Europa-List Digest Archive

Mon 05/02/11


Total Messages Posted: 4



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:06 AM - Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 (Tony Renshaw)
     2. 03:01 AM - Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 (G-IANI)
     3. 05:02 AM - Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 (Karl Heindl)
     4. 05:24 AM - Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 (Jan de Jong)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:06:35 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914
    From: Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com>
    I already have a 20B, which is a marine sensor, for gasoline engines, generally outboards such as 4 stroke Honda. Spec wise, it seems fine, and I have a feeling the internals are probably one and the same. Tempted just to get another one, as they are a little over $100.00 as I recall. TR On 02/05/2011, at 4:51 AM, Jan de Jong wrote: > > I intend to make a pair of Model 231 for general (marine) use work for the 914. > Total factory direct cost is USD 220. > > Jan de Jong > > > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:01:31 AM PST US
    From: "G-IANI" <g-iani@ntlworld.com>
    Subject: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914
    Karl and Jan I am quoting what I have been told by both Grand Rapids and Part for Aircraft. I am waiting for an MGL FF1 (with the FT60 sensors) to go into the repair of G-IRON. The 201B (and 201C) are capable of higher flow rates with slightly reduced resolution but, I believe, are still acceptable to the LAA . The Marine versions are probably also acceptable, cost less but are heavier. Ian Rickard G-IANI XS Trigear, 300hours Europa Club Mods Specialist e-mail g-iani@ntlworld.com


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:02:34 AM PST US
    From: Karl Heindl <kheindl@msn.com>
    Subject: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914
    Ian=2C I was confused. I thought I had the A model=2C as you suggested=2C but it i s actually a B. Perhaps that is why I couldn't get it to work by using just the one plus a pulsation damper=2C as John Wigney had done successfully.I will now get another B for the return line. Or would an A be compatible ?Th e FS450 installation manual only mentions the part numbers for models B and C. The price is the same for all 3. The manual also warns about using alum inum fittings. Cheers=2C Karl From: g-iani@ntlworld.com Subject: RE: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 Karl and Jan I am quoting what I have been told by both Grand Rapids and Pa rt for Aircraft. I am waiting for an MGL FF1 (with the FT60 sensors) to go into the repair of G-IRON. The 201B (and 201C) are capable of higher flow rates with slightly reduced resolution but=2C I believe=2C are still accept able to the LAA . The Marine versions are probably also acceptable=2C cost less but are heavier. Ian Rickard G-IANI XS Trigear=2C 300hours Europa Club Mods Specialist e-mail g-iani@ntlworld.com


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:24:34 AM PST US
    From: Jan de Jong <jan_de_jong@casema.nl>
    Subject: Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914
    The 20B could be equivalent to 201A (<30gph), the 231 to 201B (<60gph). A 914 fuel system could exceed 30 gph. Factory direct: http://www.floscan.com/html/blue/accessories.php I installed a matched pair of 231, K-factors stamped on are 025498 (forward) and 025424 (return). I expect signal frequencies of 200 to 300 Hz. We shall see. Jan de Jong > > I already have a 20B, which is a marine sensor, for gasoline engines, generally outboards such as 4 stroke Honda. Spec wise, it seems fine, and I have a feeling the internals are probably one and the same. Tempted just to get another one, as they are a little over $100.00 as I recall. > TR > > On 02/05/2011, at 4:51 AM, Jan de Jong wrote: > > >> >> I intend to make a pair of Model 231 for general (marine) use work for the 914. >> Total factory direct cost is USD 220. >> >> Jan de Jong >> >> >> >>




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   europa-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Europa-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/europa-list
  • Browse Europa-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/europa-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --