Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:22 AM - Re: Pneumatic connectors (Steade)
     2. 01:48 AM - Mogas UK (goff)
     3. 01:48 AM - Rotax fuel flow detection (Guerner Remi)
     4. 04:09 AM - SV: Rotax fuel flow detection (Sidsel & Svein Johnsen)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Pneumatic connectors | 
      
      Thanks for the replies
      
      Supplier now located.
      
      
      Regards
      
      David Steade
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      The ukga.com site now lists 4 UK airfields that have Mogas for sale. Sherburn and
      Sywell I knew about but Enstone and Wolverhampton were news to me.
      
      Goff
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=316740#316740
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Rotax fuel flow detection | 
      
      Svein,
      
      I basically agree with what you wrote. However  my proposed schematic  
      is very close to the one recommanded (and optionally  supplied) by   
      Rotax in the 912 Install Manual (see attached). This arrangement works  
      on most LSAs so I do not see why it would not work with the addition  
      of the fuel flow sensor as propsed.
      
      Regards
      Remi Guerner
      
      
      <<<<<<At first sight, your proposal may look like the obvious  
      solution.  With
      respect, however, I think it is not to be recommended for 912ULS
      installations (I do not know enough about 914 to comment on that  
      engine).
      
      Contrary to what seems to be a common assumption, the return flow  
      through
      the restrictor is not insignificant - it is roughly 10 litres per hour  
      (i.e.
      roughly half of the net cruise consumption, or roughly 1/3 of the fuel  
      going
      to the engine is flowing back to the tank).  The reason for this  
      relatively
      high surplus circulation is of course to reduce the time the fuel is  
      exposed
      to heat before it reaches the carbs, by increasing the flow velocity  
      through
      the fuel line.  According to the build manual, the return line  
      branches off
      at the point farthest from the pump, just before the left side carb
      (assuming the fuel line goes from the pump to the right side of the  
      engine
      with a short branch off to the right carb, and from there across the  
      back of
      the engine to the left carb).
      
      Moving the return line branch-off upstream (closer to the pump)  
      increases
      the risk of vapour forming in the fuel lines downstream from this  
      branch-off
      point.  By how much, I do not know, but maybe it is critical under
      unfavourable circumstances.  "Maybe's" under the cowling are not nice  
      - - -
      - - .>>>>>>>>>
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Rotax fuel flow detection | 
      
      
      Remi,
      
      The Rotax manual shows a principle, not one that is optimal for all actual
      installations.  Different aircraft will have different under-the-cowl
      arrangements, different cool air flows under the cowl, etc.  Europa shows
      another arrangement, which of course is better but I cannot say by how much
      or whether it will matter. The difference in fuel tube length at high vs low
      flow velocity is small, and if the tube is placed in a heat shield the
      increase in vapour lock risk may be acceptable.
      
      Regards,
      Svein 
      
      
      -----Opprinnelig melding-----
      Fra: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] P vegne av Guerner Remi
      Sendt: 23. oktober 2010 10:44
      Til: Europa-List Digest Server
      Emne: Europa-List: Rotax fuel flow detection
      
      Svein,
      
      I basically agree with what you wrote. However  my proposed schematic  
      is very close to the one recommanded (and optionally  supplied) by   
      Rotax in the 912 Install Manual (see attached). This arrangement works on
      most LSAs so I do not see why it would not work with the addition of the
      fuel flow sensor as propsed.
      
      Regards
      Remi Guerner
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |