Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:00 AM - Mixture control (Remi Guerner)
     2. 03:20 AM - Tannkosh and other events in Germany (Remi Guerner)
     3. 03:20 AM - Re: Has anyone mounted their battery aft of baggage (Frans Veldman)
     4. 03:54 AM - Re: Has anyone mounted their battery aft of baggage (craig bastin)
     5. 09:49 AM - Re: Mixture control (Terry Seaver (terrys))
     6. 11:49 AM - Re: Importing a Europa to the USA (glenn crowder)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Hi Terry,
      
      That interesting information. I am not surprised to learn that the 
      engine is running lean of peak at sea level, even at full power, as this 
      is consistent with the specific fuel consumptions advertised by Rotax.
      I am interested in knowing more about your mixture control system.
      My concern is about the reliability of this system as you are adding 
      piping from the engine to the cockpit and a sort of tap to control the 
      leak I suppose. What happens if one of the pipe connections leaks or 
      breaks? What are the effect of advancing or retarding the throttle if 
      you forget to enrichen first? Does that kill the engine?  
      Regards
      Remi
      
      
      >>>>>   We are members of the Experimental Aircraft Association who have
      built an 'experimental aircraft'.  As such, among other things not
      included in our standard kit, we have installed a mixture control on our
      912S which bleeds manifold pressure back into the carb bowl vents.
      Testing has shown that the standard rotax carb settings are actually
      lean-of-peak at sea level on the front two cylinders and that it (of
      course) gets richer with altitude, passing thru peak and on down the
      richer side of peak EGT with increasing altitude.  It is our assumption
      that it is acceptable for them to run the engines this way (lean of peak
      at take off) because the heads are liquid cooled.
         We believe it is then a fair assumption that we can run the engine
      lean-of-peak at altitude and <75% power, given that the factory settings
      run the engine lean-of-peak at full power/sea level.  Of course we
      monitor our exhaust, head, water, and oil temps just to make sure
      everything is happy while leaning at altitude
      regards,
      Terry Seaver<<<<<<<<<<<
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Tannkosh and other events in Germany | 
      
      Hi Bruno and all,
      
      The French RSA rally will be held in Vichy on  July 10-12, 2009. Vichy 
      is located right in the center of France.
      More info will be available within the next few months at 
      http://www.rsafrance.com 
      Hope many Europa will attend.
      
      Regards
      Remi 
      F-PGKL 
      
      
      >>>>>>>>I will issue the important dates via this forum. On other hand 
      we should
      also build up Europa fleets for events in England, France, Austria and 
      other countries an our friends from the other countries should do the 
      same, so
      that we can create a nice fly-in programme. 
      It would be great to show the strength of the Europa Family to all the
      others.<<<<<<<<<
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Has anyone mounted their battery aft of baggage | 
      
      
      rparigoris wrote:
      > That said I would like to visit why as you indicate a high resistance joint will
      in fact occur with a soldered first, then crimped joint? Please elaborate,
      as I am not quite certain as to the why after I got to thinking about it.
      
      Consider solder as some kind of liquid. It moves over time, and gives
      way to any stresses exercised on it. Crimping is a stress, and the
      solder will slowly "flow" away under it. This process may take months or
      even years, but it will move away finally.
      If you crimp something, the connection is made by clamping two or more
      metals together. If one of the metals involved is solder and gives way
      over time, it compromises the entire "clamp", the whole thing loosens up.
      
      > Thus wire is a pretty darn good fit. On one of my sample pieces I was fooling
      with I soldered through a 1/8" hole and allowed solder to flow till I just saw
      it out wire end. 
      > Just for ha has I tried a crimp on it. This is not something I plan to do on
      the "real deal", but when I crimped the sample it seemed to work quite well meaning
      that I think the solder joint under the crimp did not get too disturbed,
      
      Just give it some rest, and re-evaluate the sample next year and see how
      tight it is by then.
      
      > Again strictly a hypothetical case, this joint will be seeing cranking amps of
      ~ 50 amps for not very long, and probably a continuous drain of under 10 amps
      for longer than an hour, and charge max. of lets say best case 40 amps engine
      at take off power with SD 20S and internal generator roaring, and perhaps 100
      amps for a very short time if I was desperate enough to use a super automobile
      for a jump on a completely dead battery.
      
      In this case it may not be harmfull, but still the solder doesn't do any
      good.
      
      -- 
      Frans
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Has anyone mounted their battery aft of baggage | 
      
      
      Just a little further to the solder then crimp discussion. An electrical
      engineer mate of mine told me that any sort of impact or shock to a soldered
      joint is likely to fail over time. He was adament that any form of
      mechanical
      retention must be done before soldering. It was a few years ago now, but i
      believe he mentioned something about work hardening of the joint.
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Frans
      Veldman
      Sent: Tuesday, 6 January 2009 9:20 PM
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: Has anyone mounted their battery aft of
      baggage
      
      
      
      rparigoris wrote:
      > That said I would like to visit why as you indicate a high resistance
      joint will in fact occur with a soldered first, then crimped joint? Please
      elaborate, as I am not quite certain as to the why after I got to thinking
      about it.
      
      Consider solder as some kind of liquid. It moves over time, and gives
      way to any stresses exercised on it. Crimping is a stress, and the
      solder will slowly "flow" away under it. This process may take months or
      even years, but it will move away finally.
      If you crimp something, the connection is made by clamping two or more
      metals together. If one of the metals involved is solder and gives way
      over time, it compromises the entire "clamp", the whole thing loosens up.
      
      > Thus wire is a pretty darn good fit. On one of my sample pieces I was
      fooling with I soldered through a 1/8" hole and allowed solder to flow till
      I just saw it out wire end.
      > Just for ha has I tried a crimp on it. This is not something I plan to do
      on the "real deal", but when I crimped the sample it seemed to work quite
      well meaning that I think the solder joint under the crimp did not get too
      disturbed,
      
      Just give it some rest, and re-evaluate the sample next year and see how
      tight it is by then.
      
      > Again strictly a hypothetical case, this joint will be seeing cranking
      amps of ~ 50 amps for not very long, and probably a continuous drain of
      under 10 amps for longer than an hour, and charge max. of lets say best case
      40 amps engine at take off power with SD 20S and internal generator roaring,
      and perhaps 100 amps for a very short time if I was desperate enough to use
      a super automobile for a jump on a completely dead battery.
      
      In this case it may not be harmfull, but still the solder doesn't do any
      good.
      
      --
      Frans
      
      
      Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
      7:20 PM
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Hi Remi,
      
      As I recall, we installed the Green Sky HACman mixture control system,
      see their URL at;
      http://www.greenskyadventures.com/bing/HACmandetails.htm 
      
      Since we already had manifold pressure (vacuum) behind our panel (for
      the MP pressure transducer) it was only one additional line back to the
      carb bowl vents to implement. 
      My partner in the plane, Dave DeFord, is the one who did most of the
      installation and testing, so he knows it better than I do.  We use the
      mixture control on longer trips at altitude.  You would want to use the
      EGT on a front cylinder to set lean-of-peak mixture (since the front
      cylinders run leaner the the rear), although just leaning until the
      engine gets rough and then richening up a little also works just fine
      (like I used to do with the Cessna 152).  It does work better with the
      throttle closed just a little, but may work some even at full throttle,
      I don't quite remember that part.  The engine can be expected to run
      rough if you close the throttle and/or descend, but I don't ever
      remember it actually dying.  Any aircraft will run rough if you descend
      without readjusting the leaned mixture, so this is really not all that
      different, and you are unlikely to close the throttle for any other
      reason than descending, are you?
      
      I am not sure the leaning mechanism has enough 'authority' to actually
      kill the engine, I will check with Dave later tonight to see if he
      recalls testing for that.
      
      regards,
      Terry Seaver
      
      ________________________________
      
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Remi
      Guerner
      Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 2:58 AM
      Subject: Europa-List: Mixture control
      
      
      Hi Terry,
      
      That interesting information. I am not surprised to learn that the
      engine is running lean of peak at sea level, even at full power, as this
      is consistent with the specific fuel consumptions advertised by Rotax.
      I am interested in knowing more about your mixture control system.
      My concern is about the reliability of this system as you are adding
      piping from the engine to the cockpit and a sort of tap to control the
      leak I suppose. What happens if one of the pipe connections leaks or
      breaks? What are the effect of advancing or retarding the throttle if
      you forget to enrichen first? Does that kill the engine?  
      Regards
      Remi
      
      
      >>>>>   We are members of the Experimental Aircraft Association who have
      built an 'experimental aircraft'.  As such, among other things not
      included in our standard kit, we have installed a mixture control on our
      912S which bleeds manifold pressure back into the carb bowl vents.
      Testing has shown that the standard rotax carb settings are actually
      lean-of-peak at sea level on the front two cylinders and that it (of
      course) gets richer with altitude, passing thru peak and on down the
      richer side of peak EGT with increasing altitude.  It is our assumption
      that it is acceptable for them to run the engines this way (lean of peak
      at take off) because the heads are liquid cooled.
         We believe it is then a fair assumption that we can run the engine
      lean-of-peak at altitude and <75% power, given that the factory settings
      run the engine lean-of-peak at full power/sea level.  Of course we
      monitor our exhaust, head, water, and oil temps just to make sure
      everything is happy while leaning at altitude
      regards,
      Terry Seaver<<<<<<<<<<<
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Importing a Europa to the USA | 
      
      
      Hey Robert=2C I just called the local FAA DAR in the north Denver area=2C T
      erry Edwards and he says no problem.  Just
      get it here any way you can and he will just run it as a new US registered 
      experimental with a US N#.  He will do 
      the inspection and you will get a new US airworthiness statement with a tem
      porary flight limitation just like all new
      US built experimentals receive=2C fly off the 40 hours and your'e good to g
      o.  You will not be able to carry passengers during this 40 hrs.  Cost $450
      .00 US.  There will be no further inspections except the annual condition i
      nspection=2C usually around $150. You can call Terry yourself 303-817-3745.
        Very nice fellow.
      
                                                              Glenn
      
      
      From: roberthatton1@googlemail.comTo: europa-list@matronics.comSubject: Eur
      opa-List: Importing a Europa to the USADate: Mon=2C 5 Jan 2009 20:35:12 +00
      00
      
      
      I am looking to import my UK based Europa to the USA. I know there will be 
      a =93right way=94 to do this=2C and wonder if anyone can provide any advice
      ?
      
      Any advice and information anyone may have on shipping to the USA=3B any su
      ggested port to ship to=3B what has to be done to the aircraft from an FAA 
      perspective to make the aircraft legal in the USA=3B and anything anyone ca
      n think of to help me in this process would be extremely useful.
      
      I have not yet contacted the local FAA office yet=2C I thought I would try 
      and find out as much as possible that I could first.   
      
      Robert Hatton
      email: roberthatton1@googlemail.com
      UK Mobile: +44 79 66 184171
      US Mobile: +01 303 906 9395
      
      
      _________________________________________________________________
      It=92s the same Hotmail=AE. If by =93same=94 you mean up to 70% faster.
      http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_broad
      1_122008
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |