Europa-List Digest Archive

Fri 02/28/14


Total Messages Posted: 13



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:42 AM - Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments requested . (Tony Renshaw)
     2. 04:33 AM - Build Master Task List (alan_hunter1664)
     3. 05:05 AM - Re: Build Master Task List (Rowland Carson)
     4. 07:37 AM - Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......com (rparigoris)
     5. 09:44 AM - Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments requested . (richard)
     6. 01:55 PM - Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments requested . (Tim Ward)
     7. 02:23 PM - Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments requested . (Tony Renshaw)
     8. 02:52 PM - Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments requested . (Tim Ward)
     9. 04:20 PM - Potential problem with second Nicopress and dull SS control,cable question (Tony Renshaw)
    10. 04:47 PM - Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments requested . (Lance Sandford)
    11. 05:13 PM - Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments requested . (Tony Renshaw)
    12. 06:03 PM - Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments requested . (Lance Sandford)
    13. 11:30 PM - Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments requested . (Tony Renshaw)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:42:55 AM PST US
    From: Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com>
    Subject: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments
    requested . Gidday, I=92ve attached 2 photos of my Nicopress squeezes, and 1 of the jaws of the tool. Any input gratefully received. Regards Tony Renshaw


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:33:24 AM PST US
    Subject: Build Master Task List
    From: "alan_hunter1664" <alan_hunter1664@yahoo.co.uk>
    I've been reading the Europa build manual, on to my 20th time now I think, and although very good, I find it wordy and not conducive to tracking the progress of work. I was therefore considering producing a Master Task List for each chapter as this would make is far easier to use the kitlog prgramme I've bought to track and report on build progress. Has anyone produced A MTL before that I could use as a starting point? Thanks Alan Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=419483#419483


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:05:42 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Build Master Task List
    From: Rowland Carson <rowlandcarson@gmail.com>
    On 28 Feb 2014, at 12:32, alan_hunter1664 wrote: > I've been reading the Europa build manual, on to my 20th time now I think, and although very good, I find it wordy and not conducive to tracking the progress of work. I was therefore considering producing a Master Task List for each chapter as this would make is far easier to use the kitlog prgramme I've bought to track and report on build progress. Has anyone produced A MTL before that I could use as a starting point? Alan - this MTL idea is new to me, but sounds very sensible for both planning & logging - and I'd be interested to get access to it if it's ever created! The only thing I can think of as a springboard towards producing such a document is the LAA list of inspections. Here's a copy of that list: 1 Workroom conditions Check workroom for suitability and cleanliness. Check thermometer and hygrometer available. Check epoxy ratio balance for accuracy. 2 Education layup Check Euro Chock for quality of layup, correct ply orientation and flox corners for voids. 3 Rudder Check for lean or rich areas in layup, ply orientation, leading and trailing edges for straightness. Check close-out layup and reinforced areas for hinge attachment. 4 Tailplane Check outboard rib for correct layup and accuracy. 5 Tailplane Check skins for quality and ply orientation. Check inboard rib and rear spar for hinge area reinforcements. Check anti-servo tab for correct layup and hinge attachment, free movement without hinge binding. Check correct fitting to torque tube, inboard rib bushes and pip pin operation. Check that both tailplanes have the same incidence. 6 Ailerons Check top skin, bottom skin and close-outs for correct layup, cure and ply orientation and straightness of aileron. 7 Ailerons Check inboard rib and insert for position and push rod attachment pin for correct installation. 8 Ailerons Check correct hinge attachment, position and safety. 9 Ailerons Check mass balance weight for correct attachment. 10 Flaps Check top and bottom skins for correct layup, ply orientation and quality. 11 Flaps Check end ribs for correct layup and insert position accuracy. 12 Flaps Check aileron and flap close-outs for correct layup and ply orientation. 13 Wing Inspection stage 1 Working conditions must have been satisfied prior to start of wing build. Check all layups for full cure using scratch and tap test if in doubt. Ply orientation +/- 10 degrees, wet or dry areas, all joints for correct layup procedure and general cleanliness. 14 Wing Check aileron bellcrank attachment to spar, and inspection hole. Check bellcrank assembly for correct assembly and riveting. 15 Wing Inspect spar to upper and lower skins layups for quality and ply orientation, also root rib, diagonal rib, and walkway rib to skin layups for quality and ply orientation. 16 Wing Inspect outrigger double rib to skin layup for quality and ply orientation, also correct installation of 3mm plywood transverse rib and associated layups between double ribs. 17 Wing Check upper trailing edge skin bond to main wing structure and alignment with leading edge. 18 Wing Check position of inserts and orientation of 12mm stainless root pins. 19 Wing Check hinge arm alignment using templates on outboard and inboard sighting centre as per plans. With ailerons and flaps attached check for smooth operation, interference, travel and outrigger retract and extension mechanism. 20 Fuselage Inspection stage 1 Workroom conditions must have been satisfied prior to start of fuselage build. Check all layups for full cure using scratch and tap test if in doubt. Check ply orientation +/- 10 degrees, wet or dry areas, all joints for correct layup procedure and general cleanliness. Check all parts for quality before assembly. 21 Fuselage Check installation of rear bulkhead. 22 Fuselage Check installation and alignment of tailplane torque tube bushes and tailplane. 23 Fuselage Prior to installation of completed cockpit module into bottom of fuselage, check fitment and operation of flying controls (with wings attached). 24 Fuselage Check final installation of cockpit module into fuselage. 25 Fuselage Check installation and operation of fuel system. 26 Fuselage Check installation of main and tailwheel undercarriage. 27 Fuselage Check installation and operation of electrical system. 28 Fuselage Check installation and operation of panel and instruments. 29 Fuselage Final check of completed fuselage including doors and all hardware. 30 Fuselage Check installation of engine including all systems, propeller and cowlings. Record fuel flow checks in build book. 31 Structure - general Check structure after filling and sanding for excessive sanding which may compromise the integrity of the structure. 32 Final inspection Final check of complete aircraft including rigging and control movements, correct operation of all systems, proper cockpit and panel placarding, cockpit furnishings including harness installation, external markings including registration. Weigh aircraft and forward results and weight schedule to PFA. The tab characters that separate item number, functional area, and description may not survive the e-mail transmission process. If you want a clean copy please ask for an attachment. in friendship Rowland | Rowland Carson ... that's Rowland with a 'w' ... | <rowlandcarson@gmail.com> http://www.rowlandcarson.org.uk | Skype, Twitter: rowland_carson Facebook: Rowland Carson | pictures: http://picasaweb.google.com/rowlandcarson


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:37:56 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......com
    From: "rparigoris" <rparigor@suffolk.lib.ny.us>
    Hi Tony You can look at my Nicos in two pages at below link. They look like yours. My large tool like yours came with a gauge, you can adjust crimp size. I am pretty sure 43.13 would give you dimension. If you are only going with one Nico, leave some cable sticking out, if two Niocos, then you can capture end with second. I use Teflon shrink tube, needs lots of heat and expensive, but holds up to nasty sharp end of cable. I forget if you are building a mono, check out slick 3 Nico short tailwheel cable. I mentioned it before, turnbuckles can get tangled together and shorten up, very bad because you lose rudder travel. See cause and resolution. http://www.europaowners.org/main.php?g2_itemId=27732 Ron P. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=419497#419497


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:44:49 AM PST US
    From: "richard" <rcollings@talktalk.net>
    Subject: Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments
    requested . Hi Tony You must leave an inch long tail after the sleeve and shrink a short length of electric wire sleeving on to that end for protection. Two things you can do also, conduct a proof load test, I don=92t know the loads but Europa may, or you could drop an email to Andy Draper at the LAA engineering dept he would know. The other way of being certain is to build the cables with two Nicopress sleeves on each end. I know its more weight but =93Piece of mind=94is worth a few ounces . Best of luck Richard From: Tony Renshaw Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 10:41 AM Subject: Europa-List: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments requested . Gidday, I=92ve attached 2 photos of my Nicopress squeezes, and 1 of the jaws of the tool. Any input gratefully received. Regards Tony Renshaw No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 02/27/14


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:55:19 PM PST US
    From: Tim Ward <ward.t@xtra.co.nz>
    Subject: Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments
    requested . Tony, As Richard stated, I used two Nicopress Sleeves for " peace of mind". Good recommendation. Tim Tim Ward 12 Waiwetu Street Fendalton, Christchurch, 8052 New Zealand. ward.t@xtra.co.nz Ph 64 3 3515166 Mob 0210640221 > On 1/03/2014, at 6:39 am, "richard" <rcollings@talktalk.net> wrote: > > Hi Tony You must leave an inch long tail after the sleeve and shrink a sh ort length of electric wire sleeving on to that end for protection. > Two things you can do also, conduct a proof load test, I don=81ft know the loads but Europa may, or you could drop an email to Andy Draper at the LAA e ngineering dept he would know. The other way of being certain is to build th e cables with two Nicopress sleeves on each end. I know its more weight but =81 gPiece of mind=81his worth a few ounces . > Best of luck > Richard > > From: Tony Renshaw > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 10:41 AM > To: europa-list@matronics.com > Subject: Europa-List: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer. .....comments requested . > > Gidday, > I=81fve attached 2 photos of my Nicopress squeezes, and 1 of the jaws of t he tool. Any input gratefully received. > Regards > Tony Renshaw > > > > > > <2014_02_28_Distorted_Nicopress-12.jpeg><2014_02_28_Squeezed_Nicopress_End -14.jpeg> > > <2014_02_28_Nicopress_Crimper_Jaws-11.jpeg> > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:23:19 PM PST US
    From: Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments
    requested . Hi Tim, So did you use two on all the ends, from pedal all the way thru to rudder? TR > On 1 Mar 2014, at 8:52, Tim Ward <ward.t@xtra.co.nz> wrote: > > Tony, > As Richard stated, I used two Nicopress Sleeves for " peace of mind". > Good recommendation. > Tim > > Tim Ward > 12 Waiwetu Street > Fendalton, > Christchurch, 8052 > New Zealand. > > ward.t@xtra.co.nz > > Ph 64 3 3515166 > Mob 0210640221 > > >> On 1/03/2014, at 6:39 am, "richard" <rcollings@talktalk.net> wrote: >> >> Hi Tony You must leave an inch long tail after the sleeve and shrink a s hort length of electric wire sleeving on to that end for protection. >> Two things you can do also, conduct a proof load test, I don=99t kn ow the loads but Europa may, or you could drop an email to Andy Draper at th e LAA engineering dept he would know. The other way of being certain is to b uild the cables with two Nicopress sleeves on each end. I know its more weig ht but =9CPiece of mind=9Dis worth a few ounces . >> Best of luck >> Richard >> >> From: Tony Renshaw >> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 10:41 AM >> To: europa-list@matronics.com >> Subject: Europa-List: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer ......comments requested . >> >> Gidday, >> I=99ve attached 2 photos of my Nicopress squeezes, and 1 of the jaw s of the tool. Any input gratefully received. >> Regards >> Tony Renshaw >> >> >> >> >> >> <2014_02_28_Distorted_Nicopress-12.jpeg><2014_02_28_Squeezed_Nicopress_En d-14.jpeg> >> >> <2014_02_28_Nicopress_Crimper_Jaws-11.jpeg> >> >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:52:58 PM PST US
    From: Tim Ward <ward.t@xtra.co.nz>
    Subject: Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments
    requested . Yes I did. The 25mm long tail Richard talks about, instead of using tape I u se an additional sleeve. Tim Tim Ward 12 Waiwetu Street Fendalton, Christchurch, 8052 New Zealand. ward.t@xtra.co.nz Ph 64 3 3515166 Mob 0210640221 > On 1/03/2014, at 11:22 am, Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Tim, > So did you use two on all the ends, from pedal all the way thru to rudder? > TR > >> On 1 Mar 2014, at 8:52, Tim Ward <ward.t@xtra.co.nz> wrote: >> >> Tony, >> As Richard stated, I used two Nicopress Sleeves for " peace of mind". >> Good recommendation. >> Tim >> >> Tim Ward >> 12 Waiwetu Street >> Fendalton, >> Christchurch, 8052 >> New Zealand. >> >> ward.t@xtra.co.nz >> >> Ph 64 3 3515166 >> Mob 0210640221 >> >> >>> On 1/03/2014, at 6:39 am, "richard" <rcollings@talktalk.net> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Tony You must leave an inch long tail after the sleeve and shrink a s hort length of electric wire sleeving on to that end for protection. >>> Two things you can do also, conduct a proof load test, I don=81ft know t he loads but Europa may, or you could drop an email to Andy Draper at the LA A engineering dept he would know. The other way of being certain is to build the cables with two Nicopress sleeves on each end. I know its more weight b ut =81gPiece of mind=81his worth a few ounces . >>> Best of luck >>> Richard >>> >>> From: Tony Renshaw >>> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 10:41 AM >>> To: europa-list@matronics.com >>> Subject: Europa-List: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeeze r......comments requested . >>> >>> Gidday, >>> I=81fve attached 2 photos of my Nicopress squeezes, and 1 of the jaws of the tool. Any input gratefully received. >>> Regards >>> Tony Renshaw >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> <2014_02_28_Distorted_Nicopress-12.jpeg><2014_02_28_Squeezed_Nicopress_E nd-14.jpeg> >>> >>> <2014_02_28_Nicopress_Crimper_Jaws-11.jpeg> >>> >>> No virus found in this message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 4 >>> >> >> >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> a-List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> //forums.matronics.com >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:20:00 PM PST US
    From: Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com>
    Subject: Potential problem with second Nicopress and dull SS control,cable
    question Gidday, So, I've tried using a second incompressible, but am now concerned I have do ne that correctly. I placed the second one up against the other one, and as t hey compress, we know they exude outward, even a little bit. I reckon the ca ble I between the 2 could now be under tension, continually, and possibly qu ite a lot. Whatever stress it is preloaded is an equivalent weight, which in essence would minimise the stress loading on the cable. I've Lao got cable kicking around that looks more like gal than Stainless St eel, but I know I have only ever bought the right stuff 7x7 3/32" dia contro l cable. Is there a reason why over time Stainess Steel cable can go dull o ver time? Tony Renshaw Sent from my iPad > On 1 Mar 2014, at 9:52 am, Tim Ward <ward.t@xtra.co.nz> wrote: > > Yes I did. The 25mm long tail Richard talks about, instead of using tape I use an additional sleeve. > Tim > > Tim Ward > 12 Waiwetu Street > Fendalton, > Christchurch, 8052 > New Zealand. > > ward.t@xtra.co.nz > > Ph 64 3 3515166 > Mob 0210640221 > > >> On 1/03/2014, at 11:22 am, Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Tim, >> So did you use two on all the ends, from pedal all the way thru to rudder ? >> TR >> >>> On 1 Mar 2014, at 8:52, Tim Ward <ward.t@xtra.co.nz> wrote: >>> >>> Tony, >>> As Richard stated, I used two Nicopress Sleeves for " peace of mind". >>> Good recommendation. >>> Tim >>> >>> Tim Ward >>> 12 Waiwetu Street >>> Fendalton, >>> Christchurch, 8052 >>> New Zealand. >>> >>> ward.t@xtra.co.nz >>> >>> Ph 64 3 3515166 >>> Mob 0210640221 >>> >>> >>>> On 1/03/2014, at 6:39 am, "richard" <rcollings@talktalk.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Tony You must leave an inch long tail after the sleeve and shrink a short length of electric wire sleeving on to that end for protection. >>>> Two things you can do also, conduct a proof load test, I don=99t k now the loads but Europa may, or you could drop an email to Andy Draper at t he LAA engineering dept he would know. The other way of being certain is to b uild the cables with two Nicopress sleeves on each end. I know its more weig ht but =9CPiece of mind=9Dis worth a few ounces . >>>> Best of luck >>>> Richard >>>> >>>> From: Tony Renshaw >>>> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 10:41 AM >>>> To: europa-list@matronics.com >>>> Subject: Europa-List: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeez er......comments requested . >>>> >>>> Gidday, >>>> I=99ve attached 2 photos of my Nicopress squeezes, and 1 of the j aws of the tool. Any input gratefully received. >>>> Regards >>>> Tony Renshaw >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> <2014_02_28_Distorted_Nicopress-12.jpeg><2014_02_28_Squeezed_Nicopress_ End-14.jpeg> >>>> >>>> <2014_02_28_Nicopress_Crimper_Jaws-11.jpeg> >>>> >>>> No virus found in this message. >>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 14 >>>> >>> >>> >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> a-List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> //forums.matronics.com >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> >> >> >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> a-List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> //forums.matronics.com >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:47:09 PM PST US
    From: Lance Sandford <sandford@melbpc.org.au>
    Subject: Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments
    requested . Tony The final proof is in the testing. AC43-13-1b chapter 7 gives a chart and testing procedure. Attached is a picture of my cable test rig. When I was doing the actual test I had a large ladder between myself and the victim. If they break they can go with a bang. Regards Lance Sandford On 28/02/14 20:41, Tony Renshaw wrote: > Gidday, > Ive attached 2 photos of my Nicopress squeezes, and 1 of the jaws of > the tool. Any input gratefully received. > Regards > Tony Renshaw >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:13:35 PM PST US
    From: Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments
    requested . Hi Lance, Thanks for responding. That looks a great tester. With the various holes, did you do the maths to calculate and what is the formula you use? Good setup. I am impressed. I believe you are close to flying. Is that right? TR. Sent from my iPad > On 1 Mar 2014, at 11:46 am, Lance Sandford <sandford@melbpc.org.au> wrote: > > Tony > > The final proof is in the testing. > > AC43-13-1b chapter 7 gives a chart and testing procedure. > Attached is a picture of my cable test rig. > When I was doing the actual test I had a large ladder between myself and the victim. If they break they can go with a bang. > > Regards > > Lance Sandford > > >> On 28/02/14 20:41, Tony Renshaw wrote: >> Gidday, >> Ive attached 2 photos of my Nicopress squeezes, and 1 of the jaws of the tool. Any input gratefully received. >> Regards >> Tony Renshaw > <Cable Testing.jpg>


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:03:20 PM PST US
    From: Lance Sandford <sandford@melbpc.org.au>
    Subject: Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments
    requested . Tony The beam is part of a sash clamp I used for making window frames many years ago. I set it in the nearest hole to give me the weight I required and adjusted the rest with the much under used weights from my barbell, then carefully lowered the jack and kept my fingers crossed. Im sure a Man of your ability can do the maths for whatever you have available. The check is 60% of 700 lbs for 3 minutes I think, but read the document. Incidentally, the breaking strain of a well made Nicopress is about 1.5 times the minimum breaking strain of the cable hence I only used one on the ends of my cables. I was hoping to be flying by mid year until my neighbour conned me into helping lay 160 meters of concrete during our 30 Degree, 70% humidity days, which has slowed build progress a couple of Months. Lance On 01/03/14 11:12, Tony Renshaw wrote: > > Hi Lance, > Thanks for responding. That looks a great tester. With the various holes, did you do the maths to calculate and what is the formula you use? > Good setup. I am impressed. I believe you are close to flying. Is that right? > TR. > > > Sent from my iPad > >> On 1 Mar 2014, at 11:46 am, Lance Sandford <sandford@melbpc.org.au> wrote: >> >> Tony >> >> The final proof is in the testing. >> >> AC43-13-1b chapter 7 gives a chart and testing procedure. >> Attached is a picture of my cable test rig. >> When I was doing the actual test I had a large ladder between myself and the victim. If they break they can go with a bang. >> >> Regards >> >> Lance Sandford >> >> >>> On 28/02/14 20:41, Tony Renshaw wrote: >>> Gidday, >>> Ive attached 2 photos of my Nicopress squeezes, and 1 of the jaws of the tool. Any input gratefully received. >>> Regards >>> Tony Renshaw >> <Cable Testing.jpg> >


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:30:52 PM PST US
    From: Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Nicopress Squeezes Using Aviation Approved Squeezer......comments
    requested . Hi Lance, What powerplant are you using again? I am wondering whether I fit my flap floor hinge hardware at this stage, or just rely on the redux pads, and put them in later? I figure filling and painting might be easier without obstructions, although I will be making up a cover I would imagine, or fill to hide them. Do you have a recommendation there? Also, I am struggling with my rudder cables but might be starting to see light at the wnd of the tunnel, to coin a phrase. I have both stainless steel cable I have bought from ACS and what appears to be Gal cable, probably from Europa but it is not labelled, and I truly dont know where it came from. It must have been Europa, but it definitely is NOT SS, as it is far more magnetic. Did u use the Europa cable or some other? I will do 2 crimps even though I know they are 1.5 the load of the cable, as cheap insurance in case something slips, but, it comes with its own pitfalls. If you dont leave a reasonable gap, it loads up the cable between them, as they pull in when you crimp them, as we all probably know. So, I put 2 butted together for one cable, and if I imagine the internal tension, that atatic load I could have created, I cant leave it as is. I dont know how many times I have done this, but at least I have turnbuckle to make the work a bit easier. I couldnt imagine doing this without then, and the tensioner in the manual, well, I didnt even bother to read the manual properly to digest how those things worked. So, I have mow run out of Nicopress, & cable, at a very inconvenient time. I will get some locally, or ACS to send it out, but there packaging is ridiculous. I think they have a rates deal with their courier company to maximise space over weight, and rhen they charge you on volume. I have asked them to minimise the packaging but you get a box full of these air bladders to fill the space, and then a baby package within. Crazy! Anyway, onward and upward. As for my maths, I have to be really good at my 3 x tables for profile management on descent, and ideally fast at it otherwise, I get high and fast, both of which can get a bit ugly. So, watch your back with that concrete, says he who only learnt the benefits of a Larry Hoe after hand mixing about 1,000 wheelbarrow full of concrete. So, I at the local RSL to watch the Reds against the Waratahs, and need to eat first. Thks for the advice. TR > On 1 Mar 2014, at 13:02, Lance Sandford <sandford@melbpc.org.au> wrote: > > > Tony > > The beam is part of a sash clamp I used for making window frames many years ago. > I set it in the nearest hole to give me the weight I required and adjusted the rest with the much under used weights from my barbell, then carefully lowered the jack and kept my fingers crossed. > Im sure a Man of your ability can do the maths for whatever you have available. > The check is 60% of 700 lbs for 3 minutes I think, but read the document. > Incidentally, the breaking strain of a well made Nicopress is about 1.5 times the minimum breaking strain of the cable hence I only used one on the ends of my cables. > I was hoping to be flying by mid year until my neighbour conned me into helping lay 160 meters of concrete during our 30 Degree, 70% humidity days, which has slowed build progress a couple of Months. > > Lance > >> On 01/03/14 11:12, Tony Renshaw wrote: >> >> Hi Lance, >> Thanks for responding. That looks a great tester. With the various holes, did you do the maths to calculate and what is the formula you use? >> Good setup. I am impressed. I believe you are close to flying. Is that right? >> TR. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 1 Mar 2014, at 11:46 am, Lance Sandford <sandford@melbpc.org.au> wrote: >>> >>> Tony >>> >>> The final proof is in the testing. >>> >>> AC43-13-1b chapter 7 gives a chart and testing procedure. >>> Attached is a picture of my cable test rig. >>> When I was doing the actual test I had a large ladder between myself and the victim. If they break they can go with a bang. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Lance Sandford >>> >>> >>>> On 28/02/14 20:41, Tony Renshaw wrote: >>>> Gidday, >>>> Ive attached 2 photos of my Nicopress squeezes, and 1 of the jaws of the tool. Any input gratefully received. >>>> Regards >>>> Tony Renshaw >>> <Cable Testing.jpg> > > > > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   europa-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Europa-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/europa-list
  • Browse Europa-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/europa-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --