Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:00 AM - Re: Mod 72 - Undercarriage mounting frame strengthening (craig bastin)
     2. 07:35 AM - Re: Mod 72 - Undercarriage mounting frame strengthening (Rob Housman)
     3. 09:23 PM - Mod 72 - Undercarriage mounting frame strengthening  (Erich Trombley)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Mod 72 - Undercarriage mounting frame strengthening | 
      
      If you can get the tubes out again, easier said than do probably, I would
      suggest a shrink fit, if you are happy
      the insert tubes are the same size as the ID of the tubes after reaming then
      throwing the tubes in the freezer
      and GENTLY heating the UC frame should give you the clearance you need long
      enough to get them home
      mine took about 4 decent taps and they were home, mind you i did use a lathe
      and skimmed the tubes till they
      were within .01mm, the heating/cooling dropped the tube size to about .2mm
      smaller than the UC frame. I believe
      quite a few have opted for this method with good results
      
      craig
        -----Original Message-----
        From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Rob Housman
        Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2008 12:52 AM
        To: europa-list@matronics.com
        Subject: Europa-List: Mod 72 - Undercarriage mounting frame strengthening
      
      
        Having been working mostly on those factory mandated or recommended
      modifications of late, I now realize that it is much easier to build an
      airplane than it is to repair one.  Mod 70 (Mass balance arm) was merely
      tedious, working deep in the tailcone, one handed, through small access
      holes, but Mod 73 (Tailplane retention) and Mod 59 (Shimmy damper) did not
      go well when following the written procedures, and now with Mod 72 there is
      more of that wonderful English understatement: Insert the tubes - they will
      probably need a light tap to fit them it says in the procedure.  English
      hammers must be considerably larger and heavier than American hammers (or
      16.5 mm reamers must be a bit larger) because a light tap does nothing.
      After pounding away for entirely too long, and peening the ends of the tubes
      where the hammer repeatedly struck, I finally fabricated a steel spud to put
      between the offending pin and the hammer.  This made it easier to keep
      pounding with less damage to the pins, or to the adjacent smaller diameter
      tubes to which the engine mounts attach if I were to miss the target.  The
      steel spud is starting to look like a mushroom from all of those light
      taps.
      
      
        I should have retained my initial skepticism regarding the fit of painted
      tubes, which after painting with etch primer are larger than 16.5mm, but no,
      I foolishly believed that the factory had actually tried this procedure.
      Well folks, the paint makes the pin almost impossible to fit.
      
      
        Fearing complaints from my neighbors about so much hammering on a peaceful
      Sunday afternoon I finally quit pounding with the intention of resuming
      mid-day today when most of my neighbors will be away at work.  As of
      yesterday afternoon one pin was snug against the bolt attaching the frame to
      the fuselage and the other was still barely halfway home.
      
      
        Now, if I could find one of those English hammers at Home Depot.
      
      
        Best regards,
      
      
        Rob Housman
      
        Irvine, CA
      
        Europa XS Tri-Gear
      
        A070
      
        Airframe complete
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Mod 72 - Undercarriage mounting frame strengthening | 
      
      
      Craig & Martin:
      
      
      Good suggestion in re: taking advantage of thermal effect on size.  However,
      in my case one pin is in and the other is far enough in to preclude removal
      and starting over.
      
      
      Prior to starting the Mod I measured both pins and confirmed that each was
      less than 16.5mm (PRIOR to applying the etch primer) and not tapered, and
      the hand reamer was fabricated by a local shop with whom I've done business
      for a long time, and it is to size.  Were it not for the factory's
      instruction to paint the pins (and my foolishness in following that
      suggestion) the pins would have fit easily.
      
      
      Best regards,
      
      
      Rob Housman
      
      Irvine, CA 
      
      Europa XS Tri-Gear
      
      A070
      
      Airframe complete
      
      
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of craig bastin
      Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:07 AM
      Subject: RE: Europa-List: Mod 72 - Undercarriage mounting frame
      strengthening
      
      
      If you can get the tubes out again, easier said than do probably, I would
      suggest a shrink fit, if you are happy
      
      the insert tubes are the same size as the ID of the tubes after reaming then
      throwing the tubes in the freezer
      
      and GENTLY heating the UC frame should give you the clearance you need long
      enough to get them home
      
      mine took about 4 decent taps and they were home, mind you i did use a lathe
      and skimmed the tubes till they
      
      were within .01mm, the heating/cooling dropped the tube size to about .2mm
      smaller than the UC frame. I believe
      
      quite a few have opted for this method with good results
      
      
      craig
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Rob Housman
      Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2008 12:52 AM
      Subject: Europa-List: Mod 72 - Undercarriage mounting frame strengthening
      
      Having been working mostly on those factory mandated or recommended
      modifications of late, I now realize that it is much easier to build an
      airplane than it is to repair one.  Mod 70 (Mass balance arm) was merely
      tedious, working deep in the tailcone, one handed, through small access
      holes, but Mod 73 (Tailplane retention) and Mod 59 (Shimmy damper) did not
      go well when following the written procedures, and now with Mod 72 there is
      more of that wonderful English understatement: "Insert the tubes - they will
      probably need a light tap to fit them" it says in the procedure.  English
      hammers must be considerably larger and heavier than American hammers (or
      16.5 mm reamers must be a bit larger) because "a light tap" does nothing.
      After pounding away for entirely too long, and peening the ends of the tubes
      where the hammer repeatedly struck, I finally fabricated a steel spud to put
      between the offending pin and the hammer.  This made it easier to keep
      pounding with less damage to the pins, or to the adjacent smaller diameter
      tubes to which the engine mounts attach if I were to miss the target.  The
      steel spud is starting to look like a mushroom from all of those "light
      taps."
      
      
      I should have retained my initial skepticism regarding the fit of painted
      tubes, which after painting with etch primer are larger than 16.5mm, but no,
      I foolishly believed that the factory had actually tried this procedure.
      Well folks, the paint makes the pin almost impossible to fit.  
      
      
      Fearing complaints from my neighbors about so much hammering on a peaceful
      Sunday afternoon I finally quit pounding with the intention of resuming
      mid-day today when most of my neighbors will be away at work.  As of
      yesterday afternoon one pin was snug against the bolt attaching the frame to
      the fuselage and the other was still barely halfway home.
      
      
      Now, if I could find one of those English hammers at Home Depot..
      
      
      Best regards,
      
      
      Rob Housman
      
      Irvine, CA 
      
      Europa XS Tri-Gear
      
      A070
      
      Airframe complete
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Mod 72 - Undercarriage mounting frame strengthening  | 
      
      
      Rob,
      
      Before hacking off the end of the insert I would try and first remove it using
      a slide hammer.  While you won't find a slide hammer at Home Depot they are readily
      available at Harbor Freight or an auto body supply house.  With the appropriate
      attachment on the slide hammer the insert should be easily extracted at
      which point the primer can be removed and the insert re-installed with wet primer.
      Good luck.
      
      Erich Trombley
      N28ET Classic Mono 914
      
      ____________________________________________________________
      Click for free info on discount teaching degrees programs.
      http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/Ioyw6iif8jdcKxWaHjlqS73Qqd6LNJ5JIk3wkkGf8C6lJ1MLlbEUV5/
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |