Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 02:12 AM - nev eyre (DAVID JOYCE)
2. 02:39 AM - Re: IMPORTANT NEWS ABOUT YOUR 2013 SUBSCRIPTIONS (Dave Disney)
3. 03:03 AM - Re: Weight and Balance Scales (jonathanmilbank)
4. 04:28 AM - Re: nev eyre (Trevpond)
5. 11:19 AM - SV: SV: Re: SV: fuel flow and return line status (Sidsel & Svein Johnsen)
6. 01:28 PM - Re: mid-door latch - YERLY (Alan Carter)
7. 02:13 PM - Re: SV: Re: SV: fuel flow and return line status (Clives email)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Can anyone email me nevs contact number please?=0A-=0Argds=0ADJ=0A=0ASent
to you from David Joyce=0Awww.eastmidsspas.com
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: IMPORTANT NEWS ABOUT YOUR 2013 SUBSCRIPTIONS |
Please send me a standing order form so that I can get this set up ASAP.
Thanks
Dave
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=396309#396309
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Weight and Balance Scales |
Hi Richard and Bob,
Thanks for the tips and advice. I have also looked at the info on the Europa website,
which seems quite similar to what is published in my copy of the Owners
Manual. My inspector has plenty of experience and will no doubt cope, in spite
of my best efforts. Good to have your help.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=396310#396310
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hi Dave,
07951 141890
Regards
Trev
D-LINN
Sent from my iPad
On 15 Mar 2013, at 09:12, DAVID JOYCE <stranfaer@btinternet.com> wrote:
> Can anyone email me nevs contact number please?
>
> rgds
> DJ
>
> Sent to you from David Joyce
> www.eastmidsspas.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: SV: Re: SV: fuel flow and return line status |
Hello Clive,
> Thinking more about the single fuel flow setup - would you agree that
> another way of checking the restrictor is not blocked, is simply to
monitor
> that there IS fuel flow without the engine running but with the boost pump
> running? I get around 9L/hr.
>
> Assuming the float chambers are full and there are no external leaks, not
> sure where else fuel can go if it is not being consumed by a running
engine. . .
>
> Clive
>
Yes, I do agree. This is effectively the same as I will do with my
two-sender set-up : momentarily switch off the feed (total) flow sender and
switch the return flow sender to the feed input as a single sender.
Your 9L/hr return flow is close to what I measured when I, too, had a system
with only one sender - I got approx. 10L/hr. However, if you have adjusted
the k-factor to get a reasonably good totalizer function (i.e. adjusted the
k-factor so that the displayed fuel consumed on an average flight is
approximately correct), your actual return flow is higher than the displayed
flow, of course.
Regards,
Svein
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: mid-door latch - YERLY |
Hi All.
I have the inner door handle guarded by a plate, and I have painted the closed
shadow of the door handle in Red on the outside,
I have greased the shoe bolts where they enter the frame, this made a world of
difference in taking the strain off the door handle, they close feather light
now, but also open feather light.
However with the doors properly closed, how far should the shoe bolt go into the
frame,bearing in mind there is a gap between door and frame, and what are the
chances of the actual door flexing under airflow so the bolts could spring out
you only need one to spring .
Are they any tel tell signs that could point to this happening, the possibilities
in turbulence or a dive to VNE.
Alan
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=396341#396341
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: SV: Re: SV: fuel flow and return line status |
Hi Svein,
Thanks for your reply. I regret that the 9lit/hr indicated figure I gave in
my last email is actually wrong - 9lit/hr is indicated with the 912ULS
running at idle and with boost pump 'on'. I just checked the boost
pump-only flow rate (my a/c is in the garage next door for the winter), and
it reads just over 4Lit/hr with a K factor of 17030 - which I think all
tallies rather well with your comments about 'spot' flow rates vs totalised
flow rates and the 9 lit/hr figures you have found. My K factor will be
specific to the sensor/Stratomaster setup of course, other combinations may
easily have different K factors.
Regards,
Clive.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Sidsel & Svein
Johnsen
Sent: 15 March 2013 18:19
Subject: SV: Europa-List: SV: Re: SV: fuel flow and return line status
--> <sidsel.svein@oslo.online.no>
Hello Clive,
> Thinking more about the single fuel flow setup - would you agree that
> another way of checking the restrictor is not blocked, is simply to
monitor
> that there IS fuel flow without the engine running but with the boost
> pump running? I get around 9L/hr.
>
> Assuming the float chambers are full and there are no external leaks,
> not sure where else fuel can go if it is not being consumed by a
> running
engine. . .
>
> Clive
>
Yes, I do agree. This is effectively the same as I will do with my
two-sender set-up : momentarily switch off the feed (total) flow sender and
switch the return flow sender to the feed input as a single sender.
Your 9L/hr return flow is close to what I measured when I, too, had a system
with only one sender - I got approx. 10L/hr. However, if you have adjusted
the k-factor to get a reasonably good totalizer function (i.e. adjusted the
k-factor so that the displayed fuel consumed on an average flight is
approximately correct), your actual return flow is higher than the displayed
flow, of course.
Regards,
Svein
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|