Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:25 AM - Re: SV: lower cowl opening for 914 only? (Richard Iddon)
     2. 01:02 AM - Re: Spar socket failure (article in the clubmagazine) (Martin Olliver)
     3. 01:28 AM - Re: Re: Spar socket failure (article in the clubmagazine) (Carl Meek)
     4. 01:29 AM - SV: SV: lower cowl opening for 914 only? (Sidsel & Svein Johnsen)
     5. 07:49 AM - Re : lower cowl opening for 914 only? (John Wigney)
     6. 08:57 AM - Re: Re : lower cowl opening for 914 only? (Raimo Toivio)
     7. 09:21 AM - Re: Re : lower cowl opening for 914 only? (Frans Veldman)
     8. 09:48 AM - lower cowl opening for 914 only? Maintain temp on cold weather (on 912) (Max Cointe)
     9. 10:30 AM - Maintain temp on cold weather (on 912) (Sidsel & Svein Johnsen)
    10. 11:12 AM - Thomas Scherer's flight (Karl Heindl)
    11. 11:26 AM - Re: Thomas Scherer's flight (Gerry Holland)
    12. 01:30 PM - Re: Thomas Scherer's flight (Frans Veldman)
    13. 01:53 PM - Re: Thomas Scherer's flight (Frans Veldman)
    14. 03:16 PM - Re: Thomas Scherer's flight (GRAHAM SINGLETON)
    15. 03:44 PM - Re: Thomas Scherer's flight (Bob Harrison)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: lower cowl opening for 914 only? | 
      
      
      I had exactly the same experoence. Cut out the opening, discovered I didn't need
      to then patched it up with epoxy/bid and filled and faired it. After a short
      while running, the heat from the exhaust made the patch turn brown and some blisters
      appeared. I refilled the blisters and resprayed the patch then stuck some
      aluminium foil over the patch inside the cowl to reflect the heat and haven't
      had any further problems since. 
      
      Richard Iddon
      
      G-RIXS
      
      On 15 Jan 2012, at 18:55, Sidsel & Svein Johnsen wrote:
      
      > 
      > Greame,
      > 
      > Further to what Bob Borger just suggested:  I have done some other small
      > mods on my lower cowl, and discovered after some operating hours that the
      > bid/epoxy layups turned dark brown on the inside and the nice, white paint
      > turned light brown on the outside!  Those at Europa Aircraft at that time
      > told me the reason for this:  Epoxy does not stand up to heat as well as
      > polyester does, and the cowls are therefore made of bid/polyester.
      > 
      > If someone with better knowledge/better memory can confirm this, you should
      > use polyester with suitable bid to cover the duct inlet.
      > 
      > Note:  There has been no separation of the epoxy-based layups from the
      > factory-made cowl in my case, so it is only cosmetic.
      > 
      > Regards,
      > Svein
      > LN-SKJ
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Spar socket failure (article in the clubmagazine) | 
      
      
      Hi Roland. Message sent to your in box.
      Regards.
      Martin.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=363965#363965
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Spar socket failure (article in the  clubmagazine) | 
      
      
      Just wanted to mention it's my aircraft that featured in the club
      magazine/ LAA Bulletin. G-CGNZ, previously PH-XXS.
      
      I rigged her again yesterday and have not found that the OTHER socket has
      a crack and looks like it will detach itself too.
      
      I still haven't' refitted the original, I'm not convinced that it's
      important, certainly had no problem rigging without it.
      
      Regards,
      -Carl.
      
      
      On 16/01/2012 08:59, "Martin Olliver" <martflynut@aol.com> wrote:
      
      >
      >Hi Roland. Message sent to your in box.
      >Regards.
      >Martin.
      >
      >
      >Read this topic online here:
      >
      >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=363965#363965
      >
      >
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | lower cowl opening for 914 only? | 
      
      
      >>I refilled the blisters and resprayed the patch then stuck some aluminium
      foil over the patch inside the cowl to reflect the heat and haven't had any
      further problems since. <<
      
      Thank you, Richard, I will do that!
      
      Regards,
      Svein
      
      Do not archive
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re : lower cowl opening for 914 only? | 
      
      Hi Graeme,
      
      When I built my plane, I also cut out that inlet. It is still open after 
      10 years and 800 hours and I am not aware of any ill effects. I have 
      never had any cooling problems and in the winter, I have to partially 
      mask my oil and water coolers to maintain temperatures. I would suggest 
      leaving it alone.
      
      Cheers, John
      N262WF, mono XS, 912S
      Mooresville, North Carolina
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------
      ORIGINAL MESSAGE
      
      Subject: Europa-List: lower cowl opening for 914 only?
      From: "graeme bird"<graeme@gdbmk.co.uk>
      
      
      Had a sudden panic that I had unnecessarily opened up the lower cowl starboard
      NACA duct and that it was only required for 914 inlet and not my 912. I cant see
      what its for for the 912ULS as it would only cool the oil tank (which is already
      too cool in flight) and possibly one end of the exhaust.
      Is it necessary, has anyone filled it in?
      
