Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:04 AM - Re: Oil cooler thermostat (R.C.Harrison)
     2. 03:06 AM - Re: Oil cooler thermostat (Duncan & Ami McFadyean)
     3. 03:06 AM - Re: Oil cooler thermostat (Duncan & Ami McFadyean)
     4. 06:08 AM - Re: Oil cooler thermostat (Raimo Toivio)
     5. 06:59 AM - Oil cooler thermostat (Europa List)
     6. 08:07 AM - Re: Oil cooler thermostat (Belinda Glover)
     7. 08:38 AM - Re: Oil cooler thermostat (Raimo Toivio)
     8. 10:38 AM - Re: Oil cooler thermostat (josok)
     9. 10:38 AM - Flying for Fun" accident (josok)
    10. 11:42 AM - Re: Flying for Fun" accident (Belinda Glover)
    11. 01:31 PM - Re: Oil cooler thermostat (Terry Seaver (terrys))
    12. 02:04 PM - Re: Oil cooler thermostat (R.C.Harrison)
    13. 03:09 PM - Re: Airport survival (europa flugzeug fabrik)
    14. 04:05 PM - Re: Flying for Fun" accident (Graham Singleton)
    15. 04:35 PM - Re: Flying for Fun" accident (GLENN CROWDER)
    16. 04:40 PM - Re: Re: Airport survival (John & Amy Eckel)
    17. 04:43 PM - FW: Was Re:- Oil Cooler Thermostat ....now "fit for purpose Gills slots in top cowl" (R.C.Harrison)
    18. 06:39 PM - Epibond 420. was Araldite. (creighton smith)
    19. 07:46 PM - Re: Epibond 420. was Araldite. (Europa List)
    20. 07:51 PM - Re: Epibond 420. was Araldite. (Rman)
    21. 08:02 PM - Re: Oil cooler thermostat (Rman)
    22. 08:54 PM - Re: Airport survival (europa flugzeug fabrik)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Oil cooler thermostat | 
      
      Hi! Paul/ Duncan.
      Thanks for the message below. Even without any gills but with the Jabiru
      arrangement I had no such thing as cable tie meltdown. The nearest sign
      I had was some "spirowrap" which ran under the exhaust manifolds. As I
      said I believe the presence of the gills in flight allows the upper cowl
      pressure to reduce so discouraging the downward cooling flow. If the
      gills were added to allow residual cooling after shutdown it would be
      simpler to open the top access panels immediately on shut down. I have
      ordered "the fibre glass engine cooling hood" on my engine which should
      also assist in preventing the heat build up in the cowl top and I expect
      my intercooler air to assist with cowl top cooling too. I would have
      expected the Jabiru being fully air cooled to have far more residual
      heat to dissipate on shutdown anyway and since I didn't have a problem
      then I will leave the gills on my new cowls closed, unless I get some
      more feedback against.
      I've not had a rattling response on the question
      Regards
      Bob Harrison G-PTAG
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Paul
      McAllister
      Sent: 16 November 2006 00:48
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: Oil cooler thermostat
      
      Hi All,
      
      Actually I have my gills rear ward facing.  It wasn't by design, I just
      made a mistake and I didn't even know until Andy pointed it out to me.  
      
      Although I don't have before and after measurements,  the underneath of
      my cowl seems cooler that some other people have reported.  I base this
      on the fact that I don't have any cable ties that melt under the cowl,
      whereas I have heard many reports from others.
      
      One of these days I must smear a bit of oil around to see what is
      happening 
      
      Paul
      
       -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Duncan & Ami
      McFadyean
      
      IConversion of the gills to a rear-facing exit may prove beneficial (to
      reducing cooling drag), although care needed to ensure fuselage
      composite not overheated. I have the moulds for such a mod., but never
      tried it out.
      
      Duncan McF
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Oil cooler thermostat | 
      
      Paul,
      Does this mean that you cut out the incorrect face on the gills (choice 
      of two faces; one correct, one not)?
      You are not unique, there is at least one other around that had this 
      'mod'.
      
      Duncan McF
      do not archive
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Paul McAllister 
        To: europa-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:47 AM
        Subject: Re: Europa-List: Oil cooler thermostat
      
      
        Hi All,
      
        Actually I have my gills rear ward facing.  It wasn't by design, I 
      just made a mistake and I didn't even know until Andy pointed it out to 
      me.  
      
        Although I don't have before and after measurements,  the underneath 
      of my cowl seems cooler that some other people have reported.  I base 
      this on the fact that I don't have any cable ties that melt under the 
      cowl, whereas I have heard many reports from others.
      
        One of these days I must smear a bit of oil around to see what is 
      happening 
      
        Paul
      
         -----Original Message-----
        From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Duncan & Ami 
      McFadyean
      
      
          IConversion of the gills to a rear-facing exit may prove beneficial 
      (to reducing cooling drag), although care needed to ensure fuselage 
      composite not overheated. I have the moulds for such a mod., but never 
      tried it out.
      
          Duncan McF
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Oil cooler thermostat | 
      
      Closing off the gills is likely to result in thermal stress and shorter 
      life of the alternator regulator, if you have it mounted in that region.
      
      A permanent hot air vent (following shutdown) in the top of the cowl can 
      be achieved by leaving out the baffle seals around the top of the carb 
      airbox. However, I have yet to discover whether this also results in 
      flow reversal through the cowl-top NACA duct at high AoA.
      
      I've recently opened up this duct (without the baffle seals and having 
      previously run on under-cowl air) and find that the significant power 
      increase (a good10+% I reckon and an additional 200fpm on climb out) is 
      a bit fickle, depending on flight condition, suggesting variable 
      effectiveness of  the duct.
      
      Duncan McF.
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: R.C.Harrison 
        To: europa-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 8:03 AM
        Subject: RE: Europa-List: Oil cooler thermostat
      
      
        Hi! Paul/ Duncan.
      
        Thanks for the message below. Even without any gills but with the 
      Jabiru arrangement I had no such thing as cable tie meltdown. The 
      nearest sign I had was some "spirowrap" which ran under the exhaust 
      manifolds. As I said I believe the presence of the gills in flight 
      allows the upper cowl pressure to reduce so discouraging the downward 
      cooling flow. If the gills were added to allow residual cooling after 
      shutdown it would be simpler to open the top access panels immediately 
      on shut down. I have ordered "the fibre glass engine cooling hood" on my 
      engine which should also assist in preventing the heat build up in the 
      cowl top and I expect my intercooler air to assist with cowl top cooling 
      too. I would have expected the Jabiru being fully air cooled to have far 
      more residual heat to dissipate on shutdown anyway and since I didn't 
      have a problem then I will leave the gills on my new cowls closed, 
      unless I get some more feedback against.
      
        I've not had a rattling response on the question
      
        Regards
      
        Bob Harrison G-PTAG
      
         
      
         
      
        -----Original Message-----
        From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Paul 
      McAllister
        Sent: 16 November 2006 00:48
        To: europa-list@matronics.com
        Subject: Re: Europa-List: Oil cooler thermostat
      
         
      
        Hi All,
      
         
      
        Actually I have my gills rear ward facing.  It wasn't by design, I 
      just made a mistake and I didn't even know until Andy pointed it out to 
      me.  
      
         
      
        Although I don't have before and after measurements,  the underneath 
      of my cowl seems cooler that some other people have reported.  I base 
      this on the fact that I don't have any cable ties that melt under the 
      cowl, whereas I have heard many reports from others.
      
         
      
        One of these days I must smear a bit of oil around to see what is 
      happening 
      
         
      
        Paul
      
         
      
         -----Original Message-----
        From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Duncan & Ami 
      McFadyean
      
           
      
          IConversion of the gills to a rear-facing exit may prove beneficial 
      (to reducing cooling drag), although care needed to ensure fuselage 
      composite not overheated. I have the moulds for such a mod., but never 
      tried it out.
      
           
      
          Duncan McF
      
             
      
               -- Please Support Your Lists This Month --           (And Get 
      Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!)   November is the Annual List Fund Raiser.  
      Click on   the Contribution link below to find out more about   this 
      year's Terrific Free Incentive Gifts provided   by:     * AeroElectric 
      www.aeroelectric.com     * The Builder's Bookstore www.buildersbooks.com 
          * Aeroware Enterprises www.kitlog.com     * HomebuiltHELP 
      www.homebuilthelp.com   List Contribution Web Site   --> 
      http://www.matronics.com/contribution   Thank you for your generous 
      support!                              -Matt Dralle, List Admin.          
      - The Europa-List Email Forum -   --> 
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List 
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Oil cooler thermostat | 
      
      
      Gilles
      
      I hope this the Spirit of the Forum:"
      "Everyone here is entitled to express one's technical opinion"
      So nothing personal. All the responsibility is readers not writers.
      Also everybody can understand this is not pure black or white -case.
      I personally trust water thermostat and that is it. Flaps are for you.
      Most Rotax flyers fly w/o cowl flaps or thermostats and are happy.
      
      My "salesmans comparson list" was made by IMHO principle.
      I know and understand thermostats well but flaps; I have only 
      mental pictures. Maybe you could list the facts of flaps?
      
      Ideal Temperature Regards, Raimo
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Gilles Thesee" <Gilles.Thesee@ac-grenoble.fr>
      Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 11:56 PM
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: Oil cooler thermostat
      
      
      > 
      > Raimo,
      > 
      > > - it is heavy (thermostat is light weight)
      > > - it is complicated (thermostat is simple)
      > > - it is unic hand work (thermostat is a mass serial product)
      > > - it is hard to install (thermostat is straightforward)
      > > - it tooks space and you have not it too much w Europa (thermostat does not)
      > > - it needs regular service and inspections (thermostat is forgetable)
      > > - it is expensive (thermostat is cheap)
      > > - it is manual and you have one knob more (thermostat is automatic)
      > > - it is not always in ideal position, because it is pilot operated
      > > (thermostat is always in ideal position, no steps)
      > > - when broken, it can happen in closed position and it stays closed
      > > (thermostat stays open when broken but that situation happens
      > > almost never - they are highreliable)
      > > - when starting, cold water is cooling your engine harmly instantly
      > > (when thermostat water is not cooling the engine until necessary)
      > >
      > >   
      > 
      > Everyone here is entitled to express one's technical opinion, and 
      > clearly your are sold on the water thermostat !
      > I understand your motivations, and wouldn't try to dissuade you. I would 
      > say that you are right on most of the above points concerning the 
      > thermostat.
      > Like many others, I sure would appreciate any technical feedback on it's 
      > operation.
      > I only intervened in this topic because I (maybe wrongly) got the 
      > impression that you were asking questions about cooling.
      > 
      > I just hope I too am entitled to express my opinion on cowl flaps, based 
      > on many hours experimenting and flying them, with findings somewhat 
      > different than most of the above points.
      > 
      > Best regards,
      > Gilles
      > http://contrails.free.fr
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Oil cooler thermostat | 
      
      I would be very inclined to go with a water thermostat, but I have one 
      question. If it fails, does it fail closed or open? 
      
      Vaughn
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Oil cooler thermostat | 
      
      Hi Bob, 
      
      Since you know all about my "Flying for Fun" accident already, just a 
      word of WARNING for others reading this thread.
      
      Don't try closing the gills if you fly an NSI Subaru in a Europa. This 
      PFA "Approved" installation, even with the standard gills the cooling to 
      the alternator is wholly inadequate and can kill you. This has now fried 
      2 alternator bearings out of 10 examples in the U.K. I can't find any 
      U.S examples of such an incident so it looks like a thoroughly home 
      grown U.K. installation problem.
      
      The alternator seizure would be only a minor inconvenience were it not 
      for the fact that the dual drive belts as "Approved" then fill the 
      cockpit with thick smoke before stopping the engine via the braking 
      effect on the crankshaft drive pulley and the "Approved" propeller then 
      goes in to full disk drag freewheeling mode providing an earlier 
      opportunity for a forced landing than you ever bargained for with a 
      descent deck angle of about 20 degrees and rate of 1700ft/min and with 
      the all flying"now no longer flying" tailplane allowing you to slap the 
      stick from stop to stop on the way down as you relearn how to fly the 
      crippled airframe. All this of course negating any amount of practice 
      forced landings you were forced to do before being allowed to test fly 
      the creation yourself and which were so misrepresentative as to have 
      best been avoided completely !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      
      Been there done that got the T-shirt just like Bill Wynne who had it 
      happen first but sadly his incident was never subsequently properly 
      investigated. It will be now though my wreckage is with the AAIB at 
      Farnborough.
      
      I am still trying to find out if "Approved"  for regulatory end users 
      means anything other than you are "Approved" to go and be our 
      installation test pilot with a passenger, oh and in case you survive 
      please report any testing we might have overlooked !!!!!!!!!!!!!
      
      Despite the direct question having been twice posed to the PFA, by me 
      and the AAIB so far no cigar!!!!!!!!!!!
      
      Ironically, I just applied for the PFA airworthiness engineer job, which 
      I thought might have even come about because of our near death 
      experience. I just received a response having heard nothing for a 
      fortnight as follows;
      " Unfortunately you were not short listed for the initial interviews".
      That is despite going and asking if I would be wasting my time preparing 
      a C.V. before hand!
      
      Incedently our Europa callsign was G-BWCV abbreviated to 'CV. Obviously 
      our recent ridiculous incident was not deemed the right sort of 'CV for 
      that particular job.
      
      So look outl for the AAIB report coming out soon if you realy want a 
      case study in how not to do it!!!!!  
      
      If anybody thought "Approved" in the regulatory end user context was a 
      verb implying knowledge or understanding and testing to a standard at 
      least minimally fit for purpose like I did, think again. 
      
      Like most things these days you end up having to do other peoples jobs 
      for them whilst in the case of the regulators they tie both hands behind 
      your back when you try to do your own. 
      
      Regards
      Gary McKirdy
      
        From: R.C.Harrison 
        To: europa-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 11:43 AM
        Subject: RE: Europa-List: Oil cooler thermostat
      
      
        Hi! Nigel/all
      
        My two pennyworth .....I also tried a cowl exit flap but not to close 
      off. My Jabiru cooling system of course was ALL air cooled and the 
      theory ventured by the Jab dealer and Factory was to extend it into the 
      air stream and create a low pressure area aft of the cooling exit to 
      suck out the hot air..... needless to say it made no improvement 
      whatever. However what I did find was that it was important to maintain 
      top cowl pressure high to promote the mass down flow of air past the 
      engine, I even collected my cabin heating air(when not being used for 
      purpose) and dumped it in the cowl top which also assisted. Since all 
      the high pressure oil cooling air was directed under the sump cooling 
      fins(Rotax oil and water cooling likewise) to leave it "floating" in the 
      lower cowl restrained the downward flow of engine cooling air. 
      
        You may ask why am I "rabbitting on" about damn Jabiru's ?.... so to 
      my question:-
      
         
      
        What purpose do the Europa "Gills" serve?
      
        Has anyone flown with them blocked off to check the effects?
      
         
      
        As it happens, against most advice, I have decided to fit an 
      intercooler on my 914 Turbo which of course has a huge discharge of warm 
      air mostly into the top cowling and I'm not sure it's the right 
      philosophy to let it exit out the "gills", with my Jabiru experiences 
      I'm suggesting that to increase the down flow of air, even with water 
      and oil cooling on the engine, it would be best maintaining the top cowl 
      pressure. 
      
        I never had any top cowl exits on my Jabiru set up ...all air was 
      discharged out the lower cowl exit plus the lower cowl was "jacked" off 
      the fuselage by approx 1" increasing the discharge annulus considerably.
      
        Any help with these questions would be gratefully received.
      
        I also would have liked to have the Rotax oil flow to its cooler 
      selectable and/or meterable which I achieved on the Jabiru by a hand 
      control valve operated from the P1 Position allowing most flying to be 
      accomplished without the cooler being in circuit. The resultant warm air 
      (even with no oil circulating  though the cooler) was a primary source 
      of cabin heat and with the oil cooler in full flow I could fry the 
      passenger, I get the feeling that a number of Europa Rotax owners would 
      dearly like such a facility !
      
         
      
        Regards
      
        Bob Harrison G-PTAG (Still prepared to learn!)
      
         
      
         
      
         
      
        -----Original Message-----
        From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of nigel 
      charles
        Sent: 15 November 2006 09:38
        To: europa-list@matronics.com
        Subject: RE: Europa-List: Oil cooler thermostat
      
         
      
      <nwcmc@tiscali.co.uk>
      
         
      
        >It is best to place a flap at the exit of the cowl/radiator duct.
      
        Placing an obstruction in the front destroys dynamic pressure. An we 
      
        need to recover as much pressure as we can to persuade the air to flow 
      
      
        across the rad core.<
      
         
      
        For what its worth I tried a cooler flap at the rear of the radiators.
      
        With it fully closed it cut off nearly all the airflow and it made
      
        little difference to the CHT and oil temperatures.
      
         
      
        When I was at Vichy this year I met one of our French owners (sorry I
      
        forgot his name). He has a very clever inlet cowl flap. It is part of
      
        the lower cowl in front of the radiators and has a hinge at the rear 
      of
      
        it. In very hot weather it is lowered below the normal cowl allowing
      
        more cooling air in. In cold weather it is raised impeding airflow to
      
        the radiators. This is all controlled from the cockpit so that 
      inflight
      
        adjustments can be made. From what he told me it works very well. 
      
         
      
        I appreciate that normally control of cooling air is best done at the
      
        outlet but in this case it seems it is better to use the inlet.
      
         
      
        Nigel Charles
      
         
      
         
      
         
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Oil cooler thermostat | 
      
      Vaughn,
      
      I cannot be absolutely sure but NORMALLY
      thermostat design itself leaves it fully 
      open in failure situation.
      
      Who knows ANY broken thermostat in
      cars (younger than 10-20 years)?
      
      Problems may occur if the coolant liquid
      is NEVER changed. 
      
      In cars most people never do it IMHO.
      Just like brake fluid, it should be changed
      regularly (let=B4s say once a 1-3 year
      to remove moisture and small obstackles etc).
      
      May I suggest you to go some car spare shop, 
      keep it on your hand and look at it carefully?
      
      Regards, Raimo
      
      
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Europa List 
        To: europa-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 4:57 PM
        Subject: Europa-List: Oil cooler thermostat
      
      
        I would be very inclined to go with a water thermostat, but I have one 
      question. If it fails, does it fail closed or open? 
      
        Vaughn
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Oil cooler thermostat | 
      
      
      Could it be, that the combination of open gills, bottom cowl opening and entry
      holes in front creates a pocket of standing air, or pulls air from around the
      exhaust over the generator or would it not be better to have a designated, more
      or less defined single entry and exit point? So doing away with the gills all
      together. 
      I've asked Andy the same question on his last day at the factory, and if i remembered
      correctly the answer was something like "needed only after shutdown" To
      prevent heat collecting under the cows after shutdown on a hot day i could just
      open the inspection covers? 
      
      Kind Regards,
      
      Jos Okhuijsen
      
      
      Visit -  www.EuropaOwners.org
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Flying for Fun" accident | 
      
      
      Hi Gary
      
      Sorry about your accident, from which i can't recall hearing anything. Happy to
      see you survived it. There are several points in the message that i would like
      to have more clarification on, forgive me for asking dumb questions please.
      Started a new thread as well, to keep the subject of the previous line clean.
      
      "dual drive belts as "Approved" then fill the cockpit with thick smoke before stopping
      the engine"
      There is a firewall between the engine and the cockpit, how did the smoke enter
      the cockpit? 
      I have had one generator seizing on me, in a car, that is once in 43 years and
      2 million miles. It had been screaming for weeks before it happened, did your
      generator freeze out of the blue sky?
      
      Kind Regards,
      
      Jos Okhuijsen
      
      
      Visit -  www.EuropaOwners.org
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Flying for Fun" accident | 
      
      
      Jos,
      
      The Europa Mono has the combined flap/gear lever and brake lever holes cut
      in the centre tunnel and poorly fitting stainless steel plate in front of
      the centre tunnel through which the smoke arrived as if a smoke grenade had
      gone off.
      
      It was indeed literally an out of the blue failure almost in to the blue as
      well since I thought at one point I might have to ditch in the sea at the
      Seven estuary to put the smoke/fire out!
      
      In hindsight the "Approved" installation had the normally reliable
      Nippondenser alternator sat high aft in the cowls which proved too much for
      the grease in the sealed bearing.
      
      The fact that the water cooled intake manifold sat right behind it, the
      swirl pot to the side, the electronic ignition heat sink radiator plates in
      front and the remote oil tank radiating oil temperature straight on the
      alternator pulley bearing also in front probably caused the overheat
      failure.
      
      The installation of the dual pulley added extra overhang loads to the
      bearing and the cooling fan had to be removed to fit the dual pulley!!!!!!
      
      You see I should have been offered an interview for the PFA airworthiness
      engineers job after even if only to have the pleasure of turning it down! I
      have been doing it anywhere here for some time without any pay or
      recognition, someone has to.
      
      Regards
      Gary McKirdy
      
      Hope that explains it
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "josok" <josok-e@ukolo.fi>
      Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 6:38 PM
      Subject: Europa-List: Flying for Fun" accident
      
      
      >
      > Hi Gary
      >
      > Sorry about your accident, from which i can't recall hearing anything.
      Happy to see you survived it. There are several points in the message that i
      would like to have more clarification on, forgive me for asking dumb
      questions please. Started a new thread as well, to keep the subject of the
      previous line clean.
      > "dual drive belts as "Approved" then fill the cockpit with thick smoke
      before stopping the engine"
      > There is a firewall between the engine and the cockpit, how did the smoke
      enter the cockpit?
      > I have had one generator seizing on me, in a car, that is once in 43 years
      and 2 million miles. It had been screaming for weeks before it happened, did
      your generator freeze out of the blue sky?
      >
      > Kind Regards,
      >
      > Jos Okhuijsen
      >
      >
      > Visit -  www.EuropaOwners.org
      >
      >
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Oil cooler thermostat | 
      
      
      Just a comment on the 'gills'.  We spent a lot of time curing our temp
      problems on a 912S powered XS, instrumenting and logging in flight
      various temperatures under the cowl.  Our experiences indicate to us
      that the gills significantly hurt cooling in flight and doesn't help
      much cooling the engine after shutdown.
         In flight, the gills allow cooling air from the front eyeball inlets
      to bypass most of the engine, exiting without helping cool anything
      particularly hot.  Blocking them off completely caused no significant
      temperature rise in the top, rear, of the cowl, which remained within a
      few degrees of ambient during all phases of flight.
         As for cooling the engine after shutdown, only the coolant inspection
      panel on top of the cowl seems to help much, the gills are too low to
      get much convection action going.
      
         We did end up closing off all but one of the gills, leaving that one
      open just in case we missed something, although flight testing with ALL
      of them closed off indicated no real reason for having it open.
      
      Just my two cents worth,
      Terry Seaver
      A135/N135TD
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of josok
      Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 10:37 AM
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: Oil cooler thermostat
      
      
      Could it be, that the combination of open gills, bottom cowl opening and
      entry holes in front creates a pocket of standing air, or pulls air from
      around the exhaust over the generator or would it not be better to have
      a designated, more or less defined single entry and exit point? So doing
      away with the gills all together. 
      I've asked Andy the same question on his last day at the factory, and if
      i remembered correctly the answer was something like "needed only after
      shutdown" To prevent heat collecting under the cows after shutdown on a
      hot day i could just open the inspection covers? 
      
      Kind Regards,
      
      Jos Okhuijsen
      
      
      Visit -  www.EuropaOwners.org
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Oil cooler thermostat | 
      
      
      Hi! Jos
      These are exactly my thoughts.
      
      BTW I'll be in Gallivare? for Christmas and New Year! For a christening
      .
      
      Regards
      Bob Harrison G-PTAG
      Do not archive...
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of josok
      Sent: 16 November 2006 18:37
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: Oil cooler thermostat
      
      
      Could it be, that the combination of open gills, bottom cowl opening and
      entry holes in front creates a pocket of standing air, or pulls air from
      around the exhaust over the generator or would it not be better to have
      a designated, more or less defined single entry and exit point? So doing
      away with the gills all together. 
      I've asked Andy the same question on his last day at the factory, and if
      i remembered correctly the answer was something like "needed only after
      shutdown" To prevent heat collecting under the cows after shutdown on a
      hot day i could just open the inspection covers? 
      
      Kind Regards,
      
      Jos Okhuijsen
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Airport survival | 
      
      
      
      eckel1(at)comcast.net wrote:
      > A proposal has been made to the town to make the  property a combination airport
      and playing fields.  They have agreed to look into this  option so we are
      hopeful.  What I would like to know is if anyone has ever  seen such a combination
      and how successfully they have operated  together.
      
      We have such an airport -- with an indoor sports setup (tennis, basketball, etc)
      and an outdoor soccer field, all private-sector investment and operation. It
      must be losing big time, I think for obvious reasons. Theres no compatibility
      problem, but a fence is needed for liability reasons, if thats your question.
      Plus, I wouldnt want to be landing there just on the off-chance something could
      happen.  Id rather crash into the fence than hurt anybody.
      
      Aint Google quick and cool, cause I found that the County will front $1.5 million
      for this.  But with a fence, and depending upon size, that $1.5 mil may not
      stretch far enough.  You also didnt say if govt intends to charge the public
      fees, to be as self-sustaining as possible. With fees it wont be. Apparently 4
      small towns would be involved in this, and voters there usually set the $$ limits.
      There could be organized opposition, which should be headed off now, if
      feared.  In our nice suburb of 75,000, voters once approved an indoor skating
      rink, roller and ice.  Very popular.  City recently proposed another rink.  70/30
      to defeat, even as a bond issue; taxes are high enough.  Voters are actually
      smart.  The first rink in a pretty brick building in a pretty City Park was
      about property values -- a town to live in.  The second rink was just about
      skaters, a small % of voters.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=75069#75069
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Flying for Fun" accident | 
      
      
      The N'Denso alternator is reliable if properly installed, so is the 
      Subaru engine, However, the NSI /Subaru conversion has a very poor 
      reliability record. The alternator failure was exactly the same as Bill 
      Wynne's it seems,  it wasn't "out of the blue", imho it was just a 
      matter of time.
      I haven't looked closely at the alternator placing but my understanding 
      is that the belt tension necessary to drive the alternator results in 
      bearing overload. IOWs bad engineering design.
      The gear box  (redrive) has a similar record, frequent failures due to 
      overheating but for different reasons. These Subaru installations were 
      aproved by PFA but without the benefit of hindsight. NSI marketing was 
      very seductive at the time. I doubt if they would be aproved now except 
      under "grandfather " considerations.
      Graham
      
      Belinda Glover wrote:
      
      >It was indeed literally an out of the blue failure almost in to the blue as
      >well since I thought at one point I might have to ditch in the sea at the
      >Seven estuary to put the smoke/fire out!
      >
      >In hindsight the "Approved" installation had the normally reliable
      >Nippondenser alternator sat high aft in the cowls which proved too much for
      >the grease in the sealed bearing.
      >
      >  
      >
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Flying for Fun" accident | 
      
      
        The problem with the dual pulley setup on this engine is that it is very 
      easy to put
      too much tension in the belts.  I was shocked to check my belt tension after 
      a
      hot shutdown and found it was extremely tight.  The engine expansion after
      running up to temp tightens the belt severely.  It must be set quite loose 
      to get
      the right tension when hot.  I have also heard of cracked alternator 
      brackets from
      the same cause.  Also, the internal alternator fan is there for a good 
      reason!
      In addition, it is a good idea to run a blast tube to cool the alternator on 
      very
      tightly cowled units.  Very sorry to hear of this accident.
      
                                                       Glenn
      
      >From: Graham Singleton <grahamsingleton@btinternet.com>
      >To: europa-list@matronics.com
      >Subject: Re: Europa-List: Flying for Fun" accident
      >Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:07:55 +0000
      >
      ><grahamsingleton@btinternet.com>
      >
      >The N'Denso alternator is reliable if properly installed, so is the Subaru 
      >engine, However, the NSI /Subaru conversion has a very poor reliability 
      >record. The alternator failure was exactly the same as Bill Wynne's it 
      >seems,  it wasn't "out of the blue", imho it was just a matter of time.
      >I haven't looked closely at the alternator placing but my understanding is 
      >that the belt tension necessary to drive the alternator results in bearing 
      >overload. IOWs bad engineering design.
      >The gear box  (redrive) has a similar record, frequent failures due to 
      >overheating but for different reasons. These Subaru installations were 
      >aproved by PFA but without the benefit of hindsight. NSI marketing was very 
      >seductive at the time. I doubt if they would be aproved now except under 
      >"grandfather " considerations.
      >Graham
      >
      >Belinda Glover wrote:
      >
      >>It was indeed literally an out of the blue failure almost in to the blue 
      >>as
      >>well since I thought at one point I might have to ditch in the sea at the
      >>Seven estuary to put the smoke/fire out!
      >>
      >>In hindsight the "Approved" installation had the normally reliable
      >>Nippondenser alternator sat high aft in the cowls which proved too much 
      >>for
      >>the grease in the sealed bearing.
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >
      >
      
      _________________________________________________________________
      Get FREE company branded e-mail accounts and business Web site from 
      Microsoft Office Live 
      
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Airport survival | 
      
      
      The County is putting up $500,000 this year and $1.5 million next year for 
      the purchase of the field from the present owners.  One of the attractions 
      of the airport is that it is flat and they feel all
      they have to do is put lines down and put up goal posts.
      
      We are pushing the idea of keeping the airport for educational as well as 
      recreational use.  Things like the Young Eagles program ( we just flew 42 
      kids) and Boy Scout merit badges.
      Adults also need recreation and the airport would serve that purpose, 
      especially for Sport pilots.  I have been told that Charles Lindberg used 
      the airport, so there are historical reasons to keep the airport.  It is 
      only 8 miles from where he lived in Hopewell, NJ. (The same town as the 
      airport)  There are a lot of good reasons, but it will be a lot of work. 
      Thanks for writing.
      
      John
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "europa flugzeug fabrik" <n3eu@comcast.net>
      Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 6:07 PM
      Subject: Europa-List: Re: Airport survival
      
      
      > <n3eu@comcast.net>
      >
      >
      > eckel1(at)comcast.net wrote:
      >> A proposal has been made to the town to make the  property a combination 
      >> airport and playing fields.  They have agreed to look into this  option 
      >> so we are hopeful.  What I would like to know is if anyone has ever  seen 
      >> such a combination and how successfully they have operated  together.
      >
      > We have such an airport -- with an indoor sports setup (tennis, 
      > basketball, etc) and an outdoor soccer field, all private-sector 
      > investment and operation. It must be losing big time, I think for obvious 
      > reasons. There?Ts no compatibility problem, but a fence is needed for 
      > liability reasons, if that?Ts your question.  Plus, I wouldn?Tt want to 
      > be landing there just on the off-chance something could happen.  I?Td 
      > rather crash into the fence than hurt anybody.
      >
      > Ain?Tt Google quick and cool, ?~cause I found that the County will front 
      > $1.5 million for this.  But with a fence, and depending upon size, that 
      > $1.5 mil may not stretch far enough.  You also didn?Tt say if gov?Tt 
      > intends to charge the public fees, to be as self-sustaining as possible. 
      > With fees it won?Tt be. Apparently 4 small towns would be involved in 
      > this, and voters there usually set the $$ limits.  There could be 
      > organized opposition, which should be headed off now, if feared.  In our 
      > nice suburb of 75,000, voters once approved an indoor skating rink, roller 
      > and ice.  Very popular.  City recently proposed another rink.  70/30 to 
      > defeat, even as a bond issue; taxes are high enough.  Voters are actually 
      > smart.  The first rink in a pretty brick building in a pretty City Park 
      > was about property values -- a town to live in.  The second rink was just 
      > about skaters, a small % of voters.
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=75069#75069
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | FW: Was re:- Oil Cooler Thermostat ....now "fit for purpose | 
      Gills slots in top cowl"
      
      
      Hi! All Europa Forum 
      Below is a message sequence I published thanking Terry Seaver for his
      contribution of information. Seemingly it has been blocked by some
      "Baracuda Spam Firewall Protection system of the Matronics Site .
      Please give it access.
      Regards
      Bob Harrison G-PTAG
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: R.C.Harrison [mailto:ptag.dev@tiscali.co.uk] 
      Sent: 16 November 2006 22:23
      Subject: Was re:- Oil Cooler Thermostat ....now "fit for purpose Gills
      slots in top cowl"
      
      Hi! Terry
      Thanks for the message below, it is invaluable at my stage of re-build
      and I was suspicious of the facts having had no gills on  my Jabiru
      arrangement.
      I will be making reference about your results should I need a mod.
      application if you don't mind.
      Regards and "thanks a million"!
      Bob Harrison G-PTAG preparing for a 914 Rotax.c/w intercooler!
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Terry
      Seaver (terrys)
      Sent: 16 November 2006 21:30
      Subject: RE: Europa-List: Oil cooler thermostat
      
      <terrys@cisco.com>
      
      Just a comment on the 'gills'.  We spent a lot of time curing our temp
      problems on a 912S powered XS, instrumenting and logging in flight
      various temperatures under the cowl.  Our experiences indicate to us
      that the gills significantly hurt cooling in flight and doesn't help
      much cooling the engine after shutdown.
         In flight, the gills allow cooling air from the front eyeball inlets
      to bypass most of the engine, exiting without helping cool anything
      particularly hot.  Blocking them off completely caused no significant
      temperature rise in the top, rear, of the cowl, which remained within a
      few degrees of ambient during all phases of flight.
         As for cooling the engine after shutdown, only the coolant inspection
      panel on top of the cowl seems to help much, the gills are too low to
      get much convection action going.
      
         We did end up closing off all but one of the gills, leaving that one
      open just in case we missed something, although flight testing with ALL
      of them closed off indicated no real reason for having it open.
      
      Just my two cents worth,
      Terry Seaver
      A135/N135TD
      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Epibond 420.  was Araldite. | 
      
      
      Good morning all.
      I've taken over a Classic kit and am in need of some, as we call it in 
      the USA, Araldite 420.
      I have several questions.
      1)  How much is needed to bond the top, doors, glass, etc on average?
      2)  Is there an acceptable substitute generally available in the US?
      3)  Does anyone have an unexpired Kg to sell?
      4)  Does anyone or several people want to go in on a 6 Kg minimum order?
      I can't seem to get anyone to a)  return phone calls or b)  sell less 
      than 6ea 1Kg cans.
      And now for something completely different.
      How have the many holes and slots in the tunnel been successfully stoppered?
      Thanks,
      Creighton Smith
      A036 Classic
      Vermont USA
      
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Epibond 420.  was Araldite. | 
      
      
      I was able to get a 1 quart kit from the people below. When I ordered mine 
      in September, they had 3 quart kits left. It's now called Epibond 420.
      
      The distributor that 3 quarts in stock in September is:
      Krayden Industries
      Denver, CO
      1-800-448-0406
      
      I spoke with Edie to place my order.
      
      Vaughn Teegarden
      N914VA
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "creighton smith" <crouton@well.com>
      Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 9:28 PM
      Subject: Europa-List: Epibond 420. was Araldite.
      
      
      >
      > Good morning all.
      > I've taken over a Classic kit and am in need of some, as we call it in the 
      > USA, Araldite 420.
      > I have several questions.
      > 1)  How much is needed to bond the top, doors, glass, etc on average?
      > 2)  Is there an acceptable substitute generally available in the US?
      > 3)  Does anyone have an unexpired Kg to sell?
      > 4)  Does anyone or several people want to go in on a 6 Kg minimum order?
      > I can't seem to get anyone to a)  return phone calls or b)  sell less than 
      > 6ea 1Kg cans.
      > And now for something completely different.
      > How have the many holes and slots in the tunnel been successfully 
      > stoppered?
      > Thanks,
      > Creighton Smith
      > A036 Classic
      > Vermont USA
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Epibond 420.  was Araldite. | 
      
      
      Contact AeroPoxy.  Talk to their tech guy.  Very helpful.  About half of 
      Baby Blue is assembled with their stuff.  I don't remember the 
      particular part number (I opted for the 60 minute working time hardner), 
      but, apparantly it is used in the construction of the Velocity line of 
      kits.  I've had zero problems with the bonds after 240 hours of flying.  
      Oh yeah, quart kits are something like $39....
      
      Jeff - Baby Blue
      240 hours...
      
      creighton smith wrote:
      
      >
      > Good morning all.
      > I've taken over a Classic kit and am in need of some, as we call it in 
      > the USA, Araldite 420.
      > I have several questions.
      > 1)  How much is needed to bond the top, doors, glass, etc on average?
      > 2)  Is there an acceptable substitute generally available in the US?
      > 3)  Does anyone have an unexpired Kg to sell?
      > 4)  Does anyone or several people want to go in on a 6 Kg minimum order?
      > I can't seem to get anyone to a)  return phone calls or b)  sell less 
      > than 6ea 1Kg cans.
      > And now for something completely different.
      > How have the many holes and slots in the tunnel been successfully 
      > stoppered?
      > Thanks,
      > Creighton Smith
      > A036 Classic
      > Vermont USA
      >
      >
      
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Oil cooler thermostat | 
      
      
      It's funny how different builds render different results.  I was 
      experiencing  high temps, both on the ground and in the air, with the 
      gills open.  I closed them, and temps went up, across the board.  
      Lowering the water radiator and sealing it to the lower cowl with a 
      rubber seal dropped temps by 10-20 degrees F.  My cowl slits are now 
      open and temps are normal.  I should mention that I did the firewall 
      mod, suggested by Bob at Flightcrafters, which is sealing the tunnel 
      (tri-gear) behind the bungies and leaving the factory firewall out, 
      completely.  Lots of air exiting that big hole.  The Construction can be 
      seen at http://www.N55XS.com
      
      Jeff - Baby Blue
      240 hours
      
      josok wrote:
      
      >
      >Could it be, that the combination of open gills, bottom cowl opening and entry
      holes in front creates a pocket of standing air, or pulls air from around the
      exhaust over the generator or would it not be better to have a designated, more
      or less defined single entry and exit point? So doing away with the gills all
      together. 
      >I've asked Andy the same question on his last day at the factory, and if i remembered
      correctly the answer was something like "needed only after shutdown" To
      prevent heat collecting under the cows after shutdown on a hot day i could just
      open the inspection covers? 
      >
      >Kind Regards,
      >
      >Jos Okhuijsen
      >
      >
      >Visit -  www.EuropaOwners.org
      >
      >
      >  
      >
      
      
Message 22
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Airport survival | 
      
      
      
      eckel1(at)comcast.net wrote:
      > Adults also need recreation and the airport would serve that purpose, especially
      for Sport pilots.  I have been told that Charles Lindberg used the airport,
      so there are historical reasons to keep the airport.  It is only 8 miles from
      where he lived in Hopewell, NJ. (The same town as the airport)  There are a
      lot of good reasons, but it will be a lot of work.
      
      Indeed. And that really works for me as long-time pilot and aircraft owner, but
      scrap the nostalgia except as anecdotal. Strictly business, as in the Godfather
      movies. Take a tip from somebody who is an officer in our Airport User Association.
      Ive been politely lectured more than once in the Mayors office or that
      of County Commissioners, each of avoiding sunshine laws. Ive several times
      got up before the microphone to address government on the merits if the issue
      for the public good, with people from themedia table flagging me down for quoted
      comment.  Unlike usually annoying talking heads on TV of the federal pols,
      local pols make crap for pay, and they really want to make the commonweal work.
      
      You want to save that airport for your airplane, marginal utility though a turf
      strip may be, but please scrap that agenda. The beauty of American democracy
      is how (sadly or not) few people get involved at the local level to make things
      happen.  And local pols can be rather clueless. Success or failure, its a priceless
      experience.
      
      Fred F.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=75131#75131
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |