---------------------------------------------------------- Europa-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Mon 05/02/11: 4 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 02:06 AM - Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 (Tony Renshaw) 2. 03:01 AM - Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 (G-IANI) 3. 05:02 AM - Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 (Karl Heindl) 4. 05:24 AM - Re: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 (Jan de Jong) ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 02:06:35 AM PST US Subject: Re: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 From: Tony Renshaw I already have a 20B, which is a marine sensor, for gasoline engines, generally outboards such as 4 stroke Honda. Spec wise, it seems fine, and I have a feeling the internals are probably one and the same. Tempted just to get another one, as they are a little over $100.00 as I recall. TR On 02/05/2011, at 4:51 AM, Jan de Jong wrote: > > I intend to make a pair of Model 231 for general (marine) use work for the 914. > Total factory direct cost is USD 220. > > Jan de Jong > > > > ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ Time: 03:01:31 AM PST US From: "G-IANI" Subject: RE: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 Karl and Jan I am quoting what I have been told by both Grand Rapids and Part for Aircraft. I am waiting for an MGL FF1 (with the FT60 sensors) to go into the repair of G-IRON. The 201B (and 201C) are capable of higher flow rates with slightly reduced resolution but, I believe, are still acceptable to the LAA . The Marine versions are probably also acceptable, cost less but are heavier. Ian Rickard G-IANI XS Trigear, 300hours Europa Club Mods Specialist e-mail g-iani@ntlworld.com ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________ Time: 05:02:34 AM PST US From: Karl Heindl Subject: RE: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 Ian=2C I was confused. I thought I had the A model=2C as you suggested=2C but it i s actually a B. Perhaps that is why I couldn't get it to work by using just the one plus a pulsation damper=2C as John Wigney had done successfully.I will now get another B for the return line. Or would an A be compatible ?Th e FS450 installation manual only mentions the part numbers for models B and C. The price is the same for all 3. The manual also warns about using alum inum fittings. Cheers=2C Karl From: g-iani@ntlworld.com Subject: RE: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 Karl and Jan I am quoting what I have been told by both Grand Rapids and Pa rt for Aircraft. I am waiting for an MGL FF1 (with the FT60 sensors) to go into the repair of G-IRON. The 201B (and 201C) are capable of higher flow rates with slightly reduced resolution but=2C I believe=2C are still accept able to the LAA . The Marine versions are probably also acceptable=2C cost less but are heavier. Ian Rickard G-IANI XS Trigear=2C 300hours Europa Club Mods Specialist e-mail g-iani@ntlworld.com ________________________________ Message 4 _____________________________________ Time: 05:24:34 AM PST US From: Jan de Jong Subject: Re: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 The 20B could be equivalent to 201A (<30gph), the 231 to 201B (<60gph). A 914 fuel system could exceed 30 gph. Factory direct: http://www.floscan.com/html/blue/accessories.php I installed a matched pair of 231, K-factors stamped on are 025498 (forward) and 025424 (return). I expect signal frequencies of 200 to 300 Hz. We shall see. Jan de Jong > > I already have a 20B, which is a marine sensor, for gasoline engines, generally outboards such as 4 stroke Honda. Spec wise, it seems fine, and I have a feeling the internals are probably one and the same. Tempted just to get another one, as they are a little over $100.00 as I recall. > TR > > On 02/05/2011, at 4:51 AM, Jan de Jong wrote: > > >> >> I intend to make a pair of Model 231 for general (marine) use work for the 914. >> Total factory direct cost is USD 220. >> >> Jan de Jong >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Matronics Email List Services ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post A New Message europa-list@matronics.com UN/SUBSCRIBE http://www.matronics.com/subscription List FAQ http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Europa-List.htm Web Forum Interface To Lists http://forums.matronics.com Matronics List Wiki http://wiki.matronics.com Full Archive Search Engine http://www.matronics.com/search 7-Day List Browse http://www.matronics.com/browse/europa-list Browse Digests http://www.matronics.com/digest/europa-list Browse Other Lists http://www.matronics.com/browse Live Online Chat! http://www.matronics.com/chat Archive Downloading http://www.matronics.com/archives Photo Share http://www.matronics.com/photoshare Other Email Lists http://www.matronics.com/emaillists Contributions http://www.matronics.com/contribution ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.