      --------
      Graeme Bird
      G-UMPY
      Mono Classic/XS FWFD 912ULS/Warp drive FP
      Just Test Flying to obtain permit
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Re : lower cowl opening for 914 only? | 
      
      Hi Graeme, 
      
      I opened it also and installed there a taxi light (HID Xenon =93 
      check an attachment).
      
      Now if you some day decide to go for 914 you have much less to do! 
      
      No reason for panic! 
      
      
      Cheers, Raimo Toivio
      
      
      Europa XS Mono OH-XRT #417
      
      Updated flight hours /landings: 258,15 /466
      
      37500 Lempaala
      FINLAND
      
      p +358-3-3753 777
      f +358-3-3753 100
      
      toivio@fly.to
      www.rwm.fi
      
      
      From: John Wigney 
      Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 5:44 PM
      Subject: Europa-List: Re : lower cowl opening for 914 only?
      
      Hi Graeme,
      
      When I built my plane, I also cut out that inlet. It is still open after 
      10 years and 800 hours and I am not aware of any ill effects. I have 
      never had any cooling problems and in the winter, I have to partially 
      mask my oil and water coolers to maintain temperatures. I would suggest 
      leaving it alone.
      
      Cheers, John
      N262WF, mono XS, 912S
      Mooresville, North Carolina
      
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      -------
      ORIGINAL MESSAGE
      
      Subject: Europa-List: lower cowl opening for 914 only?
      From: "graeme bird" mailto:graeme@gdbmk.co.uk
      
      
      Had a sudden panic that I had unnecessarily opened up the lower cowl 
      starboard
      NACA duct and that it was only required for 914 inlet and not my 912. I 
      cant see
      what its for for the 912ULS as it would only cool the oil tank (which is 
      already
      too cool in flight) and possibly one end of the exhaust.
      Is it necessary, has anyone filled it in?
      
      --------
      Graeme Bird
      G-UMPY
      Mono Classic/XS FWFD 912ULS/Warp drive FP
      Just Test Flying to obtain permit
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Re : lower cowl opening for 914 only? | 
      
      
      On 01/16/2012 04:44 PM, John Wigney wrote:
      > It is still open after
      > 10 years and 800 hours and I am not aware of any ill effects.
      
      Well, in that case to make you aware of it:
      Diverting air, rushing by with a speed of 100+ knots, from a smooth path
      alongside the airplane, instead into a hole with lots of obstacles,
      sharp turns, etc and letting it out again as a turbulent mass in the
      wrong direction and with the wrong speed, is certainly costly in terms
      of performance and efficiency. And in this case for no usefull purpose.
      Maybe you have invested a lot of effort to make the airplane as smooth
      as possible, in that case such a needless source of drag is an even
      larger waste.
      As a general rule you should close off all unnessecary holes in an
      airplane. This is the reason why you have made the covers for the torque
      tube access holes. You can leave them off without any ill effects,
      except of course a reduction in speed and fuel efficiency.
      
      Frans
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | lower cowl opening for 914 only? Maintain temp on  cold weather | 
      (on 912)
      
      
      Hi there All,
      
      Some collateral question about maintaining oil and cylinders temperatures
      during cold weather (I have ~70C when external temp is 0C): has anyone
      installed some mechanism to deviate fresh air from the radiators, as I have
      seen on other home built planes? Any REX?
      
      Max  Cointe
      F-PMLH TriGear Kit #560
      912ULS Airmaster 400 hours
      
      -----Message d'origine-----
      De: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] De la part de Frans Veldman
      Envoy: lundi 16 janvier 2012 18:15
      : europa-list@matronics.com
      Objet: Re: Europa-List: Re : lower cowl opening for 914 only?
      
      
      On 01/16/2012 04:44 PM, John Wigney wrote:
      > It is still open after
      > 10 years and 800 hours and I am not aware of any ill effects.
      
      Well, in that case to make you aware of it:
      Diverting air, rushing by with a speed of 100+ knots, from a smooth path
      alongside the airplane, instead into a hole with lots of obstacles,
      sharp turns, etc and letting it out again as a turbulent mass in the
      wrong direction and with the wrong speed, is certainly costly in terms
      of performance and efficiency. And in this case for no usefull purpose.
      Maybe you have invested a lot of effort to make the airplane as smooth
      as possible, in that case such a needless source of drag is an even
      larger waste.
      As a general rule you should close off all unnessecary holes in an
      airplane. This is the reason why you have made the covers for the torque
      tube access holes. You can leave them off without any ill effects,
      except of course a reduction in speed and fuel efficiency.
      
      Frans
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Maintain temp on  cold weather (on 912) | 
      
      Max,
      
      For the coolant cooler, I have fitted a shutter (controlled during flight
      from inside the cockpit) purchased from Vans Aircraft. See attached photo,
      where you will note that approx. 1/3 of the cooler front area is not covered
      by the shutter.  This is to allow free air flow into the warm air collector
      behind the cooler, for heating the cockpit (in warm weather, this collector
      is open at the back).
      
      You will also note that the oil cooler is completely covered by aluminum
      plates in this winter photo.  They are no longer used, as I have since
      fitted a Rotax recommended oil thermostat.
      
      This arrangement works very well for me (912 ULS), down to outside air temp
      of about - 5 degr C (I don't fly in colder weather!).
      
      Purchasing details - Vans Aircraft, Oregon, USA (as of 2007):  
      Cooler Shutter - Part Number = EA OIL COOLER VENT Price = $85.00
      Bowden Cable Wire End - Part Number = HW WIRE NUT KIT Price = $6.10
      72" long Push Pull Cable BLACK - Part Number = CT A-740 BLACK Price = $25.00
      
      Regards,
      Svein
      LN-SKJ
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Thomas Scherer's flight | 
      
      
      Is anyone following his flight from Corsica to Cameroon or wherever ?He has
       been up for almost 9 hours and is somewhere in the middle of the Algerian 
      desert=2C and it's nighttime there.Where is he going to land ?That guy is j
      ust amazing.
      
       		 	   		  
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Thomas Scherer's flight | 
      
      
      Thomas appears to be at Noumerat Airport in Algeria, just north of the Trans Sahara
      Highway on Google Earth.
      Not too crowded by the look of it!
      Regards
      Gerry
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Thomas Scherer's flight | 
      
      
      On 01/16/2012 08:09 PM, Karl Heindl wrote:
      > Is anyone following his flight from Corsica to Cameroon or wherever ?
      
      Yep, I'm following it.
      
      > He has been up for almost 9 hours
      
      Did you notice his airspeed? It appears to be in the 60's most of the
      time. Either the logger is lying, or he has a terrible head wind, or he
      is aggressively flying in fuel saving mode, or a combination of the
      above. I'm too busy to do the math.
      
      Anyway, he has a lot of fuel on board.
      
      > That guy is just amazing.
      
      Indeed...
      
      Frans
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Thomas Scherer's flight | 
      
      
      On 01/16/2012 10:27 PM, Frans Veldman wrote:
      > Did you notice his airspeed? It appears to be in the 60's most of the
      > time.
      
      Well, that was the case for "just" the last hour or so (maybe he was
      getting low on fuel), but his airspeed rarely reaches 100 knots..
      
      Frans
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Thomas Scherer's flight | 
      
      Thomas does keep his speed down, fuel flow is kept very low; that's why it 
      took him 21 hours (wasn't it) to cross the pacific.=0AGraham=0A=0A=0A______
      __________________________=0A From: Frans Veldman <frans@privatepilots.nl>
      =0ATo: europa-list@matronics.com =0ASent: Monday, 16 January 2012, 21:27=0A
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: Thomas Scherer's flight=0A =0A--> Europa-List mes
      sage posted by: Frans Veldman <frans@privatepilots.nl>=0A=0AOn 01/16/2012 0
      8:09 PM, Karl Heindl wrote:=0A> Is anyone following his flight from Corsica
       to Cameroon or wherever ?=0A=0AYep, I'm following it.=0A=0A> He has been u
      p for almost 9 hours=0A=0ADid you notice his airspeed? It appears to be in 
      the 60's most of the=0Atime. Either the logger is lying, or he has a terrib
      le head wind, or he=0Ais aggressively flying in fuel saving mode, or a comb
      ination of the=0Aabove. I'm too busy to do the math.=0A=0AAnyway, he has a 
      lot of fuel on board.=0A=0A> That guy is just amazing.=0A=0AIndeed...=0A=0A
      ==================
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Thomas Scherer's flight | 
      
      He's probably circling the cruise ship watching what happens to keep awake!
      Best wishes to him on his massive Journey.
      
      Regards
      
      Bob Harrison G-PTAG
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Frans Veldman
      Sent: 16 January 2012 21:50
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: Thomas Scherer's flight
      
      
      
      
      On 01/16/2012 10:27 PM, Frans Veldman wrote:
      
      > Did you notice his airspeed? It appears to be in the 60's most of the
      
      > time.
      
      
      Well, that was the case for "just" the last hour or so (maybe he was
      
      getting low on fuel), but his airspeed rarely reaches 100 knots..
      
      
      Frans
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |