Today's Message Index:
----------------------
0. 06:33 AM - Please Make a Contribution to Support Your Lists... (Matt Dralle)
1. 08:16 AM - Re: Container contingency (Hitchflight)
2. 11:11 AM - Re: Container contingency (Patrick Tunney)
Message 0
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Please Make a Contribution to Support Your Lists... |
Dear Listers,
Just a reminder that November is the Annual List Fund Raiser. Please make a Contribution
today to support the continued operation and upgrade of these great
List services!! Pick up a really nice free gift with your qualifying Contribution
too!
The Contribution Site is fast and easy:
http://www.matronics.com/contribution
or by dropping a personal check in the mail to:
Matt Dralle / Matronics
581 Jeannie Way
Livermore CA 94551-0347
Thank you!
Matt Dralle
Matronics Email List Administrator
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Container contingency |
Hi Jonathon and the three others that replied off list.
Good input. Thank-you.
What has become clear is how seemingly perfect it would be for the Tri-Gear. But,
in my case, being a tail-dragger with a Singleton tailwheel removing the
rudder doesnt bring a big advantage. See picture. The Singleton tailwheel projects
a long way beyond the fuselage. Furthermore the rakish angle of the Mono
on the ground also consumes marginally more of the available length inside the
Container compared to the Tri-Gear.
Noting in the ideal circumstance I would not want to remove a control surface.
Nevertheless it has been a good exercise. A 20 foot container is great contingency
option. Thanks to all for the advice.
And for the record I love the Singleton tailwheel. It is just so much more forgiving
than its predecessors.
Regards
Bob
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=493196#493196
Attachments:
http://forums.matronics.com//files/afc33f7a_c536_4c2c_9f9f_5436e6c2e3c0_135.jpeg
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Container contingency |
What about putting it diagonally or using a 30 foot container.
I know when i was looking at storage in a container located at an airfield i ruled
out a 20 foot container.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=493200#493200
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|