Europa-List Digest Archive

Fri 04/17/09


Total Messages Posted: 35



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:33 AM - Re: propeller torque ()
     2. 12:51 AM - Jabiru Cowls (James, Clive R)
     3. 03:08 AM - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_Europa-List=3A_propeller_torque? (Carl Pattinson)
     4. 03:08 AM - Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa Flyer Mag. (Robert C Harrison)
     5. 03:48 AM - Re: Re: propeller torque (Frans Veldman)
     6. 03:48 AM - Re: Re: propeller torque (Robert C Harrison)
     7. 04:51 AM - Re: Lancair vs. Europa (TELEDYNMCS@aol.com)
     8. 05:20 AM - Re: Re: propeller torque (Karl Heindl)
     9. 07:17 AM - Re: Re: propeller torque (Rowland Carson)
    10. 07:21 AM - Re: Re: Lancair vs. Europa (craig bastin)
    11. 07:28 AM - Re: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa Flyer Mag. (G-IANI)
    12. 07:28 AM - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_Europa-List=3A_Re=3A_Europa-List=3A_?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?propeller_torque? (Carl Pattinson)
    13. 07:28 AM - Re: Re: Jabiru Cowls (Fred Klein)
    14. 08:14 AM - Re: Re: Lancair vs. Europa (Garry)
    15. 08:40 AM - Re: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa Flyer Mag. (Frans Veldman)
    16. 09:44 AM - Re: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa Flyer Mag. (Karl Heindl)
    17. 09:53 AM - Re: Re: Jabiru Cowls (Graham Singleton)
    18. 10:13 AM - Re: Matronic on the Europa Forum (rampil)
    19. 10:22 AM - Re: Lancair vs. Europa (rampil)
    20. 10:32 AM - Re: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa Flyer Mag. (Frans Veldman)
    21. 10:35 AM - Re: Re: Jabiru Cowls (Frans Veldman)
    22. 10:44 AM - Re: Re: Jabiru Cowls (Fred Klein)
    23. 10:53 AM - Re: Re: propeller torque (Sidsel & Svein Johnsen)
    24. 11:53 AM - Scuff sanding before top fuse goes on and other ideas (rparigoris)
    25. 12:24 PM -  Re: Matronic on the Europa Forum (josok)
    26. 12:29 PM - Re: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa Flyer Mag. (Karl Heindl)
    27. 02:03 PM - Re: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa Flyer Mag. (Frans Veldman)
    28. 03:18 PM - Re: Re: Jabiru Cowls, Wing tips (ALAN YERLY)
    29. 03:37 PM - Wanted: Jabiru 3300, used or new. Suggestions? (messydeer)
    30. 04:08 PM - Re: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa Flyer Mag. (Karl Heindl)
    31. 04:21 PM - Re: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa Flyer Mag. (craig bastin)
    32. 05:43 PM - Re: Re: Jabiru Cowls (Graham Singleton)
    33. 05:47 PM - Re: Re: Jabiru Cowls (Graham Singleton)
    34. 05:48 PM - Re: Scuff sanding before top fuse goes on and other ideas (Graham Singleton)
    35. 06:17 PM - Re: Re: Jabiru Cowls (Fred Klein)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:33:39 AM PST US
    From: <ivor.phillips@ntlworld.com>
    Subject: Re: propeller torque
    Hi Fran I purchased A Snap on tool made for the job, http://buy1.snapon.com/catalog/item.asp?P65=&tool=all&item_ID=2224&group_ID=269&store=uk&dir=catalog Not the cheapest solution but against a prop being loose no contest, regards Ivor ---- Frans Veldman <frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl> wrote: > > All, > > Today I received my Woodcomp propeller. According to the manual I should > torque the bolts with 22Nm. > However, because of the location of the bolts, it is impossible to get > there with a normal torque wrench. > Is there a special tool I'm not aware off? Or do people practice > torqueing with 22Nm with a torque wrench as reference, and once mastered > the feel, apply it to the propeller bolts? Or is it just not critical at > all and is anything between hand-tight and applying brute force acceptable? > > BTW, the propeller appears to be of good quality, there is a mechanical > end-stop indeed, and there are two limit switches *in series*. > > -- > Frans Veldman > > > > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:51:05 AM PST US
    Subject: Jabiru Cowls
    From: "James, Clive R" <clive.james@uk.bp.com>
    RE: the enquiry about 3300 cowls. I have a 3300 on an Esqual and managed to fit the Rotax cowls however it is very tight as Bob found out many years ago. You are welcome to these if you want to make me an offer. However my suggestion would be to get in touch with Arion who market the Lightning. They created the Lightning from the Esqual and have developed an excellent set of cowls which give plenty of room for the 3300. They are that good that I have a set on order for my Esqual. I suggest to get a pair of these, they are $430 for the cowls and I'd recommend their cooling ducts which are broader and do a better cooling job than the Jab ones. Ducts are $310 a pair. The Lightning http://www.flylightning.net/ can be found there, you'll see the cowl has the chubby look not unlike the Europa (sorry guys...:-). They will need a slight mod I'm sure, to fit the Esqual they need the bottom cowl tapering in though the Europa looks deeper. With Fibre glass anything is possible of course. Regards, Clive


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:08:19 AM PST US
    From: "Carl Pattinson" <carl@flyers.freeserve.co.uk>
    Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_Europa-List=3A_propeller_torque?
    X-mailer: iAVMailScanner 1.5.6.4 Im a bit puzzled here. Whilst I can see how the device works it occurrs to me that increasing the distance of the torque measuring device from the bolt centre will affect the actual torque applied to the bolt head. Surely there has to be an adjustment in the setting to compensate for this. Unless I am much mistaken, the longer the adapter arm, the less force will be needed to make the torque wrench click (you know what I mean). If the torque wrench is set to the reccommended setting, the likelyhood is that the bolt will be over tightened or even possibly stripped. PS: I have said bolts when I mean nuts. Perhaps someone can point out the error of my thinking. Carl Pattinson G-LABS ----- Original Message ----- From: <ivor.phillips@ntlworld.com> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 8:29 AM Subject: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque > > > Hi Fran > I purchased A Snap on tool made for the job, > http://buy1.snapon.com/catalog/item.asp?P65=&tool=all&item_ID=2224&group_ID=269&store=uk&dir=catalog > Not the cheapest solution but against a prop being loose no contest, > regards > Ivor > ---- Frans Veldman <frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl> wrote: >> <frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl> >> >> All, >> >> Today I received my Woodcomp propeller. According to the manual I should >> torque the bolts with 22Nm. >> However, because of the location of the bolts, it is impossible to get >> there with a normal torque wrench. >> Is there a special tool I'm not aware off? Or do people practice >> torqueing with 22Nm with a torque wrench as reference, and once mastered >> the feel, apply it to the propeller bolts? Or is it just not critical at >> all and is anything between hand-tight and applying brute force >> acceptable? >> >> BTW, the propeller appears to be of good quality, there is a mechanical >> end-stop indeed, and there are two limit switches *in series*. >> >> -- >> Frans Veldman >> >> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________ > No viruses found in this incoming message > Scanned by iolo AntiVirus 1.5.6.4 > http://www.iolo.com > _______________________________________ No viruses found in this outgoing message Scanned by iolo AntiVirus 1.5.6.4 http://www.iolo.com


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:08:20 AM PST US
    From: "Robert C Harrison" <ptag.dev@tiscali.co.uk>
    Subject: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa
    Flyer Mag. Hi! Ian, You quote :-"This was something of a surprise as, to the best of my knowledge, we had not had an accident with the nose wheel" Do you mean your bird specifically or in the fleet generally? Where were you when I tried to give a "heads up" to trike operators two years ago about my incident of nose wheel/yoke departure? Everyone I highlighted this self same issue to seemed once again to put it down to "Bob Harrison Syndrome." The factory did load tests and gave assurances as to the adequacy of the arrangement so how come we are needing to revisit the matter? My claim was that simple load tests do not represent real time operation and because of the prising action of the friction assembly the stresses can far outweigh the dead weight factors. I don't need "brownie points" but I do have a conscience for other flyers lives. Now to return to the main points of engineering:- I think you may well find that aft of your yoke spindle hole the metal is beginning to be compressively distressed if the spindle has been bent. Your roll pin seems to indicate that movement has taken place so there will also be compressive distress in front of the spindle hole at its lower forward reaches. (BTW the application of Loctite was part of the original assembly procedure anyway.) The solution you proffer is to put an additional 1" of spindle into the Yoke as I did but may I suggest that you also insert a second roll pin 1" below the original and still use Loctite but also applied from the bottom of the hole. As to the cause of the failure and pot holes etc. the possibility of a "wheel barrow" landing also adds loads from forward of the spindle centre line and I posted a message only last week on the Matronics Forum in a debate about Bungee/Springs and suspension only supposed to be by flexing of the nose leg. These forces "out of vertical plumb" also go to cause the prising/opening action of the friction device against the castellated adjustment nut holding the whole assembly together. Much more attention is needed to be applied to inspection and the loading applied by the castellated nut. I had re-set my friction loading only 10 days prior to the incident but unbeknown to me the assembly was being pulled apart by the adjustment loading. BTW let me know the mod. number for the longer spindle when you have it ! Ignore all this at your peril. Regards Bob Harrison G-PTAG


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:48:42 AM PST US
    From: Frans Veldman <frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl>
    Subject: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque
    Carl Pattinson wrote: > Whilst I can see how the device works it occurrs to me that increasing > the distance of the torque measuring device from the bolt centre will > affect the actual torque applied to the bolt head. Surely there has to > be an adjustment in the setting to compensate for this. You are right. You have to apply a conversion factor here. On the internet, I even found a few online calculators for this purpose (although the math is trivial). How did you torque the propeller? -- Frans Veldman


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:48:42 AM PST US
    From: "Robert C Harrison" <ptag.dev@tiscali.co.uk>
    Subject: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque
    Hi! Carl You need to apply the torque 90 deg to the end of the spanner to have the load be real time torque quoted on your tool. Regards Bob Harrison G-PTAG -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Carl Pattinson Sent: 17 April 2009 11:07 Subject: Europa-List: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque <carl@flyers.freeserve.co.uk> Im a bit puzzled here. Whilst I can see how the device works it occurrs to me that increasing the distance of the torque measuring device from the bolt centre will affect the actual torque applied to the bolt head. Surely there has to be an adjustment in the setting to compensate for this. Unless I am much mistaken, the longer the adapter arm, the less force will be needed to make the torque wrench click (you know what I mean). If the torque wrench is set to the reccommended setting, the likelyhood is that the bolt will be over tightened or even possibly stripped. PS: I have said bolts when I mean nuts. Perhaps someone can point out the error of my thinking. Carl Pattinson G-LABS ----- Original Message ----- From: <ivor.phillips@ntlworld.com> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 8:29 AM Subject: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque > > > Hi Fran > I purchased A Snap on tool made for the job, > http://buy1.snapon.com/catalog/item.asp?P65=&tool=all&item_ID=2224&group _ID=269&store=uk&dir=catalog > Not the cheapest solution but against a prop being loose no contest, > regards > Ivor > ---- Frans Veldman <frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl> wrote: >> <frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl> >> >> All, >> >> Today I received my Woodcomp propeller. According to the manual I should >> torque the bolts with 22Nm. >> However, because of the location of the bolts, it is impossible to get >> there with a normal torque wrench. >> Is there a special tool I'm not aware off? Or do people practice >> torqueing with 22Nm with a torque wrench as reference, and once mastered >> the feel, apply it to the propeller bolts? Or is it just not critical at >> all and is anything between hand-tight and applying brute force >> acceptable? >> >> BTW, the propeller appears to be of good quality, there is a mechanical >> end-stop indeed, and there are two limit switches *in series*. >> >> -- >> Frans Veldman >> >> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________ > No viruses found in this incoming message > Scanned by iolo AntiVirus 1.5.6.4 > http://www.iolo.com > _______________________________________ No viruses found in this outgoing message Scanned by iolo AntiVirus 1.5.6.4 http://www.iolo.com


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:51:09 AM PST US
    From: TELEDYNMCS@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Lancair vs. Europa
    In a message dated 4/17/2009 3:03:02 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, europa-list@matronics.com writes: Almost an insult that, John? Lancair might look pretty but it doesn't fly pretty imho. Neibaur neglected to employ an aerodynamicist. Ivan had Don Dykins who is a genius. (imho) Hey Graham, Well, I didn't take it that way, and I'm reasonably sure they were speaking more about the lines of my Europa, as opposed to the flight characteristics. However, I have had at least one first hand account regarding the Lancair 320 that echoes those sentiments that made me glad I built a Europa. The wife and I were out on a site seeing and lunch flight one cold winter day a year or so ago. It was one of those crystal clear winter days when you can see 100 miles. We stopped at Elizabethton, TN, for a bite to eat after flying around over in the Smokey Mountains looking at recent snow that had fallen on the mountain tops. There was this fellow on the ramp who was preparing to depart in a 320 for New Jersey. I stepped out of my Europa wearing only a tee shirt, (my cabin heat works very well) but quickly had to grab a jacket. This fellow was wearing a snowmobile suit. We struck up a conversation on the ramp and as I chatted with him I couldn't resist asking why he was wearing such heavy clothing when he was about to depart on a 3 hour flight. He said "Because my heater doesn't work very well". Continuing the conversation, he commented that he limited his airport preferences to strips with at least 3500' and only paved strips because the 320 didn't slow down very well and was "a handful" to land. Apparently, it takes quite a bit of runway to take off, too. He also went on to comment how uncomfortable the seats were. Overall, he didn't sound all that impressed with his creation. It was pretty to look at, though. I had taken a long, serious look at the 320 before I decided to build a Europa. That day I smiled all the way home. Regards, John Lawton Whitwell, TN (TN89) N245E - Flying DO NOT ARCHIVE **************Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the web. Get the Radio Toolbar! (http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000003)


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:20:11 AM PST US
    From: Karl Heindl <kheindl@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque
    Frans=2C we had the same thread about 2 years ago. Special tools (I was sil ly enough to buy one)=2C and recalculatind torque is a waste of time=2C if you do as Bob says. The force exerted by your arm is less=2C but the torque applied at the nut is unchanged. Karl > From: ptag.dev@tiscali.co.uk > To: europa-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: Europa-List: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque > Date: Fri=2C 17 Apr 2009 11:44:48 +0100 > co.uk> > > Hi! Carl > You need to apply the torque 90 deg to the end of the spanner to have > the load be real time torque quoted on your tool. > Regards > Bob Harrison G-PTAG > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Carl > Pattinson > Sent: 17 April 2009 11:07 > To: europa-list@matronics.com > Subject: Europa-List: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque > > <carl@flyers.freeserve.co.uk> > > Im a bit puzzled here. > > Whilst I can see how the device works it occurrs to me that increasing > the > distance of the torque measuring device from the bolt centre will affect > the > actual torque applied to the bolt head. Surely there has to be an > adjustment > in the setting to compensate for this. > > Unless I am much mistaken=2C the longer the adapter arm=2C the less force > will > be needed to make the torque wrench click (you know what I mean). If the > > torque wrench is set to the reccommended setting=2C the likelyhood is tha t > the > bolt will be over tightened or even possibly stripped. > > PS: I have said bolts when I mean nuts. > > Perhaps someone can point out the error of my thinking. > > Carl Pattinson > G-LABS > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <ivor.phillips@ntlworld.com> > To: <europa-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Friday=2C April 17=2C 2009 8:29 AM > Subject: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque > > > > > > > > Hi Fran > > I purchased A Snap on tool made for the job=2C > > > http://buy1.snapon.com/catalog/item.asp?P65=&tool=all&item_ID=2224& group > _ID=269&store=uk&dir=catalog > > Not the cheapest solution but against a prop being loose no contest=2C > > regards > > Ivor > > ---- Frans Veldman <frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl> wrote: > >> <frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl> > >> > >> All=2C > >> > >> Today I received my Woodcomp propeller. According to the manual I > should > >> torque the bolts with 22Nm. > >> However=2C because of the location of the bolts=2C it is impossible to > get > >> there with a normal torque wrench. > >> Is there a special tool I'm not aware off? Or do people practice > >> torqueing with 22Nm with a torque wrench as reference=2C and once > mastered > >> the feel=2C apply it to the propeller bolts? Or is it just not critica l > at > >> all and is anything between hand-tight and applying brute force > >> acceptable? > >> > >> BTW=2C the propeller appears to be of good quality=2C there is a > mechanical > >> end-stop indeed=2C and there are two limit switches *in series*. > >> > >> -- > >> Frans Veldman > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________ > > No viruses found in this incoming message > > Scanned by iolo AntiVirus 1.5.6.4 > > http://www.iolo.com > > > > > _______________________________________ > No viruses found in this outgoing message > Scanned by iolo AntiVirus 1.5.6.4 > http://www.iolo.com > > > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:17:50 AM PST US
    From: Rowland Carson <rowil@clara.net>
    Subject: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque
    At 2009-04-17 11:06 +0100 Carl Pattinson wrote: >Whilst I can see how the device works it occurrs to me that >increasing the distance of the torque measuring device from the bolt >centre will affect the actual torque applied to the bolt head. >Surely there has to be an adjustment in the setting to compensate >for this. > >Unless I am much mistaken, the longer the adapter arm, the less >force will be needed to make the torque wrench click (you know what >I mean). If the torque wrench is set to the reccommended setting, >the likelyhood is that the bolt will be over tightened or even >possibly stripped. > >PS: I have said bolts when I mean nuts. > >Perhaps someone can point out the error of my thinking. Carl - we had a similar discussion in September 2006, during which I had exactly the same visualisation problem as you, until .... At 2006-09-08 20:34 +0100 Rowland Carson wrote: >Consider (as they say in all the best textbooks) a virtual lever >going diagonally from the handle end of the torque wrench to the >centre of the prop bolt. This will be longer than the actual torque >wrench, but the component of force effective at right angles to its >axis will be smaller than the force exerted by the operator, in the >exact proportion required to apply the required torque to the prop >bolt. > >All I had to do was remember that the torque-wrench & spanner >assembly is a rigid body (at least until the torque wrench clicks) >and sketch the components of the operator force. Sorry to be so slow >on the uptake Does that help? regards Rowland -- | Rowland Carson http://home.clara.net/rowil/ | <rowil@clara.net> ... that's Rowland with a 'w' ...


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:21:17 AM PST US
    From: "craig bastin" <craigb@onthenet.com.au>
    Subject: Re: Lancair vs. Europa
    Hmmm interesting, I was thinking about building a lancair ES or IV once my XS is flying maybe I should look elseware. craig -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of TELEDYNMCS@aol.com Sent: Friday, 17 April 2009 9:49 PM To: europa-list@matronics.com Subject: Europa-List: Re: Lancair vs. Europa In a message dated 4/17/2009 3:03:02 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, europa-list@matronics.com writes: Almost an insult that, John? Lancair might look pretty but it doesn't fly pretty imho. Neibaur neglected to employ an aerodynamicist. Ivan had Don Dykins who is a genius. (imho) Hey Graham, Well, I didn't take it that way, and I'm reasonably sure they were speaking more about the lines of my Europa, as opposed to the flight characteristics. However, I have had at least one first hand account regarding the Lancair 320 that echoes those sentiments that made me glad I built a Europa. The wife and I were out on a site seeing and lunch flight one cold winter day a year or so ago. It was one of those crystal clear winter days when you can see 100 miles. We stopped at Elizabethton, TN, for a bite to eat after flying around over in the Smokey Mountains looking at recent snow that had fallen on the mountain tops. There was this fellow on the ramp who was preparing to depart in a 320 for New Jersey. I stepped out of my Europa wearing only a tee shirt, (my cabin heat works very well) but quickly had to grab a jacket. This fellow was wearing a snowmobile suit. We struck up a conversation on the ramp and as I chatted with him I couldn't resist asking why he was wearing such heavy clothing when he was about to depart on a 3 hour flight. He said "Because my heater doesn't work very well". Continuing the conversation, he commented that he limited his airport preferences to strips with at least 3500' and only paved strips because the 320 didn't slow down very well and was "a handful" to land. Apparently, it takes quite a bit of runway to take off, too. He also went on to comment how uncomfortable the seats were. Overall, he didn't sound all that impressed with his creation. It was pretty to look at, though. I had taken a long, serious look at the 320 before I decided to build a Europa. That day I smiled all the way home. Regards, John Lawton Whitwell, TN (TN89) N245E - Flying DO NOT ARCHIVE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the web. Get the Radio Toolbar!


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:28:38 AM PST US
    From: "G-IANI" <g-iani@ntlworld.com>
    Subject: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa
    Flyer Mag. Bob > Do you mean your bird specifically or in the fleet generally Our bird. I was aware of the discussion re your accident two years ago. > The factory did load tests and gave assurances as to the adequacy of the arrangement. As far is I am aware what the factory tested was the adequacy of the roll pin to retain the spindle. What is called into question this time is the bending of the spindle. > simple load tests do not represent real time operation and because of the prising action of the friction assembly the stresses can far outweigh the dead weight factors. I agree with you here. On the three examples I have examined there is evidence of loads on the roll pin that I would not have expected. This is on the forward lower side and may compressed the casting. This marking indicates stress but far below what would be required to shear the pin. > BTW the application of Loctite was part of the original assembly procedure anyway. That is not what David Person (who makes the unit) said. The three I have examined did not use Loctite or similar. > The solution you proffer I am reporting what David Person is now doing. I believe this is an improvement and I have no evidence to suggest a second roll pin is needed. > These forces "out of vertical plumb" also go to cause the prising/opening action of the friction device against the castellated adjustment nut holding the whole assembly together. Basically I agree with this analysis. As I understand it, it is this action which is allowing the bending to occur. I think we have very limited understanding of the loads applied to the components in the real world of potholes and wheelbarrow landings. G-IANI has damping grease applied to the friction plate. As a result the castellated nut does not need to be very tight to provide the necessary damping friction. Under shock loads this means the spindle can move a short distance vertically against the spring washers. I have speculated that this may be what allows the bending to occur. Taking this to its logical conclusion, it would be best to eliminate the spring washers. The question is how to do this and provide and maintain the anti shimmy damping required. So:- 1) The point of may article was to prompt owners to keep a close watch on their nose wheel. 2) If there a better man/woman out there, who can come up with an improved design for the nose wheel, I am sure we will be pleased to hear from them. What we want is proper trailing link springing, controllable anti shimmy damping, no weight increase etc. PS) The longer spindle does not have a Mod number at present but it probably should have. I will discuss this with Roger when I have time. Ian Rickard G-IANI XS Trigear, 250 hours Europa Club Mods Rep (Trigear) e-mail mods@europaclub.org.uk or direct g-iani@ntlworld.com


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:28:44 AM PST US
    From: "Carl Pattinson" <carl@flyers.freeserve.co.uk>
    Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_Europa-List=3A_Re=3A_Europa-List=3A_?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?propeller_torque? X-mailer: iAVMailScanner 1.5.6.4 Well, I was a tad skecptical but thought I would put it to the test. Just been down to the workshop and put a bolt in the vice and torqued a nut onto it using a socket and torque wrench. I then substituted a 1/2 in spanner (1/2 ring at one end and 1/2 open at the other). Result was exactly the same !! Thanks for the info. Our prop is due back from Woodcomp next week so we know how to attach it now. Thanks all for the info. Regards, Carl - or should that be Thomas (doubting! ) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert C Harrison" <ptag.dev@tiscali.co.uk> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 11:44 AM Subject: RE: Europa-List: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque > > <ptag.dev@tiscali.co.uk> > > Hi! Carl > You need to apply the torque 90 deg to the end of the spanner to have > the load be real time torque quoted on your tool. > Regards > Bob Harrison G-PTAG > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Carl > Pattinson > Sent: 17 April 2009 11:07 > To: europa-list@matronics.com > Subject: Europa-List: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque > > <carl@flyers.freeserve.co.uk> > > Im a bit puzzled here. > > Whilst I can see how the device works it occurrs to me that increasing > the > distance of the torque measuring device from the bolt centre will affect > the > actual torque applied to the bolt head. Surely there has to be an > adjustment > in the setting to compensate for this. > > Unless I am much mistaken, the longer the adapter arm, the less force > will > be needed to make the torque wrench click (you know what I mean). If the > > torque wrench is set to the reccommended setting, the likelyhood is that > the > bolt will be over tightened or even possibly stripped. > > PS: I have said bolts when I mean nuts. > > Perhaps someone can point out the error of my thinking. > > Carl Pattinson > G-LABS > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <ivor.phillips@ntlworld.com> > To: <europa-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 8:29 AM > Subject: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque > > >> >> >> Hi Fran >> I purchased A Snap on tool made for the job, >> > http://buy1.snapon.com/catalog/item.asp?P65=&tool=all&item_ID=2224&group > _ID=269&store=uk&dir=catalog >> Not the cheapest solution but against a prop being loose no contest, >> regards >> Ivor >> ---- Frans Veldman <frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl> wrote: >>> <frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl> >>> >>> All, >>> >>> Today I received my Woodcomp propeller. According to the manual I > should >>> torque the bolts with 22Nm. >>> However, because of the location of the bolts, it is impossible to > get >>> there with a normal torque wrench. >>> Is there a special tool I'm not aware off? Or do people practice >>> torqueing with 22Nm with a torque wrench as reference, and once > mastered >>> the feel, apply it to the propeller bolts? Or is it just not critical > at >>> all and is anything between hand-tight and applying brute force >>> acceptable? >>> >>> BTW, the propeller appears to be of good quality, there is a > mechanical >>> end-stop indeed, and there are two limit switches *in series*. >>> >>> -- >>> Frans Veldman >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________ >> No viruses found in this incoming message >> Scanned by iolo AntiVirus 1.5.6.4 >> http://www.iolo.com >> > > > _______________________________________ > No viruses found in this outgoing message > Scanned by iolo AntiVirus 1.5.6.4 > http://www.iolo.com > > > _______________________________________ > No viruses found in this incoming message > Scanned by iolo AntiVirus 1.5.6.4 > http://www.iolo.com > _______________________________________ No viruses found in this outgoing message Scanned by iolo AntiVirus 1.5.6.4 http://www.iolo.com


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:28:56 AM PST US
    From: Fred Klein <fklein@orcasonline.com>
    Subject: Re: Jabiru Cowls
    On Apr 16, 2009, at 2:21 PM, Graham Singleton wrote: > Almost an insult that, John? Lancair might look pretty but it > doesn't fly pretty imho. Neibaur neglected to employ an > aerodynamicist. Ivan had Don Dykins who is a genius. (imho) Graham, I too had considered buying a Lancair kit, going so far as to visit their factory and have a contract prepared, and I've got to admit that there was a time back in 2004 when I questioned my decision to pop for the Europa. Though I can't pretend to understand fully what Don wrote in his books about the design of the Europa and don't question his genius, I've often wondered about his choice of wing tip; Hoerner and VanGrunsven clearly believe that in the speed range of the Europa, some special attention is warranted. Your thoughts? Fred A194 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:14:13 AM PST US
    From: "Garry" <garrys@tampabay.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Lancair vs. Europa
    You might take a long look at the RV series of planes. More Europa builders have gone on to build RV's than any other type of plane, at least in the US. Garry Stout Europa Trigear, RV7A ----- Original Message ----- From: craig bastin To: europa-list@matronics.com Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:21 AM Subject: RE: Europa-List: Re: Lancair vs. Europa Hmmm interesting, I was thinking about building a lancair ES or IV once my XS is flying maybe I should look elseware. craig -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of TELEDYNMCS@aol.com Sent: Friday, 17 April 2009 9:49 PM To: europa-list@matronics.com Subject: Europa-List: Re: Lancair vs. Europa In a message dated 4/17/2009 3:03:02 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, europa-list@matronics.com writes: Almost an insult that, John? Lancair might look pretty but it doesn't fly pretty imho. Neibaur neglected to employ an aerodynamicist. Ivan had Don Dykins who is a genius. (imho) Hey Graham, Well, I didn't take it that way, and I'm reasonably sure they were speaking more about the lines of my Europa, as opposed to the flight characteristics. However, I have had at least one first hand account regarding the Lancair 320 that echoes those sentiments that made me glad I built a Europa. The wife and I were out on a site seeing and lunch flight one cold winter day a year or so ago. It was one of those crystal clear winter days when you can see 100 miles. We stopped at Elizabethton, TN, for a bite to eat after flying around over in the Smokey Mountains looking at recent snow that had fallen on the mountain tops. There was this fellow on the ramp who was preparing to depart in a 320 for New Jersey. I stepped out of my Europa wearing only a tee shirt, (my cabin heat works very well) but quickly had to grab a jacket. This fellow was wearing a snowmobile suit. We struck up a conversation on the ramp and as I chatted with him I couldn't resist asking why he was wearing such heavy clothing when he was about to depart on a 3 hour flight. He said "Because my heater doesn't work very well". Continuing the conversation, he commented that he limited his airport preferences to strips with at least 3500' and only paved strips because the 320 didn't slow down very well and was "a handful" to land. Apparently, it takes quite a bit of runway to take off, too. He also went on to comment how uncomfortable the seats were. Overall, he didn't sound all that impressed with his creation. It was pretty to look at, though. I had taken a long, serious look at the 320 before I decided to build a Europa. That day I smiled all the way home. Regards, John Lawton Whitwell, TN (TN89) N245E - Flying DO NOT ARCHIVE ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the web. Get the Radio Toolbar! href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List">http://www.matron href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:40:16 AM PST US
    From: Frans Veldman <frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl>
    Subject: Re: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa
    Flyer Mag. G-IANI wrote: > 2) If there a better man/woman out there, who can come up with an improved > design for the nose wheel, I am sure we will be pleased to hear from them. > What we want is proper trailing link springing, controllable anti shimmy > damping, no weight increase etc. If we are referring to the bending spindle problem only, I believe this is easy to solve. Aircraft Spruce offers a few tubes with the same diameter and material as the original spindle, with various wall thicknesses. Have a look at: http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/mepages/4130tubing_un1.php Most likely you can insert a matching tube inside the original spindle to make it stronger. The inner tube can be fixed inside the original spindle by the roll pin, but of course some redux between the two tubes would make it even stronger. You can go further than that: As I was looking for a way to increase the length of the nose wheel assembly, to accomodate for a larger prop, I got the idea from Karl Heindle to increase the length of the spindle and to insert a nylon block between the friction disk and wheel fork. Alas, ACS has no tubes with a wall thickness similar to the original spindle, but there are tubes with sizes that allow them to fit into each other, and by doing so, you can create any wall thickness you want. It is easy to make a spindle that is stronger than the original spindle, and also larger if that is what you want. Karl is flying from his rough gras strip for years now with a 2" larger nose wheel spindle. I'm working on the same modification. If anyone is interested, I have quite some left of the nylon rod that fills up the gap between the wheel fork and friction disk. -- Frans Veldman


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:44:22 AM PST US
    From: Karl Heindl <kheindl@msn.com>
    Subject: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa
    Flyer Mag. Frans=2C Sorry to butt in again=2C but you say that ACS don't have a matching wall t hickness spindle. They have exactly the same=2C I gave you the part number. Cheers=2C Karl > Date: Fri=2C 17 Apr 2009 17:38:36 +0200 > From: frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl > To: europa-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Europa-List: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failur e. Europa Flyer Mag. > l> > > G-IANI wrote: > > > 2) If there a better man/woman out there=2C who can come up with an imp roved > > design for the nose wheel=2C I am sure we will be pleased to hear from them. > > What we want is proper trailing link springing=2C controllable anti shi mmy > > damping=2C no weight increase etc. > > If we are referring to the bending spindle problem only=2C I believe this > is easy to solve. > > Aircraft Spruce offers a few tubes with the same diameter and material > as the original spindle=2C with various wall thicknesses. > > Have a look at: > http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/mepages/4130tubing_un1.php > > Most likely you can insert a matching tube inside the original spindle > to make it stronger. > > The inner tube can be fixed inside the original spindle by the roll pin =2C > but of course some redux between the two tubes would make it even stronge r. > > You can go further than that: As I was looking for a way to increase the > length of the nose wheel assembly=2C to accomodate for a larger prop=2C I > got the idea from Karl Heindle to increase the length of the spindle and > to insert a nylon block between the friction disk and wheel fork. Alas=2C > ACS has no tubes with a wall thickness similar to the original spindle=2C > but there are tubes with sizes that allow them to fit into each other=2C > and by doing so=2C you can create any wall thickness you want. It is easy > to make a spindle that is stronger than the original spindle=2C and also > larger if that is what you want. > > Karl is flying from his rough gras strip for years now with a 2" larger > nose wheel spindle. I'm working on the same modification. If anyone is > interested=2C I have quite some left of the nylon rod that fills up the > gap between the wheel fork and friction disk. > > -- > Frans Veldman > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:53:56 AM PST US
    From: Graham Singleton <grahamsingleton@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: Jabiru Cowls
    Fred Klein wrote: > Though I can't pretend to understand fully what Don wrote in his books > about the design of the Europa and don't question his genius, I've > often wondered about his choice of wing tip; Hoerner > and VanGrunsven clearly believe that in the speed range of the Europa, > some special attention is warranted. > > Your thoughts? > > Fred > A194 Fred I used to try and get Don (and Ivan) to explore wing tip design but he never would, he felt that in the cruise the induced drag was so low (because of the wing area) that it wasn't worth the troublel; probably true for the cruise but not true for climb. I always liked the wing on the Dornier 228 (number?) It reminded me of the top glider wings with increasing sweep on the leading edge. I don't like straight lines and square wings, don't see many birds like that do you? Graham


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:13:56 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Matronic on the Europa Forum
    From: "rampil" <ira.rampil@gmail.com>
    Hi Steve, Hope you see this. My login credentials on the EuropaOwners site have gone bad. Whats the route to fix? Ira -------- Ira N224XS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=239718#239718


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:22:55 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Lancair vs. Europa
    From: "rampil" <ira.rampil@gmail.com>
    Of course, for those with the true need for speed, there is always the "egg." An acquaintance of mine thinks the Venture is going to come back. Flys with better pitch stability than the Lancairs according to several printed reviews. There are quite a few RV3-8s at my aerodrome and they are a lot of fun to fly, but not very pitch stable (in my hands). The Europa, which was not designed for IFR, seems to me a better platform for it than the RV series. Maybe the 10 is better, I have not tried it myself yet ;-) Ira -------- Ira N224XS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=239719#239719


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:32:27 AM PST US
    From: Frans Veldman <frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl>
    Subject: Re: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure.
    Europa Flyer Mag. hi Karl, > Sorry to butt in again, but you say that ACS don't have a matching wall > thickness spindle. > They have exactly the same, I gave you the part number. The part number you gave has a smaller wall thickness than what I measured on the original. Maybe Europa changed the tubing size somewhat? My solution is to order 03-04800 and 03-06600, which will give me a combined wall thickness of .240 The largest wall thickness of 1" steel tube offered by ACS (your part number) is .188, and that is smaller than what I measured. I measured an I.D. of .5 Given the fact that some people experienced problems with a bending nosewheel spindle, I'd rather stick to the original wall thickness. Also, an inner I.D. of .5 allso provides a snug fit of the AN8-bolt to be inserted. Has anyone else measured the wall thickness and/or inner diameter of the nosewheel spindle? Maybe there are two versions supplied? Which explains why some people experience problems and some others not (bad landings excluded of course! ;-) ) Another difference I experienced is that my nosehweel spindle is not just held by the famous roll pin, but also "glued" with something (probably locktite). Of course I can't exclude the possibility that I didn't measure correctly. In that case, I will just get a stronger nose wheel spindle than original. -- Frans Veldman


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:35:43 AM PST US
    From: Frans Veldman <frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl>
    Subject: Re: Jabiru Cowls
    Graham Singleton wrote: > I used to try and get Don (and Ivan) to explore wing tip design but he > never would, he felt that in the cruise the induced drag was so low > (because of the wing area) that it wasn't worth the troublel; probably > true for the cruise but not true for climb. I recall having read somewhere that for the speeds reached by GA-aircraft, any improvements by winglets etc. is countered by the additional drag (frontal area, friction drag). If you see winglets, it is usually the result of fashion, not science. -- Frans Veldman


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:44:01 AM PST US
    From: Fred Klein <fklein@orcasonline.com>
    Subject: Re: Jabiru Cowls
    On Apr 17, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Graham Singleton wrote: > I always liked the wing on the Dornier 228 (number?) It reminded me > of the top glider wings with increasing sweep on the leading edge. Graham...ah yes, the raked tips...something akin to those on the Lancair Legacy?? (sorry, jus couldn't resist...) Cheers, Fred -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:53:06 AM PST US
    From: "Sidsel & Svein Johnsen" <sidsel.svein@oslo.online.no>
    Subject: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque
    Actually, the torque wrench may be at any angle to the spanner - it "clicks" only when the bending moment at the end (= torque) reaches the set point. The bending moment transferred to the spanner (ref. my sketch yesterday) is then equal to that set point. The important point is that the force applied by your hand at the torque wrench handle MUST ALWAYS BE PARALLELL TO THE SPANNER, ALSO IF THE TWO TOOLS ARE AT 90 DEGREES. If not, your force causes an additional bending moment in the spanner and thus an additional torque on the prop bolt. The reason for recommending (and drawing) the spanner and the torque wrench at 90 degrees angle is that the natural direction of your hand's force on the handle is also 90 degrees, i.e. less risk that you forget to apply the force parallel to the spanner. If the torque wrench is not 90 degrees to the spanner, more force (PARALLEL TO THE SPANNER!) must be applied to the torque wrench to reach the set point, but the torque at the prop bolt is still equal to the set point when the torque wrench "clicks". Regards, Svein -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] P vegne av Robert C Harrison Sendt: 17. april 2009 12:45 Til: europa-list@matronics.com Emne: RE: Europa-List: Re: Europa-List: propeller torque <ptag.dev@tiscali.co.uk> Hi! Carl You need to apply the torque 90 deg to the end of the spanner to have the load be real time torque quoted on your tool. Regards Bob Harrison G-PTAG


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:53:13 AM PST US
    Subject: Scuff sanding before top fuse goes on and other ideas
    From: "rparigoris" <rparigor@suffolk.lib.ny.us>
    Prior to bonding on top fuse, besides what is mentioned in manual to scuff sand, figure we will scuff sand fin rib contact area and area that will get 2 BID, sternpost and sternpost contact area, baggage bulkhead and baggage bulkhead contact area and area that gets 2 BID, door sill area that will get 2 BID and balsa for strengthening / wire conduit. Not going to make a splash for mass balance tower or fin rib. *Rudder cables, turnbuckles and guides installed. *All antennas installed, wired and tested (except transponder). *Pitch servo wired. *Fuel system installed (914) and pumps wired. *Tailwheel pad installed (mono) and steel outrigger to help support twisting forces on mounting bolt. *Fin rib has foam dug out for better bite upon bonding (then will get 2 BID from rear). *Aft Odyssey PC545 battery mount installed with CCA wire strain relief supports on top clamp. *Any ty wrap clips needed aft of baggage bulkhead installed. *Any gaps larger than in lower fuse between bottom of joggle and where foam begins is filled with PVC foam and 2 BID over) *406Mhz ELT installed *Mono undercarriage installed *Airbrake lever and control horn installed. *Ceiling installed and aft portion wired. *Rollbar installed with attachments for shoulder harness x2. *Filler cap receptical installed and area that cobra attaches has balsa and BID reinforcement. *Fuel tank has BID reinforcement in tunnel and bottom is filled with foam to help support. *Baggage ribs installed to fuse with splash on the tops. *Two cameras, one in fin and one on aft ceiling mounted and wired. DVR mounted on folding tray attached to baggage bulkhead to allow aft access. * Will make holes to run pneumatic and wires to wings going down side of fuse prior to top bond on. Will rig wings with top permanent bonded on to remove any change that may occur, will take hit having to rig flaps and rear lift pin crossbar with top on. What did I miss? Any negative comments? Thx. Ron Parigoris Visit - www.EuropaOwners.org


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:24:35 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Matronic on the Europa Forum
    From: "josok" <josok-e@ukolo.fi>
    Ira, You have email in your gmail account, Regards, Jos Visit - www.EuropaOwners.org


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:29:20 PM PST US
    From: Karl Heindl <kheindl@msn.com>
    Subject: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure.
    Europa Flyer Mag. Hi Frans=2C That must explain the confusion over wall thickness. Europa's supplier must have changed the specs somewhere along the line. In decimal inches=2C the thickness of mine is .188=2C with an i.d. of .625. My serial number is 392. It seems strange that no-one was informed of this. It also seems strange that no mandatory mod was ever issued to change the r oll pin to a bolt=2C after Bob H.'s experience. We have had one or two othe r imho completely useless mandatory mods. And how did the PFA/LAA ever approve the instrument module which is very fl ammable and giving off very toxic fumes when ignited. Cheers=2C Karl > Date: Fri=2C 17 Apr 2009 19:28:43 +0200 > From: frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl > To: europa-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Europa-List: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failur e. Europa Flyer Mag. > l> > > hi Karl=2C > > > Sorry to butt in again=2C but you say that ACS don't have a matching wa ll > > thickness spindle. > > They have exactly the same=2C I gave you the part number. > > The part number you gave has a smaller wall thickness than what I > measured on the original. Maybe Europa changed the tubing size somewhat? > > My solution is to order 03-04800 and 03-06600=2C which will give me a > combined wall thickness of .240 > The largest wall thickness of 1" steel tube offered by ACS (your part > number) is .188=2C and that is smaller than what I measured. I measured a n > I.D. of .5 > Given the fact that some people experienced problems with a bending > nosewheel spindle=2C I'd rather stick to the original wall thickness. > Also=2C an inner I.D. of .5 allso provides a snug fit of the AN8-bolt to > be inserted. > > Has anyone else measured the wall thickness and/or inner diameter of the > nosewheel spindle? Maybe there are two versions supplied? Which explains > why some people experience problems and some others not (bad landings > excluded of course! =3B-) ) Another difference I experienced is that my > nosehweel spindle is not just held by the famous roll pin=2C but also > "glued" with something (probably locktite). > > Of course I can't exclude the possibility that I didn't measure > correctly. In that case=2C I will just get a stronger nose wheel spindle > than original. > > -- > Frans Veldman > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > >


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:03:51 PM PST US
    From: Frans Veldman <frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl>
    Subject: Re: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure.
    Europa Flyer Mag. Karl Heindl wrote: > > That must explain the confusion over wall thickness. Europa's supplier > must have changed the specs somewhere along the line. In decimal inches, > the thickness of mine is .188, with an i.d. of .625. My serial number is > 392. My serial number is 589. Could be interesting to compare the serial numbers of airplanes with nose wheel troubles. BTW, it occurs to me that the fork itself is ridiculous strong and heavy, compared to the spindle and anything above it. If I'm not mistaken, it is ordinairy cast iron, and that doesn't belong on an airplane IMHO. Some steel-alloy part could do the same job with less than half of the weight. Above the wheel axle, one could drill a series of holes of increasing size, or cut out a triangle shape on each side, without compromising the strength (at least not compared to the rest of the leg), saving considerable weight. Any ideas, comments? > And how did the PFA/LAA ever approve the instrument module which is very > flammable and giving off very toxic fumes when ignited. Glad I didn't use it at all. ;-) If anyone is interested in a never used instrument module, mail me privately. Although it is somewhat tempting to see how flammable it is. ;-) -- Frans Veldman


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:18:16 PM PST US
    From: ALAN YERLY <budyerly@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: Jabiru Cowls, Wing tips
    Not to butt in=2C but as you all know=2C I have flaws... Wing tip design is to control vortices as we all know. Mr. Dykins did a gr eat job of designing the wing with the tip creating virtually no lift at cr uise speeds of 130 KTS and up to 10=2C000 MSL. Therefore=2C in my opinion =2C an aerodynamic gimmick to reduce tip drag is not necessary=2C unless fo r cosmetics or utilty. For those of you unfamiliar=2C the Europa wing lift distribution is very ne arly elliptic (optimum)=2C giving the least induced drag at low altitude cr uise. Wing tip redesign is only necessary if the wing loading or wing lift distribution is not elliptic and a large vortex is generated by the wing t ip=2C adding drag. Horner tips or winglets work when the big square wing h as a large vortex created at the tip due to lack of twist=2C so the added f rontal area drag is compensated for by the reduced vortex drag. And frankl y=2C the increase in wing area at the tip reduces the stall speed=2C not th e shape in GA aircraft. On large aircraft with swept wings=2C winglets hel p break down tip drag and tip losses due to the wide flight envelope of the aircraft. Should we ask our Europa wing design to lift another 500 pounds of airplane =2C or cruise above 20=2C000 MSL=2C wing tip design may be relevant. I lik e what Claude Tugwell did on his classic. He made the tip to include a sli ght Horner dip adding about 6 inches from aileron end to the tip. It makes grasping the tip for carrying=2C rigging and de-rigging easier=2C but does n't do a thing for speed. A Plane Jane wing tip isn't sexy=2C but it works if the wing design is righ t. As one of my aerodynamics instructors (Mr. Bonde=2C who worked on the o riginal 727 wing) said in college=2C "Tip design can be a flat plate if yo u got the lift distribution right". We'll talk more at Sun n Fun over a bit of libation. Now I have to get the displays ready for Sun 'n Fun. Bud Yerly Custom Flight Creations (813) 653-4989 > Date: Fri=2C 17 Apr 2009 19:35:19 +0200 > From: frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl > To: europa-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Europa-List: Re: Jabiru Cowls > l> > > Graham Singleton wrote: > > I used to try and get Don (and Ivan) to explore wing tip design but he > > never would=2C he felt that in the cruise the induced drag was so low > > (because of the wing area) that it wasn't worth the troublel=3B probabl y > > true for the cruise but not true for climb. > > I recall having read somewhere that for the speeds reached by > GA-aircraft=2C any improvements by winglets etc. is countered by the > additional drag (frontal area=2C friction drag). If you see winglets=2C i t > is usually the result of fashion=2C not science. > > -- > Frans Veldman > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > >


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:37:09 PM PST US
    Subject: Wanted: Jabiru 3300, used or new. Suggestions?
    From: "messydeer" <messydeer@YAHOO.COM>
    I'm looking for a used or new Jabiru 3300 or where else besides Barnstormers and Ebay to look. Thanks, Dan Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=239770#239770


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:08:55 PM PST US
    From: Karl Heindl <kheindl@msn.com>
    Subject: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure.
    Europa Flyer Mag. Frans=2C Are you sure the fork is made of cast iron ? Mine is aluminum. What kind of a kit did you buy ? Cheers=2C Karl > Date: Fri=2C 17 Apr 2009 22:59:02 +0200 > From: frans@paardnatuurlijk.nl > To: europa-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Europa-List: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failur e. Europa Flyer Mag. > l> > > Karl Heindl wrote: > > > > That must explain the confusion over wall thickness. Europa's supplier > > must have changed the specs somewhere along the line. In decimal inches =2C > > the thickness of mine is .188=2C with an i.d. of .625. My serial number is > > 392. > > My serial number is 589. > Could be interesting to compare the serial numbers of airplanes with > nose wheel troubles. > > BTW=2C it occurs to me that the fork itself is ridiculous strong and > heavy=2C compared to the spindle and anything above it. If I'm not > mistaken=2C it is ordinairy cast iron=2C and that doesn't belong on an > airplane IMHO. Some steel-alloy part could do the same job with less > than half of the weight. > Above the wheel axle=2C one could drill a series of holes of increasing > size=2C or cut out a triangle shape on each side=2C without compromising the > strength (at least not compared to the rest of the leg)=2C saving > considerable weight. Any ideas=2C comments? > > > And how did the PFA/LAA ever approve the instrument module which is ver y > > flammable and giving off very toxic fumes when ignited. > > Glad I didn't use it at all. =3B-) > If anyone is interested in a never used instrument module=2C mail me > privately. Although it is somewhat tempting to see how flammable it is. =3B-) > > -- > Frans Veldman > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > >


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:21:24 PM PST US
    From: "craig bastin" <craigb@onthenet.com.au>
    Subject: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa
    Flyer Mag. I have come in on the end of this conversation. From the descriptions and examination of the nose gear yoke etc, am i right you are all referring to the shaft in the yoke being pulled out the top of the fork that holds the wheel. There is no mention of any work needed to fix this issue on the europa site, I can see how a wheelbarrow landing could create such loads. Could some one point me in the right direction for the orginal issue. thanks craig VH-XSV -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Robert C Harrison Sent: Friday, 17 April 2009 8:06 PM Subject: Europa-List: Trike nose wheel castor spindle and yoke failure. Europa Flyer Mag. <ptag.dev@tiscali.co.uk> Hi! Ian, You quote :-"This was something of a surprise as, to the best of my knowledge, we had not had an accident with the nose wheel" Do you mean your bird specifically or in the fleet generally? Where were you when I tried to give a "heads up" to trike operators two years ago about my incident of nose wheel/yoke departure? Everyone I highlighted this self same issue to seemed once again to put it down to "Bob Harrison Syndrome." The factory did load tests and gave assurances as to the adequacy of the arrangement so how come we are needing to revisit the matter? My claim was that simple load tests do not represent real time operation and because of the prising action of the friction assembly the stresses can far outweigh the dead weight factors. I don't need "brownie points" but I do have a conscience for other flyers lives. Now to return to the main points of engineering:- I think you may well find that aft of your yoke spindle hole the metal is beginning to be compressively distressed if the spindle has been bent. Your roll pin seems to indicate that movement has taken place so there will also be compressive distress in front of the spindle hole at its lower forward reaches. (BTW the application of Loctite was part of the original assembly procedure anyway.) The solution you proffer is to put an additional 1" of spindle into the Yoke as I did but may I suggest that you also insert a second roll pin 1" below the original and still use Loctite but also applied from the bottom of the hole. As to the cause of the failure and pot holes etc. the possibility of a "wheel barrow" landing also adds loads from forward of the spindle centre line and I posted a message only last week on the Matronics Forum in a debate about Bungee/Springs and suspension only supposed to be by flexing of the nose leg. These forces "out of vertical plumb" also go to cause the prising/opening action of the friction device against the castellated adjustment nut holding the whole assembly together. Much more attention is needed to be applied to inspection and the loading applied by the castellated nut. I had re-set my friction loading only 10 days prior to the incident but unbeknown to me the assembly was being pulled apart by the adjustment loading. BTW let me know the mod. number for the longer spindle when you have it ! Ignore all this at your peril. Regards Bob Harrison G-PTAG Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 16:38:00


    Message 32


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:43:38 PM PST US
    From: Graham Singleton <grahamsingleton@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: Jabiru Cowls
    Frans Veldman wrote: > I recall having read somewhere that for the speeds reached by > GA-aircraft, any improvements by winglets etc. is countered by the > additional drag (frontal area, friction drag). If you see winglets, it > is usually the result of fashion, not science. > > But don't try and fly an EZ without it's winglets! Not possible. It all depends how much washout the designer put in and the wing area. Exceed Vne in a sailplane and the wings bend down. Winglets can certainly be fashionable but square wings are just a poorly optimised compromise. There are no straight lines on a bird and some of them are optimised for incredible feats of efficiency. Graham


    Message 33


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:47:49 PM PST US
    From: Graham Singleton <grahamsingleton@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: Jabiru Cowls
    Fred Klein wrote: > I always liked the wing on the Dornier 228 (number?) It reminded me of > the top glider wings with increasing sweep on the leading edge. > > Graham...ah yes, the raked tips...something akin to those on the > Lancair Legacy?? > > (sorry, jus couldn't resist...) > > Cheers, > > Fred > I think the Legacy was designed by Martin Holman wasn't it? not Lance Neubaur. (can't remember how he spells his name) Graham ;-)


    Message 34


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:48:44 PM PST US
    From: Graham Singleton <grahamsingleton@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: Scuff sanding before top fuse goes on and other ideas
    rparigoris wrote: > > Will rig wings with top permanent bonded on to remove any change that may occur, will take hit having to rig flaps and rear lift pin crossbar with top on. > > What did I miss? > Any negative comments? > > Thx. > Ron Parigoris Big hit for negative gain imho. You won't twist the cockpit module anmd the tail is easi;ly corrected when top goes on. Graham


    Message 35


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:17:46 PM PST US
    From: Fred Klein <fklein@orcasonline.com>
    Subject: Re: Jabiru Cowls
    I don't know Graham...I do know that Lance was an artist/illustrator with no formal training in aerodynamics when he started his company...not at all certain of the extent or quality of engineering help upon which he was relying. And Bud...I very much appreciate your weighing in with your solid background and knowledge. See ya next week! Fred On Apr 17, 2009, at 5:43 PM, Graham Singleton wrote: > > > > Fred Klein wrote: >> I always liked the wing on the Dornier 228 (number?) It reminded me >> of the top glider wings with increasing sweep on the leading edge. >> >> Graham...ah yes, the raked tips...something akin to those on the >> Lancair Legacy?? >> >> (sorry, jus couldn't resist...) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Fred >> > I think the Legacy was designed by Martin Holman wasn't it? not > Lance Neubaur. (can't remember how he spells his name) > Graham ;-) > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   europa-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Europa-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/europa-list
  • Browse Europa-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/europa-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --