinder
      cowl required/recommended?  Is it a Rotax part or from Europa?
      
      
      Regards,
      Svein
      A225 - now in Norway
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Help - I need a ferry pilot in the UK | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Peter Rees" <peter.rees05@ntlworld.com>
      
      Hi Guys
      
      Our Europa has finally been converted to a tri gear and will be ready for collection
      in a couple of days or so. Only problem is, its in Yorkshire and needs to
      get home to Rochester.
      
      I'm not experienced on type and the chances of finding a day with enough VFR wx
      at this time of year to get from here to Yorkshire, get enough training to be
      proficient then make the flight home is next to zero.
      
      Is there anyone either in the South East or Yorkshire area who would be willing
      to do me the massive favour of collecting the aeroplane. I would of course arrange
      for you to get home and compensate you for your time.
      
      Failing that, is there anyone in the same areas who may have a tri gear trailer
      I could borrow from them for a reasonable consideration?
      
      Peter
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: 912S - cylinder cowl??? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Gilles Thesee" <Gilles.Thesee@ac-grenoble.fr>
      
      
      > The 912S installation instructions from Rotax (came with the engine) does
      > not mention anything regarding the cylinder cowl, and does not show it on
      > any of the engine drawings, either.
      >
      > Can anyone explain this?  Do I have an older version of 912S than what
      Issue
      > 2 of the factory's manual refers to (serial no. 4426924)?  Is the cylinder
      > cowl required/recommended?  Is it a Rotax part or from Europa?
      
      
      This "cylinder cowl" is an option from Rotax. You can retrofit it (we did).
      
      Regards,
      
      Gilles Thesee
      Grenoble, France
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Long wings and ratings | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Dave Anderson" <dja767@charter.net>
      
      Long wings  glider rating - if you want it to be registered that way with the FAA.
      
      Dave
      A227
      Mini U2
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: 912S - cylinder cowl??? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: JEFF ROBERTS <jeff@rmmm.net>
      
      Svein,
      If I had to do mine al over again I would not have used the splash 
      molding to make the NACA vent on the top. I would have like others 
      brought the intake air up from the bottom NACA inlet that the 914 uses. 
      Some have created a plenum that covers the top of the air box that a 2 
      inch scat tube can attach too from the lower inlet. The splash molding 
      is unnecessary and if you do want an inlet on the top you can make it 
      easier by simply cutting the opening shape of the inlet but not the 
      forward narrow part. Just push it down about an inch in the back and 
      bid over it from underneath.  Thats what flight crafters does. They 
      throw away the splash molding. Which I find amusing as Europa charged 
      me $200 for the thing. I was one of the few that had to receive the FWF 
      parts separate. If you did use the underneath NACA it would allow you 
      to use a bypass valve to draw under the cowl air that could serve as 
      carb heat. A builder in Canada has done this with great results. Hope 
      this helps.
      Jeff
      A258
      Finished priming all flying services. Stalled now as business is 
      booming.
      
      On Nov 8, 2004, at 3:40 PM, Sidsel & Svein Johnsen wrote:
      
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: "Sidsel & Svein Johnsen" 
      > <sidsel.svein@oslo.online.no>
      >
      > I downloaded Issue 2 of the 912/912S installation manual from the 
      > Club's
      > members' section today, to see if it contains any improvements over 
      > Issue 1
      > which came with my Firewall Forward kit in 2001.  It does, but it also
      > leaves me quite confused and concerned:
      >
      > On p. 7-3 it says:  "The Rotax 912S engine is provided with a glass 
      > fibre
      > cowl around the cylinders to ensure that sufficient cooling air reaches
      > them", and then goes on to describe how to make the additional air 
      > inlet for
      > this cowl by using a "splash" moulding.  My 912S (delivered by Europa 
      > in
      > Lakeland in 2001) does NOT have this glass fibre cowl, but the FF kit 
      > HAS
      > the splash moulding!
      >
      > The 912S installation instructions from Rotax (came with the engine) 
      > does
      > not mention anything regarding the cylinder cowl, and does not show it 
      > on
      > any of the engine drawings, either.
      >
      > Can anyone explain this?  Do I have an older version of 912S than what 
      > Issue
      > 2 of the factory's manual refers to (serial no. 4426924)?  Is the 
      > cylinder
      > cowl required/recommended?  Is it a Rotax part or from Europa?
      >
      >
      > Regards,
      > Svein
      > A225 - now in Norway
      >
      >
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Long wings and ratings | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Kevin Klinefelter" <kevann@gte.net>
      
      And do you need to also have a "self launch" logbook endorsement ?
      Kevin
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Dave Anderson
      Subject: Europa-List: Long wings and ratings
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Dave Anderson" <dja767@charter.net>
      
      Long wings  glider rating - if you want it to be registered that way with
      the FAA.
      
      Dave
      A227
      Mini U2
      
      
      ---
      
      ---
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: What engine for my Europa? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "KARL HEINDL" <kheindl@msn.com>
      
      
      Terry,
      
      
      Y ouseem to be badmouthing a perfectly good engine just because you have a problem
      with yours. Some builders have their 912 S running as smooth as a sewing machine.
      Mine could be smoother, but then I have not yet done a carb or propeller
      blade balance. Techniques for smooth startups and shutdowns were discussed
      in detail recently on this forum. I have no idea about high altitude performance,
      but one owner claims 914 equivalent performance up to 10,000 feet. The 914
      is obviously a better performer at really high altitudes. It should also be kept
      in mind that early Europa builders did not have the choice of the S model.
      
      
      I have read all the engine discussions and it seems that each type has had reports
      ranging from awful to wonderful. How is a newcomer supposed to make up his
      mind ?
      
      
      Karl
      
      
      From: Terry Seaver terrys@cisco.com 
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: What engine for my Europa? 
      
      -- Europa-List message posted by: Terry Seaver terrys@cisco.com 
      
      Hi Richard, 
      
      You didn't say where you do your flying.If you intend flying at 
      altitude like we do around the Sierra Nevadas, you might consider the 
      914 the best bet. 
      We have a mono-wheel XS with 912S and Airmaster prop.I would seriously 
      consider installing the 914 or Jabiru over the 912S, given our 
      experiences (we have over 400 hours on the plane/engine). 
      Issues I have with the 912S are: 
      
      1) It shakes the whole plane when starting and stopping, causing great 
      stress on any number of componants.Our exhaust system is in constant 
      need of repair because of this.An ignition wire probably broke because 
      of this.Standing outside the uncowled engine and watching the extreme 
      travel of the shaken componants can be a real eye opener.It is not 
      unusual to see +2G/0G on the panel mounted accelerometer following a 
      start or stop. I would guess the 912S is worse than the 914 because of 
      its higher compression.I would expect the Jabiru to be much smoother. 
      
      2) The 912S is a little anemic at high density altitudes.At 7,000+ 
      feet the plane has difficulty accelerating past 55 knots on take off 
      until the gear/flaps are lifted a little.Climb rate at these altitudes 
      can also be lower than I would like. 
      
      3) The mixture becomes rich at altitude, negating the fuel economy 
      advantages of flying at altitude.The 914 is altitude compensating, and 
      I assume the Jabiru has a mixture control (?). 
      
      4) Although the Rotax is claimed to have a TBO of 1000 hours or greater 
      it is recommended that the gearbox be removed and sent in for check out 
      every 300-400 hours.There have also been suggestions that idling the 
      912S down to 1400 rpm can cause damage to the gearbox due to rough 
      idling.We idle our engine at about 1700-1800 rpm, which make the 
      landings a little hotter with the additional idle thrust. 
      
      just my two cents worth, 
      regards, 
      Terry Seaver 
      A135 / N135TD 
      
      Richard Sementilli wrote: 
      
       -- Europa-List message posted by: Richard Sementilli rsementi@gmail.com 
      
       I am down to 3 choices for an engine for my Europa. 
       1. Rotax 912S 
       2. Rotax 914 
       3. Jabiru 3300 
      
       I would like to get objective opinions and actual experiences from 
       anyone about the pro's and cons of each engine. 
       My first choice is the 914 because of the all around performance but 
       more than the huge price, I am worried about the complexity of the 
       engine as it relates to maintenance and overall reliability. I have 
       spoken to a few mechanics for Rotax but none of them have any 
       experience with the 914 turbo. They all say to keep it simple and go 
       with the 912 or the 3300. I agree but I'm willing to stretch that goal 
       iffeel that I could handle the burden of its complexity. 
       My most probable choice would be the 912S because it seems I can get 
       great performance (the same or better than the Jabiru 3300) with 
       relative ease of operation and mainenance, lighter weight, and 
       comparable price to the Jabiru. I've even found a mechanic that is 
       near (2 hours away) to my location. However, to the best of my 
       research, it is still a more complicated engine and drive unit than 
       the simple low reving Jabiru. It needs pump gas almost always, which 
       may not be easy to come by during cross country flights. 
       The Jabiru is the least expensive, most simple design, seems easier to 
       maintain, and is direct drive. However, it's less proven, heavier and 
       I can't find any repair facilities in the NY tristate area. 
       Am I missing any other engine possibilities that could be even a better choice?
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: Paul Boulet <possibletodo@yahoo.com>
      
      
      My dear friends;
      Well it finally happened...the test pilot of my beautiful airplane project turned
      the controls over to me and I flew for the first time on Saturday,November
      6th.
      
      It was a beautiful day at the Mesa, Arizona airport (called Falcon field) with
      high clouds and a gentle breeze.  Temperatures were near perfect at about 73
      degrees.  The Commemorative Air Force (used to be called the Confederate Air Force-
      they restore and maintain flying WWII type aircraft) was having a big
      event in celebration of Veterans day so there were many interesting aircraft flying
      about the field that day.
      
      We took off and climbed out to the East about 3,000 feet above ground level.  I
      practiced learning my new Grand Rapids EIS (which I don't recommend) and also
      how this airplane would handle.  I practiced some aerobatic maneuvers- stalls,
      spins, aileron rolls, wingovers, and barrel rolls.
      
      Apparently the aerobatics loosened some "chaff" that was in the plastic fuel tank.
      We had taken pains to flush this system out completely but apparently this
      is almost impossible to do.  We had changed the fuel filters just before flight
      and found little debris in them so thought we had no problem.  In any event,
      the fuel pressure starting fluctuating wildly swinging closer and closer to
      zero.  We turned on a second fuel pump (called a boost pump) to increase fuel
      pressure through the filters.  This helped marginally but the pressure continued
      to drop.  We knew we could not make it back to Falcon field so started looking
      for an alternative and found one called Williams Gateway airport (an old
      military base).  It was 9 miles away and as we started there we reduced power
      (to reduce fuel demands on the engine).  The plane was running roughly by this
      time and even quit entirely a couple of times. Fortunately our high airspeed
      in this wonderful plane caused the prop to windmill a
       nd
       re-start by itself almost immediately.  We landed with no further incident.
      
      A call to our mechanics showed that the fuel filters had not been installed in
      tandem but had mistakenly been installed to separate gas tanks (a main tank and
      an auxiliary).  While on the ground we switched to the auxiliary tank and the
      fuel pressure jumped to full without a problem.  You might wonder why we didn't
      do this in the air.  The reason is that since the aux tank rarely gets used
      any sort of debris tends to collect there.  Therefore if you're having a problem
      with pressure, switching tanks may make the situation worse.
      
      We prepared to fly back to Falcon Field however another sad event occurred.  A
      pilot with a Piper Super Cub (an old tail dragger style plane from the 1940's
      but still in production- you may have seen them- they are nearly always painted
      bright yellow) was carrying a passenger- one of the spectators from the Veterans
      Day show- and as he took off, he climbed faster than the plane was designed
      for.  The result was a stall/spin into the ground smashing into a
      military plane called an "Albatross."  It killed both pilot and passenger while
      destroying both aircraft. The airport was closed for the remainder of the day.
      
      We called our mechanics again and they brought out a trailer to pick us up.  
      My stomach was a bit sore after all this excitement but as someone once said, "walking
      a tightrope is living, everything else is just waiting."
      
      Thanks for sharing in my thoughts about this wonderful adventure of life we are
      on,
      
      Your friend,
      Paul Boulet, N914PB, Malibu, California
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 22
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | 912S - cylinder cowl??? | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Sidsel & Svein Johnsen" <sidsel.svein@oslo.online.no>
      
      Gilles,
      
      Thank you for your quick response:
      
      >>This "cylinder cowl" is an option from Rotax. You can retrofit it (we
      did).<<
      
      - Did you retrofit it before first flight, or later because you experienced
      high cyl. head temperatures?
      
      - Is it easy to retrofit?
      
      
      Jeff,
      
      - and thanks to you, too, for the recommendation re. the NACA inlet on top,
      to the air box.
      
      Regards,
      Svein
      A225 - now in Norway
      
      
      
      
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |