Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:27 AM - Re: Reposition oil cooler on Classic Trigear (Scudrunner)
     2. 06:51 AM - Tank outlets! (tennant)
     3. 07:14 AM - Tank outlets! (tennant)
     4. 07:15 AM - Re: Tank outlets! (Roger Sheridan)
     5. 12:32 PM - Coolant temperature (William Daniell)
     6. 12:36 PM - Re: Coolant temperature (William Daniell)
     7. 02:16 PM - Re: coolant choce and temperature monitoring questions (Europaul383)
     8. 02:22 PM - Re: coolant choce and temperature monitoring questions (Bud Yerly)
     9. 02:37 PM - Re: Re: Reposition oil cooler on Classic Trigear (Bud Yerly)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Reposition oil cooler on Classic Trigear | 
      
      
      A couple of left field ideas:
      
      Is the engine running too lean? Lean engines run hotter right? 
      
      I have a mono classic & UL and don't get those temps and I need to partially blank
      the oil cooler in the winter. 2 summers ago I went through the LAA new VP
      prop schedule which if I remember correctly calls for a 5 minute WOT climb and
      temps were OK.
      
      Air lock in either the water or oil cooler circuits? (I remember needing to bleed
      the water cooling rad through a small hole in the inlet/outlet pipe.
      
      Agree that once temps get high it takes longer for the oil to cool than the water.
      
      I agree with the principal of checking the simple stuff 1st. The alternatives tend
      to be expensive and time consuming!
      
      Hope that helps?
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456275#456275
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Hi you experts,
      I am out at our airfield, draining a full tank because the tank outlet is leaking.
      20 years ago, when I built my Classic the fitting of the tank outlets was pretty
      fumbly. There was then no instructions for making inspection holes in the floor.
      I am 20 years older now and dreading the fight to replace these connections.
      Does anyone have a super idea to get at the connections??
      
      --------
      Barry Tennant
      D-EHBT
      At EDLM  -  Germany
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456281#456281
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Hi you experts,
      I am out at our airfield, draining a full tank because the tank outlet is leaking.
      20 years ago, when I built my Classic the fitting of the tank outlets was pretty
      fumbly. There was then no instructions for making inspection holes in the floor.
      I am 20 years older now and dreading the fight to replace these connections.
      Does anyone have a super idea to get at the connections??
      
      --------
      Barry Tennant
      D-EHBT
      At EDLM  -  Germany
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456282#456282
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Tank outlets! | 
      
      
      Hi Barry,
      
      I just refitted tank outlets as part of 5 yearly servicing & also changed from
      single filter to dual seat pan filters. It was essential to have the access holes,
      I dont see any quick fix & would trailer it to the workshop.
      
      Sorry, no super idea.
      
      Roger
      > On 16 May 2016, at 14:50, tennant <barrington.tennant@gmail.com> wrote:
      > 
      > 
      > Hi you experts,
      > I am out at our airfield, draining a full tank because the tank outlet is leaking.
      > 20 years ago, when I built my Classic the fitting of the tank outlets was pretty
      fumbly. There was then no instructions for making inspection holes in the
      floor.
      > I am 20 years older now and dreading the fight to replace these connections.
      > Does anyone have a super idea to get at the connections??
      > 
      > --------
      > Barry Tennant
      > D-EHBT
      > At EDLM  -  Germany
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Read this topic online here:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456281#456281
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Coolant temperature | 
      
      I am installing the Dynon engine sensors and I notice that there is no
      coolant temp sensor.  I am guessing that that there is no need because
      there is an oil temp and oil press sensor.    I am merely wondering because
      my MXP has a coolant temp sensor.  Is there any advantage in having a
      coolant temp sensor?
      thanks
      Will
      William Daniell
      LONGPORT
      +57 310 295 0744
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Coolant temperature | 
      
      scratch that sorry...its in the rotax manual
      
      William Daniell
      LONGPORT
      +57 310 295 0744
      
      On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:31 PM, William Daniell <
      wdaniell.longport@gmail.com> wrote:
      
      > I am installing the Dynon engine sensors and I notice that there is no
      > coolant temp sensor.  I am guessing that that there is no need because
      > there is an oil temp and oil press sensor.    I am merely wondering because
      > my MXP has a coolant temp sensor.  Is there any advantage in having a
      > coolant temp sensor?
      > thanks
      > Will
      > William Daniell
      > LONGPORT
      > +57 310 295 0744
      >
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: coolant choce and temperature monitoring questions | 
      
      
      I used the Skydrive coolant temp kit, repositioning one of the 2 fitted CHT senders
      for use in the M10 threaded tube.  The CHT sockets on my 912S are blind,
      so I could remove one without creating a leak - check yours, or just buy an additional
      sender for use in the coolant kit!
      
      I have the carb heat kit, so needed the Adapter 3 (sort of double T piece - see
      picture) to take off both the carb heat and the temp probe.
      
      http://www.skydrive.co.uk/products.asp?cat=67
      
      It makes sense when you see the parts. Holler if it's not clear, although Mark
      (Mick?) at Skydrive is v helpful and will talk you through the options.
      
      HTH
      
      Paul M 383
      XS Mono 912S
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456307#456307
      
      
      Attachments: 
      
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/adapter_3__new_large_197.jpg
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: coolant choce and temperature monitoring questions | 
      
      
      Rowland,
      I place the coolant overflow on the starboard side and it is accessible 
      through the oil door on the XS.
      Glycol is my choice in the hot climate of Florida.  In cool climates Evans 
      is fine.
      Rotax requires coolant outflow to be monitored as the owner who chooses to 
      run at 275 will boil glycol in the head.  New engines have new heads and 
      coolant monitoring.
      I find the in line coolant temp probe to be more of a pain and inaccuracies 
      than it is worth.  Don't let the cylinder head temp go above 245F and the 
      coolant never boils over.
      Because Evans has nearly 20% less heat transfer ability, it is essential to 
      optimize your cooling or enlarge the radiator in hotter climates.  Good news 
      is, Evans is lifetime and frankly, it does not appear to corrode as 
      water/glycol can.
      
      In the UK you should be fine with a 912S, even on long taxis and hard climbs 
      at 90 KIAS provided you paid attention to your ducting.
      
      Best Regards,
      Bud Yerly
      
      
      -----Original Message----- 
      From: Rowland Carson
      Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2016 2:14 PM
      Subject: Europa-List: coolant choce and temperature monitoring questions
      
      
      I thought Id got all the instrumentation I needed sorted out, but Ive come 
      across the following items in the Rotax Installation Manual:
      
      
      "2 different types of coolant are permitted.
      
      Type 1:
      - Conventional coolant based on ethylene glycol
      Conventional coolant is recommended as it is commonly available and has a 
      greater thermal heat transfer capability.
      . . .
      Permanent monitoring of coolant temperature and cylinder head temperature is 
      necessary.
      
      Type 2:
      - Waterless coolant based on propylene glycol
      Waterless coolant is recommended if the design of the aircraft can not 
      maintain the coolant temperature limit.
      . . .
      Permanent monitoring of cylinder head temperature is necessary.
      Additional monitoring of the actual coolant temperature is possible but not 
      necessary for waterless coolant.
      
      
      I seem to recall that Evans (waterless) coolant was the flavour of the month 
      some time back, and then it fell out of favour. I understand it's more 
      expensive than ethylene glycol coolants as well as causing the engine to run 
      hotter (because it doesnt transfer heat so well).
      
      However, it appears from the above Rotax manual extracts that if one wants 
      to use the cheaper ethylene glycol option, its necessary to have a coolant 
      temperature gauge as well as the CHT monitoring. And elsewhere in the manual 
      coolant temp monitoring is required during the test flying period even with 
      waterless coolant.
      
      So, the question is - what do folks in UK generally use in the coolant 
      system? And if conventional ethylene glycol, what type of coolant 
      temperature sensor do they have and where is it fitted?
      
      All advice born of experience welcome.
      
      in friendship
      
      Rowland
      
      | Rowland Carson          ... that's Rowland with a 'w' ...
      | <rowlandcarson@gmail.com>            http://www.rowlandcarson.org.uk
      | Skype, Twitter: rowland_carson      Facebook: Rowland Carson
      | pictures: http://picasaweb.google.com/rowlandcarson
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Reposition oil cooler on Classic Trigear | 
      
      
      Richard,
      Leaving oil in the cooler is fine.  With the tank above the oil cooler, you 
      will sometimes get a bit of air in the feed line if you leave the oil drain 
      for a considerable period of time.  Otherwise, I've not had a problem with 
      the low oil coolers in either the Classic or XS.  I drain the tank, and 
      refill very quickly, then change the oil filter.
      
      I am a fan of lowering the oil cooler to the front below the spinner on the 
      Classic and then glassing in a small bracket to hold the cooler.  Creighton 
      Smith and others have used long pip pins to hold the oil cooler in place for 
      quick lower cowl removal.  Alas, there is no quick cowl removal with the 
      Classic radiators, but we try by using nut plates and planning so it is 
      typically two pins, and four bolts and the lower cowl is off.
      
      I open up the classic exit about two more inches on each side for hot 
      weather operations.  At cruise, this drives both the oil temp and head temps 
      below 200 F at low altitude and 160 at high altitude.  But climb is just 
      right at about 230 with an 80 HP engine.  So to be honest with you all, it 
      would help to install a small cowl flap to regulate the cruise temps and 
      keep them about 180-200 F.
      
      Best Regards,
      Bud Yerly
      
      -----Original Message----- 
      From: Richard Lamprey
      Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2016 8:25 AM
      Subject: Europa-List: Re: Reposition oil cooler on Classic Trigear
      
      <lamprey.richard@gmail.com>
      
      Gordon,
      
      Something to add...  Repositioning the oil cooler means that now you have 
      the whole thing anchored to the lower cowling.  This makes lowering the 
      lower cowling, or taking it off completely, more complicated.  The cooler 
      now has to be exactly repositioned to enable the retaining screws from the 
      outside to engage with the anchor nuts on the cooler..  All of this is a 
      real nuisance for oil changes.
      
      Maybe others have better solutions.
      
      I now have an inspection panel directly beneath the oil reservoir to drain 
      the oil, without dropping the lower cowling.  It means that a certain amount 
      of oil in the cooler stays in oil changes, but this prevents opening the 
      system with the dreaded possibility of air entry into the system.  (I read 
      somewhere in a Rotax bulletin that leaving some residual oil in the cooler 
      is OK in oil changes).  I change oil every 30 hours.
      
      So, one thing leads to another, but oil cooling is not a problem.
      
      Best
      Richard
      Classic number 168, Monowheel, Rotax 912 UL, Warpdrive fixed, 600 hours, reg 
      5Y-LRY
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456249#456249
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |