Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:31 AM - Shoulder harness (John & Paddy Wigney)
     2. 08:47 AM - Re: Shoulderharness mounting (Davidghillam@aol.com)
     3. 09:17 AM - VS: Shoulderharness mounting (Sidsel & Svein Johnsen)
     4. 11:18 AM - Re: VS: Shoulderharness mounting (RMRRick@aol.com)
     5. 11:49 AM - FAA style Harness (irampil@notes.cc.sunysb.edu)
     6. 12:01 PM - Re: VS: Shoulderharness mounting (Duncan McFadyean)
     7. 12:41 PM - Re: FAA style Harness (DuaneFamly@aol.com)
     8. 01:19 PM - Re: Experience with E04 re missing kit parts (josok)
     9. 02:04 PM - Re: FAA style Harness (Ken Stribling)
    10. 02:22 PM - Re: VS: Shoulderharness mounting (Fred R. Klein)
    11. 05:17 PM - Re: FAA style Harness (Kingsley Hurst)
    12. 08:29 PM - Site update (Paul McAllister)
    13. 08:32 PM - Intercooler for 914 (Craig Ellison)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Shoulder harness | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: John & Paddy Wigney <johnwigney@worldnet.att.net>
      
      Hi Hans,
      
      Some time ago I attended a seminar at Oshkosh which, amongst other things, stressed
      the importance of correct orientation of the shoulder restraints. There is
      an FAA document somewhere which spells out the details. The standard Europa
      method does not comply with the recommendation which is to have the line of restraint
      above the horizontal. The reason of course is to minimise or eliminate
      compression of the spine.
      
      I took 2 pieces of 0.125 in. aluminium plate (about 3 in. x 5 in.) and formed them
      to the shape of the rear upper fuselage behind each seat and in front of the
      bulkhead. I bonded a MS24694/AN509 1/4-28 countersunk machine screw into a
      hole in each plate with Redux so that the screws were flush on the outer convex
      surface. I then cut away the inner layer of glass and filler in the fuselage
      and bonded the plates into position with Redux and a BID glass cover. A short
      length of control cable (5/32" dia . as I remember) with cable thimbles and Nicopress
      fittings was fitted to adjust for the extra length needed. It works fine.
      
      Cheers, John
      N262WF, mono XS, 912S
      Mooresville, North Carolina 
      
      ********
      I have for a long time questioned this particular way of mounting the 
      shoulderharness - even more as it does not comply to recommended procedures 
      set forth in the JAR technical documents (or, for all I know, in  FAA 
      recommendations). I seem to remember that the harness should not be routed 
      below a line going straight back from the shoulders (the angle not to be 
      less than 90 degrees to a line along your spine) , but may be orientated 
      upwards by a certain degree. I don't have access to this document now and 
      cannot confirm the figures.
      Nearing the end to my build - I have still to mount mine, and am considering 
      hardpoints in the baggage comp. ceiling  where to fasten the harnesses. Are 
      there others out there who have done it this way ? - Any viewpoints please ?
      Again: I hope you will soon be better, Graham!  Regards, 
      Hans Danielsen, #334 in Norway
      ********
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Shoulderharness mounting | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: Davidghillam@aol.com
      
      > significant decelleration.
      > My injuries included a compression  fracture of the first lumbar vertebra,
      > unstable, and one fragment was  displaced rearward 5 mm, compressing the
      > thecal sac. Some very clever  surgery involved removal of the body of the 
      > L1
      
      Hi,
      
      I am very sorry to hear of your injuries and wish you a speedy  recovery.
      I have heard good reports of Dynafoam energy absobing foam upholstery in  the 
      seat base and wonder whether it could have helped.  I have fitted it  into my 
      monowheel but hope never to know how effective it is.
      
      David
      G-SHSH
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | VS: Shoulderharness mounting | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Sidsel & Svein Johnsen" <sidsel.svein@oslo.online.no>
      
      All,
      
      Hans addressed an important point in his posting yesterday, which has been
      on my mind, too, since the earlier discussion on this issue (check out the
      thread on Matronics' site).  I cannot see that a solution was offered,
      however.
      
      FAA's AC21-34 leaves one in no doubt that the existing fixation point for
      the shoulder harnesses should not be used.  See it at
      http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular
      .nsf/1ab39b4ed563b08985256a35006d56af/5214c6ffb14e1383862569b2005e77f9/$FILE
      /AC21-34.pdf
      
      It recommends between -5 and +30 degrees from the seatback perpendicular, at
      shoulder height.   What one may overlook is that not only is the pressure
      acting down the spine from both the front and the back, resulting in twice
      the compression load on the spine compared to if the harness were tangential
      over the shoulder and then down the chest, but the force on the harness at
      the back (which is multiplied by 2) is so much higher because of the sharp
      downward angle, given the same restraining force in the aircraft
      longitudinal direction.
      
      Assuming that not only Hans and I are interested in exploring this issue, I
      called Andy at Europa 2004 today and suggested that they do us all a service
      by investigating if a hardpoint could be made to satisfy FAA's
      recommedation, and then address it in their next Tech Talk column.  Andy was
      very understanding of the background for my question, and promised to have
      his structural man take a look at it.
      
      I am not aware that 4-point harness is a requirement, one diagonal shoulder
      harness should satisfy the rules, I believe (have not checked!) but if a
      fourpoint (or more probable, two shoulder harnesses attached to a common
      point in the back) can be arranged, then all the better.  I hope E2004 can
      address this earlier rather than later, and maybe they can make some money
      on a mod kit at the same time?
      
      Regards,
      Svein
      A225 - XS trigear now in Norway
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: VS: Shoulderharness mounting | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: RMRRick@aol.com
      
      The PFA magazine had a very good article some time ago about this very  
      subject. Regardless of the foam used the standard belt design is a potential  
      killer. The Vans / Dynero set up meets the basic safety critria of a  relatively
      
      minor downward pull on the shoulders.  It beats meet how the PFA  accepts our 
      set up anymore.
      
      Rick Morris
      
      G-RIKS
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | FAA style Harness | 
       12/07/2004 02:49:28 PM,
              Serialize complete at 12/07/2004 02:49:28 PM
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: irampil@notes.cc.sunysb.edu
      
      Greetings,
      I put a micro album up on Steve's site illustrating my attachment which 
      provide
      an FAA suggested angle.  This is a design I derived from Bob Berube at 
      FlightCrafters
      
      
      http://www.europaowners.org/modules.php?set_albumName=Harness-per-FAA-recommendation&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php 
      
      
      Ira N224xs flying
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: VS: Shoulderharness mounting | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Duncan McFadyean" <ami@mcfadyean.freeserve.co.uk>
      
      So design one that is better!
      eg a "gantry" on top of the 'headrest' that routes the shoulder straps over
      a higher point than existing.
      
      Duncan McF.
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: <RMRRick@aol.com>
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: VS: Shoulderharness mounting
      
      
      > --> Europa-List message posted by: RMRRick@aol.com
      >
      > The PFA magazine had a very good article some time ago about this very
      > subject. Regardless of the foam used the standard belt design is a
      potential
      > killer. The Vans / Dynero set up meets the basic safety critria of a
      relatively
      > minor downward pull on the shoulders.  It beats meet how the PFA  accepts
      our
      > set up anymore.
      >
      > Rick Morris
      >
      > G-RIKS
      >
      >
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: FAA style Harness | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: DuaneFamly@aol.com
      
      Good Day All,
      
      Ira, I went to the pix and then sat in my 1/2 built plane (plane noises  soon 
      followed). I don't see the plus side of the cable coming from down that low  
      on the "D" window. It is still a downward angle from shoulder height. To be  
      level with shoulder height, the cable would have to be mounted nearer the  
      midpoint of the "D" window.
      I think between the two ideas, the idea John came up with is better suited  
      to meet the problem and the FAA guidelines. But I would wonder how well the  
      attachment points would hold up during a sudden stop.
      Not flaming....I just have an opinion. Any other ideas out in the world in  
      use?  
      
      Mike Duane  A207
      Redding, California
      XS Conventional Gear
      Just about to put the top  on but still finding little things to do before  
      that.
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | RE: Experience with E04 re missing kit parts | 
              2.60 REPLY_TO_EMPTY         Reply-To: is empty
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "josok" <josok-e@ukolo.fi>
      
      Hi George, 
      The good news here is that E 2004 really seems to try to help where EMIL left off.
      While i can understand your frustation, i think that you won't find another
      plane, at least not such a nice one for the $ 14.000.  being asked.
      Of course the low dollar is a very important factor for the price increase.  Just
      back from holiday in Florida, i must say: Boy you live in a cheap country!
      The other factor for the difference might be, that EMIL has been selling for any
      price in the USA, taking  losses  for granted, leading to disaster. I certainly
      hope that Mercedes, Audi, and not to forget Europa 2004  won't fall into
      the same trap.  Again, i feel sorry you and the others.
      ----------------
      Visit EuropaOwnersForum http://www.europaowners.org/
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | FAA style Harness | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Ken Stribling" <ken@striblingranch.com>
      
      Just for what it's worth my RV has belts that are almost directly back
      from shoulder height witch is fine until you drop in a wind shear or do
      a negative maneuver unwillingly and the harness is not super tight. You
      tend to hit the canopy fairly hard with your head.
      How about the restraints like on modern roller coasters???
      
      Ken S.
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      DuaneFamly@aol.com
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: FAA style Harness
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: DuaneFamly@aol.com
      
      Good Day All,
      
      Ira, I went to the pix and then sat in my 1/2 built plane (plane noises
      soon 
      followed). I don't see the plus side of the cable coming from down that
      low  
      on the "D" window. It is still a downward angle from shoulder height. To
      be  
      level with shoulder height, the cable would have to be mounted nearer
      the  
      midpoint of the "D" window.
      I think between the two ideas, the idea John came up with is better
      suited  
      to meet the problem and the FAA guidelines. But I would wonder how well
      the  
      attachment points would hold up during a sudden stop.
      Not flaming....I just have an opinion. Any other ideas out in the world
      in  
      use?  
      
      Mike Duane  A207
      Redding, California
      XS Conventional Gear
      Just about to put the top  on but still finding little things to do
      before  
      that.
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: VS: Shoulderharness mounting | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Fred R. Klein" <fklein@orcasonline.com>
      
      Fellow Europeans...
      
      If I had ever doubted the value of this forum, those doubts would have been
      put to rest w/ the thoughtful discussion in this thread.  My most sincere
      condolences to Graham Higgins and my hopes for his quick and full recovery.
      
      
      on 12/7/04 9:17 AM, Sidsel & Svein Johnsen at sidsel.svein@oslo.online.no
      wrote:
      
      > 
      > I am not aware that 4-point harness is a requirement, one diagonal shoulder
      > harness should satisfy the rules, I believe (have not checked!) but if a
      > fourpoint (or more probable, two shoulder harnesses attached to a common
      > point in the back) can be arranged, then all the better.  I hope E2004 can
      > address this earlier rather than later, and maybe they can make some money
      > on a mod kit at the same time?
      > 
      > Regards,
      > Svein
      > A225 
      
      On the question of hardpoints, it first occurs to me that I prefer the dual
      shoulder straps, just from an ergonomic point of view, and second, that I
      like the notion of four attachpoints in the "ceiling" above the baggage bay
      as this would afford the opportunity to distribute (rather than concentrate)
      point loads on the structure of the fuselage. As I ponder this issue, my
      concerns are what impact loads can be tolerated, and I'm delighted to hear
      that E2004 seems interested in researching this and making recommendations.
      
      Fred
      A194
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | FAA style Harness | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Kingsley Hurst" <hurstkr@growzone.com.au>
      
      Mike Duane wrote :-
      > Not flaming....I just have an opinion. Any other ideas out in the
      world in  
      use?  
      
      Mike,
      
      There is a Europa over here in Oz that has the shoulder straps anchored
      to a fitting behind the channel in the door surround a little way down
      from the original gas strut lower attachment point position.
      
      Graham Higgins e-mailed me last Friday advising of his misfortune and
      having contemplated the inadequacy of the standard shoulder restraint
      for some time now, my mind was immediately made up to find an
      alternative.  Unfortunately, the aircraft aforementioned is over 1,000
      km from me and it has changed hands twice.  Notwithstanding, I will
      endeavour to find out who did this mod, what I can about it and if it
      was 'approved' but I am hoping Andy will come to the rescue as requested
      in the meantime.
      
      Graham and his wife flew out to see me for a weekend last May and I had
      the privilege of almost an hour in the air with him.  The smoothness of
      his 914 /Airmaster Propeller combination was something to behold for a
      piston engined aircraft and it breaks my heart to know the aircraft has
      now been damaged not to mention Grahams personal injury.  By all
      accounts thankfully, Graham expects a successful recovery but it was too
      close for my liking and it has left a horrible feeling in my stomach.
      
      Graham is especially mystified by the sudden surge in power and has
      asked the list for input from anybody in the know.  I see there has been
      little response to his actual enquiry so I am now hoping that list
      members even if they don't know themselves, will sound out others in the
      hope that someone can come up with a reason for Graham.
      
      Thanks in anticipation, Cheers and Season's Greetings to all
      
      Kingsley
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Paul McAllister" <paul.mcallister@qia.net>
      
      Hi all,
      
      I have finally updated my web site a bit and written up the story about getting hit by lightning. Its at http://europa363.versadev.com/ , just scroll down to the bottom and you will see a link to that page.  I have also added a google search and a better index.  I will probably write up a few pages about test flying in the next few weeks
      
      Paul
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Intercooler for 914 | 
      
      --> Europa-List message posted by: "Craig Ellison" <craig.ellison2@verizon.net>
      
      All,
      
      Sometime ago there was a request for info/availability of the intercooler kit for
      the Rotax 914.  Didn't hear the outcome.  I contacted Europa 2004 and was told
      the John Hurst developed it out of the Lakeland office.  Does anyone have
      one installed and running on a 914(does it work?) and if so is it still manufactured?
      
      
      craig ellison
      silverton OR
      
      wiring panel/fuselage , waiting for
      FWF, all flying surfaces painted
      
      
      
      
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |