Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 02:06 AM - Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 (Tony Renshaw)
2. 03:01 AM - Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 (G-IANI)
3. 05:02 AM - Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 (Karl Heindl)
4. 05:24 AM - Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 (Jan de Jong)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 |
I already have a 20B, which is a marine sensor, for gasoline engines, generally
outboards such as 4 stroke Honda. Spec wise, it seems fine, and I have a feeling
the internals are probably one and the same. Tempted just to get another one,
as they are a little over $100.00 as I recall.
TR
On 02/05/2011, at 4:51 AM, Jan de Jong wrote:
>
> I intend to make a pair of Model 231 for general (marine) use work for the 914.
> Total factory direct cost is USD 220.
>
> Jan de Jong
>
>
>
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 |
Karl and Jan
I am quoting what I have been told by both Grand Rapids and Part for
Aircraft. I am waiting for an MGL FF1 (with the FT60 sensors) to go into
the repair of G-IRON.
The 201B (and 201C) are capable of higher flow rates with slightly reduced
resolution but, I believe, are still acceptable to the LAA . The Marine
versions are probably also acceptable, cost less but are heavier.
Ian Rickard G-IANI XS Trigear, 300hours
Europa Club Mods Specialist
e-mail g-iani@ntlworld.com
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 |
Ian=2C
I was confused. I thought I had the A model=2C as you suggested=2C but it i
s actually a B. Perhaps that is why I couldn't get it to work by using just
the one plus a pulsation damper=2C as John Wigney had done successfully.I
will now get another B for the return line. Or would an A be compatible ?Th
e FS450 installation manual only mentions the part numbers for models B and
C. The price is the same for all 3. The manual also warns about using alum
inum fittings.
Cheers=2C
Karl
From: g-iani@ntlworld.com
Subject: RE: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a
914
Karl and Jan I am quoting what I have been told by both Grand Rapids and Pa
rt for Aircraft. I am waiting for an MGL FF1 (with the FT60 sensors) to go
into the repair of G-IRON. The 201B (and 201C) are capable of higher flow
rates with slightly reduced resolution but=2C I believe=2C are still accept
able to the LAA . The Marine versions are probably also acceptable=2C cost
less but are heavier. Ian Rickard G-IANI XS Trigear=2C 300hours
Europa Club Mods Specialist
e-mail g-iani@ntlworld.com
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 |
The 20B could be equivalent to 201A (<30gph), the 231 to 201B (<60gph).
A 914 fuel system could exceed 30 gph.
Factory direct: http://www.floscan.com/html/blue/accessories.php
I installed a matched pair of 231, K-factors stamped on are 025498
(forward) and 025424 (return).
I expect signal frequencies of 200 to 300 Hz.
We shall see.
Jan de Jong
>
> I already have a 20B, which is a marine sensor, for gasoline engines, generally
outboards such as 4 stroke Honda. Spec wise, it seems fine, and I have a feeling
the internals are probably one and the same. Tempted just to get another
one, as they are a little over $100.00 as I recall.
> TR
>
> On 02/05/2011, at 4:51 AM, Jan de Jong wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I intend to make a pair of Model 231 for general (marine) use work for the 914.
>> Total factory direct cost is USD 220.
>>
>> Jan de Jong
>>
>>
>>
>>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|