Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 01:41 AM - toroids for vhf comms aerial cable (Rowland Carson)
2. 02:23 AM - Re: toroids for vhf comms aerial cable (Frans Veldman)
3. 02:37 AM - Re: toroids for vhf comms aerial cable (Carl Pattinson)
4. 02:43 AM - Re: toroids for vhf comms aerial cable (GRAHAM SINGLETON)
5. 09:20 AM - =?Windows-1252?Q?Re:__Re:_Europa-List:_Re:_Europa-List:_Instr?= =?Windows-1252?Q?ument_Panel_Sub_Panel_Setup=85..Runners=3F_? (Bud Yerly)
6. 10:54 AM - Re: Sub Panels....thanks (Alan Carter)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | toroids for vhf comms aerial cable |
Annex C of my manual calls out 4-off toroids to fit on the RG-58 coax cable adjacent
to the dipole tapes. The part number given is Philips 4330 030 34420, but
this now appears to be made of unobtainium.
Does anyone know of an equivalent ferric toroid currently available?
RS list hundreds; obviously it needs to have a central hole of a suitable size
for RG-58 (or probably RG-400 in my case) to pass through, but what about the
other dimensions, and the magnetic characteristics? It's not clear whether the
toroids are fitted to act as a filter, as tuning, or as a balun. If, as I suspect,
the latter, the magnetic characteristics are likely to be more critical.
in friendship
Rowland
| Rowland Carson ... that's Rowland with a 'w' ...
| <rowlandcarson@gmail.com> http://www.rowlandcarson.org.uk
| Skype, Twitter: rowland_carson Facebook: Rowland Carson
| pictures: http://picasaweb.google.com/rowlandcarson
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: toroids for vhf comms aerial cable |
On 09/20/2013 10:34 AM, Rowland Carson wrote:
> RS list hundreds; obviously it needs to have a central hole of a suitable size
for RG-58 (or probably RG-400 in my case) to pass through, but what about the
other dimensions, and the magnetic characteristics? It's not clear whether the
toroids are fitted to act as a filter, as tuning, or as a balun. If, as I suspect,
the latter, the magnetic characteristics are likely to be more critical.
The torroids are there do make it clear to the electrons where the
border is between the outer surface of the coax and the antenna leg
connected to it. Without the torroids it is just one long piece of
conductor.
It is not that critical though, but without these torroids you will get
more radiation from the cable itself and it will pick up more noise from
the surroundings of the cable, and since this is an airplane packed with
lots of electronic stuff you will want to prevent that.
The magnetic properties of the torroids are critical indeed. I don't
have a list or manual, part numbers have been disappeared from memory
long time ago, but you obviously need to find something suitable for the
intended frequency range (100-150 MHz). Some googling is in order here.
Or ask a local radio amateur club, the popular 2m-band (144 MHz) is
close to the aircraft frequencies and what will work for them will work
for you too. Changes are that someone has a box full of these things on
his bench and is happy to share a few.
As an alternative you can coil up a part of the coax close to the
antenna, but this is heavier.
Frans
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | toroids for vhf comms aerial cable |
As I recall Rowland, any old toroid is suitable. I think we used ones
sourced from Maplin or Tandy and they appear to work fine.
Being a non-technical type I haven't got an idea if the exact specification
was critical.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rowland Carson
Sent: 20 September 2013 09:34
Subject: Europa-List: toroids for vhf comms aerial cable
--> <rowlandcarson@gmail.com>
Annex C of my manual calls out 4-off toroids to fit on the RG-58 coax cable
adjacent to the dipole tapes. The part number given is Philips 4330 030
34420, but this now appears to be made of unobtainium.
Does anyone know of an equivalent ferric toroid currently available?
RS list hundreds; obviously it needs to have a central hole of a suitable
size for RG-58 (or probably RG-400 in my case) to pass through, but what
about the other dimensions, and the magnetic characteristics? It's not clear
whether the toroids are fitted to act as a filter, as tuning, or as a balun.
If, as I suspect, the latter, the magnetic characteristics are likely to be
more critical.
in friendship
Rowland
| Rowland Carson ... that's Rowland with a 'w' ...
| <rowlandcarson@gmail.com> http://www.rowlandcarson.org.uk
| Skype, Twitter: rowland_carson Facebook: Rowland Carson
| pictures: http://picasaweb.google.com/rowlandcarson
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: toroids for vhf comms aerial cable |
Rowland=0Athey are to form a balun, Fergus Kyle will probably know the answ
ers you want,=0Ahe won't be up yet (Ontario)=0AGraham=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A_______
_________________________=0A From: Frans Veldman <frans@privatepilots.nl>
=0ATo: europa-list@matronics.com =0ASent: Friday, 20 September 2013, 10:23
=0ASubject: Re: Europa-List: toroids for vhf comms aerial cable=0A =0A=0A--
=0AOn 09/20/2013 10:34 AM, Rowland Carson wrote:=0A> --> Europa-List messag
e posted by: Rowland Carson <rowlandcarson@gmail.com>=0A=0A> RS list hundre
ds; obviously it needs to have a central hole of a suitable size for RG-58
(or probably RG-400 in my case) to pass through, but what about the other d
imensions, and the magnetic characteristics? It's not clear whether the tor
oids are fitted to act as a filter, as tuning, or as a balun. If, as I susp
ect, the latter, the magnetic characteristics are likely to be more critica
l.=0A=0AThe torroids are there do make it clear to the electrons where the
=0Aborder is between the outer surface of the coax and the antenna leg=0Aco
nnected to it. Without the torroids it is just one long piece of=0Aconducto
r.=0AIt is not that critical though, but without these torroids you will ge
t=0Amore radiation from the cable itself and it will pick up more noise fro
m=0Athe surroundings of the cable, and since this is an airplane packed wit
h=0Alots of electronic stuff you will want to prevent that.=0AThe magnetic
properties of the torroids are critical indeed. I don't=0Ahave a list or ma
nual, part numbers have been disappeared from memory=0Along time ago, but y
ou obviously need to find something suitable for the=0Aintended frequency r
ange (100-150 MHz). Some googling is in order here.=0AOr ask a local radio
amateur club, the popular 2m-band (144 MHz) is=0Aclose to the aircraft freq
uencies and what will work for them will work=0Afor you too. Changes are th
at someone has a box full of these things on=0Ahis bench and is happy to sh
are a few.=0A=0AAs an alternative you can coil up a part of the coax close
===========
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: ndows-1252?Q?Re:_Europa-List:_Re:_Europa-List:_Re:_Europa-List:_Instr?= |
=?Windows-1252?Q?ument_Panel_Sub_Panel_Setup=85..Runners=3F_?
Jeremy, Tony and all,
I have tried the pivot out panels in RVs and Europas and frankly the
system works, however the length of todays instruments always seem to
prevent the tilt out from being satisfactory. A slide out panel or
whole panel is much more convenient. I prefer to build the panel so
that when the outer support screws on the panel edge are unscrewed, the
entire panel shell is free to detach as a unit. Of course I have a
through the firewall access panel that I learned from Pete and Bob at
Flight Crafters and further refined the screw pattern, metal selection,
attachments, and sealing technique to assure a fire resistant and fully
sealed panel. I fully understand those who prefer not to put an access
hole in the panel for fear of fire/smoke incursion and the sealing that
is necessary to prevent such a problem. If you don't want to learn to
do it, I understand. .060 aluminum and .016 stainless, and some high
temp sealant is what is needed form material, and a good steady hand
with a diamond wheel on a dremel to cut the hole so the phenolic panel
has minimum gap. Rivet the stainless to the cut panel after fit and it
is a door ready to go.
The back of the panel is equipped with CPC screw type plugs and D subs
as appropriate. The cowl and access cover take longer to detach than
the instrument panel.
Typically the panel is ten screws, 4 D subs and three CPC circular
connectors, and the quick disconnect pitot and static. The whole panel
comes out and on to the bench for upgrades and testing. I have never
found a reason to open my panel and just look. If it's broke, you built
it so fix it. During an annual inspection, I routinely pull my panel
and check my busses, through panel mounts and wire bundles for any
upgrades I would like. It makes experimenting and maintenance of
components a breeze.
The trick is making sure the brakes, throttle etc. do not need to be
removed. The high top fuselage has just enough height that the panel
can be lifted over the brakes, throttle etc. in a trigear or mono. In a
low top, I can unscrew six screws and drop my throttle and brake handles
down to easily clear the panel. We have it down pat when removing, just
pull aft an inch to check you didn't accidently leave a plug attached,
then pull the panel back four inches, rotate the panel left side back
and down to clear the canopy bow and remove. Carry to the bench and
work. Make some extension plugs and put the panel on the bench next to
the plane and troubleshoot away.
Should one component fail such as the prop controller or autopilot, I
can see the desire to pull out the front and then reach around and try
to disconnect the D sub connector from the front, but in practice, I
just found it not worth the time. Pull the firewall access panel and
unplug and pull the whole thing out. Less of a chance of breaking wires
and more convenience for me. I also don' t have to deal with
excessively long and tediously folded service loops to work the panel.
In the RV series I have found that the pull out on drawer slides to be
quite nice as the bottom of the panel is open to allow you to work the
service loops. I still hate to crawl into the RV8 and lay upside down
to work on something. I am too stiff for that sort of thing, so I make
the whole panel to pull. I have done it in two RVs, a Zenith and all
the Europas I have built.
Regards,
Bud
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeremy Fisher<mailto:jffisher@gmail.com>
To: europa-list@matronics.com<mailto:europa-list@matronics.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:54 AM
Subject: Europa-List: Re: Europa-List: Re: Europa-List: Instrument
Panel Sub Panel Setup=85..Runners?
Graham,
Do you mean like this? Photo is of my instrument panel ready for
installations. Both sides are hinged, with 2 Camloc fasteners for each
side; both are hinged, with one shown closed and the other open.
Opening one takes 10 seconds.
Jerry Fisher
On Sep 17, 2013, at 5:00 AM, GRAHAM SINGLETON wrote:
Tony
excellent idea to think about this. I've been working on an old
Classic and several times wanted to check things
behind the panel. Accessibility on a standard plans built Europa is
a long way from being good. Factory was so
stressed at design time that they laft all that to we builders and
there were a few good ideas tried.
One I haven't seen is a hinge at the bootom of the panel.
Most important is to keep it light, early panel installations with a
lot of steam age stuff in them weighed anything
up to 40lbs!
Digital stuff has made it a lot easier and engine management systems
ease the workload of single crew VFR.
Graham
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
From: Tony Renshaw
<tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com<mailto:tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com>>
To: "europa-list@matronics.com<mailto:europa-list@matronics.com>"
<europa-list@matronics.com<mailto:europa-list@matronics.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, 17 September 2013, 1:23
Subject: Europa-List: Instrument Panel Sub Panel Setup=85..Runners?
<tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com<mailto:tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com>>
Gidday,
I am interested in advice on what might be considered the best setup
for the instrument panel, in terms of ease of maintenance, removal etc.
I am wondering if the main sub panel could be removable forward on
runners, like drawer sliders? Big aircraft have these, as was my
misfortune one day to realise when I grabbed the two foot rests D rings
either side of the panel and pulled to give my shoulders a stretch, but
little did I know that during maintenance the locking screws had not
been actuated, and the whole panel came forward up to the back of the
control column! I looked at the other guy with shock, and just gently
eased it back in place, hoping nothing had, or would disconnect in the
process. Yes, we were airborne! It left an indelible memory, but has
inspired me as to whether such a setup could work on the Europa. This
idea is borne out of imagining how unwieldy it might be with all the
weight aft of the sub panel, to remove it forward easily, especially
with plumbing a!
ttached. Runners would make it a lot easier.
If there is other options for these sub panels I'd appreciate
knowing, or whether my anxieties are unfounded. Thanks in anticipation.
Regards
Tony Renshaw
Sydney
=======ref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-Lis
t<http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List>"
target="_blank">htronics.com/" = -->
<http://www.matronics.com/contribution>
face="courier
new,courier"><http://www.matronics.com/contribution>http://www.matronics.
com/Navigator?Europa-List<http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List>
href="http://forums.matronics.com/">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
ontribution
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Sub Panels....thanks |
Hi Tony.
My panel which I did not build has the six main instruments in a sub panel secured
by six screws, the chap who built it did not use anchor bolts, when I try
to remove the panel, the screws just went round and round, a nice sub panel that
you can't remove, just my luck.
However if I ever get it off there is always the opportunity of hinging it from
the bottom, provided they is the clearance for the instruments as they rotate
through the 90 degrees,?
I see some postings of all electric panels on the forum, but I can not see any
room to mount the stand by vacuum driven instrument, the minimum would be a Turn
and Slip, Altimeter and Compass to maintain control if you are very very good
,just the last two but only in calm air.
You could have Main Electric instruments and battery electric standby, say an ipad
horizon, but in flight some strange things can happen, so I would not rely
on this and use vacuum for stand by.
VFR is the rule , but there could be a time when circumstances put you in cloud
or on top of cloud, and without instruments in cloud or over the sea in poor
visibilty I know you would be out of control within less than 3 minutes.
I would have thought the LAA would have something laid out on just what you must
have,???
Regards.
Alan
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=408902#408902
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|