Europa-List Digest Archive

Sat 05/17/14


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 11:37 AM - Re: Europa-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 05/16/14 ()
     2. 02:58 PM - Re: Re: Europa-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 05/16/14 (GRAHAM SINGLETON)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:37:13 AM PST US
    From: <f.kyle@sympatico.ca>
    Subject: RE: Europa-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 05/16/14
    Cheers, Lance's message below reminded me that we had discussed cockpit versus aft fuse pressures before. It has been almost unanimous that it's higher out back than in front. HOWEVER, have we measured the two pressures against ambient ouside? maybe cockpit is lower than ambient, perhaps afte is higher than ambient - perhaps they are either side of ambient- or both over - or under? It seems to me that we should establish which is who, and then decide what to use in the discussion. Open to Flames....... Ferg C-FFGG still in the hangar In OZ, in the strictly controlled era prior to experimental regulations, (pre 1999). Our Civil aviation released an Airworthiness Directive for Europa Aircraft stating there should be no airflow between the cockpit and the rear fuselage. Their concern was, with the pressure rear of the bulkhead being higher than the cockpit, engine exhaust could be drawn into the rear fuselage via the flap slots and find its way into the cockpit. This AD was withdrawn with the advent of experimental aviation with responsibility being handed to the builder. Sorry I cant find the copy I thought I had. Regards Lance Sandford in OZ On 14/05/14 03:49, Frans Veldman wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/13/2014 12:07 AM, Tony Renshaw wrote: >> <tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com> >> >> Hi Fran's, I expect the pressure in the aft fuselage might be more >> representative than cockpit pressure, > Not in my airplane. In my airplane the aft fuselage seems to be of > higher pressure than the cockpit. I installed a vent in the D-panel > with the intention to let the air out, but it is blowing into the > cockpit instead! I have no idea where the air is leaving again as > every opening in the cockpit seems to be blowing inward (and yes my > doors are sealed with a center pin arrangement). Also I don't > understand why the aft fuselage is pressurised. The main openings in > the aft fuselage are the tailplane drive slots but it looks to me they > are in a low pressure area. The slots for the flap drive are covered > by the wing root fairings so they are normally sealed in flight. The > only other openings are the small openings for the rudder cable and > one small opening in the sternpost for the rudder drive rod. > >> Believe it or not I have this Nylaflow? Tubing, the hard walled >> opaque stuff from ACS, and it makes an excellent push to fit. I am >> tempted to use the 3/8" OD inside a 3/8" ID joiner, and just push >> them together. Very un-aviation, but if you've ever done it, you'll >> appreciate how hard they are to pull apart, and no vibration is >> going to do it. > I have used this equipment to plumb my entire pitot/static system. > Only for the wing to fuselage connection I use the "official" quick > (dis)connect fittings. I agree that it is great stuff. > > Frans > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTclsVAAoJEC+zXxqs0ZzV4QMQAM8lZZfm0CN/lTVxa88gMBJP > 3xbNZBOlUmC+04u+Kl8C8c9UfqpAH17aCRsKRz4GK6wDdsbvwwjGJI9nHVkGx8Vm > 9u9ZzA0MnK3V5Heuw+w361689m8k/Y8fZS/iDVFE9bWjDtFEzI8ME/YpYYaXgEiq > G3C62gq1GOHFJAE1+gK1Gnjjus+6gqBShRomHqu+EgbysXsuOJ6r4NV5cu29fAbc > 1g+WFNWkuh1Y/70d6X/qIepYecHzAWZNDK5KSlh58xXMote19pVlAHuvlmul+7PR > qy/ilQqRyFbK98vQI0harYajRjFRd4MQu7EKYmYwaJgQFSkAvjMQpjPhJVagVokA > 08g+kNuHnPaTZ7V+QF0KTH/v1BtSNKCdRSr2I+y4jbvk+zrLdIgs4E/8M7MVXL2p > xu1jTbn3j+f5L0s/Th0oUbfcddEXy/aokFyJI8W2fVZiE8L1bdQlvO8CHjIFFkEs > cnoYSyDrlQo4SiTyvbKYUM+qGWeOs4Ob0ELus9BnU5L71+Z7BX2wdqwiNCMjJLa8 > QWqnnU3C1kNU/siIoMdCjzlN/f3O+JlWuJZR9/SXP9zQ/EADRPOjTJjfGMhNeQXG > PPOJ8654zw/xx95KfAbjSu6bTOyl9GmI1DsNdV4Q9t5qyVdvdfRpUGPA7ekk7/8f > ICHdYmmg2VudTdUacrM7 > =LAm1 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:58:54 PM PST US
    From: GRAHAM SINGLETON <grahamsingleton@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: RE: Europa-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 05/16/14
    I can verify that on the Classic I used to fly, flaps down at low speed you could smell exhaust fumes in the cockpit.=0A=0AGraham=0A=0A=0A=0A_________ _______________________=0A From: "f.kyle@sympatico.ca" <f.kyle@sympatico.ca >=0ATo: europa-list@matronics.com =0ASent: Saturday, 17 May 2014, 19:38=0AS ubject: Europa-List: RE: Europa-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 05/16/14=0A =0A=0A--> Europa-List message posted by: <f.kyle@sympatico.ca>=0A=0ACheers,=0A-- - Lance's message below reminded me that we had discussed cockpit=0Aversu s aft fuse pressures before. It has been almost unanimous that it's=0Ahighe r out back than in front. HOWEVER, have we measured the two pressures=0Aaga inst ambient ouside? maybe cockpit is lower than ambient, perhaps afte is =0Ahigher than ambient - perhaps they are either side of ambient- or both o ver=0A- or under?=0A--- It seems to me that we should establish which is who, and then=0Adecide what to use in the discussion. Open to Flames... ....=0AFerg C-FFGG=0Astill in the hangar=0A=0A=0A=0AIn OZ, in the strictly controlled era prior to experimental regulations,=0A(pre 1999). Our Civil a viation released an Airworthiness Directive for=0AEuropa Aircraft stating t here should be no airflow between the cockpit and=0Athe rear fuselage. Thei r concern was, with the pressure rear of the bulkhead=0Abeing higher than t he cockpit, engine exhaust could be drawn into the rear=0Afuselage via the flap slots and find its way into the cockpit. This AD was=0Awithdrawn with the advent of experimental aviation with responsibility being=0Ahanded to t he builder. Sorry I cant find the copy I thought I had.=0A=0ARegards=0A=0AL ance Sandford in OZ=0A=0A=0AOn 14/05/14 03:49, Frans Veldman wrote:=0A>=0A> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----=0A> Hash: SHA1=0A>=0A> On 05/13/2014 12 :07 AM, Tony Renshaw wrote:=0A>> <tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com>=0A>>=0A>> Hi Fr an's, I expect the pressure in the aft fuselage might be more=0A>> represen tative than cockpit pressure,=0A> Not in my airplane. In my airplane the af t fuselage seems to be of=0A> higher pressure than the cockpit. I installed a vent in the D-panel=0A> with the intention to let the air out, but it is blowing into the=0A> cockpit instead! I have no idea where the air is leav ing again as=0A> every opening in the cockpit seems to be blowing inward (a nd yes my=0A> doors are sealed with a center pin arrangement). Also I don't =0A> understand why the aft fuselage is pressurised. The main openings in =0A> the aft fuselage are the tailplane drive slots but it looks to me they =0A> are in a low pressure area. The slots for the flap drive are covered =0A> by the wing root fairings so they are normally sealed in flight. The =0A> only other openings are the small openings for the rudder cable and=0A > one small opening in the sternpost for the rudder drive rod.=0A>=0A>> Bel ieve it or not I have this Nylaflow? Tubing, the hard walled=0A>> opaque st uff from ACS, and it makes an excellent push to fit. I am=0A>> tempted to u se the 3/8" OD inside a 3/8" ID joiner, and just push=0A>> them together. V ery un-aviation, but if you've ever done it, you'll=0A>> appreciate how har d they are to pull apart, and no vibration is=0A>> going to do it.=0A> I ha ve used this equipment to plumb my entire pitot/static system.=0A> Only for the wing to fuselage connection I use the "official" quick=0A> (dis)connec t fittings. I agree that it is great stuff.=0A>=0A> Frans=0A>=0A> -----BEGI N PGP SIGNATURE-----=0A> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)=0A>=0A> iQIcBAE BAgAGBQJTclsVAAoJEC+zXxqs0ZzV4QMQAM8lZZfm0CN/lTVxa88gMBJP=0A> 3xbNZBOlUmC+0 4u+Kl8C8c9UfqpAH17aCRsKRz4GK6wDdsbvwwjGJI9nHVkGx8Vm=0A> 9u9ZzA0MnK3V5Heuw+w 361689m8k/Y8fZS/iDVFE9bWjDtFEzI8ME/YpYYaXgEiq=0A> G3C62gq1GOHFJAE1+gK1Gnjju s+6gqBShRomHqu+EgbysXsuOJ6r4NV5cu29fAbc=0A> 1g+WFNWkuh1Y/70d6X/qIepYecHzAWZ NDK5KSlh58xXMote19pVlAHuvlmul+7PR=0A> qy/ilQqRyFbK98vQI0harYajRjFRd4MQu7EKY mYwaJgQFSkAvjMQpjPhJVagVokA=0A> 08g+kNuHnPaTZ7V+QF0KTH/v1BtSNKCdRSr2I+y4jbv k+zrLdIgs4E/8M7MVXL2p=0A> xu1jTbn3j+f5L0s/Th0oUbfcddEXy/aokFyJI8W2fVZiE8L1b dQlvO8CHjIFFkEs=0A> cnoYSyDrlQo4SiTyvbKYUM+qGWeOs4Ob0ELus9BnU5L71+Z7BX2wdqw iNCMjJLa8=0A> QWqnnU3C1kNU/siIoMdCjzlN/f3O+JlWuJZR9/SXP9zQ/EADRPOjTJjfGMhNe QXG=0A> PPOJ8654zw/xx95KfAbjSu6bTOyl9GmI1DsNdV4Q9t5qyVdvdfRpUGPA7ekk7/8f=0A > ICHdYmmg2VudTdUacrM7=0A> =LAm1=0A> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----=0A>=0A> =




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   europa-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Europa-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/europa-list
  • Browse Europa-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/europa-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --