Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 01:52 AM - Re: Flight Control for the Mono. (Peter Jeffers)
2. 02:14 AM - Re: Flight Control for the Mono. (Tim Ward)
3. 04:08 AM - Re: First Flight (carlp101)
4. 04:19 AM - Re: Alternate static port & Switch (carlp101)
5. 04:26 AM - Re: Re: Alternate static port & Switch (Alan Burrill)
6. 04:41 AM - Re: Re: Alternate static port & Switch (David Watts)
7. 10:47 PM - Garmin GMU11? (=?utf-8?Q?Gert_Dalgaard_S=C3=B8rensen?=)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Flight Control for the Mono. |
Well copied Tim,
I would not have recognised that it was a different aircraft.
Pete
PS are you still intending to come home in time for the Skype meeting this snowy
am here in the UK?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Ward
Sent: 02 March 2018 07:36
Subject: Europa-List: Flight Control for the Mono.
Hi All,
Just designed a Flight Control Locking device after spying a similar cunning device
in a Mono which Peter Jeffers and John Baranski showed me. Built for a Mono
as it does not lock the rudders, however hopefully the grounded tail wheel
will take care of that.
See photo attachments and if any builder/owner requires the profile template for
the aluminium plate, I am happy to send it to them.
Hope you are keeping warm over in the UK. The beast from the Eastthey are reporting!
Cheers,
Tim
Antipodes Rep
Hope the phots come through.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Flight Control for the Mono. |
Hi Pete,
I should be on Skype tonight.
Tim
Tim Ward,
12 Waiwetu Street,
Fendalton,
Christchurch 8052
New Zealand
Ph; 03 3515166
Mob; 0210640221
email; ward.t@xtra.co.nz
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Jeffers
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2018 10:52 PM
Subject: RE: Europa-List: Flight Control for the Mono.
Well copied Tim,
I would not have recognised that it was a different aircraft.
Pete
PS are you still intending to come home in time for the Skype meeting this
snowy am here in the UK?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Ward
Sent: 02 March 2018 07:36
Subject: Europa-List: Flight Control for the Mono.
Hi All,
Just designed a Flight Control Locking device after spying a similar cunning
device in a Mono which Peter Jeffers and John Baranski showed me. Built for
a Mono as it does not lock the rudders, however hopefully the grounded tail
wheel will take care of that.
See photo attachments and if any builder/owner requires the profile template
for the aluminium plate, I am happy to send it to them.
Hope you are keeping warm over in the UK. The beast from the Eastthey are
reporting!
Cheers,
Tim
Antipodes Rep
Hope the phots come through.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: First Flight |
Excellent job, Bob. See you in the skies soon.
All the best.
Carl
G-URMS
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=478347#478347
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Alternate static port & Switch |
Being an aircraft that does not have the ability to be configured with a pressurised
cockpit, I've often wondered why people route static ports to the outside
world instead of just leaving the static port unconnected behind the panel?
I discussed this recently with the LAA and they didn't see and issue with leaving
them unconnected in non-pressurised aircraft.
Thoughts?
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=478348#478348
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Alternate static port & Switch |
>From the amount of drafts through various parts Im not sure how representative
it is but certainly better than a blocked static vent on the wing.
Alan
Sent from my iPad
> On 2 Mar 2018, at 12:19, carlp101 <cparkinson@cisc-uk.com> wrote:
>
>
> Being an aircraft that does not have the ability to be configured with a pressurised
cockpit, I've often wondered why people route static ports to the outside
world instead of just leaving the static port unconnected behind the panel?
I discussed this recently with the LAA and they didn't see and issue with leaving
them unconnected in non-pressurised aircraft.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=478348#478348
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Alternate static port & Switch |
In the early days I fitted a switched static line with the alternate being behind
the panel and I found the readings to be substantially different to the standard
static port and I eventually removed it all.
Unfortunately, being 20 odd years ago it is to long ago for me to remember exactly
what the differences were in actual numbers.
Dave Watts
G-BXDY Classic Mono 2,463 hrs after 20.3 years and still loving it.
> On 2 Mar 2018, at 12:19 pm, carlp101 <cparkinson@cisc-uk.com> wrote:
>
>
> Being an aircraft that does not have the ability to be configured with a pressurised
cockpit, I've often wondered why people route static ports to the outside
world instead of just leaving the static port unconnected behind the panel?
I discussed this recently with the LAA and they didn't see and issue with leaving
them unconnected in non-pressurised aircraft.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=478348#478348
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hi
Anyone who have been experimenting with Garmins GMU11 unit?
I plan to instal it in the fuselage - Garmin recommend that installation is done
in the wing.
Hmmm ??
Regards
Gert
OY-GDS, Mono, 914, Woodcomp 3000
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|