Europa-List Digest Archive

Sat 08/23/08


Total Messages Posted: 9



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 01:50 AM - Re: Mono or Tri-Gear, what to choose? (Brian Davies)
     2. 01:59 AM - Re: Mode S transponders (Rowland Carson)
     3. 06:07 AM - Re: No Slipper Clutch? (Christoph Both)
     4. 08:40 AM - Fw: No Slipper Clutch? (David Buckley)
     5. 08:40 AM - Fw: Mono or Tri-Gear, what to choose? (David Buckley)
     6. 10:11 AM - Re: Mono or Tri-Gear, what to choose? (zwakie)
     7. 11:33 AM - Mode S transponders (Remi Guerner)
     8. 02:33 PM - Re: Mode S transponders (nwcmc@tiscali.co.uk)
     9. 03:20 PM - Re: Mono or Tri-Gear, what to choose? (steve v)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:50:40 AM PST US
    From: "Brian Davies" <bdavies@dircon.co.uk>
    Subject: Mono or Tri-Gear, what to choose?
    Hi Marcel, You have touched on a hotly debated subject - Mono versus Trigear. I originally built a Monowheel Europa with a Rotax 912S and Airmaster variable pitch prop. It was a very capable aircraft, enormous fun to fly and no real problem taking off and landing on grass. I found it quite challenging to land in a crosswind on tarmac and eventually decided to convert the aircraft to Trigear configuration. It is now a much more forgiving aircraft to land in crosswinds but it does not enjoy bumpy grass so much. If the aircraft has been modified to fit steel nosewheel springs instead of the original bungee cords it can get quite "bouncy" if not handled carefully on bumpy surfaces. As with most aircraft types, once you have developed your technique none of these things are a real problem. Most Trigear are about 16Kg heavier than an equivalent Monowheel and tend to use slightly more fuel. The difference only really shows up on long distance touring were the Mono has the edge on performance. If you intend to do long distance touring and want to exploit the full capacity of the aircraft in terms of full fuel, two people and ample baggage, look for a Europa that is no more than 400Kg empty weight. >From a pure enjoyment angle I found the Mono much more challenging and much more fun. As a Trigear it gives me a much more relaxed flying experience and more enjoyable touring. There are a number of high quality Europas fore sale at the moment so this is a good time to buy. I suggest you join the Europa Club and get access to a great deal of additional help and information. Go to their website www.europaclub.org.uk and follow the links to join online. Best regards Brian Davies, Membership Sec. The Europa Club -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of zwakie Sent: 22 August 2008 20:12 Subject: Europa-List: Mono or Tri-Gear, what to choose? I'm new here, so let me first introduce myself: my name is Marcel, 45 years of age and from The Netherlands. I am a private pilot license holder since a couple of years, currently about 125 hours in my logbook and thinking about buying my own plane. I have decided to go for an Europa (I guess you all the know the reasons why :wink: ), and instead of building one myself I will be looking for one that is for sale. During my search on the web I also visited the Air Accidents Investigations Branch website, and what kind of struck me there is the high number of incident-reports involving Europa's, even though the trend seems to be fewer incidents occur over time. I have read most of these reports (don't ask!) to learn more about Europa's and what to expect from this type of aircraft. One picture that evolved from these reports was that a relative high number of incidents occurred with the mono-gear type. Besides incidents with technical causes, a significant number of mono-gear incidents were caused by pilot error: not lowering and locking the gear or not being able to properly deal with cross- and/or gusty winds seem to be the two most common causes. What surprised me was that of these pilot-error incidents occurred with experienced pilots on the controls (experienced as in: lots and lots of hours, quite often also with hundreds of hours on type). Obviously incidents also occurred on the nose wheel types due to cross- and/or gusty winds, but the number of incidents were significantly lower. Well, I guess you will know where this is leading: I will have to decide between a mono-gear or nose-wheel Europa, and would like to find out if flying the mono-gear is that much more difficult as compared to the nose-wheel. I also would like to get some idea of how a nose-wheel Europa compares to f.i. Cessna's 152/172 in terms of handling it in take-off and landings. All information that you can provide to help me in my decision-making process is highly appreciated! Visit - www.EuropaOwners.org Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 06:48


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:59:52 AM PST US
    From: Rowland Carson <rowil@clara.net>
    Subject: Mode S transponders
    At 2008-08-23 06:56 +0100 nigel charles wrote: > >>For me the big attraction would be to be able to display traffic. Do >you happen to know if the Trig TT31 has a data output for traffic that >can me interfaced into Garmin 430's or compatible device ?< > >I have no knowledge on this. Best to contact Trig direct. Nigel - here's a quote from one of Trig's excellently-produced PDFs (brochure, user manual, installation guide - all available for free download on their website): "The TT31 will support Traffic Information Service (TIS) functions, where available, by interfacing to an appropriate cockpit display. ADS-B and TIS functions will be made available as a software-only field upgrade." Hope this helps. regards Rowland -- | Wilma & Rowland Carson http://home.clara.net/rowil/ | <rowil@clara.net> ... that's Rowland with a 'w' ...


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:07:51 AM PST US
    Subject: No Slipper Clutch?
    From: "Christoph Both" <christoph.both@acadiau.ca>
    Hi, I ordered my 912S for the Classic FWF from Rotec which are the authorized DISTRIBUTOR for Canada. They changed the originally installed HD started to the normal starter and said it would be just fine. Christoph Both #223 Wolfville, NS ________________________________ From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of europaman Sent: Fri 8/22/2008 10:20 PM Subject: Re: Europa-List: No Slipper Clutch? All, The reason I asked is this. I felt I needed it to protect my engine in the event of a prop strike, God forbid. So in talking to Lockwood they quoted me a price, told me how to get it off etc, never mentioning any downside to it, even though I said I could not fit the HD starter. A few days later, speaking to the same guy, to get the shipping address, he said if I did not put the HD starter on too, starting would be very difficult and advised against it. This is impossible with the classic FWF. This was after I already had the gearbox off and boxed up to ship. I am seeking advise from the folks that know, you guys. I prefer the classic cowling for many reasons, mainly the money and time invested, it's painted, and I want to fly!!!! I may go ahead and send it in a few days depending on what I learn. Thanks for the helping hands, or wings, to get me into the air. Troy Maynor Visit - www.EuropaOwners.org


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:40:10 AM PST US
    From: "David Buckley" <wooburnaviation@googlemail.com>
    Subject: No Slipper Clutch?
    IHMO don't fly a mono without a slipper clutch. To miquote the old aviation saying, there are two types of mono pilots, those who have and those who will ! Dave G-CCGW


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:40:10 AM PST US
    From: "David Buckley" <wooburnaviation@googlemail.com>
    Subject: Mono or Tri-Gear, what to choose?
    Hi Marcel I had a Europa share from 1999 to 2005. It was originally a mono, but due to the fact that several pilots in our group were low houred, we converted it to a trike, (in fact I think ours was one of the first customer trikes flying). It was certainly much easier to land and take off as a trike, but can still be quite tricky until you have some experience - especially on bumpy grass surfaces. However, as Brian noted, the mono is better as a touring aircraft - slightly faster, slightly less fuel consumption, and slightly lighter. But all these "slightly's" add up. After a few years without a Europa ( I restored and flew a Luscombe 8A by way of a change), I have just bought another example - and chose the mono! I certainly would not advise flying the mono without either a good amount of tailwheel time, or preferably an extensive type conversion course with an experienced *Europa experienced* flying instructor/coach. All the best with your decision. Whichever you go for, the Europa is a brilliant little aircraft to own and fly. Dave G-CCGW


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:11:27 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Mono or Tri-Gear, what to choose?
    From: "zwakie" <marcel@zwakie.com>
    First, many thanks to the numerous people who provided me with lots of valuable information to my questions, both here on the forum as well as by sending me direct emails. The overall tone of the responses I received, seem to confirm my suspicion about flying mono-wheels. I was pleasantly surprised about the responses I received from a couple of 'mono-wheel-guys' who informed me about the Europa mono not being the typical taildragger, having some quirks of it's own. In translated the many advises into: 'be careful trying to tame this animal' and 'don't try to fly a mono without extensive training from an instructor/pilot that has extensive experience on type'. Economical reasons (insurance/resale) and safety-reasons (higher level of required skill to handle a mono-wheel safely in all situations as opposed to a tri-gear) have lead to a decision: I will focus on a tri-gear from now on. OK, this question has been answered, many more to answer in the next stage of compiling the list of specs... Again, thanks to you all! Marcel Visit - www.EuropaOwners.org


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:33:43 AM PST US
    From: "Remi Guerner" <air.guerner@orange.fr>
    Subject: Mode S transponders
    Hi Nigel, I have replaced my GTX320 by a 328. In spite of being deeper, the 328 fits perfectly in the same place as the 320. Same panel cut out, too. However, a 90 degree elbow antenna connector is required. Same panel cut out, too. Regards Remi Guerner F-PGKL options for replacing my Garmin 320 transponder. The logical choice would initially appear to be the Garmin 328. However having checked on the specifications the 328 is too deep for the central avionics stack on the Europa


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:33:40 PM PST US
    From: "nwcmc@tiscali.co.uk" <nwcmc@tiscali.co.uk>
    Subject: Mode S transponders
    Thanks for all the inputs on transponder selection. I was surprised to hear that it was possible to fit the Garmin 328as it is significantly longer than a Garmin/Apollo SL40 radio which only just fits. I guess the extra length must all be in the connector. Having trawled the net for more info I have come to a similar conclusion to Rowland. The points which I found to be significant were as follows: 1. The Garmin 328 is a tight fit and is by far the heaviest and is more limited in its capabilities 2. The Trig and the Filser are both much lighter with the Filser including the encoder which saves even more weight and is simpler to connect up. 3. The Filser is the cheapest of those available that fit in the normal avionics stack. 4. The Filser offers a flip/flop type code selection like most radios. 5. The Garmin is the only one to offer dedicated number buttons for entering codes. We use this way of inputting codes in our airliner transponders and it is by far the easiest. 6. The power output is a little confusing. Most of them offer 250W output from the set with an estimated 125W at the antenna. Some manufacturers quote set power and others antenna power. 7. The Becker is significantly more expensive than the rest and seems to offer no advantages to justify the extra price. >From the above, on balance the Filser seems to be the most suitable for my requirements. Regards Nigel Charles -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list- server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Remi Guerner Sent: 23 August 2008 19:29 Subject: Europa-List: Mode S transponders Hi Nigel, I have replaced my GTX320 by a 328. In spite of being deeper, the 328 fits perfectly in the same place as the 320. Same panel cut out, too. However, a 90 degree elbow antenna connector is required. Same panel cut out, too. Regards Remi Guerner F-PGKL options for replacing my Garmin 320 transponder. The logical choice would initially appear to be the Garmin 328. However having checked on the specifications the 328 is too deep for the central avionics stack on the Europa How safe is your email? - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/products/securemail __________________________________________________________


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:20:00 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Mono or Tri-Gear, what to choose?
    From: "steve v " <s@vestuti.orangehome.co.uk>
    Hi, i just thought i would add that even though there is no mention in the build manual ,the trigears main gear can come in usefull shoud you become entangled with pylon cables... steve #573 Visit - www.EuropaOwners.org




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   europa-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Europa-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/europa-list
  • Browse Europa-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/europa-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --