Europa-List Digest Archive

Mon 03/24/14


Total Messages Posted: 3



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 01:20 PM - Re: XS Fuel Tank Kiwi Mod (John Wighton)
     2. 01:41 PM - Re: Instrument panel bolts (richard)
     3. 03:25 PM - Re: Re: XS Fuel Tank Kiwi Mod (bill)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:20:08 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: XS Fuel Tank Kiwi Mod
    From: "John Wighton" <john@wighton.net>
    Sorry to be seen as a spoil sport. The intention was to highlight a very real problem- mods and improvements that are excellently executed but may not maintain a level of safety in relation to the original design. The main point, in this instance, is that a pressure test is a no-brainer (how else do you know it will maintain its contents under all flight conditions?). Yes in the UK we do have a formal system of approving modifications. Yes it would be great to have the Experimental system (as per US). That system allows for great innovation and enables developers to get their aircraft flying without much of the cost that has to be incurred in the UK (and other countries which follow our system, of which there are many). What is does not do is allow people to do what they want. Basic testing and calculations can not be circumnavigated with risk of a failure. Failures kill people. Suggesting that a test may be required for a fuel tank may seem like a dampener to you. To me, as an aeronautical engineer, it is a mandatory action. Whats more it costs nothing to do it. As l say a no-brainer. -------- John Wighton Europa XS trigear G-IPOD Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=420946#420946


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:41:18 PM PST US
    From: "richard" <rcollings@talktalk.net>
    Subject: Re: Instrument panel bolts
    Hi I used metallastic rubber bushes to mount the whole unit onto the fire wall having first made an internal mounting flange on the instrument panel module. I reduced the original outer flange to about 10mm and once mounted in place the thickness of the rubber of the metalastic bush gave me an air gap for ventilation . To reduce the modules movement I added one bush as a support from the top of the wheel tunnel just in front of the throttle quadrant. best of luck Richard From: Fred Klein Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 6:22 AM Subject: Europa-List: Instrument panel bolts <tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com> Gidday, I=92m stuck and was hoping someone could resurrect my momentum. I need to know how long to make my instrument panel studs to accommodate a washer, possibly conical, and probably only on the cockpit side, as the other side should use either metal or phenolic washers. This means I am having permanent studs out the back of the panel, going through the firewall, and being secured on the engine compartment side of the firewall. Tony=85to get the benefit of vibration isolation, the SS 1/4=94 dia. McMaster-Carr vibration damping sandwich mounts do the trick=85much better IMO than any kind of a thru bolt...see cat. pg.: http://www.mcmaster.com/#vibration-damping-sandwich-mounts/=r882gh ...photo below shows the male threaded stud each side, and there is also a male / female style, 3 of which I used on the picnic tray STBD side along w/ SS machine screws and finish washers. I found the 1/2=94 long studs to be just long enough to penetrate the firewall and to have room for a washer and stiff nut. Although a stickler will notice that I lack the requisite visible threads beyond the face of the nut, I do not consider that to be critical in this instance. Fred DSCN0961.JPG DSCN0964.JPG No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 03/23/14


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:25:40 PM PST US
    From: bill <bill.sue@orcon.net.nz>
    Subject: Re: XS Fuel Tank Kiwi Mod
    Thanks John, Just to put your mind at rest, yes all of the issues you highlighted were considered and I am confident that the change to an aluminium tank eliminating all of the issues that are experienced with the plastic tank is a major improvement. Loads and CofG were calculated and tank pressure tested. The experimental system as we have in New Zealand has proven that it does not compromise safety. We have an excellent record, one that is improving all of the time. The freedom it gives in being able to design and build virtually whatever you like can only be the envy of those countries that do not have it. Regards Sue and Bill Sisley On 25/03/2014 9:19 a.m., John Wighton wrote: > > Sorry to be seen as a spoil sport. The intention was to highlight a very real problem- mods and improvements that are excellently executed but may not maintain a level of safety in relation to the original design. The main point, in this instance, is that a pressure test is a no-brainer (how else do you know it will maintain its contents under all flight conditions?). > > Yes in the UK we do have a formal system of approving modifications. Yes it would be great to have the Experimental system (as per US). That system allows for great innovation and enables developers to get their aircraft flying without much of the cost that has to be incurred in the UK (and other countries which follow our system, of which there are many). What is does not do is allow people to do what they want. Basic testing and calculations can not be circumnavigated with risk of a failure. Failures kill people. > > Suggesting that a test may be required for a fuel tank may seem like a dampener to you. To me, as an aeronautical engineer, it is a mandatory action. Whats more it costs nothing to do it. As l say a no-brainer. > > -------- > John Wighton > Europa XS trigear G-IPOD > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=420946#420946 > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   europa-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Europa-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/europa-list
  • Browse Europa-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/europa-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --